KollegeStudnet Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 Bigger needs at 10. Don't see them going after Trubisky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Success Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 The Bills always pass on good prospects because they have a guy who is good enough. That said, it all depends on how they view Trubisky. If they think he's a franchise guy, take him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinky finger Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 Many Bills fans like mediocrity. It's comfortable. i always picked door number 2. Bigger needs at 10. Don't see them going after Trubisky. yes - this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 Does he mean Deshone Kizer or Deshaun Watson? He means Watson I have read the piece on NFL.com. You know those numbers are exactly where I expected them to be. When Alpha and others were trying to tell us teams liked Kizer the best I continued to say that was nonsense. I know Mayock has Kizer as his #1 but that is pure crazy talk. I can absolutely see why someone might prefer Trubisky, personally I like Watson better, they are both first round Quarterbacks. It also doesn't surprise me to see a couple of teams going for the wildcard that is Mahomes. He has the highest ceiling possibly.... but there is a hell of a lot of work to get him there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bakin Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 How many QBs shoukd we have? We know we can only start one. You'll never know how they are until they play. Develop them till the cows come home - till they start a game or a season you have no idea what you have. Having Trubisky and Kelly and Cardale sitting behind TT isn't a luxury...it's a waste of roster spots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 If they're in love with a QB whether it's Watson, Trubisky, MaHomes, Kizer, etc...take him in the 1st and don't think twice. QB is too important. Luckily, if they aren't crazy about a QB we don't have to reach for one like we did for EJ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Vader Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 If he's there at 10, and another team wants him, get the best deal you can and trade down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 I'm not feeling it with any of these QBs with the 10th overall. it's a value thing i suppose. HA! me neither. Glad you did not mind my humor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinky finger Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 me neither. Glad you did not mind my humor. all good my friend cheers If he's there at 10, and another team wants him, get the best deal you can and trade down. Perhaps a best case scenario Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CommonCents Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 all good my friend cheers Perhaps a best case scenario Wouldn't the best case scenario consist of the Bills selecting the right QB to lead this team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsredneck1 Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 If he's there at 10, and another team wants him, get the best deal you can and trade down. that's why i made the the trade with cleveland a little pricey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r00tabaga Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 I'd stay away from any of these QBs in the 1st round. You draft starters in the 1st and none are ready. I want the sure thing. This has EJ, Geno, Nassib, Glennon written all over it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 Poses an interesting question. If you have basically 3 rookies developing behind a veteran, does it increase or decrease the chances that one becomes a high-end starter? I guess it's how you look at it. Are you focused on developing a QB or is your plan to roll the dice until you come up with a winner? The Bills have shown no ability to develop one, so it might not make a difference. Well, no team has enough reps with today's practice limitations. Talent will rise to the top when a guy gets the opportunity. I'm not so big on the concept of " developing" a QB. You can't coax anything out a player that isn't there. Everyone knows what proper footwork looks like and the right way to break down film. But a QB either has it or he doesn't. It comes from within and can't be measured . More QBs is just a better chance that you will find the right one. That's where the Bills are today, still looking because they haven't taken enough shots in the past. That needs to change. I think Cardale is a real long shot so they should take a couple more QBs this draft if a guy like CK is available in the middle rounds. There are other weak areas on the roster, but the QB weakness is what is holding the team back from real progress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 I don´t think Cleveland gives you that much for a little jump from 12 to 10. I will take almos any trade down scenario, and grab the BAP of WR, CB, S, LB and maybe OL There may be a team or two that may like to jump Cleveland to get their QB. Arizona, for instance. All depends on if our top target is there or not at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianFan Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 Take the best available talent at the position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonborn10 Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 Seriously? Let's just pass for 200 ypg and go 7-9 for another 20 years. I'll scream too " we did it baby !! ". Victory !! Or play a modern defense and win 11 games with the best rushing offense in the NFL. I'm fine with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 pass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 i've recently seen a couple of mocks...br comes to mind that has trubisky there at # 10. if you're the gm , what do you do? imo he'd be the only qb i would use a first round pick on....but... it would be awfully tempting to me to trade down and try to pick up some extra picks, so here's a scenario that i would look at. trade #10 to cleveland for no. #12...for one of their seconds and a 4th. forgive me for not following the value chart, but i could see the browns drooling here. trade #12 to the redskins for #17...for a 3rd,4th and 7th. they need quality receivers in the worst way and they have the picks to spare. with #17 i'm taking a tackle and i like bolles from utah. i know it may be high and he's 25, but i can see a run on olineman from the giants on down through the rest of the 1st. this kid gives us a day one upgrade. he could be our big nasty incognito on the right side. of course at #17, i wouldn't take the phone off the hook in case jerry jones is in love with say a ross...or maybe peppers is still there. they don't have extra picks though, but here i would settle for a high 2018 pick. so at #17, that would be bolles...an extra 2nd, 3rd,4th and 7th. we could really do well in this draft. i don't have a mock,but with 2 2nds and 2 3rds we should be able to get zay jones, a cb, a safety and maybe that dl from vandy. with the cleveland 4th round pick, i take chad kelly and make sure he comes to buffalo. i would use the rest for mainly line depth. i do like marcus maye the fs from florida. the draft can't get here soon enough, im stoked. if we did pick trubisky at #10, i'd be happy with that, but would hope they could move down in the 2nd and at least grab one or 2 more picks. lastly, does anyone know how to retrieve avatars from the old board? i also apologize for the lack of caps button talent. Trading down to 12 would be ideal scenario. We can likely still get who we want there and pick up another asset. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wilcoam Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 It really depends how our Bills rate him on our board If they think with certainty he's an NFL future starting QB then you have to take him However if they only grade him as a potential future starter you pass Because their are better players available at that slot that will have a bigger impact over the next 5 years And at that point it does not really make a difference what position they play except RB I think Foster is falling, and Adams, Hooker, Lattimore, will all gone It'll be a CB, Williams or Davis, or Howard and either or is fine by me I'd be thrilled if Hooker fell to us, beyond excited, way more than drafting a QB, that's a potential transformative player jc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 Does he mean Deshone Kizer or Deshaun Watson? Maybe 9 is the total votes for Kizer and Watson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts