MrSarcasm Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 Step 1. Pay zero attention to what is going on. Step 2. Let the receiver jump up and catch the ball Step 3. Ready your hands for placement Step 4. Place hands on ball that receiver caught. 3 1 16 4 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirAndrew Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 The user name checks out. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 Just give it to him... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBills1998 Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 That ref should be fired for that call. That was such BS, like WTF was he looking at?? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Livinginthepast Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 First of all it if that actually was a take away then why is it called a INT. The DB did not intercept a pass. He placed his hands on an already caught ball. Then the receiver who caught the ball first , hits the ground. The play is actually over at that point. The Simultaneous possession rule clearly states the ball belongs to the offense. In no way was that an INT or a fumble. The refs didnt seem to understand their own rule on that play but of course clearly understand the nonsense no horsecollar in the pocket rule in full detail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yall Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 Wide right and home run throwback notwithstanding I've never seen a play that was more deserving of its own thread. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeGOATski Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 1 hour ago, MrSarcasm said: Step 1. Pay zero attention to what is going on. Step 2. Let the receiver jump up and catch the ball Step 3. Ready your hands for placement Step 4. Place hands on ball that receiver caught. Step 5: get a drink of water while the refs take a second look, just for ***** and giggles 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TroutDog Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 43 minutes ago, BuffaloBills1998 said: That ref should be fired for that call. That was such BS, like WTF was he looking at?? It’s not only him. NY backed it. It was absolutely appalling. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSarcasm Posted September 27, 2020 Author Share Posted September 27, 2020 43 minutes ago, BuffaloBills1998 said: That ref should be fired for that call. That was such BS, like WTF was he looking at?? The fact that it was reviewed and still stays the same is just absolutely astonishing. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brennan Huff Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 (edited) That interception call is going to keep me up tonight Edited September 27, 2020 by Brennan Huff 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 2 minutes ago, MrSarcasm said: The fact that it was reviewed and still stays the same is just absolutely astonishing. Yep. I wasn't at all worried cos I thought it was an obvious overturn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 3 minutes ago, MrSarcasm said: The fact that it was reviewed and still stays the same is just absolutely astonishing. Made me feel. 🤢 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. K Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 Most puzzling INT of all time. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dollars 2 donuts Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 1 minute ago, Brennan Huff said: That play call is going to keep me up tonight Brennan, we won in exciting fashion, but you know what...yeah, buddy, you are damn right. I enjoyed the win, but I literally can’t stop thinking about how that interception...was a real thing that happen in the real plain of existence. ....*looks left and right for Spock’s beard* 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeGOATski Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 1 minute ago, GunnerBill said: Yep. I wasn't at all worried cos I thought it was an obvious overturn. I turned to my wife and said "they won't overturn this because a lot of big money came in on the Rams..." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Call_Of_Ktulu Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 51 minutes ago, BuffaloBills1998 said: That ref should be fired for that call. That was such BS, like WTF was he looking at?? He should be fire and tied to rail road tracks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralonzo Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 I'm still hot. But if that's what it takes for Josh to throw a pick and get all the shitbirds to talk about his recklessness putting the Rams back in the game, you go right ahead, there's a surprise waiting for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hapless Bills Fan Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 8 minutes ago, dollars 2 donuts said: Brennan, we won in exciting fashion, but you know what...yeah, buddy, you are damn right. I enjoyed the win, but I literally can’t stop thinking about how that interception...was a real thing that happen in the real plain of existence. I know, right? Kudos to Josh for not going there and owning it and saying he can't put the ball in harms way, but his postgame presser made me want to puke even more. He literally made a good throw to a receiver who came down with it. He has nothing to apologize for. 5 minutes ago, Call_Of_Ktulu said: He should be fire and tied to rail road tracks. I'd settle for just fired, no need to traumatize a train engineer. That was totally ridiculous and I can't believe NY backed it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Playoffs? Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 6 minutes ago, LeGOATski said: I turned to my wife and said "they won't overturn this because a lot of big money came in on the Rams..." I hate that I have the same thoughts. I want to be proved wrong, but until then, will feel that scores are certainly manipulated by the zebras. What is the purpose of the review system if they blow such an obvious call?? Maddening and downright scary. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloTX Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 Just further proof that inside betting is in the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DabillsDaBillsDaBills Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 I'm absolutely flabbergasted that the refs didn't overturn this call. It was, objectively, the wrong call. https://operations.nfl.com/the-rules/nfl-video-rulebook/completing-a-catch/ From the NFL rulebook 4. If a pass is caught simultaneously by two eligible opponents, and both players retain it, the ball belongs to the passers. It is not a simultaneous catch if a player gains control first and an opponent subsequently gains joint control. If the ball is muffed after simultaneous touching by two such players, all the players of the passing team become eligible to catch the loose ball. Per the underlined sentence, this was NOT a simultaneous catch. Kroft clearly makes the catch and then the defender gains joint control. Per the bolded sentence, even if this was a simultaneous catch (which it was not), the tie goes to the offense. I'm disgusted that this call wasn't overturned, and am really looking forward to an explanation from the league office (unlikely to happen, but a guy can dream). 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Playoffs? Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 The Bills absolutely should make a big deal out of that call. Demand an explanation until we get one. Get fined... who cares? Billsmafia will pay it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DabillsDaBillsDaBills Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 https://buffalonews.com/sports/bills/nfl-explains-why-controversial-interception-was-not-overturned/article_3144b798-00fc-11eb-b691-d383bab887e8.html Via a pool reporter, NFL Senior Vice President of Officiating Al Riveron said, “Anytime we go into a replay review, we have to start with the ruling on the field. And the ruling on the field is an interception. So therefore, the officials ruled that the process of the catch had not been completed by the offensive player. And if the process of the catch is not over, in their opinion, the defender comes up with the football and they rule an interception. "We have to start with the ruling on the field, and that’s why I want to walk you through the process. The ruling on the field is an interception. In order for us to change the ruling on the field, we have to have clear and obvious visual evidence to overturn that ruling. So therefore, if they rule that the process of the catch is not over and the defender comes up with the ball, we have to have clear and obvious evidence to rule otherwise, which we don’t. We do not have clear and obvious evidence to rule otherwise. Therefore, we must stay with the ruling on the field.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Playoffs? Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 I’d like to give Al Riverton a clear and obvious punch to the nuts. Guy is the worst. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 1 hour ago, Livinginthepast said: First of all it if that actually was a take away then why is it called a INT. The DB did not intercept a pass. He placed his hands on an already caught ball. Then the receiver who caught the ball first , hits the ground. The play is actually over at that point. The Simultaneous possession rule clearly states the ball belongs to the offense. In no way was that an INT or a fumble. The refs didnt seem to understand their own rule on that play but of course clearly understand the nonsense no horsecollar in the pocket rule in full detail. The Horsecollar in the pocket one confuses me since its apparently such a dangerous tackle that they don't want to risk WR & RB injuries with it, but the one player that is always given even more protection in the pocket is ok to tackle with it? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmotionallyUnstable Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 Clean catch. Eff the refs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Livinginthepast Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 1 minute ago, apuszczalowski said: The Horsecollar in the pocket one confuses me since its apparently such a dangerous tackle that they don't want to risk WR & RB injuries with it, but the one player that is always given even more protection in the pocket is ok to tackle with it? Only in the Alice in wonderland world of NFL officiating does a rule so intensely stupid get created. Its as bad as the tuck rule or some of the leagues idiotic attempts to define a catch in recent years! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Red King Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 The defender never had sole possession, and joint possession goes to the offense. Cut and dry call here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Tim Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 34 minutes ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said: https://buffalonews.com/sports/bills/nfl-explains-why-controversial-interception-was-not-overturned/article_3144b798-00fc-11eb-b691-d383bab887e8.html Via a pool reporter, NFL Senior Vice President of Officiating Al Riveron said, “Anytime we go into a replay review, we have to start with the ruling on the field. And the ruling on the field is an interception. So therefore, the officials ruled that the process of the catch had not been completed by the offensive player. And if the process of the catch is not over, in their opinion, the defender comes up with the football and they rule an interception. "We have to start with the ruling on the field, and that’s why I want to walk you through the process. The ruling on the field is an interception. In order for us to change the ruling on the field, we have to have clear and obvious visual evidence to overturn that ruling. So therefore, if they rule that the process of the catch is not over and the defender comes up with the ball, we have to have clear and obvious evidence to rule otherwise, which we don’t. We do not have clear and obvious evidence to rule otherwise. Therefore, we must stay with the ruling on the field.” Riverton is simply a well paid dishonest stooge for the NFL to make decisions that help the NFL make money. The fact that he can say Kroft did not absolutely catch it first and still have 50% control when his knee hit the ground is just a simple lie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts