Jump to content

Official: (Bengals) Game will not be resumed this week UPDATE: OFFICIALLY CANCELLED


Process

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

 

 

I don't really get it. That game had barely started.  

 

I'm repeating myself on this thread, but we drove down the field as easily as they did.  The sentiments I'm seeing online now are "clearly, the  Bengals were going to win that game - they were locked in."  I guess, for people who just started watching the NFL this past week.

 

And there is a LOT of chatter online about how the Bills should have to forfeit the game, because it was our players that couldn't continue. Pretty sure I've heard multiple comments that both teams didn't want to play after that. And the league was universally reviled for the idea that the game should continue at that point.

 

It's gonna get to me - because it's only going to get worse.  People are turning on the Bills for some reason. It's getting ugly out there.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Taro Nimbus said:

I like how everyone is just automatically assuming the chiefs are winning this week.  Bottom line, if they lose and we win, we get the 1 seed.  Yeah the championship game could still be at a neutral field, but the bills would get the Bye 

I'm pretty sure that if the Bills win and the Chiefs lose, the AFC championship game is in Buffalo no matter what because they have the head-to-head against the Chiefs (and a better win-loss record) and would hold a better record than the Bengals.

Edited by ImpactCorey
  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Taro Nimbus said:

I like how everyone is just automatically assuming the chiefs are winning this week.  Bottom line, if they lose and we win, we get the 1 seed.  Yeah the championship game could still be at a neutral field, but the bills would get the Bye 

It wouldn't be on a neutral field in that scenario because we'd have had the better seed than them in that scenario no matter what happened in the Bengals game. That's how the Bills have homefield throughout the playoffs though if the Bengals win this week it'd be fair if we played them on a neutral field.

 

1 hour ago, Process said:

Can someone explain to me what exactly they are b**ching about? They want to go by win percentage but isn't that exactly what the NFL is doing? With the only difference being if the Ravens win this Sunday there's a coin flip for home field.

 

Just beat the ravens who are playing a backup QB for **** sake.

 

 

It is kind of hypocritical to be completely fine with the advantage the canceling of the game gives you but find it completely unfair when there is a decision that tries to balance it out some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Taro Nimbus said:

I like how everyone is just automatically assuming the chiefs are winning this week.  Bottom line, if they lose and we win, we get the 1 seed.  Yeah the championship game could still be at a neutral field, but the bills would get the Bye 

In that case my understanding is it would not be at a neutral field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ImpactCorey said:

I'm pretty sure that if the Bills win and the Chiefs lose, the AFC championship game is in Buffalo no matter what because they have the head-to-head against the Chiefs (and a better win-loss record) and would hold a better record than the Bengals.

 

I think it will be on a neutral field, as the Chiefs and Bills will have played a different number of games. Same with Chiefs and Bengals. But Bills and Bengals will be played at either Orchard Park or the Jungle, depending on how Sunday plays out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Captain Caveman said:

In that case my understanding is it would not be at a neutral field. 

It would not. It would be in Buffalo. Raiders win pretty much negates all this bs. Everything back to normal.

4 minutes ago, UKBillFan said:

 

I think it will be on a neutral field, as the Chiefs and Bills will have played a different number of games. Same with Chiefs and Bengals. But Bills and Bengals will be played at either Orchard Park or the Jungle, depending on how Sunday plays out.

Been stated many times and very clear at this point. If bills are one seed everything back to normal. No neutral field. If KC loses and we win it would have been impossible for them to be the one seed regardless of the outcome of the bills Bengals game. 

Edited by Process
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Success said:

 

I don't really get it. That game had barely started.  

 

I'm repeating myself on this thread, but we drove down the field as easily as they did.  The sentiments I'm seeing online now are "clearly, the  Bengals were going to win that game - they were locked in."  I guess, for people who just started watching the NFL this past week.

 

And there is a LOT of chatter online about how the Bills should have to forfeit the game, because it was our players that couldn't continue. Pretty sure I've heard multiple comments that both teams didn't want to play after that. And the league was universally reviled for the idea that the game should continue at that point.

 

It's gonna get to me - because it's only going to get worse.  People are turning on the Bills for some reason. It's getting ugly out there.

 

 

It's OK...just keep winning, that's the best remedy.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Process said:

It would not. It would be in Buffalo. Raiders win pretty much negates all this bs. Everything back to normal.

Been stated many times and very clear at this point. If bills are one seed everything back to normal. No neutral field.

 

Thanks; that changed from the previous proposal. Not sure how I feel about that though I suppose the Bills would have been seeded higher than the Chiefs even if they had lost to the Bengals, if they then beaten the Pats and the Chiefs lost to the Raiders.

 

Again, it's the Bengals losing out the most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, UKBillFan said:

 

I think it will be on a neutral field, as the Chiefs and Bills will have played a different number of games. Same with Chiefs and Bengals. But Bills and Bengals will be played at either Orchard Park or the Jungle, depending on how Sunday plays out.

While true they would have uneven games, it essentially doesn't matter.  Had the game been played and the Bills lost to Cincinnati, given the scenario Bills beat Patriots and Chiefs lose to Vegas, the Bills would still outrank them.

Edited by ImpactCorey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming that the proposal goes through, which I think it will, I think it's a compromise that no one is perfectly happy with but the main parties affected get something:

 

The Bills get forebearance for losing a dear teammate. They still rank over the Bengals and have home games or neutral sites in their path (barring week 18 surprises)

 

The Bengals get to lock up their division. The only way their home field is in doubt is if they lose twice in the year to the Ravens and even then they get a coin flip.

 

The Ravens get screwed out of a chance to take the North but after losing to the Steelers in SNF I have a hard time being upset for them. 

 

The Chiefs get unfairly rewarded (unless they choke and we don't rendering it moot) but 90% of why I wanted the #1 seed was to not play them in Arrowhead. 

 

I can live with this 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, ImpactCorey said:

I'm pretty sure that if the Bills win and the Chiefs lose, the AFC championship game is in Buffalo no matter what because they have the head-to-head against the Chiefs (and a better win-loss record) and would hold a better record than the Bengals.

If the Bills have one fewer loss than KC, we get the tie breaker & no need for a neutral field, but if the Bills have one fewer loss than Cincy & we play them, then it's on a neutral field since Cincy never got the chance to win & beat us for the #1 seed in the cancelled game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Albany,n.y. said:

If the Bills have one fewer loss than KC, we get the tie breaker & no need for a neutral field, but if the Bills have one fewer loss than Cincy & we play them, then it's on a neutral field since Cincy never got the chance to win & beat us for the #1 seed in the cancelled game.  

This is also not accurate.  If the Bills have a better record than Cincy (Bills win or both Bills and Cincy lose this weekend) then Bills host against Cincy as well.

 

There are only THREE scenarios where there is a neutral site:

Quote

 

Scenario 1: If Buffalo and Kansas City both win or both tie in Week 18, then a Buffalo vs. Kansas City championship game would be at a neutral site.

Scenario 2: If the Bills and Chiefs both lose in Week 18 and Baltimore wins or ties with the Bengals, then a Buffalo vs. Kansas City championship game would be at a neutral site.

Scenario 3: If Buffalo and Kansas City both lose and Cincinnati beats Baltimore, then a Bills or Bengals vs. Chiefs championship game would be at a neutral site.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Taro Nimbus said:

I like how everyone is just automatically assuming the chiefs are winning this week.  Bottom line, if they lose and we win, we get the 1 seed.  Yeah the championship game could still be at a neutral field, but the bills would get the Bye 

No, if Bills win and KC loses Bills get the bye and home field as 1 seed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Albany,n.y. said:

If the Bills have one fewer loss than KC, we get the tie breaker & no need for a neutral field, but if the Bills have one fewer loss than Cincy & we play them, then it's on a neutral field since Cincy never got the chance to win & beat us for the #1 seed in the cancelled game.  

 

But that's not the proposal that was approved

 

The reasoning is that the Bills and Cinci played the same number of games, and Buffalo won more of them.

 

Anyway the Bills and Cinci most likely will only be playing in the Divisional game, not the championship game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, What a Tuel said:

 

We are currently pissed KC is getting the bye when we have the edge in the 1 seed. At least I know I am. 

 

KC is pissed that there was a decent chance the Bills could lose to the Bengals and give them control of 1 seed again.

 

Both teams have something to be pissed about, but you guys are saying the Chiefs fans shouldn't be pissed for some reason?

 

Yes they'd be pissed they lost 1 seed because of a coin but at least it wouldn't be some indecisive arbitrary changing of the seeding rules.

I honestly don’t think the chiefs have anything to be pissed about…unless they have a crystal ball and could’ve guaranteed the bills were going to lose the bengals game.  That’s where the chiefs fans are coming from with being pissed and it’s ridiculous imo.  Both teams were easily moving the ball and the bengals had an extra possession.  Bills definitely could’ve double dipped before/after halftime and picked up 14 points so even a 14-3 lead would not have been any type of panic situation. 
 

if there was no freak injury, the game was going to continue, and you offered Andy Reid this same deal early in the first quarter he would take it every single time. They traded a very sizable chance at no bye/no home field advantage for the 1 seed nearly guaranteed and all they gave up was a couple specific potential iterations of the AFC championship being played at a neutral site.  If the bills don’t make it,  the chiefs got the one seed/bye/home field advantage for free. 
 

and if they truly believe cincy is that much better of a team than us that our loss the other night was guaranteed, they have nothing to worry about at all most likely.  We’re all probably going to win and then we would get cincy in the divisional round and lose and it will be business as usual in arrowhead if cincy is the better team 

Edited by Generic_Bills_Fan
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...