bdutton Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 1 minute ago, McGee Return TD said: What are the rules for the members who can read the report? I've seen it reported that only 12 or so members can see the report and they cannot discuss it with anyone, not even other members of Congress, outside of the room it's in. Even so... why haven't they at least taken the trouble to see it. They claim to want to be more informed yet they refuse this? They know they cannot see the fully unredacted report due to legal reasons. This is nothing more than a circus show. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 Just now, McGee Return TD said: What are the rules for the members who can read the report? I've seen it reported that only 12 or so members can see the report and they cannot discuss it with anyone, not even Congress, outside of the room it's in. Everyone in Congress can see the report, just as every citizen can. The DOJ negotiated to allow leadership to not only read the unredacted (bar 2% of GJ material) report, but to take any notes they wish to take down with them. It's SOP for material of this nature (ongoing investigations) -- even that, the DOJ lowered the bar to allow them to take notes. Still declined. Because they don't want to read it. It's not about the report. It's about the coup. Just now, Tiberius said: It has to be made public to refute Trump's and the GOP lies that are being told about it. Right now its just he said, she said, and Barr is refusing to go on the record with the House because he knows he will have to lie about it. It's just that simple It's NOT just he said she said. The REPORT IS PUBLIC AND HAS BEEN FOR THREE WEEKS. Your talking points are weak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Who cares if they haven't read it. That's not important. What's important is: they've had the ability to read the report, in full, outside of grand jury information, and they're throwing a hissy fit over Barr misrepresenting the report and withholding it from them. They held Barr in contempt for one of two things: withholding something he's not withholding, or withholding details that he's required by law to withhold. And judges routinely allow GJ testimony to be released, so take it to a judge. Oh thats right, the president has executive privlidge over the report of his own criminality, lol! Constitution, smonstitution! 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's NOT just he said she said. The REPORT IS PUBLIC AND HAS BEEN FOR THREE WEEKS. Your talking points are weak. LOL!!! The redacted by liar Barr has been. Nice try...not Trump is making you guys look so stupid, he has enlisted you in his stupidity. Love it!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 6 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Trump is making you guys look so stupid, he has enlisted you in his stupidity. Love it!! The only one who looks stupid is the guy still pushing Russian collusion/conspiracy a year and a half after it was disproven -- by Mueller's own filings and now his report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 De Nang Dick -- who's up to his neck in the coup and is dirty beyond belief -- should be looking in the mirror as he says this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 2 hours ago, row_33 said: Dems, your lottery ticket didn’t win the jackpot. No sense looking at the ticket a million more times, it didn’t win. The solution is simple: Barr must keep drawing numbers out of fear of 'contempt' charges until they hit the jackpot! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 57 minutes ago, Tiberius said: And judges routinely allow GJ testimony to be released, so take it to a judge. Please cite sources for this, and point out under what Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure judges are authorized to order release of grand jury testimony to parties who are not specifically listed under rule 6. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 11 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Please cite sources for this, and point out under what Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure judges are authorized to order release of grand jury testimony to parties who are not specifically listed under rule 6. Tibs can't comprehend 12 things in that sentence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 4 minutes ago, row_33 said: Tibs can't comprehend 12 things in that sentence. I know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Koko78 said: Please cite sources for this, and point out under what Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure judges are authorized to order release of grand jury testimony to parties who are not specifically listed under rule 6. They did it in Watergate, for instance. And that sets a precedent because its the president. And in a recent historical case involving a lynching, but I'll give you the fact that courts have been split on the decisions over this. 1 hour ago, Koko78 said: I know. Oh now, you are agree with a POS like Row? Row is like a trash wrapper on the floor of PPP. Nothing more @row_33 Edited May 9, 2019 by Tiberius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdutton Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: They did it in Watergate, for instance. And that sets a precedent because its the president. And in a recent historical case involving a lynching, but I'll give you the fact that courts have been split on the decisions over this. You obviously don't realize that laws were written and rules made in RESPONSE to Watergate... or you are being intentionally obtuse when its been pointed out multiple times in this and other threads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 2 minutes ago, bdutton said: You obviously don't realize that laws were written and rules made in RESPONSE to Watergate... or you are being intentionally obtuse when its been pointed out multiple times in this and other threads. For Grand Jury testimony? Ya right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 5 minutes ago, bdutton said: You obviously don't realize that laws were written and rules made in RESPONSE to Watergate... or you are being intentionally obtuse when its been pointed out multiple times in this and other threads. Intentionally obtuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 2 hours ago, Koko78 said: I know. does he just read our comments and then "things go gray" and he comes back and forgets and plods on with his intelligence levels? 18 minutes ago, bdutton said: You obviously don't realize that laws were written and rules made in RESPONSE to Watergate... or you are being intentionally obtuse when its been pointed out multiple times in this and other threads. he has not shown any reading or comprehension of any of 1,000s of responses except to tell us to do something perverted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 10 minutes ago, row_33 said: does he just read our comments and then "things go gray" and he comes back and forgets and plods on with his intelligence levels? he has not shown any reading or comprehension of any of 1,000s of responses except to tell us to do something perverted How in the world would you know? You wouldn't understand anyway, trash Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 sorry, decent people find these acts perverted, they are never more than .3 seconds away from Tibs's mind and then his typing fingertips. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 Tibs...is there even the slightest possibility that the Attorney General knows the Law better than you do? I’m guessing he does! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 2 hours ago, Koko78 said: Please cite sources for this, and point out under what Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure judges are authorized to order release of grand jury testimony to parties who are not specifically listed under rule 6. I don't think you are even remotely considering how all of this makes people feel. People are hurting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 2 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 1 hour ago, Hedge said: He just doesn't give a *****. They want the AG to be independent. This is what an independent AG looks like. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: 1 hour ago, Hedge said: these are great. i've got to find the full clip. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 (edited) They cant lay a glove on Barr. Hes too smart, knowledgeable and crafty for them and it drives them, the media and their base nuts. Edited May 9, 2019 by Magox 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 Same event 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 10, 2019 Share Posted May 10, 2019 Link to article Special Counsel Robert Mueller spent more than $732,000 on outside contractors, including private investigators and researchers, records show, but his office refuses to say who they were. While it’s not unusual for special government offices to outsource for services such as computer support, Mueller also hired contractors to compile “investigative reports” and other “information." The arrangement has led congressional investigators, government watchdog groups and others to speculate that the private investigators and researchers who worked for the special counsel’s office might have included Christopher Steele and Fusion GPS, the private research firm that hired Steele to produce the Russia collusion dossier for the Clinton campaign. They suspect the dossier creators may have been involved in Mueller's operation - and even had a hand in his final report - because the special counsel sent his team to London to meet with Steele within a few months of taking over the Russia collusion investigation in 2017. Also, Mueller's lead prosecutor, Andrew Weissmann, had shared information he received from Fusion with the media. </snip> 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 10, 2019 Share Posted May 10, 2019 Circling back to this news that broke just as I got pulled into a (never-ending) meeting: https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/442944-fbis-steele-story-falls-apart-false-intel-and-media-contacts-were-flagged This story is interesting for several reason -- chief among them is the timing of it's release: just as Comey was holding his CNN town hall with Anderson CIAooper. That's masterful trolling because the information here is check mate for a lot of people, Comey among them. First -- note this clip from earlier today: DiGenova states that Horowitz's team has already concluded that the three FISA renewals on Carter Page were fraudulent, and now the OIG is looking into new evidence regarding the original request. Enter the Solomon piece/Judicial watch story above -- which verifies that the FBI had four separate statements/accounts that Christopher Steele was pushing political propaganda rather than factual information. So what does that mean? It means that if the Carter Page FISA was obtained by committing fraud on the court, everyone who signed it is guilty of serious crimes, that's: Comey, McCabe, RR, and Boente. Per Solomon's interview tonight on Fox (looking for the clip), the State Department evidence his article mentions was hidden/lost by the FBI and kept from Horowitz's team. ... And they just found it this week. This discovery is reportedly (from Mark Meadows and Joe above) going to delay Horowitz's report for two to four weeks as he must now formerly investigate the evidence in relation to that first FISA. I would suggest that the timing of this evidence coming out, and how it came out (through a FOIA request), that it's been known by the CI team for much longer. (cough). I would also point out that this helps explain (in large part, but only part) the escalation against Barr. They know he's going to investigate and take action, and if all the above evidence is real and verified (it is), that would mean it really is checkmate. Because if the Carter Page FISA goes away, and you can demonstrate malicious intent in keeping information from the FISC -- that opens the door into questioning the motives of the same supervisors sending in the likes of Downer, Halper, Turk in the months before the crooked FISA. This is due process. It's slow. But it's real and ongoing -- and it has those complicit in this plot very, very nervous. And while I was typing the above, this tweet was sent: He's telling us what's coming. Comey is going to be indicted. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 10, 2019 Share Posted May 10, 2019 UPDATE: Comey: Yeah, Strzok and Page made us all look bad, huh? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 10, 2019 Share Posted May 10, 2019 Just now, B-Man said: UPDATE: Comey: Yeah, Strzok and Page made us all look bad, huh? All that matters is their coworkers and their dinner party guest opinions. They cannot conceive that people would differ from this line unless they were deplorable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 11, 2019 Share Posted May 11, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 11, 2019 Share Posted May 11, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: ...................... 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 11, 2019 Share Posted May 11, 2019 https://politicallyshort.com/2019/04/20/fisa-court-woods-procedures-and-carter-page/ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 12, 2019 Share Posted May 12, 2019 And Trump still kicked her ass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted May 12, 2019 Share Posted May 12, 2019 So, has Jerome Corsi been tried, convicted, sentenced, and imprisoned yet? Asking for a curious Leftist. Oh, and what about Flynn. What jail is he serving his sentence in? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 12, 2019 Share Posted May 12, 2019 (edited) @the 5:30(ish) mark, Maria drops that a large portion of the upcoming IG report will focus on the media's role and complicity in the hoax. Edited May 12, 2019 by Deranged Rhino 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 12, 2019 Share Posted May 12, 2019 52 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: @the 5:30(ish) mark, Maria drops that a large portion of the upcoming IG report will focus on the media's role and complicity in the hoax. "Political persecution! Oppression of the press! Constitutional crisis! Kill the antiPresident!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted May 12, 2019 Share Posted May 12, 2019 4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: @the 5:30(ish) mark, Maria drops that a large portion of the upcoming IG report will focus on the media's role and complicity in the hoax. The MSM is total SCUM and the American people KNOW IT. Hopefully all these people go down in flames. There are just too many awful MSM personalities to name here. I think you get my drift. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 13, 2019 Share Posted May 13, 2019 https://townhall.com/columnists/sheriffdavidclarke(ret)/2019/05/13/send-in-the-clowns-n2546212 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted May 17, 2019 Share Posted May 17, 2019 don't know that i have ever seen a thread on BNL News before. https://twitter.com/BreakingNLive/status/1128314686309638144 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted May 17, 2019 Share Posted May 17, 2019 (edited) 37 minutes ago, Foxx said: don't know that i have ever seen a thread on BNL News before. https://twitter.com/BreakingNLive/status/1128314686309638144 Nothing new to see here. Someone on their staff probably just finished reading some of Gpap's book. Edit: That's not a dig at you, Foxx. Just my personal gripe with the "DEVELOPING" opening. Edited May 17, 2019 by Hedge 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts