Jump to content

Occasi-Cortez Channeling the Rent's too damn high guy


bdutton

Recommended Posts

Inciting violence! Drink!

 

Women of color! Drink!

 

AOC is awesome! I simply LOVE her. I mean, you have a antisemite refer to 9/11 as "something someone did," and this freaking Pez dispenser is quick to call out all the trigger words. 

 

Donate please. We need more AOC!

 

 

Edited by LABillzFan
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Do something?? You want him to do something??  While you were mixing overpriced drinks he was getting blown up in Afghanistan.  WFT???

 

The problem is that when you read all the comments to her post, as well as Omar's post, it's filled with leftists who believe AOC is speaking truth and Crenshaw is a corrupt stooge.

 

No, I'm not kidding. Too many leftists believe what Omar, AOC, Tlaib, etc.  believes; America got was it deserved on 9/11.

 

Notice you don't see anyone on the left condemning these comments? Not even here?

 

There's a reason. America is the land of genocide and slavery, and it's time to pay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HAH!  If nothing else, Pelosi tells it like it is in her 'lib' part of the thinking.  And she doesn't seem to think much of AOC :)  Should be alot of fun coming our way in the next 6 months :)

 

I say six, as I don't expect half of them to survive the cannibalism that's on its way for their side :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

:lol: When she has to think for herself, things go off the rails. Every time. 

 

 

 

The reasons AOC cites are policy differences, not offenses

 

Unless she is advicsting that holding an alternative viewpoint is a criminal act

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, /dev/null said:

 

Unless she is advicsting that holding an alternative viewpoint is a criminal act

 

Have you been asleep for the last 27 months?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, /dev/null said:

The reasons AOC cites are policy differences, not offenses

 

Unless she is advicsting that holding an alternative viewpoint is a criminal act

 

The criminalization of wrong-think has long been a tool of the totalitarian left.

 

You see it everywhere.

 

- Deplatforming of conservative speakers on tech platforms, and at live speaking engagements.

- The prosecution of individuals who "misgender"

- The attempt to pathologize normal male sexuality

- The drive to have President Trump's foreign policy differences criminalized

 

And these are just recent examples.  Look across the history of Marxism you you'll find these consistent themes.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Common Jim. She’s clean, articulate, (for a moron) and good looking. Why, she’s just the kind of piece of fluff that Uncle Joe would LOVE to sniff her hair and neck perfume while caressing and rubbing her shoulders. 

 

BIDEN 2020!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

:lol: When she has to think for herself, things go off the rails. Every time. 

 

 

 

 

I like the tax fraud bit. Because that's totally not the Democrats' plan to proclaim when/if they obtain Trump's taxes for "legislative purposes" then "accidentally" release selected portions to the public through their media sponsors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Taro T said:

 

Just how dumb does Snopes think it's average user is that it felt THAT meme was worthy of debunking?

 

Really expected to find out Snopes giving any sort of legitimacy to it was fake.  Sadly, doesn't apper to be the case.  SMH.

 

Snopes is another joke....just another knee jerk TDS outlet.

 

"Quick!!!  Must protect AOC's reputation!!!"

 

 

 

Edited by KD in CA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

Looks like AOC's campaign manager also believes the Boston Bomber should be able to vote...because of...uhhhh...an unjust law?

 

Keep up the good work, leftists. You make every day a sunshine day.

 

 

I think AOC should add the elimination of terrorism laws to her platform.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said:

I think AOC should add the elimination of terrorism laws to her platform.

There's consistency here though. Prison reform is a worthwhile discussion point, but not how it is being discussed there. Climate Change is a worthwhile discussion point, but not how it was approached in the GND.

 

She is consistent with basing the absurdity in a topic worth discussion. That way, when she is called out she can pull back and say that her opponents do not see the value in discussing the base idea while ignoring that her approach was a complete bastardization of the discussion to begin with.

Edited by BuffaloHokie13
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

There's consistency here though. Prison reform is a worthwhile discussion point, but not how it is being discussed there. Climate Change is a worthwhile discussion point, but not how it was approached in the GND.

 

She is consistent with basing the absurdity in a topic worth discussion. That way, when she is called out she can pull back and say that her opponents do not see the value in discussing the base idea while ignoring that her approach was a complete bastardization of the discussion to begin with.

We need a new prison reform discussion just after new laws were put in place?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

We need a new prison reform discussion just after new laws were put in place?

I'm not thrilled with the bloat and I'm not convinced that everyone who is incarcerated deserves prison as opposed to alternatives. I think taxpayer money could be better spent elsewhere. If you don't think it's worth discussing, that's fine, but I disagree wholeheartedly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

There's consistency here though. Prison reform is a worthwhile discussion point, but not how it is being discussed there. Climate Change is a worthwhile discussion point, but not how it was approached in the GND.

 

Last time I tried to discuss climate change, I was blocked on Twitter by multiple climatologists for daring to point out that crying "We're all gonna die in 12 years" for the second time in 20 years was a counterproductive strategy for countering climate change.

 

Climate change is never a worthwhile discussion.  It SHOULD be.  But it's not.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DC Tom said:

Last time I tried to discuss climate change, I was blocked on Twitter by multiple climatologists for daring to point out that crying "We're all gonna die in 12 years" for the second time in 20 years was a counterproductive strategy for countering climate change.

 

Climate change is never a worthwhile discussion.  It SHOULD be.  But it's not.

:lol: that's fair. I was equally confused when the world was going to end in 12 years, but they decided to make projections through 2099 anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

:lol: that's fair. I was equally confused when the world was going to end in 12 years, but they decided to make projections through 2099 anyway.

 

Not surprisingly, the people most vocal about the coming Climate Change apocalypse have only been adults long enough to experience one doomsday prediction.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...