bbb Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 You reap what you sow libs................. Mizzou Shutters Three More Dorms As Enrollment Plummets After Race Protests The University of Missouri has announced the closure of three additional undergrad residence halls due to the shortfall in student enrollment following the 2015 race protests. The closures bring the total number of closed residence halls to seven. Speaking to ABC 17 News, Mizzou News Bureau associate director Liz McCune said that the Discovery, Responsibility and Center halls will close to “ensure that we are maximizing the space we have and being as efficient as possible with our resources.” Other shuttered residence halls include Respect, Excellence, Schurz, and McDavid. https://heatst.com/culture-wars/mizzou-shutters-three-more-dorms-as-enrollment-plummets-after-race-protests/ WTF - McDavid already has a dorm named after him. We got screwed by the lottery! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 It's like today's students are a parody of real protesters.............. Amanda PrestigiacomoVerified account @AmandaPresto 56m56 minutes ago Students Protesting Alleged Racism Segregate Themselves: 'White Students To The Front!' http://www.dailywire.com/news/15274/students-protesting-racism-segregate-themselves-amanda-prestigiacomo … FTA: For white accomplices: Please keep in mind that your role at this protest, aside from acting in solidarity with POC students at the 5Cs, particularly Black students, is to serve as a buffer between students of color and the police. That means, if the police come, it is imperative that you stay at the protest with fellow accomplices and engage with cops should it come to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 i remember mlk jr putting all those white folks in front of him on that bridge every time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 It's like today's students are a parody of real protesters.............. FTA: For white accomplices: Please keep in mind that your role at this protest, aside from acting in solidarity with POC students at the 5Cs, particularly Black students, is to serve as a buffer between students of color and the police. That means, if the police come, it is imperative that you stay at the protest with fellow accomplices and engage with cops should it come to that. Actually a smart tactical move. If things get violent they put the white folk on point and as a bonus they can shoot whitey in the back and blame the cops Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Actually a smart tactical move. If things get violent they put the white folk on point and as a bonus they can shoot whitey in the back and blame the cops Plus, when the white devils turn on them they're not sandwiched front-and-back, and have a line of retreat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 I give up............... Asking people to show up on time is not inclusive, says Clemson employee training. “It disrespects other people’s cultures to ask them to follow American conventions of appointments starting when they are literally scheduled to start.” It disrespects our culture to be in America and not follow American conventions. And Clemson is mostly an engineering school, where precision and accuracy matter more than culture. Or should, anyway. . . People should be fired for this BS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 It's like today's students are a parody of real protesters.............. when i was very young i watched the news on TV with buildings being burned to the ground at major universities and bombs going off at government and military and research buildings constantly seemed like normality from 1968 to around 1972. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 (edited) I give up............... Asking people to show up on time is not inclusive, says Clemson employee training. “It disrespects other people’s cultures to ask them to follow American conventions of appointments starting when they are literally scheduled to start.” It disrespects our culture to be in America and not follow American conventions. And Clemson is mostly an engineering school, where precision and accuracy matter more than culture. Or should, anyway. . . People should be fired for this BS Peggy Lee knows best. She was ahead of here time! https://youtu.be/64qYKrJNt6c Edited April 11, 2017 by reddogblitz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Peggy Lee knows best. She was ahead of here time! https://youtu.be/64qYKrJNt6c Two thumbs waaaaay up..............for a Peggy Lee reference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 I give up............... Asking people to show up on time is not inclusive, says Clemson employee training. “It disrespects other people’s cultures to ask them to follow American conventions of appointments starting when they are literally scheduled to start.” It disrespects our culture to be in America and not follow American conventions. And Clemson is mostly an engineering school, where precision and accuracy matter more than culture. Or should, anyway. . . People should be fired for this BS That article is absolutely overflowing with stupid. They're simply training people to fail in the real world. How is it culturally disrespectful to expect people to show up on time, yet it's not directly disrespectful toward those that are on time and waiting? when i was very young i watched the news on TV with buildings being burned to the ground at major universities and bombs going off at government and military and research buildings constantly seemed like normality from 1968 to around 1972. Those people were not called protesters, they were called radicals, and those that were not captured and jailed lived for years as fugitives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 I give up............... Asking people to show up on time is not inclusive, says Clemson employee training. “It disrespects other people’s cultures to ask them to follow American conventions of appointments starting when they are literally scheduled to start.” It disrespects our culture to be in America and not follow American conventions. And Clemson is mostly an engineering school, where precision and accuracy matter more than culture. Or should, anyway. . . People should be fired for this BS Any guy who's dated a Peruvian woman has heard this before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 12, 2017 Share Posted April 12, 2017 University’s LGBT Students ‘Fear’ Arrival Of Chick-fil-A. Because their sandwiches are frighteningly juicy and crispy ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 14, 2017 Share Posted April 14, 2017 This is good example of what college students of today actually are being fed. Seen at Brown University........................ Mr Orwell, call your lawyer please.................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted April 14, 2017 Share Posted April 14, 2017 This is good example of what college students of today actually are being fed. Seen at Brown University........................ Mr Orwell, call your lawyer please.................... Not to worry - they'll be out in the real world soon. That's when the fun will begin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 15, 2017 Share Posted April 15, 2017 (edited) Highbrow Fascism on Campus. by Noah Rothman Many have observed a trend on campus toward intolerance for expression and debate. This is not a new phenomenon, nor is it limited to the monomaniacal, semi-professional street performers who dedicate themselves to careers in activism. In recent years, however, those advocating aggression in response to unwanted speech have migrated from the streets onto student-newspaper editorial boards, where they gloss their tyrannical fanaticism with a veneer of false sagacity. In recent years, student editors have protested the appearance of conservative speakers on campus by associating difficult ideas with physical trauma. A 2012 op-ed in the Harvard Crimson declared expressions of racism to be “an act of violence.” In 2015, The Oberlin Review protested Christina Hoff Sommers for questioning the statistical basis for a variety of feminist myths by penning “a love letter to ourselves.” This exercise in self-soothing relieved the pain that resulted from the rejection of what Hillary Clinton once called a self-professed victim’s “right to be believed.” Georgetown’s The Hoya endorsed Oberlin’s assessment of the threat posed by Sommers and, thus, critical statistical analysis by asserting that her invitation to speak at the university amounted to endorsing “a harmful conversation.” The notion that one is under physical assault eventually legitimizes—even demands—a preventative response. The editors at Wellesley College’s student newspaper inadvertently endorsed this grim totalitarianism in an editorial advocating the use of “appropriate measures” against those who support those they deem to be irresponsible politicians or lecturers. “f people are given the resources to learn and either continue to speak hate speech or refuse to adapt their beliefs, then hostility may be warranted,” the piece read. Amid laborious prose that read as though an algorithm translated it from the original Mandarin, these students articulated the logical foundations of fascism: We, the victimized, are owed reparative justice. And here it comes. Edited April 15, 2017 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted April 15, 2017 Share Posted April 15, 2017 Is it time to deny white males the franchise http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2017/04/13/could_it_be_time_to_deny_white_men_the_franchise_407603.html And when I'm done smashing my skull against a brick wall trying to understand that mindset, it frightens me that there are people who will accept it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted April 15, 2017 Share Posted April 15, 2017 Is it time to deny white males the franchise http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2017/04/13/could_it_be_time_to_deny_white_men_the_franchise_407603.html And when I'm done smashing my skull against a brick wall trying to understand that mindset, it frightens me that there are people who will accept it What's not to understand? That's simply the most ignorant, racist, misguided thing that I've read in a very long time, and the kicker is that the article makes a strong case for tying progressivism to racism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 Lead Baseball writer for NBC Sports..................... Craig CalcaterraVerified account @craigcalcaterra Apr 16 "Will you keep politics out of sports, please. We like sports to be politics-free" Opening Day in Atlanta. ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 What's not to understand? That's simply the most ignorant, racist, misguided thing that I've read in a very long time, and the kicker is that the article makes a strong case for tying progressivism to racism. It's been taken down: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.za/shelley-garland/could-it-be-time-to-deny-white-men-the-franchise_a_22036640/ Huffington Post SA has removed the blog "Could It Be Time To Deny White Men The Franchise?" published on our Voices section on April 13, 2017.We have done this because the blog submission from an individual who called herself Shelley Garland, who claimed to be an MA student at UCT, cannot be traced and appears not to exist. We have immediately bolstered and strengthened our blogging procedures that, until now, have operated on the basis of open communication and good faith. From now on, bloggers will have to verify themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 any Deans of already very liberal schools get fired for not being sensitive enough for people upset over Easter Bunny costumes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts