Jump to content

Is Thad Brown the dumbest Bills media personality?


HappyDays

Recommended Posts

I can agree that Peterman probably hits the routine, as designed plays. Swing passes and a couple screens. 

 

But, I don't think Thad takes into account that Minnesota would've had a completely different game plan for Peterman because he's not a threat to run. 

 

And I don't think Peterman has the improv skills Josh has. Doubt he rolls out and throws across his body to hit Ivory like JA did.

 

And yeah, it's one game, solid game plan and I'm sure we'll see some flops from JA as we roll on. But as long as I'm seeing progress, it's all good. Even in a loss, it's good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Am I still campaigning against the fact that the worst Quarterback I have ever seen take a regular season snap in the NFL is on this roster and is 1 play away from going in? Yes. Yes I am. 

When you were rating qbs with your outlier approach to grading you had some glaring misses . Didn't you have a third round grade on Josh Allen when the qb needy teams pegged him as first round talent? And weren't you also dismissive of Mahomes? :devil:

 

Peterman, a fifth round selection, was at best considered as a backup qb. That's what he is.  You need to let it go. Your obsession is become a neurosis. 

 

https://www.bing.com/search?q=song+let+it+go&form=EDGHPT&qs=PF&cvid=63602187aedd42819f6bfedbedf52da0&cc=US&setlang=en-US&PC=HCTS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, JohnC said:

When you were rating qbs with your outlier approach to grading you had some glaring misses . Didn't you have a third round grade on Josh Allen when the qb needy teams pegged him as first round talent? And weren't you also dismissive of Mahomes? :devil:

 

Peterman, a fifth round selection, was at best considered as a backup qb. That's what he is.  You need to let it go. Your obsession is become a neurosis. 

 

https://www.bing.com/search?q=song+let+it+go&form=EDGHPT&qs=PF&cvid=63602187aedd42819f6bfedbedf52da0&cc=US&setlang=en-US&PC=HCTS

No, Gunner is right. He shouldn't even be in the league. Two of the worst performances in the history of the league. Two of them. Out of two (I'm not counting the snow game where you couldn't say anything about any player on either team as far as skill goes).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kelly the Dog said:

No, Gunner is right. He shouldn't even be in the league. Two of the worst performances in the history of the league. Two of them. Out of two (I'm not counting the snow game where you couldn't say anything about any player on either team as far as skill goes).

Gunner is obsessing on a backup qb who can be easily replaced. The Bills have bigger and more important issues to focus on such as the OL and receiving corps. I doubt that Peterman is going to be replaced this season. For a player who is so inconsequential a lot of energy is expelled being bothered by his presence on the roster. I consider him to be an acceptable backup for the time being. For the long run that is another matter. But for now he being on the roster is not worth the anxious energy he is putting into it. Peterman is gong to be on the team for the rest of the year. Why be so bothered by it? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JohnC said:

Gunner is obsessing on a backup qb who can be easily replaced. The Bills have bigger and more important issues to focus on such as the OL and receiving corps. I doubt that Peterman is going to be replaced this season. For a player who is so inconsequential a lot of energy is expelled being bothered by his presence on the roster. I consider him to be an acceptable backup for the time being. For the long run that is another matter. But for now he being on the roster is not worth the anxious energy he is putting into it. Peterman is gong to be on the team for the rest of the year. Why be so bothered by it? 

Because it costs us wins? That seems such a petty reason, huh? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point I wouldn't back Peterman to start again. I advocated for Peterman to start and he just let me down and made me look foolish for backing him. 

 

The guy couldn't last a game in the NFL. Josh Allen has already won his first game in the NFL. You can't even put that into question with the human hurdle and super man pylon dive. Peterman never does that ever. Your correct OP the guy is hot taking hard. 

Edited by Lfod
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ol Dirty B said:

 

He's some guy who we are unfortunately subjected to in Rochester. He's awful.

 

His name is Thad. I don't have high expectations for anyone name Thad. Thad Lewis was actually Thaddeus Lewis. No shot this guy is a Thaddeus.

You have to wonder why he replaced Mike Catalono...unless he retired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Am I still campaigning against the fact that the worst Quarterback I have ever seen take a regular season snap in the NFL is on this roster and is 1 play away from going in? Yes. Yes I am. 

You are allowed in my opinion. Peterman has proven he can't cut it. Hasn't lasted one game out of 3 starts. I dont know how he does during the Vikings game but you can subtract all the athletic plays that Josh Allen made. 

 

I advocated for Peterman but I can't deny you guys that called it anymore. I have to agree that he isn't even serious backup quality. It hurts to be wrong, but I was man. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Captain Murica said:

Impossible, Peterman would be soiling himself rather than throwing the football. 

At this point that's probably true. I don't know any way that is confidence can't be destroyed, which doesn't exactly make him a reliable backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can make an argument TT could have had the same game Allen did against Minn.  Less than 200 yards, 2 rushing TD, 1 passing, O INT, a few sacks, held onto ball a bit too long in the second half, many throws to the sidelines.  Allen was a bit more accurate throwing the ball than TT but still missed an open Clay for a TD(good enough to make a great catch but could have made it easier) and under-threw Foster by quite a bit down the middle.  

 

As for Peterman, he is the perfect tease back-up QB for fans.  He looks good in practice and preseason.  He teases by knowing where to go with the ball.  But in the end he doesn't have the tools to succeed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JohnC said:

Do you really believe that McDermott is going to replace him this season? You may but I doubt it. 

I don't really. But he surely should. It was his decision to start him twice already and it backfired as much as a QB decision coul possibly backfire considering it was an unforced error, not a situation that injury or something else necessitated it. So why the heck would we trust his judgment on it? His like for Nate as a guy blinds him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have to remember these media guys like colin cowherd types and this guy are not  football expert nor do they necessarily

understand the game. Just because you have access to the all 22 doesn't make you knowledgeable..the fact he has the ability

to see peterman on film during all 3 of his starts and projects him to play the same as allen..is asinine..you are what you are

he has shown nothing during live action so far in his career when the bullets are flying.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would anyone believe that Peterman can do anything positive on the field? Not saying he can't, but there is just no logical reason to believe that he can at this point.

 

All evidence points to Allen being light-years better than Peterman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Cheektowaga Chad said:

As pure passes made. No defense on the field as well as other offensive players. Then I can agree with what thad is saying. But as soon as you add teammates and a defense peterman cant hold any qb's lunch right now

 

 

 

But anyways Thad is trolling trying to make a bigger name for himself in the local media

 

Thad will be about as successful as Dan Fates or whatever his name is. You can try to be a big fish in a small pond, which neither are. Or you can succeed in your career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Kelly the Dog said:

I don't really. But he surely should. It was his decision to start him twice already and it backfired as much as a QB decision coul possibly backfire considering it was an unforced error, not a situation that injury or something else necessitated it. So why the heck would we trust his judgment on it? His like for Nate as a guy blinds him.  

 

I don't want it to happen but the thing that would force McDermott's hand is an injury to Allen. He would have to bring another Quarterback in and I have to believe it would have to be someone legitimate. Say Josh got hurt and was missing 3 weeks. Are you honestly running Nathan Peterman out there to start three more times? You would be the laughing stock of the NFL. 

 

Peterman costs you wins, that much is obvious, but he also costs you respect because everyone else can see that he sucks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

Yea.

 

I'm still wondering why he's still here.

 

Trying to spare everyone embarrassment at this stage. If Allen can stay healthy and they can get through to the end of the season without the dumpster fire ever needing to see the field again and can then quietly release him next offseason in the NFL dead months when nobody has to go in front of the press the next week and defend the fact that someone actually thought starting this bloke was a good idea then that is what they will do. The only thing that forces their hand is the one thing none of us want to happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having mistakenly followed Thad Brown on Twitter since training camp, I would have to answer the OP's question with an emphatic "YES."  This particular beauty is just the icing on the cake.  The man literally has no clue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Kelly the Dog said:

I don't really. But he surely should. It was his decision to start him twice already and it backfired as much as a QB decision coul possibly backfire considering it was an unforced error, not a situation that injury or something else necessitated it. So why the heck would we trust his judgment on it? His like for Nate as a guy blinds him.  

There is no surprise about Peterman's role. He was a temporary starter and a place holder until Josh Allen was ready to play. And that's exactly how it played out. Josh Allen thrown into the starting role sooner than expected is not something that I am lamenting about. I'm celebrating it. In my view Peterman as a starter is troubling; however, Peterman as a backup is acceptable. 

 

It should be remembered that whatever derision you and others (especially Gunner) have toward  Peterman he beat out McCarron, or at the least played as well as McCarron. So the cheaper player won the competition. He's going to be the backup this year and it wouldn't be a surprise to me next year. 

 

I'm not as bothered with our backup qb situation as others are. As you also indicated (blind spot or not) the wrestling coach seems to be satisfied with the current situation. The bigger issues for this rebuilding team are the OL and receiving corps.That's where more of my attention is. On the Bills there are players who start who should be on the bench. Peterman is a bench player who is on the bench. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely not. The vikings actually had to defend the whole field with Allen. With Peterman they just play 5 yards to the line.

 

Hes awful and if the FA QB options werent equally awful, hed be gone by now

12 hours ago, JohnC said:

When you were rating qbs with your outlier approach to grading you had some glaring misses . Didn't you have a third round grade on Josh Allen when the qb needy teams pegged him as first round talent? And weren't you also dismissive of Mahomes? :devil:

 

Peterman, a fifth round selection, was at best considered as a backup qb. That's what he is.  You need to let it go. Your obsession is become a neurosis. 

 

https://www.bing.com/search?q=song+let+it+go&form=EDGHPT&qs=PF&cvid=63602187aedd42819f6bfedbedf52da0&cc=US&setlang=en-US&PC=HCTS

Who uses bing?

 

Peterman is terrible. He was projected to be a backup and he should be out of the league

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Captain Hindsight said:

Absolutely not. The vikings actually had to defend the whole field with Allen. With Peterman they just play 5 yards to the line.

 

Hes awful and if the FA QB options werent equally awful, hed be gone by now

Who uses bing?

 

Peterman is terrible. He was projected to be a backup and he should be out of the league

If you got a problem with Peterman bring your complaint to the wrestling coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a caller on WGR yesterday that said he would prefer Peterman start the rest of the season over Allen.

His reasoning.....Allen is too careless and wreckless with the football and Peterman is safer.

 

One of the few times Bulldog made me laugh is his reply.  He said Allen could be juggling machetes while holding the football and he would be less wreckless than Peterman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...