Jump to content

Will DeAndre Hopkins be available this offseason?


NeverOutNick

Recommended Posts

Just now, Warriorspikes51 said:


I’d be perfectly fine tossing in a 2024 Conditional pick as well

There's a good chance AZ ends up having to cut him for nothing and they still have to eat 8M of deadcap. I wouldn't throw them a bone that isn't needed and I don't think it's needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KingBoots8 said:


Only thing I would love more than this is going from 27 <-> 34, and 91 <->105 (for them taking on some of his contract). If they need next years 6th as well I’d throw it in for sure.

You’re saying you’d want to move back  twice instead of giving them a 3rd? Idk. I think I’d rather just give them the 3rd. You could always move back with the 1st and gain a 3rd or 4th and still keep your current 3rd. 
 

wouldn’t be against it though I guess. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrags said:

You’re saying you’d want to move back  twice instead of giving them a 3rd? Idk. I think I’d rather just give them the 3rd. You could always move back with the 1st and gain a 3rd or 4th and still keep your current 3rd. 
 

wouldn’t be against it though I guess. 

 

I just wonder if there's much of a market for a trade back at 27.  If there's not, might as well just offer the swap to Arizona and take whoever you value the most at 34, while keeping six picks in your pocket. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:


he called the Edwards signing

he also said we’d be signing an LB very soon and Klein was signed the next day.

 

Sal C follows him now. 

 

He could just be lucky of course. 

but, he hasn’t been proven wrong yet

I can say "the Bills will draft a WR this weekend" and then look like a genius when they do. Why didn't he just say AJ Klein?

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SCBills said:

 

I just wonder if there's much of a market for a trade back at 27.  If there's not, might as well just offer the swap to Arizona and take whoever you value the most at 34, while keeping six picks in your pocket. 

Yeah. I agree. The more I think about it the more I’d be happy with it. Instead of losing a pick you just move back 2 spots. I like it. But I also am not sure it’s needed to move the 3rd back or if it will be enough. I’m sure someone with more knowledge of the draft point system could figure that math and give us an understanding what the 27th to the 34th would be worth and what the 3rd round move back would be worth (likely not much value to that one). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

This guy may just be a master troll, but for those who follow his words here you go.

You know how many are following these guys? And this kind of candy click bait these guys always do?

 

less than 1k followers... 

 

Click Candy

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Dr. Who said:

There's a good chance AZ ends up having to cut him for nothing and they still have to eat 8M of deadcap. I wouldn't throw them a bone that isn't needed and I don't think it's needed.

Then you're competing with a handful of teams trying to sign him as an UFA and we'd never be able to compete money wise.  Why not just swap 27 for 34 for a cash retained and restructured DHOP?  Then take you MLB, DT or OL at 34. Makes a ton of sense - we get DHOP and the new ARI GM saves face

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, mrags said:

Yeah. I agree. The more I think about it the more I’d be happy with it. Instead of losing a pick you just move back 2 spots. I like it. But I also am not sure it’s needed to move the 3rd back or if it will be enough. I’m sure someone with more knowledge of the draft point system could figure that math and give us an understanding what the 27th to the 34th would be worth and what the 3rd round move back would be worth (likely not much value to that one). 

Well, maybe I am confused on what the multiple swapping of picks scenario presumes. I think the fella is proposing 27 for 34 to acquire Hopkins and 91 for 105 to get the Cards to eat some (more?) of Hopkins' contract. I don't know if the latter is necessary. I suspect the initial swap would include AZ retaining some contract. If they don't get a taker and release him, it costs them 8M for nothing. If I'm Beane, I begin by expecting AZ to take that much.

6 minutes ago, Turbo44 said:

Then you're competing with a handful of teams trying to sign him as an UFA and we'd never be able to compete money wise.  Why not just swap 27 for 34 for a cash retained and restructured DHOP?  Then take you MLB, DT or OL at 34. Makes a ton of sense - we get DHOP and the new ARI GM saves face

Fella I was responding to was advocating adding a conditional 2024 pick to the 27 for 34 swap. I'm for the latter. I'm saying you shouldn't have to add to it. 

Edited by Dr. Who
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it works out pretty well value wise for the Cards (3rd round) for us to drop from 27 to 34 for Nuk, but man......that seems like too much of a dream scenario for us.  To get a top 10 WR without giving up an early round pick would be amazing.  Even if it costs us an additional late rounder this year or next, who cares.  To think you could come out of this draft with Hopkins and still be able to draft Campbell (or whoever your choice is at LB) at a better value in the 2nd round and still have another 2nd round pick for a OL or DT seems insane.  But if it's on the table, I just don't see why we wouldn't do something like that.  The money can be figured out even if they don't help with the contract.

 

With all the smoke around this it's going to be pretty disappointing when it doesn't happen!  HA!

Edited by sven233
  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sven233 said:

I know it works out pretty well value wise for the Cards (3rd round) to drop from 27 to 34 for Nuk, but man......that seems like too much of a dream scenario for us.  To get a top 10 WR without giving up an early round pick would be amazing.  Even if it costs us an additional late rounder this year or next, who cares.  To think you could come out of this draft with Hopkins and still be able to draft Campbell (or whoever your choice is at LB) at a better value in the 2nd round and still have another 2nd round pick for a OL or DT seems insane.  But if it's on the table, I just don't see why we wouldn't do something like that.  The money can be figured out even if they don't help with the contract.

 

With all the smoke around this it's going to be pretty disappointing when it doesn't happen!  HA!

 

 

I don't think the money can get figured out if Arizona doesn't eat a bunch of it.   

 

D-Hop could have a great comeback player year but he's not been a top 10 WR since 2020 and his trajectory matches guys like Julio and AJ Green who have flamed out in their early 30's after some injuries,  recently.    There is A LOT of risk with taking on a receiver who isn't a style fit with Josh Allen(who is averse to throwing jump balls and prefers his receiver open) and who has a $19M salary this year and who has struggled with injury and PED suspension past 2 years. 

 

 

  • Agree 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For any of you who thought the Bills were actually building a stadium in Dunkirk, here’s the latest information from an NFL “insider.”

 

FWIW this guy is making ***** up and getting the hopes up of Bills fans.  it’s gonna be glorious when the deal doesn’t go down
 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JohnNord said:

For any of you who thought the Bills were actually building a stadium in Dunkirk, here’s the latest information from an NFL “insider.”

 

FWIW this guy is making ***** up and getting the hopes up of Bills fans.  it’s gonna be glorious when the deal doesn’t go down
 

 

It sounds like you like to prove someone wrong more than you like winning if that’s the case. We should all hope that goes down. That’s exactly the value that should be given to Hopkins.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, JohnNord said:

For any of you who thought the Bills were actually building a stadium in Dunkirk, here’s the latest information from an NFL “insider.”

 

FWIW this guy is making ***** up and getting the hopes up of Bills fans.  it’s gonna be glorious when the deal doesn’t go down
 

 

Real NFL Insiders have more than 1k followers. just saying.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, JohnNord said:

For any of you who thought the Bills were actually building a stadium in Dunkirk, here’s the latest information from an NFL “insider.”

 

FWIW this guy is making ***** up and getting the hopes up of Bills fans.  it’s gonna be glorious when the deal doesn’t go down
 

 


I think he’s just reading what I wrote lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TOboy said:

Seems likely we MAY be in on him, and I’m all about it. But this guy is definitely a troll looking for attention. 

Or he listens to the Locked On Bills podcast. I believe the host, Joe Marino, executed this exact trade in the Locked On Network mock draft. 

 

It’s actually a pretty good trade idea. AZ can pretend they got a third round value (which it barely is on the JJ chart) for Hopkins and sell that to their fans. Meanwhile the Bills can draft a similarly rated player at 34 as they would’ve gotten at 27. It would make taking a LB a little easier to take. 

Edited by BarleyNY
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...