Jump to content

Sal Capaccio tweets starters... Spencer Brown and more...


Sierra Foothills

Recommended Posts

  • Sierra Foothills changed the title to Sal Capaccio tweets starters... Spencer Brown and more...

So I see Shakir is backup outside WR (good), the RB's appear to be in order of what down they'll be playing (lol) and rumors of the coaching staff being down on Elam were way off.  And good to see Brown back in the starting lineup, with Quess providing decent depth.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not surprised about Elam starting nor am I surprised about Shakir or James Cook.

 

There are MANY here who believe that McKenzie is not fit to be the starting kick returner. I feel/felt he should be given another shot because his upside is pretty damn high.

 

I thought Spencer Brown would wait a few weeks behind Quessenberry before being named the starter.

Edited by Sierra Foothills
  • Agree 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sierra Foothills said:

Not surprised about Elam starting nor am I surprised about Shakir or James Cook.

 

There are MANY here who believe that McKenzie is not fit to be the starting kick returner. I feel/felt he should be given another shot because his upside is pretty damn high.

 

I thought Spencer Brown would wait a few weeks behind Quessenberry before being named the starter.

Couldn’t have said it better. So, I will let you take the glory of that statement.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CorkScrewHill said:

The thing that surprised me was Bernard leapfrogging Dodson. He had some plays, but I didn’t see him as better than Dodson at this point

 

That one IS a bit weird because Dodson is listed as the backup to both Edmunds and Milano whereas Bernard is the "starting Strong-side LB"... a position the Bills almost never use.

 

I think in the Bills system SLB is incrementally the next step up from big nickel (Siran Neal) because theoretically he'll be better vs the run and weaker vs the pass than Neal but at the same time undersized for a SLB (this was the position most recently filled by AJ Klein).

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CorkScrewHill said:

The thing that surprised me was Bernard leapfrogging Dodson. He had some plays, but I didn’t see him as better than Dodson at this point

 

That is inconsistent with what we have seen in pre-season. In all 3 LB sets Dodson was the first guy in. I still suspect that is the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ScottLaw said:

Hopefully Browns pass blocking is a lot better this season. 

 

Because of his late-season struggles and injury-shortened offseason I was surprised to see him promoted for week one.

 

I guess the Bills are betting that Brown is better off being thrown into the fire than being eased in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Sierra Foothills said:

Yolo posted in another thread. I thought it deserved its own topic.

 

 

Fair.

 

I guess some posters here will be relieved to see that Jake Kumerow isn't listed as the backup at outside WR behind Diggs and Davis

He's only listed as the backup WR behind Davis 😁

 

Surprises to me: 

Moss > Cook as RB2

Bernard listed as the starting SLB ahead of Dodson - I guess the team sees his pre-season performance differently than fans do

Cam Lewis listed as the backup NCB and Siran Neal listed as the backup outside CB 🤷‍♂️

 

Anyone explain that last to me, I'll be obliged

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Sierra Foothills said:

Not surprised about Elam starting nor am I surprised about Shakir or James Cook.

 

There are MANY here who believe that McKenzie is not fit to be the starting kick returner. I feel/felt he should be given another shot because his upside is pretty damn high.

 

I thought Spencer Brown would wait a few weeks behind Quessenberry before being named the starter.

 

The only one of those many  who mattered was McD.....

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Sierra Foothills said:

Not surprised about Elam starting nor am I surprised about Shakir or James Cook.

 

There are MANY here who believe that McKenzie is not fit to be the starting kick returner. I feel/felt he should be given another shot because his upside is pretty damn high.

 

I thought Spencer Brown would wait a few weeks behind Quessenberry before being named the starter.

It wouldn’t surprise me if Cook gets more looks on KOs if McKenzie gets extensive time at WR. 

  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

Fair.

 

I guess some posters here will be relieved to see that Jake Kumerow isn't listed as the backup at outside WR behind Diggs and Davis

He's only listed as the backup WR behind Davis 😁

 

Surprises to me: 

Moss > Cook as RB2

Bernard listed as the starting SLB ahead of Dodson - I guess the team sees his pre-season performance differently than fans do

Cam Lewis listed as the backup NCB and Siran Neal listed as the backup outside CB 🤷‍♂️

 

Anyone explain that last to me, I'll be obliged

 

Doubtful that Cam is dressing on gameday. 

 

So I'd expect Neal to still be the backup to Taron.

 

Can't look at the depth chart in such a boxed way.  Same can be said about backup WR, Cooks role on offense, etc.  There will certainly be multiple formations/looks that will dictate playtime over depth chart.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Forlorn hope said:

I still think Doyle and Quess will rotate in to keep everyone fresh. Doyle is a monster run blocker. Nasty

 

A few thoughts on OT:

  • The idea of a rotation at ROT is interesting.
  • It's also interesting that Brown, Quess, and Doyle probably block better for the run than the pass.
  • You have to think the Bills really want Brown to grow into a consistent pillar like Dawkins on the other side.
  • When the Bills go heavy, it might be some fun mouth smashing.
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inactives 

 

Sweeney

Hart 

Shaq 

Spector*

Lewis 

 

 

 

 

If they want to keep lewis or Spector, more likely Lewis

 

You don't dress kumerow

 

Cook can also play wr

2 minutes ago, Sierra Foothills said:

 

A few thoughts on OT:

  • The idea of a rotation at ROT is interesting.
  • It's also interesting that Brown, Quess, and Doyle probably block better for the run than the pass.
  • You have to think the Bills really want Brown to grow into a consistent pillar like Dawkins on the other side.
  • When the Bills go heavy, it might be some fun mouth smashing.

They are going to punish teams. Can't wait

 

It's going to be the 1st year Allen won't have to do everything 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Forlorn hope said:

They are going to punish teams. Can't wait

 

It's going to be the 1st year Allen won't have to do everything 

 

I tend to agree.

 

With the profile of athlete they have at O-line and the addition of Kromer plus the presence of 3 TEs and a fullback, I believe that McDermott's Neanderthal tendencies will emerge from the closet from time to time.

 

Hopefully he'll be wearing a loin cloth.

  • Vomit 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand people's reservations about McKenzie's ball security issues and the importance of ball security in general but when a guy can perform feats like this, I think you have to say "He's a wide receiver so catching shouldn't continue to be a problem and besides, he's a threat to break one every time he touches it."

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bernard. Very interesting.  There has been an assumption all along that we are going to roll out the same exact defense, and therefore nobody can find a role or need for Terrel.  Seeing as how we have listed 12 starters, it is clear that there are going to be some scheme changes this year.  Lots of 4-3, less of Taron.  Maybe a 50-50 split?  

I expect Bernard to be set loose as a blitzer, and I predict him as no lower than 3rd on the team in sacks.

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Sierra Foothills said:

I understand people's reservations about McKenzie's ball security issues and the importance of ball security in general but when a guy can perform feats like this, I think you have to say "He's a wide receiver so catching shouldn't continue to be a problem and besides, he's a threat to break one every time he touches it."

 

 

 

 

He's really not though.

 

Last year he had one long one of 75 and that was it.  In 2020 it was 27 with a really bad average of 16 per.  In 2019 his long was only 24 on an average of 21. 

 

He's not much of a threat back there.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm concerned about our CB situation.  The WRs on the Rams, Packers, Dolphins and Chiefs are formidable. Fins a little less because of Tua but nonetheless very good. Not as worried about Tenn, Pitt or Balt. Hopefully our new D- front can get to opposing QBs before their WRs break free. 

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...