/dev/null Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 (edited) 20 hours ago, B-Man said: Is that a wrestling match or an example of #metoo Edited January 4, 2019 by /dev/null Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 24 minutes ago, /dev/null said: Is that a wrestling match or an example of #metoo Even if #metoo... Seriously? #wouldyareallywantto?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 14 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: Even if #metoo... Seriously? #wouldyareallywantto?? Ask me again when she's at least 18 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 2 hours ago, /dev/null said: Ask me again when she's at least 18 18???? You like them GILF's huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 (edited) OOPS, someone's going to be in trouble............................independent thought is not permitted by the left. FORMER NFL PLAYER BURGESS OWENS CLAIMS SOCIALISTS’ ANTI-WHITE AGENDA IS HURTING BLACK COMMUNITIES Former NFL player Burgess Owens said socialism and Marxism are pushing an “anti-white” and “anti-American” agenda that’s hurting the black community. Burgess was discussing the NFL’s ratings boost as national anthem protests begin to fade and said America is fighting for its soul. “The biggest takeaway from the last two years — we are in the fight for the heart and soul of our nation,” Burgess said Friday on “Fox & Friends.” “We are fighting for our American, Judeo-Christian values and we’re fighting against a very evil force of socialism and Marxism that destroy everything they come close to. The NFL has been changed forever and people don’t realize this. But it used to be a place where we come together, no matter what our political persuasion was, and there was unity because we had God, country and family.” “The Marxists and socialists made that so that we have these young people coming out of these environments — they’re anti-American, they’re anti-white, they’re anti-capitalist — and that is the message that now is going around the world and throughout our communities — that this is a place that’s not for black Americans,” he added. more at the link: https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/04/burgess-owens-football-socialism/ . Edited January 4, 2019 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 Someone else is in trouble 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 6, 2019 Share Posted January 6, 2019 PORTLAND, Ore. — A new city policy requiring public signs on brick buildings warning they might collapse in an earthquake is part of a long history of white supremacy aimed at forcing black people to move out of neighborhoods, the NAACP of Portland, Oregon, says. The group on Thursday decried the policy affecting some 1,600 unreinforced masonry buildings that are on average 90 years old, many in areas with a predominantly black population, The Oregonian/OregonLive reports . The policy “exacerbates a long history of systemic and structural betrayals of trust and policies of displacement, demolition, and dispossession predicated on classism, racism, and white supremacy,” the group said. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mead107 Posted January 6, 2019 Share Posted January 6, 2019 The new move by Democrats is to do away with Football, Baseball, and Basketball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted January 6, 2019 Share Posted January 6, 2019 22 minutes ago, B-Man said: PORTLAND, Ore. — A new city policy requiring public signs on brick buildings warning they might collapse in an earthquake is part of a long history of white supremacy aimed at forcing black people to move out of neighborhoods, the NAACP of Portland, Oregon, says. The group on Thursday decried the policy affecting some 1,600 unreinforced masonry buildings that are on average 90 years old, many in areas with a predominantly black population, The Oregonian/OregonLive reports . The policy “exacerbates a long history of systemic and structural betrayals of trust and policies of displacement, demolition, and dispossession predicated on classism, racism, and white supremacy,” the group said. . White supremacy because we don’t want buildings to fall on you? One man’s racism is another’s compassion. 9 minutes ago, mead107 said: The new move by Democrats is to do away with Football, Baseball, and Basketball. Hmmmm. I may need to rethink this whole Democrat party thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavin in Va Beach Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 Guess this is the thread for utter idiotic actions taken by academia, especially when they are caught being utterly idiotic... https://www.foxnews.com/us/portland-professor-behind-journal-paper-hoax-fears-he-could-lose-his-job A professor who fooled prestigious journals into running absurd hoax papers, as a test of their bias, says he may now lose his job because of his actions. Peter Boghossian was one of three people who collaborated last year to test the standards of various university disciplines, submitting papers loaded with left-wing buzzwords to journals in fields like feminism, race studies, ***** studies, and cultural studies. Many prestigious journals fell for their absurd hoax papers. A leading feminist journal published a section of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf that had simply been re-written with fashionable buzzwords. Another journal published a paper about “rape culture and ***** performativity” in dog parks. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 19 minutes ago, Gavin in Va Beach said: Guess this is the thread for utter idiotic actions taken by academia, especially when they are caught being utterly idiotic... https://www.foxnews.com/us/portland-professor-behind-journal-paper-hoax-fears-he-could-lose-his-job A professor who fooled prestigious journals into running absurd hoax papers, as a test of their bias, says he may now lose his job because of his actions. Peter Boghossian was one of three people who collaborated last year to test the standards of various university disciplines, submitting papers loaded with left-wing buzzwords to journals in fields like feminism, race studies, ***** studies, and cultural studies. Many prestigious journals fell for their absurd hoax papers. A leading feminist journal published a section of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf that had simply been re-written with fashionable buzzwords. Another journal published a paper about “rape culture and ***** performativity” in dog parks. That's great. Reminds me of the researcher who conducted and published a study showing that eating chocolate helps you lose weight. He designed the study to be complete junk science, then sat back and watched how it was picked up by media outlets around the world. I fooled millions into thinking that chocolate helps weight loss. Here's how. Quote I know what you’re thinking. The study did show accelerated weight loss in the chocolate group—shouldn’t we trust it? Isn’t that how science works? Here’s a dirty little science secret: If you measure a large number of things about a small number of people, you are almost guaranteed to get a “statistically significant” result. Our study included 18 different measurements—weight, cholesterol, sodium, blood protein levels, sleep quality, well-being, etc.—from 15 people. (One subject was dropped.) That study design is a recipe for false positives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 SO NOW THE PRESS IS CALLING ARMED HOME INVADERS “UNWANTED HOUSE VISITORS.” You can’t do better than this response: . 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 A thought crosses my mind in this thread a lot. A new friend is a former Mizzou cheerleader all about inclusion per her social media. She doesn't know me well and one day it's gonna get ugly when she does. It'll also be funny. ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 3 hours ago, B-Man said: SO NOW THE PRESS IS CALLING ARMED HOME INVADERS “UNWANTED HOUSE VISITORS.” You can’t do better than this response: . Wait...we can kill unwanted house visitors now? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevbeau Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 Just now, DC Tom said: Wait...we can kill unwanted house visitors now? Holidays are over Tom. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Wait...we can kill unwanted house visitors now? Only if they bring the gun!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 14, 2019 Share Posted January 14, 2019 PETER JACKSON’S RESTORED WWI FOOTAGE UNDERSCORES THE FLACCIDITY OF TODAY’S CULTURE: Can any culture raise ‘rough men’ ready to defend it against a ruthless enemy when it cannot even fix in the minds of its developing youth what their sex is? In the span of 100 years, Britain has gone from producing men who were so eager to fight and die for their country that 16-year-olds lied about their age to enlist when the minimum age was 19, to teaching primary school boys that they can have periods just like girls and offering feminine hygiene products in boys’ bathrooms. This phenomenon isn’t unique to the U.K. U.S. colleges, like the University of Wisconsin, University of Minnesota, and Brown University offer menstrual products in their men’s rooms, in the name of “menstrual equity” and as a sop to a miniscule “transgender” population. Can any culture—British, American or any other—raise “rough men” ready to defend it against a ruthless enemy when it cannot even fix in the minds of its developing youth what their sex is? What would Winston say? I don’t think he’d be very happy with Gillette’s latest virtue signaling to the woke few (which, needless to say, is a very different group than Churchill’s “Few”) rather than the masses of men who buy their products: Gillette against Toxic Masculinity............ 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 More on response "Woke Gillette" JIM TREACHER: Gillette Tells Men They’re Repulsive Creeps. Now Give Them Your Money, You Piece of Garbage. “Our society has come a long way in shaming men for behaving in any way that anybody anywhere doesn’t like, and reminding men that we’re all complicit even if we don’t behave that way. But it’s not nearly enough. The mere fact of maleness is shameful and problematic. Men and boys everywhere need to be reminded that we’re evil. We must learn to hate ourselves as much as everyone else hates us. The patriarchy must be castrated. And who better to do it than a company that makes razors?” . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 5 minutes ago, B-Man said: More on response "Woke Gillette" JIM TREACHER: Gillette Tells Men They’re Repulsive Creeps. Now Give Them Your Money, You Piece of Garbage. Y'know, I genuinely don't care much for the Gillette commercial because I'm not a fan of companies stepping outside their product line to preach to me. I don't rely on Gillette products to make me a better man. Not to mention, Gillette makes a lot of women products, so I look forward to their ad suggesting that woman stop sucking ***** to take advantage of welfare incentive laws to be a baby mama. Or a California Senator. But in the end, I don't care enough to change products. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandemonium Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 1 hour ago, LABillzFan said: Y'know, I genuinely don't care much for the Gillette commercial because I'm not a fan of companies stepping outside their product line to preach to me. I don't rely on Gillette products to make me a better man. Not to mention, Gillette makes a lot of women products, so I look forward to their ad suggesting that woman stop sucking ***** to take advantage of welfare incentive laws to be a baby mama. Or a California Senator. But in the end, I don't care enough to change products. I, on the other hand, was already boycotting them due to their association with the Patriots* 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 I don't buy Gillette because I don't believe in spending 35 bucks for three razors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 10 hours ago, LABillzFan said: Y'know, I genuinely don't care much for the Gillette commercial because I'm not a fan of companies stepping outside their product line to preach to me. I don't rely on Gillette products to make me a better man. Not to mention, Gillette makes a lot of women products, so I look forward to their ad suggesting that woman stop sucking ***** to take advantage of welfare incentive laws to be a baby mama. Or a California Senator. But in the end, I don't care enough to change products. Well I blame Gillette for toxic masculinity. As they point out in their explanation of the ad campaign, SOME of their customers are not massage artists bruts who want to keep women in the kitchen and beat up gay people. But, as they so eloquently state, SOME is not enough. Their ad campaign will educate ALL men to be truly enlightened. This begs the question of where they have been for all this time? They have been sitting back reaping profits from this disgusting country where hair grows from men's faces and women's legs. If they and their partners on Madison Avenue would have taught us earlier about our sick society, we could have known all of this much sooner. They have also failed and continue to fail their stockholders in that they have not yet marketed male leg shaving products. Who are we to let hair grow on our legs? Shouldn't we all be more feminine? Certainly Gillette, who has marketed women's shaving products for years, could have developed a male parallel. And don't ask Gillette why women need to shave their legs. Where do you think they get the extra money to fund ad campaigns telling us all how unenlightened we are? Yes, it is selfish of men to enjoy the smooth legs of a woman, but in the long run it has benefited us all as we have had this wonderful educational ad campaign bestowed upon us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 THE BEST A MAN CAN GET: 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 And on another front.............................I thought the idea was to be treated equally.........................not protected class Quote Deadline HollywoodVerified account @DEADLINE FollowFollow @DEADLINE ‘Family Guy’ Is “Phasing Out” Jokes About Gay People, Executive Producers Say https://deadline.com/2019/01/family-guy-is-phasing-out-jokes-about-gay-people-executive-producers-say-1202535256/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter … 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 1 hour ago, B-Man said: THE BEST A MAN CAN GET: That's not what 'horse back' means. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 HEH: Plus: Also: . 80Posted at 12:58 pm by Glenn Re 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: I eagerly await the upcoming Pajama Boy Gillette meme... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 8 hours ago, DC Tom said: I eagerly await the upcoming Pajama Boy Gillette meme... You mean that wasn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1085402106587238407 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 Such great irony. Alexander the Great - perhaps one of THE most toxic males that ever drew breath was responsible for the western fashion of shaving facial hair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 1 hour ago, Nanker said: Such great irony. Alexander the Great - perhaps one of THE most toxic males that ever drew breath was responsible for the western fashion of shaving facial hair. Actually, he was likely gay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 (edited) Tom has 17th century gaydar. What a *****. WTF. ***** is bleeped? How else am I going to describe Harley riders and bundles of sticks and RyanLBillz??! Edited January 16, 2019 by Boyst62 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 (edited) ***** ***** Fagget Close enough. Edited January 16, 2019 by 3rdnlng Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: Actually, he was likely gay. In fact, most of his soldiers fought for him because he was gay. His second in command was also likely gay. Named Gilletto of Macedon, he often referred to Alexander as "the best a man could get." True story. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 3 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: In fact, most of his soldiers fought for him because he was gay. His second in command was also likely gay. Named Gilletto of Macedon, he often referred to Alexander as "the best a man could get." True story. Sharp answer with a double bladed rapier like wit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said: ***** ***** Fagget Close enough. Let me try... ******. BeginnersMind #$%! Mexican ***hole ******** Moderator Them word filters work funny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 Well, I went to a party And what did they do? They took off their socks And they took off there shoes, They took off their coats, And they took off their pants. I had a hunch, They weren't gonna dance. ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts