Jump to content

IF the 49ers would take a 4th or later for Trey Lance, would you do it?


buffaloboyinATL

Would you give up a 4th round pick or later for Trey Lance?  

206 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you give up a 4th round pick or later for Trey Lance?

    • Yes
    • No
    • I would give up a pick higher than 4. (explain)


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:


Legit question…How is worst case scenario him being a solid backup?  
 

That’s the best case scenario.  The team that invested 3 first round picks in him didn’t think he was a solid backup and chose journeyman Sam Darnold over him as the backup.

 

He has not shown anything yet to suggest he can even be a solid backup.  So worst case is that we waste a 4th round pick on him and he is worse than what we have and he is cut.  Best case is he is a solid backup behind Allen, something he’s get to prove and just failed to achieve with the team that drafted him and invested a ton of draft capital in him.  
 

 

Fair question: I should have rephrased to “improved backup situation.” I do not believe that he could be worse than Allen/Barkley. I just don’t. I think they’re scrubs. If he is “not very good” it’s an improvement. His talent / style give him a floor as a decent backup IMO.

 

Remember we wasted a 5th on Fromm and he had NO CHANCE to even be a decent backup. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nucci said:

a wonderlic exam doesn't determine if you can play QB in the NFL

No kidding.

buffaloboyinATL seemed to question Lance’s ability to run Shanahan’s offense because “it may require a more cerebral QB, like Purdy and Darnold, to run it effectively.” You responded with the following:
“Then Lynch and Shanahan should have know this before giving up so much to draft him. “


All I did was mention they did their homework with regard to Lance being as cerebral or not as Purdy or Darnold. Part of that evaluation is Wonderlic, along with other testing and from what I’ve read, Lance is on par with Purdy when it comes to the cerebral part of his game. Never said/implied it would lead to success in the NFL for Lance or anyone with a good wonderlic test score. Maybe you missed my point because my post was poorly worded. Everyone knows wonderlic is not the determining factor in whether a person can play QB and be successful. Right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, buffaloboyinATL said:

It is possible that part of why he "is not good" is because of the offense that Shanahan runs.  It may require a more cerebral QB, like Purdy and Darnold, to run it effectively.  This does not mean that Lance couldn't be successful in a different system.  If the price was low enough, and we could work out the contract to have him as a backup for a couple of years, it might be worth a look.  

LOL @ calling Sam Darnold a cerebral QB

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Special K said:

If a team is willing to get rid of a guy that they traded three first round picks for, what does that tell you about his abilities?

Somebody with sense.  All of the Mafia that want him, really the guy is being replaced by a 7th round pick and SD who has bounced around since being picked.  He obviously does not have what it takes to be a starter, or a backup in this league.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Fair question: I should have rephrased to “improved backup situation.” I do not believe that he could be worse than Allen/Barkley. I just don’t. I think they’re scrubs. If he is “not very good” it’s an improvement. His talent / style give him a floor as a decent backup IMO.

 

Remember we wasted a 5th on Fromm and he had NO CHANCE to even be a decent backup. 


No disagreement that our backups aren’t much better likely, but I still would not want to spend a 4th to get someone who couldnt beat out Sam Darnold as the backup for the team that spent 3 first round picks on him.  
 

All for it if he’s cut though where we aren’t risking a good draft pick on him.

Edited by Alphadawg7
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BarleyNY said:

 

I believe that the roster bonus for this year has been paid already, but the one next season kills any thought of the deal. No way would I take on that guarantee. Even if SF ate that too, I'm still not interested. Because if Kyle Shanahan can't make anything out of him, then I have zero faith that Dorsey can. Also Sam Darnold just beat him out for QB2. SMH. So even though Barkley is hot garbage and Kyle Allen is just a tad better than hot garbage, I'll pass.

You're right.  There's an article in The Athletic that says the roster bonus was due at the beginning of camp. The problem for a team trading for his contract still owes him $5.3 million next year-A lot of $ to gamble on turning around a guy who hasn't done anything of note yet & would be a free agent at the end of next season (unless he is thrust into the starting job, lights it up & the team picks up his 5th year option)  https://theathletic.com/4800908/2023/08/24/trey-lance-49ers-options-trade-release/

 

While the 49ers would incur a dead-money hit of $8.4 million in 2023, they’d clear $940,000 in salary-cap room by offloading Lance’s contract, which is fully guaranteed because he was a first-round pick. They’ve already paid Lance a $2.82 million roster bonus, which was due at the start of training camp, so a new team would owe him only that $940,000 base salary for this season.

Edited by Albany,n.y.
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, QCity said:

Miami is an intriguing destination for him. McDaniel was his OC in SF 2021 and with Tua's injury history you would have to think he gets playing time.

which bears watching

 

if you dont hear a peep about Miami being interested, that speaks volumes.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few thoughts:

 

- SF has an excellent player development program, ala the "best version of yourself" program the Bills have.  If SF couldn't squeeze more out of him, I would be very suspicious. This is not the AZ Cardinals program - see Andy Isabella - who I have high hopes for and seems to have been in less than an ideal situation with the team that drafted him.

 

- I definitely see the temptation for trying to identify how Buffalo can acquire Trey Lance - with ideal compensation (Trade package + contract, re-worked with extension?).  There might be a way and it should be explored.  

 

- The talent is still there, (Lance isn't underperforming due to injuries he hasn't been able to recover from).  So is it lack of work ethic?  Or lack of intellect, (Does he not have the "brains" to command an offense in the NFL)?  This is where our GM needs his sources from "Deep within" to find out what the real deal is here.  

 

- Personally, I'm a big believer in "cultural fit" similar to what our GM did to identify Josh Allen as a great fit for Buffalo.  I just knew Sam Darnold wouldn't work with the NY Jets, and he seems to be much better off in SF.  Perhaps the same thing could be said about Trey Lance.  From a quick wikipedia read, it says Trey is from a small town in Minnesota and of course college in North Dakota - from the outside looking in, he seems like a small town type of guy, from a region maybe even colder than Western NY - would he be a better fit in Buffalo - vice SF? Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...