Jump to content

Pegulas taking heat for treatment of PSE employees during quarantine; donate 1.2 mill to WNY pandemic relief


Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, Buffalo619 said:

This can’t be true. In a time like this?

 

no way. 
 

That would be evil and heartless. 

 

Do you realize that Marriott has let tens of thousands of people go? You can’t pay them to sit and look at each other. 

 

Our future daughter in law was one of 40 out of 600 to survive the cut at her major hotel, but she expects to get cut in the next wave.  In the long run this may be more about the economic impact than the lives lost, though lives always count the most. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

 

This is typical of people who start businesses who think they can just do what they did in the old business into the new. The Pegulas were terrible with the BILLS and still struggling with the Sabres, but they are doing what they can to get better, they will get the hang of the restaurant biz eventually.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I read the article and thought it was it was pretty fair.  The gist is that while many in the hospitality industry are unfortunately laying off employees, few employers have the resources or the personal wealth that the Pegulas have.
 

The way they handled this situation, is not great.  I do believe that Terry and Kim are good people, so it’s a little surprising.  They are either very tone deaf or they’ve been out of the loop on this decision in their org.  

20 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

Do you realize that Marriott has let tens of thousands of people go? You can’t pay them to sit and look at each other. 

 

Our future daughter in law was one of 40 out of 600 to survive the cut at her major hotel, but she expects to get cut in the next wave.  In the long run this may be more about the economic impact than the lives lost, though lives always count the most. 


True... but it’s a little different situation.  We’re talking about one town and one company.  


Did you not read the part when it said employees were not given paid time-off?  Or that they weren’t promised a job after re-opening?  It’s clear they could have handled things better

11 minutes ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

 

This is typical of people who start businesses who think they can just do what they did in the old business into the new. The Pegulas were terrible with the BILLS and still struggling with the Sabres, but they are doing what they can to get better, they will get the hang of the restaurant biz eventually.

 

 

 


It makes you wonder how involved they were with these decisions or whether it was all their hospitality guy making the call.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

 

This is typical of people who start businesses who think they can just do what they did in the old business into the new. The Pegulas were terrible with the BILLS and still struggling with the Sabres, but they are doing what they can to get better, they will get the hang of the restaurant biz eventually.

 

 

 

 

It won’t be any time soon, since there is no such thing as a real restaurant business right now.

 

One of my guilty pleasures is going to a favorite restaurant and reading my book while having lunch. It’s a silly thing, but I really enjoy that experience. That time will come again, but I feel for all those who will suffer until we rebound, and for all those with losses in the meantime. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, sullim4 said:

From an HR perspective, it's all likely legal, but it's not how good employers deal with temporary layoffs like this.  Withholding PTO is really bad (and illegal in some states) - this is usually counted as a liability on the balance sheet which now magically has disappeared, meaning the Pegulas essentially got a refund on that expense.

 

They should just say, we're going to hire as many of our staff back at original pay as we can once this blows over, but we don't yet know how many people that will be.  That clearly states their intention without telling them to to re-apply and re-interview for their positions.


Yeah and that was the overall takeaway.  It’s clear they are in a very bad situation and many businesses are.  But the way they handled the layoffs was bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard poor things about working at 716 (can't speak for it myself). I work for Darden (who owns Olive Garden and Longhorn). They are paying all employees for 2 weeks. Not 100% but still some money. They want the staff to return

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Phil The Thrill said:


True... but it’s a little different situation.  We’re talking about one town and one company.  

 

 

It doesn’t matter if you own one Wendy’s in one location, or every Wendy’s east of the Mississippi. If you are not selling burgers, you can’t keep paying everyone. It’s quite simple, really. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

It doesn’t matter if you own one Wendy’s in one location, or every Wendy’s east of the Mississippi. If you are not selling burgers, you can’t keep paying everyone. It’s quite simple, really. 


Yea that is true.  But did you read the article?  The difference is how the Pegula’s handled the layoffs as opposed to other NHL owners.

 

They didn’t promise a job when things turned around.  They also denied paying PTO which is completely BS.

 

Not faulting them for the layoffs but they couldn’t handled this situation much much better - do you disagree?

40 minutes ago, dma0034 said:

I've heard poor things about working at 716 (can't speak for it myself). I work for Darden (who owns Olive Garden and Longhorn). They are paying all employees for 2 weeks. Not 100% but still some money. They want the staff to return


How about PTO - do you get that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Phil The Thrill said:

 

It makes you wonder how involved they were with these decisions or whether it was all their hospitality guy making the call.

 

No way of knowing but i would venture to guess because they cut so many people before the current hysteria, that tried to help too many people with jobs and  figured they could cover it and  then realized they were losing money. They aint digging another well for hospitality.

 

 

 

Edited by Buffalo Barbarian
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have to say if an employer was 'guaranteeing jobs' that I'd be skeptical. If this drags on for more than a month a lot of small to medium businesses are going to be in tough positions.

 

As for larger companies like PSE, it seems like they have the political clout that they will certainly get tax breaks and bailouts (from our pockets) to make up for paying employees so I may not blame them, but they are certainly in a position to see a short term continuation of payroll. 

 

..and if you don't think that larger companies are currently howling for the government to dole out money to the masses to ensure they keep buying things so the executives can keep getting their salaries then I have a bridge to sell you that cures covid-19

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Augie said:

 

It won’t be any time soon, since there is no such thing as a real restaurant business right now.

 

One of my guilty pleasures is going to a favorite restaurant and reading my book while having lunch. It’s a silly thing, but I really enjoy that experience. That time will come again, but I feel for all those who will suffer until we rebound, and for all those with losses in the meantime. 

 

the whole thing is an unfortunate situation.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The article conveniently glosses over the fact that a lot of the workers are employees of whoever has the contract with PSE. So most likely subject to that employers policies. Sure PSE is cutting the checks to the contractor but they may not even have the authority to just arbitrarily make policy to people that aren’t technically their employees. Hard to pass judgment without knowing the details but certainly written so that people get the pitchforks out. As with most things, not as simple as it seems on the surface. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Augie said:

 

No doubt........to what degree we shall see. But it’s no little deal. 

 

Nope, the economy is going to be devastated.

 

 

Just now, billsfanmiami(oh) said:

The article conveniently glosses over the fact that a lot of the workers are employees of whoever has the contract with PSE. So most likely subject to that employers policies. Sure PSE is cutting the checks to the contractor but they may not even have the authority to just arbitrarily make policy to people that aren’t technically their employees. Hard to pass judgment without knowing the details but certainly written so that people get the pitchforks out. As with most things, not as simple as it seems on the surface. 

 

Got to bite the hand that feeds you.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, CoudyBills said:

Cuts both ways.  The masses can't demand the economic shutdown and demand they be paid too.  

Why not? Businesses have taken record profits for years now. Yet their debt loads increased. Rather than paying down their sent, they spent heavily on stock repurchases making their stick options more and more valuable for their execs. Now they are lining up again for Corporate bailouts. Why does corporate welfare get a pass, yet a poor single parent get trashed for being on food stamps. The real money is being stolen by the top.

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Spiderweb said:

Why not? Businesses have taken record profits for years now. Yet their debt loads increased. Rather than paying down their sent, they spent heavily on stock repurchases making their stick options more and more valuable for their execs. Now they are lining up again for Corporate bailouts. Why does corporate welfare get a pass, yet a poor single parent get trashed for being on food stamps. The real money is being stolen by the top.


I don’t totally disagree with your point but that’s a pretty blanket statement to make in this situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

 

didnt know we were disagreeing

 

 

Maybe I misunderstood......

 

It will be a  very big deal, but at this point I can’t even imagine what it looks like. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, billsfanmiami(oh) said:

I mean, to be fair I don’t think there’s a lot of employers out there that are going to pay their employees for work not performed (mine included). Reeks of typical buffalo media muckraking.

Yep. He didn’t get to be a billionaire by giving money away. He’s probably going to lose a lot over the next few months. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Reed83HOF said:

giphy.gif

 

Since you are new here, it's an inside joke for us older more long-term members.

 

Edit: Also, you would be surprised by the outstanding jobs that many on here have, Doctors, Dentists, Executives, Writers, male strippers like @Gugny, etc...

To be clear, number of posts has nothing to do with common sense. 

2 hours ago, Phil The Thrill said:


Yea that is true.  But did you read the article?  The difference is how the Pegula’s handled the layoffs as opposed to other NHL owners.

 

They didn’t promise a job when things turned around.  They also denied paying PTO which is completely BS.

 

Not faulting them for the layoffs but they couldn’t handled this situation much much better - do you disagree?


How about PTO - do you get that?

Really dude? Get a grip 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Augie said:

 

Do you realize that Marriott has let tens of thousands of people go? You can’t pay them to sit and look at each other. 

 

Our future daughter in law was one of 40 out of 600 to survive the cut at her major hotel, but she expects to get cut in the next wave.  In the long run this may be more about the economic impact than the lives lost, though lives always count the most. 

Its easy to say lives count the most, but when 10s of millions of lives are ruined to save a few thousands makes you wonder if this is all worth it. The hard part most the 70 year olds we are trying to save, won’t stay home because they’ve been lied to by the government for 70 years. The Pegulas have more to lose than any of us. 

Edited by uticaclub
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Boatdrinks said:

Yep. He didn’t get to be a billionaire by giving money away. He’s probably going to lose a lot over the next few months. 

Awwww, that’s a shame. It must suck to go from 4 billion to 3 billion. Hope he doesn’t lose any sleep.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Spiderweb said:

Why not? Businesses have taken record profits for years now. Yet their debt loads increased. Rather than paying down their sent, they spent heavily on stock repurchases making their stick options more and more valuable for their execs. Now they are lining up again for Corporate bailouts. Why does corporate welfare get a pass, yet a poor single parent get trashed for being on food stamps. The real money is being stolen by the top.

I didn't say anything about corporate bailouts.  I think companies should provide their own liquidity.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest thing I hate about this is the “all about the money”... if it really was, I don’t think they would be trying to build franchises in Buffalo and come to the conclusion we are getting paid in this city... and this isn’t hate to Buffalo at all, I’m just saying they ain’t here to make money imo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BananaSquad said:

The biggest thing I hate about this is the “all about the money”... if it really was, I don’t think they would be trying to build franchises in Buffalo and come to the conclusion we are getting paid in this city... and this isn’t hate to Buffalo at all, I’m just saying they ain’t here to make money imo. 

Owning an nfl team is a guaranteed money maker (not so much nhl though), but it’s true they could make more in another city. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, MJS said:

Do former employees ever have anything good to say about an organization?

Only because they’re forced to because of severance agreements or because badmouthing a former employer won’t enhance future employment prospects 

17 hours ago, ngbills said:

Of course this is based off the reports and what employees have said, what the article says and the fact that termination letters and firings have taken place. Most in my industry have been doing what we can to keep and support employees best we can. Wont be forever, but we are not jumping straight to firing people. Sounds like they were waiting to do this and it gave them a great opportunity to do so. 

It gives corporations a perfect excuse to trim payroll .... I’d bet Elon Musk is doing a happy dance laying off everyone at the Tesla plant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, ndirish1978 said:

Are people able to collect unemployment if they have been essentially furloughed with job security guaranteed when the business re-opens?

Many guys absolutely LOVE layoffs during hunting season .... unemployment checks and knowing your back at it in a few months,  but they can plan and budget for it too - it’s a win win

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, nucci said:

so they are above being questioned or criticized?

 

When they bought the Bills I knew it was a matter of time before people would turn on them. Because memories are short and we take things for granted. We take miracles for granted. (And someone overpaying for the Bills by half a billion just to keep them here was a miracle.)

 

You want to crap on them? Go ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

When they bought the Bills I knew it was a matter of time before people would turn on them. Because memories are short and we take things for granted. We take miracles for granted. (And someone overpaying for the Bills by half a billion just to keep them here was a miracle.)

 

You want to crap on them? Go ahead.

Did  I crap on them or say anything negative about them? i asked you a simple question

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nucci said:

Did  I crap on them or say anything negative about them? i asked you a simple question

 

No but Vogl is making it his crusade. A lot of people assume they know everything about the Pegulas, how much money they have and how they should spend it.

 

If they are doing something illegal then sure, question them. Otherwise life isn't fair.

Edited by PromoTheRobot
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, billsfanmiami(oh) said:

I mean, to be fair I don’t think there’s a lot of employers out there that are going to pay their employees for work not performed (mine included). Reeks of typical buffalo media muckraking.

Agree. Pegula haters grab on to this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, billsfanmiami(oh) said:

The article conveniently glosses over the fact that a lot of the workers are employees of whoever has the contract with PSE. So most likely subject to that employers policies. Sure PSE is cutting the checks to the contractor but they may not even have the authority to just arbitrarily make policy to people that aren’t technically their employees. Hard to pass judgment without knowing the details but certainly written so that people get the pitchforks out. As with most things, not as simple as it seems on the surface. 

All NHL owners are in similar situation yet doing the right thing by paying employees now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to see the Pegula's respond to this report.  Give their side of the story or it looks like a cutthroat business decision to me.  It just doesn't make sense to me for them to do this given they seem to understand the importance of a good PR look.

 

My cousin's husband works as an editor/producer for PSE and is being paid working from home right now.  He doesn't really work with Terry but interacts with Kim often.  He's had nothing but glaring reviews for her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...