MrEpsYtown Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 With the McKenzie signing, an Engram signing actually makes more sense. It could be like a slot job share between the two. Engram can play outside too. Is McKenzie at 4 mil plus Engram at 9 million better than Kirk at 15? I don’t know. But I like Engram, who like McKenzie ran a 4.42 at 6-3, 240. I really have no problem adding him, but I would be upset if it keeps us from signing Knox long term. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsShredder83 Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 13 minutes ago, Process said: This guy is usually right isn't he? Has a source inside the organization or something? 100%. i dunno what the connection is but the dude is always out ahead on stuff 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CNY315 Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 (edited) 21 minutes ago, njbuff said: And Giant fans aren't in a position to be laughing at anyone. All that needs to be said Edited March 14, 2022 by CNY315 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Success Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 23 minutes ago, SCBills said: I’m actually really high on Engram. Shouldn’t break the bank and he could be a monster in this offense. Engram would be absolutely amazing here. Talent to spare. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCBills Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 (edited) 12 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said: With the McKenzie signing, an Engram signing actually makes more sense. It could be like a slot job share between the two. Engram can play outside too. Is McKenzie at 4 mil plus Engram at 9 million better than Kirk at 15? I don’t know. But I like Engram, who like McKenzie ran a 4.42 at 6-3, 240. I really have no problem adding him, but I would be upset if it keeps us from signing Knox long term. I don’t see any way Knox is not a long term Bill. Engram would basically give us a TE2/Slot to pair with McKenzie as Gadget/Slot. Dorsey could have a lot fun with a TE2 in 12 personnel who can line up in-line, then flex to the slot, with a slot who can flex to the backfield. Edited March 14, 2022 by SCBills 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsMafi$ Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 27 minutes ago, Process said: This guy is usually right isn't he? Has a source inside the organization or something? hes also been wrong… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 13 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said: With the McKenzie signing, an Engram signing actually makes more sense. It could be like a slot job share between the two. Engram can play outside too. Is McKenzie at 4 mil plus Engram at 9 million better than Kirk at 15? I don’t know. But I like Engram, who like McKenzie ran a 4.42 at 6-3, 240. I really have no problem adding him, but I would be upset if it keeps us from signing Knox long term. $4M for a 178 yard receiver McKenzie and $9M for a 400 yard receiver Engram.............yeah Buffalo would be getting bargains because of Josh Allen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba2018 Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 (edited) Yup, let’s have 2 TE’s that consistently drop the ball, brilliant. Edited March 14, 2022 by recovery96 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 we were all right if this is true 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyDays Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 Just now, BADOLBILZ said: $4M for a 178 yard receiver McKenzie and $9M for a 400 yard receiver Engram.............yeah Buffalo would be getting bargains because of Josh Allen. McKenzie isn't actually costing us $4 million this year. Let's what the real numbers look like before jumping to conclusions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsShredder83 Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 1 minute ago, recovery96 said: Yup, let’s have 2 TE that drop the ball, brilliant. the dudes talent is undeniable. im not saying we can fix it, but we have a better coaching staff than we ever have before... if we think a change of scenery and a diff coaching staff can fix him, than i trust the process. knox came a long way last year... and hes come a long way since draft (where he had 0 td catches in college). if we pass im cool with it, and if we sign him ill be cautiously optimistic we think we can tailor a game plan for him, and coach him up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 7 minutes ago, SCBills said: I don’t see any way Knox is not a long term Bill. Engram would basically give us a TE2/Slot to pair with McKenzie as Gadget/Slot. Dorsey could have a lot fun with a TE2 in 12 personnel who can line up in-line, then flex to the slot, with a slot who can flex to the backfield. Have you seen him play for the Giants? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 29 minutes ago, njbuff said: Giant fans would be laughing at the Bills for signing Engram. And Giant fans aren't in a position to be laughing at anyone. But they would if the Bills sign Engram. I would take that as a good sign!😜 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philo Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 4 minutes ago, recovery96 said: Yup, let’s have 2 TE’s that consistently drop the ball, brilliant. Did you watch Knox take a huge step last season or no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babulator Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 Am I missing something? What does Engram bring that Knox does not? I've been critical of Rambo in the past, but didn't he have a good season? I feel like this money better is spent elsewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JGMcD2 Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 Levi Wallace posted this on Instagram 10 minutes ago… https://www.instagram.com/tv/CbEHU55Jwt6/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Costa Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 1 minute ago, njbuff said: Have you seen him play for the Giants? I’ve seen him play a bunch for the Giants. He’d be a nice TE2 in OP. 💪 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearcat Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbo44 Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 7 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said: $4M for a 178 yard receiver McKenzie and $9M for a 400 yard receiver Engram.............yeah Buffalo would be getting bargains because of Josh Allen. McKenzie only played about 20-30% of the offensive plays (that’ll go way up this year) and you’re ignoring his end arounds. Engram had Jake Fromm passing to him on the times and really low end qbs otherwise. Also I don’t think he gets anywhere near $9m a year 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babulator Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 Just now, bearcat said: Let this be true. 🙏 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.