Jump to content

Shaq Lawson returning


Chandler#81

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, BananaB said:

Same result in playoffs 

Cry more
You gotta be in it to win it that’s what the team is doing giving themselves as much at bats as possible

Just now, mrags said:

However they were 1-1 in the playoffs when it matters and their DL couldn’t get to Burrow with 3 backups on Cincis OL. 
 

just saying 

Noted
But what exactly do you expect them to do with the limited amount of money that they have their making this window last as long as they possibly can?

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's just further confirmation that their approach is to run this thing back. Same caliber of FAs on the Offensive Line/WR, and doing everything they can to keep the defense intact. 

 

I think they're going MLB in Round 1, followed by DE and DT. 

 

I see the Shakir route (WR in Round 5) as the more likely path. 

 

At this point, I would be surprised if they go WR in Round 1. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Cry more
You gotta be in it to win it that’s what the team is doing giving themselves as much at bats as possible

Noted
But what exactly do you expect them to do with the limited amount of money that they have their making this window last as long as they possibly can?

I didn’t expect anything. I’m actually very glad that Shaq is back. I think he’s our 3rd best DE behind Miller and Rousseau. 
 

in fact I’m happy they did it because hopefully now they won’t waste a pick on DE in the draft. 
 

I was simply stating a fact based off your comment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, ExWNYer said:

 

Unfinished Business!!

45 minutes ago, Chandler#81 said:

Never good to Draft for need -especially so when you’re picking in the high 20’s. IF the mlb they like best with a 1st round grade is available, he’ll be a Bill. Otherwise, best player remaining on our board.

Even if it's a CB?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Solomon Grundy said:

Unfinished Business!!

Even if it's a CB?

It’s a curse we have to live with while McDermott is our HC. That’s likely gonna be a very long time as he’ll coach his 💯th game in Week 3 with a very impressive record, currently ranking 13th Best Ever. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, mrags said:

However they were 1-1 in the playoffs when it matters and their DL couldn’t get to Burrow with 3 backups on Cincis OL. 
 

just saying 

Exactly. Signing the same guys over and over again is not getting the job done in playoffs. In the 3 playoff games that knocked us out we have given about a 100 points. Maybe more 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BananaB said:

Exactly. Signing the same guys over and over again is not getting the job done in playoffs. In the 3 playoff games that knocked us out we have given about a 100 points. Maybe more 

We can’t discount the fact that we did pick up Miller. Yes, he wasn’t available in the playoffs but I do think things would have been different had he been. 
 

im sick of the excises too. I’m simply stating a fact that we did pick up a premier pass rusher, possibly the best option last offseason to help us with that. And we still don’t know what that would have yielded us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BananaB said:

Exactly. Signing the same guys over and over again is not getting the job done in playoffs. In the 3 playoff games that knocked us out we have given about a 100 points. Maybe more 

 

2 minutes ago, Straight Hucklebuck said:

I think the opposite.

 

They’ve done everything they can to keep things the exact same.

 

The only really difference between 2022 and 2023 team is Tremaine Edmunds.

 

That leaves me at MLB. 

Guys! We’re cash-strapped while trying to maintain an excellent status quo. If we’ve learned anything, it’s that Offense WINS in the playoffs these days. I hope we concentrate on OL & WR in the Draft.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Straight Hucklebuck said:

It's just further confirmation that their approach is to run this thing back. Same caliber of FAs on the Offensive Line/WR, and doing everything they can to keep the defense intact. 

 

I think they're going MLB in Round 1, followed by DE and DT. 

 

I see the Shakir route (WR in Round 5) as the more likely path. 

 

At this point, I would be surprised if they go WR in Round 1. 


Unacceptable if that's the case.  This team needs more firepower. Especially on Offense.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, dollars 2 donuts said:

 

 

 

Thank you, both.

 

I honestly did not know and appreciate it.

 

...so let me add...that is cool, too.  

 

In general I've been pretty OK with the offseason.

 

 

Martin is signed for the next 3 years:  https://overthecap.com/player/sam-martin/2246#:~:text=Contract Notes,per game and workout bonuses.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, BananaB said:

Bills are just treading water until they eventually sink. Same guys every year that can’t get the job done against the teams we will face in playoffs. It’s like they’re terrified to tiniest step back. McD picks these same guys over guys he drafted just because they have more experience. Bills gonna have the same ending as the past 3 years, our D not showing up in the biggest game. 

 

Nah; I don't think the bolded is going to happen.

 

Changing DC was the biggest move we could make.  The players, for the most part, are not the issue. We have a lot of talent on our defense.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:


If we don't take WR at 27, it better be OT, TE or Robinson 

That’s the perceived dilemma.

 

No fan is excited about Bernard, Dodson or Spector competing.

 

Maybe the Bills are telling the truth, and they think 1 of those 3 can be a starting MLB.

 

If so, then WR is firmly in play at #27.

 

But the other factor here is, there are only two linebackers in this draft that scouts are excited about as a starting MLB - Sanders and Campebell.

 

If you pass on both of them at #27, are you betting that you can get one of them at #59?

 

And with only (6) picks, can the Bills really afford to trade up?

 

And so, it’s pass on Campbell/Sanders at #27 and then having to trade back 10-picks or so to get one of them, and what are you getting for that move down? A 4th? That doesn’t solve the weapons problem.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said:

Hope we made a fair offer.

😂, Vet minimum is top one percent income in America, so I’m pretty sure he will be okay,

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Straight Hucklebuck said:

That’s the perceived dilemma.

 

No fan is excited about Bernard, Dodson or Spector competing.

 

Maybe the Bills are telling the truth, and they think 1 of those 3 can be a starting MLB.

 

If so, then WR is firmly in play at #27.

 

But the other factor here is, there are only two linebackers in this draft that scouts are excited about as a starting MLB - Sanders and Campebell.

 

If you pass on both of them at #27, are you betting that you can get one of them at #59?

 

And with only (6) picks, can the Bills really afford to trade up?

 

And so, it’s pass on Campbell/Sanders at #27 and then having to trade back 10-picks or so to get one of them, and what are you getting for that move down? A 4th? That doesn’t solve the weapons problem.

 

You have a few other options. 


Sign Zach Cunningham


wait for a veteran LB to be cut in the summer
 

Or trade a late 2024 draft pick for an LB that isn't a scheme fit on their team

I'm just tired of spending premium picks on Defense

Edited by Warriorspikes51
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Warriorspikes51 said:

 

You have a few other options. 


Sign Zach Cunningham


wait for a veteran LB to be cut in the summer
 

Or trade a late 2024 draft pick for an LB that isn't a scheme fit on their team

I'm just tired of spending premium picks on Defense

The only thing is they’re running out of money.

 

We know the 2023 cap is less than $8M in space now, and that’s got to cover rookies and IR money, and Beane has said 2024 is already tight.

 

So they need cheap labor. Dip into 2024 picks to secure a weapon and Campbell/Sanders early in this draft? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Straight Hucklebuck said:

The only thing is they’re running out of money.

 

We know the 2023 cap is less than $8M in space now, and that’s got to cover rookies and IR money, and Beane has said 2024 is already tight.

 

So they need cheap labor. Dip into 2024 picks to secure a weapon and Campbell/Sanders early in this draft? 

 

Extend DaQuan Jones.  There's a nice chunk.    Trade Oliver, there's 10 Million 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bobby Hooks said:

I mean, we weren’t going to sign a big money guy, and the team is better than it was before the signing. 
 

So I’d say it’s mildly inspirational. 

 

I want Melvin Ingram.  The guy plays strong, nasty and is a complete game wrecker.  He has singlehandedly ruined games against us with PIT, KC and MIA

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

 

I want Melvin Ingram.  The guy plays strong, nasty and is a complete game wrecker.  He has singlehandedly ruined games against us with PIT, KC and MIA


Yeah .. but Ingram isn’t gunna take $1.7 M to come here …would also cost them their comp pick I think …

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Straight Hucklebuck said:

That’s the perceived dilemma.

 

No fan is excited about Bernard, Dodson or Spector competing.

 

Maybe the Bills are telling the truth, and they think 1 of those 3 can be a starting MLB.

 

If so, then WR is firmly in play at #27.

 

But the other factor here is, there are only two linebackers in this draft that scouts are excited about as a starting MLB - Sanders and Campebell.

 

If you pass on both of them at #27, are you betting that you can get one of them at #59?

 

And with only (6) picks, can the Bills really afford to trade up?

 

And so, it’s pass on Campbell/Sanders at #27 and then having to trade back 10-picks or so to get one of them, and what are you getting for that move down? A 4th? That doesn’t solve the weapons problem.


I’m excited about Bernard, Dodson and Spector competing if the alternative is drafting a LB at 27. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said:


They can’t wait that long … he may still decide to not come here or even retire  so what do they do then?


Most of the veterans on the market now will wait to see what teams actually have a spot available and didn't draft their position

Just now, Bobby Hooks said:

I’d take him too, what does that have to do with my post? 

 

You said Shaq was mildly inspirational.  I was thinking Ingram would be inspirational

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BananaB said:

Same result in playoffs 

 

Yeah i get your sputtering rage in a general sense but being mad about Shaq Lawson isn't it dude.  He's been a very good player for the Bills, and you certainly aren't going to get an upgrade for what he's making

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...