Jump to content

NFL Trade Deadline Oct 31 - Rumored List of Players Available


ngbills

Recommended Posts

I’d give atleast a 1st for Surtain, (I read somewhere they’d consider trading him), and let’s be real, they’re likely going to draft a CB next year anyway, why risk another Elam?

 

Maybe the rest of the league doesn’t know how bad Elam is yet, and Beane can do Elam and a 2nd…

Edited by Dr.Mantis_Toboggan
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Solomon Grundy said:

Let's see if he plays this week. If King Henry/DHop are inactive this week, then there's smoke

Unless they eat a lot of Henry's contract, it's not happening.

 

DHop on the other hand would fit with the money they have available and can still address other needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After what we saw last game & what the Bills have in the WR room as far as Isabella, Shorter (on IR) I think there would be other positions that may be more priority than the WR's & RB's those 2 could be fine for this season CB, & LB may be more important at this point & time .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Casey D said:

On a limited budget, priority for Bills has to be defensive help-- LB, DT or CB.  Running backs and receivers are luxuries they cannot afford right now IMO.

I agree with that primary focus but otoh, if something happens to Cook then they are screwed since losing Harris. 

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, T master said:

After what we saw last game & what the Bills have in the WR room as far as Isabella, Shorter (on IR) I think there would be other positions that may be more priority than the WR's & RB's those 2 could be fine for this season CB, & LB may be more important at this point & time .


Going to be interesting to see what if, anything, “one game” before the trade deadline influenced…

 

Offense looked much better in 11 personnel.  
 

Diggs/Gabe/Shakir looked like a legit 3-wide.  
 

Is that the springboard for consistency of was it just one game?  Do we believe Harty/Sherfield is adequate depth should we revert to more 11?

 

Poona Ford had his best game as a Bill.  Looked like he finally had his sea legs under him.  Only one game though.. and prior to that, he was a liability in replacing Jones at 1T. 
 

Jackson/Benford look like a slightly above average outside CB duo in our system.   If Elam is traded or so far gone that Norman is active over him.. we have no depth.  


We don’t seem to have a 3 down LB outside of Bernard.  They don’t trust Williams yet.  Dodson is a liability against the pass.  We’ve gone to Dime in passing downs.  Is that sustainable?  Do we need a true 3 down LB? 
 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SCBills said:


Going to be interesting to see what if, anything, “one game” before the trade deadline influenced…

 

Offense looked much better in 11 personnel.  
 

Diggs/Gabe/Shakir looked like a legit 3-wide.  
 

Is that the springboard for consistency of was it just one game?  Do we believe Harty/Sherfield is adequate depth should we revert to more 11?

 

Poona Ford had his best game as a Bill.  Looked like he finally had his sea legs under him.  Only one game though.. and prior to that, he was a liability in replacing Jones at 1T. 
 

Jackson/Benford look like a slightly above average outside CB duo in our system.   If Elam is traded or so far gone that Norman is active over him.. we have no depth.  


We don’t seem to have a 3 down LB outside of Bernard.  They don’t trust Williams yet.  Dodson is a liability against the pass.  We’ve gone to Dime in passing downs.  Is that sustainable?  Do we need a true 3 down LB? 
 

 

Henry would be nice, but expensive. He's a bit of a luxury, though I'd love to have him.

I think they should prioritize 1DT and LB. Don't know what is out there.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SCBills said:


Going to be interesting to see what if, anything, “one game” before the trade deadline influenced…

 

Offense looked much better in 11 personnel.  
 

Diggs/Gabe/Shakir looked like a legit 3-wide.  
 

Is that the springboard for consistency of was it just one game?  Do we believe Harty/Sherfield is adequate depth should we revert to more 11?

 

Poona Ford had his best game as a Bill.  Looked like he finally had his sea legs under him.  Only one game though.. and prior to that, he was a liability in replacing Jones at 1T. 
 

Jackson/Benford look like a slightly above average outside CB duo in our system.   If Elam is traded or so far gone that Norman is active over him.. we have no depth.  


We don’t seem to have a 3 down LB outside of Bernard.  They don’t trust Williams yet.  Dodson is a liability against the pass.  We’ve gone to Dime in passing downs.  Is that sustainable?  Do we need a true 3 down LB? 
 

 

Still have Isabella on the bench. Also Ankou back. So we have a couple to pull for wr and dt.

 

Personally, being a Williams fan, I think he needs to get snaps. Not going to improve much without experience. Also have Klein and Matakevich if push comes to shove. Or stick with Dime if needed. Could be a lot worse. 

 

I'm disappointed on the Elam side. I was very hopeful,  but, if he can't get on the field, I understand moving on (very unfortunate). So I put CB as a priority at this point.

 

Not to jinx anything, but Edge and Saftey are also on my mind to look into.🤫

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/26/2023 at 3:19 PM, The Wiz said:

 

 

 

 

I believe it.

 

As I've said in other places,  the defense is compromised in several areas and even if they swung trades for several players the chance that they all fit in and played well is not good.

 

The offensive side of the ball is not far from being at a point where they could consistently put up 35 points per game.     One player.   Personally,  I think that player is a high quality playmaking WR1B or WR2.  

 

But I can see them thinking they can put Henry in the backfield and not have to substitute for long stretches.........play up tempo 11 personnel and spread the field and get the ball out quick to achieve success thru the air(as versus Tampa)........and blast light boxes with the 250# Henry and be more successful in short yardage and goal line runs.   And the latter is important with Harris gone and Murray looking like he's hit a wall in recent weeks.

 

It makes sense on paper but executing without making yourself vulnerable to TFL's running Henry out of shotgun requires more unpredictability than we have been seeing to avoid TFL's thru run blitz.........and the whole thing also assumes that Bills receivers will consistently execute in the pass game like they did Monday(which is doubtful, IMO).   I will say that Henry is no worse running out of shotgun than James Cook........Henry still gets to top speed pretty quick.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Well, it’s not like Henry is not a good player

 

I just questioning the dynamic because we throw the ball so much

I think we’re having a big issue where when cook is on the field the pass blocking takes a huge hit.  I’m pretty sure some of this shotgun draw business is to catch the defense off guard that dials up a delayed blitz to confuse cook in his pass blocking assignments.  And it’s not like you can trot cook out there for running plays and Murray for passing plays because then you’re pretty much telegraphing what you’re trying to do presnap 

 

 Singletary was actually a pretty competent pass blocker but not that explosive in the running game.  Derrick Henry is near top in the league in both so that would be a pretty big upgrade if he’s still got juice. 

derrick Henry also can’t truck josh Norman if he’s on our team 😂

 

Edited by Generic_Bills_Fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LyndonvilleBill said:

With the way the O looked Thursday and Shakir, Davis and Dalton looking better, does it change your mind at all as to the trade deadline and position priority?

 

No. The Bucs are a poorly coached team playing on a short week and seemed totally unprepared. They had crazy off coverage alignments and never adjusted, which allowed us to funnel the ball to Davis in a way that we normally can't. To his credit he was able to make a couple plays after the catch, but we have seen him have these sudden high production games in the past before falling back into 2 catches on 5 targets for 27 yards the following week. Don't be a prisoner of the moment. A WR that can play outside is still a big need.

 

To me, of the realistic available targets, Hopkins makes way more sense than anyone else. Right now in obvious man situations we are always throwing the ball to Diggs. That's obviously the right read 100% of the time given our current personnel, but Diggs is not a contested catch specialist and is not all that great at dealing with physical coverage, so if he doesn't outright win the route the ball likely falls to the turf. One of our drives against the Bucs in the 2nd half stalled out for exactly that reason, and it was at a time when we desperately needed to get out of our offensive rut.

 

So now add Hopkins into the mix. Suddenly defenses have to be very concerned about those jump balls/contested catches and Allen can just kind of chuck it up to him, instead of always relying on Diggs to win his route. That hopefully will pull defenses out of man coverage more frequently which gets us into favorable zone looks that we can beat with our preferred spread formations. Hopkins also gives us an actual downfield explosive presence that we currently don't have at all.

 

I'm at least intrigued by the idea of Derrick Henry because Murray has not been good the past couple weeks and we currently have no goal-to-go run offense. Henry/Cook would be a great 1-2 punch, arguably the best in the league. But I would prefer to lean into our strength which is obviously passing the ball downfield.

 

Edited by HappyDays
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...