Jump to content

List of players under contract and Free Agents in 2024


Recommended Posts

Below is the complete list of players that we have under contract next season, by position.

 

Players in italics have an out in their contract after this season:

 

QB:
Josh Allen

 

RB:
James Cook
Nyheim Hines

 

FB:
Reggie Gilliam

 

WR:
Stefon Diggs
Khalil Shakir
Deonte Harty 
Justin Shorter

Andy Isabella

K.J. Hamler

Tyrell Shavers

Bryan Thompson

 

TE:
Dalton Kincaid
Dawson Knox
Zach Davidson

Tre Mc'Kitty

 

OL:
Dion Dawkins
Connor McGovern 
Mitch Morse
O'Cyrus Torrence
Spencer Brown
-
Ryan Bates
Ryan Van Demark
Tommy Doyle
Alec Anderson

Richard Gouraige

Kevin Jarvis

 

DE:
Von Miller
Greg Rousseau
Kingsley Jonathan 

Kameron Cline

 

DT:
Ed Oliver

 

LB:
Matt Milano
Terrel Bernard
Dorian Williams
Baylon Spector

 

CB:

Rasul Douglas
Christian Benford
Tre'Davious White
Taron Johnson
Kaiir Elam
Siran Neal

Ja'Marcus Ingram

Kyron Brown

 

S:
Jordan Poyer
Damar Hamlin

Kendall Williamson

 

ST:
Tyler Bass
Sam Martin
Reid Ferguson

 

We currently sit $41.4 million over the cap. I'm sure Beane has different restructure and cut plans in place already to get us under. But there is a lot of work to be done. Though it is good to see so much of our core in place.

 

EDIT: Here's the list of guys who will be Free Agents, by position (Practice Squad players not included) -

 

QB:

Kyle Allen

 

RB:

Damien Harris

Latavius Murray

Ty Johnson

 

WR:

Gabe Davis

Trent Sherfield

 

TE:

Quintin Morris (ERFA)

 

OL:

David Edwards

 

DE:

Leonard Floyd

A.J. Epenesa

Shaq Lawson

 

DT:

Daquan Jones

Jordan Phillips

Linval Joseph

Tim Settle

Poona Ford

 

LB:

Tyrel Dodson

Tyler Matakevitch

 

CB:

Dane Jackson

Cam Lewis

 

S:

Micah Hyde

Taylor Rapp

Edited by BillsFanForever19
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Taro Nimbus said:

This will be Poyer and Tre Whites last year in Buffalo

 

Agreed. 

 

It's sad White will go out this way. But there's no way we can pay him in 2024 and 2025 what we're scheduled to pay him in the condition he's in. Being injured, it will have to come in the form of a settlement.

 

But in the situation we're in, we need space anywhere we can get it and with the injuries he sustained, we can't continue to pay him what we signed him to before those injuries happened. And we've already replaced him in the Starting Lineup and are in relatively good shape at CB as a whole.

 

Poyer is a little trickier. Releasing him would leave us absolutely nowhere at Safety. But he has a 7.5m cap hit next season and I don't think he's playing to that and we can likely find a better option cheaper and save some cap on top of it.

 

I think Harty and Bates are probably gone as well. Though with Bates, maybe we can restructure his deal or he'd take a pay cut. He is very important depth.

 

Martin has performed well at times, but his release could save a little in 2024 and another 2.28 in 2025 and it is only the Punter position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

 

 

Poyer is a little trickier. Releasing him would leave us absolutely nowhere at Safety. But he has a 7.5m cap hit next season and I don't think he's playing to that and we can likely find a better option cheaper and save some cap on top of it.

 

I think Harty and Bates are probably gone as well. Though with Bates, maybe we can restructure his deal or he'd take a pay cut. He is very important depth.

 

 


They are cash strapped so moving on from Morse could be an option iMO … he ain’t getting any younger ..

 

If they go the other way and keep Morse 1 more year  ..then Bates actually has some trade value in my view … he can start at a variety of positions and his contract value is low for two years …

 

Poyer may stay anither year given the Safety room is bare and they love having a veteran in every position group … I would have liked them to replace him this year to be honest …

 

Harty has been one of the biggest disappointments of the season and is gone 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
On 1/3/2024 at 10:26 PM, BuffBillsForLife said:

The most important question: can Elam play safety?

 

We require a lot out of our Safeties in McDermott's Defense.

 

And I don't see them going from thinking "he's not one of our Top 4 Outside CB's" to "we can covert him into a Starting Safety". 

 

On 1/3/2024 at 10:42 PM, freddyjj said:

Wonder if Bedford is the best to move to S?

 

That ship sailed when he beat out Elam and Jackson to become unquestioned starter at CB and White being injured and most likely moved on from.

 

Benford is now entrenched as a long term starter opposite Rasul Douglas. We're not going to move a very good young starting CB to Safety.

 

Easier and cheaper to replace a hole at Safety than it is to replace a competent starting CB.

Edited by BillsFanForever19
  • Agree 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Taro Nimbus said:

This will be Poyer and Tre Whites last year in Buffalo

And Hyde

7 hours ago, BuffBillsForLife said:

The most important question: can Elam play safety?

His skills are better for a corner.  The most important question about him is can  he play corner?   And can the Bills trust him.   Busts happen to all teams, not saying he is there for sure but it is heading that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea the counter balance for the $41m over the cap is 44 players under contract which is among the highest in the NFL. The maths has been done before but there are ways to get under the cap without taking any of the really hard decisions. The question is how much are they willing to take those decisions to give them the flexibility to re-make parts of the roster (secondary particularly).

8 hours ago, BuffBillsForLife said:

The most important question: can Elam play safety?

 

No. The biggest flaw in his game is his transitions (i.e go from moving backwards to moving forwards or from moving laterally to moving vertically). If you can't transition smoothly as a safety you are toast. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Taro Nimbus said:

This will be Poyer and Tre Whites last year in Buffalo

I think it's Tre White's last year in Buffalo...at that salary. Now they could outright release him but I have a feeling that they will offer him a straight up pay cut before go that route. Of course, it's his call as to if he would agree to it, but it may be in his best interest.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

I think it's Tre White's last year in Buffalo...at that salary. Now they could outright release him but I have a feeling that they will offer him a straight up pay cut before go that route. Of course, it's his call as to if he would agree to it, but it may be in his best interest.

I think they give him the option for a pay cut also. And imo he’ll take it. 

58 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

Yea the counter balance for the $41m over the cap is 44 players under contract which is among the highest in the NFL. The maths has been done before but there are ways to get under the cap without taking any of the really hard decisions. The question is how much are they willing to take those decisions to give them the flexibility to re-make parts of the roster (secondary particularly).

 

No. The biggest flaw in his game is his transitions (i.e go from moving backwards to moving forwards or from moving laterally to moving vertically). If you can't transition smoothly as a safety you are toast. 

Aren’t you a bigger liability if you have these issues at CB? So wouldn’t S be the lesser of 2 evils? 

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

I think it's Tre White's last year in Buffalo...at that salary. Now they could outright release him but I have a feeling that they will offer him a straight up pay cut before go that route. Of course, it's his call as to if he would agree to it, but it may be in his best interest.


Tre gonna need to take a pay cut whether he stays here or not.  I’m hopeful they can work something out to give him another shot while here.  He’s been a great fit for this fanbase and organization from day 1.

  • Like (+1) 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheWeatherMan said:

And Mitch Morris , Nyhiem Hines, Siran Neal’s last year.  

The name’s Morse -unless you’re talking about your cat. He & Neal will return for the Bills. Such a sad development for Nyhiem..

Edited by Chandler#81
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chewmylegoff said:

Overthecap suggests there is an out in Hines’ contract - indeed he looks like the most obvious cut with a $5m cap saving. 

I believe the Bills may bring Hines back as KR/PR and RB.  His $5M cap hit has no guaranteed money so Bills may guarantee some of his salary along with a pay cut.  Hines may replace Hardy on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GunnerBill said:

Yea the counter balance for the $41m over the cap is 44 players under contract which is among the highest in the NFL. The maths has been done before but there are ways to get under the cap without taking any of the really hard decisions. The question is how much are they willing to take those decisions to give them the flexibility to re-make parts of the roster (secondary particularly).

 

Joe Marino had Greg Thompsett on his podcast a couple of weeks ago.  Thompsett stated the Bills were $29M over the cap for 2024.  He did not cite where he the number came from.  Thompsett said the Bills could make a few salary moves with Allen, Diggs and McGovern to get under the cap.

 

Bills have 9 draft picks but will get awarded another one for Edmunds.  44 players under contract is a great start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, mrags said:

I think they give him the option for a pay cut also. And imo he’ll take it. 

Aren’t you a bigger liability if you have these issues at CB? So wouldn’t S be the lesser of 2 evils? 

no. at least imo.

 

in our defense the safety can play as deep as 20 yards or as little as only 8-9. We disguise our safety coverage and positions often to make it hard to distinguish the deep safety vs the many other opportunities we give the remainder (generally Poyer). If you remember earlier we have run Poyer as a linebacker at some times - especially when we used Rapp, Hyde and Poyer together.

 

The safety position would require Elam to read the play very quickly and determine the quickest route to cut off a play or put himself in position to be a factor. He seems decent at processing the play and he is very fast but his turning ability and cutting ability is not up to snuff to free roam the backfield.

 

A good case in point that is known to see great turn and pursuit is watching Hyde on the Perfect Game against the Patriots when he made that pick. Once he recognized the play he turned quickly to make an angle to get to the play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

I think it's Tre White's last year in Buffalo...at that salary. Now they could outright release him but I have a feeling that they will offer him a straight up pay cut before go that route. Of course, it's his call as to if he would agree to it, but it may be in his best interest.


Where would Tre play next season?

 

Not in front of either Douglas or Benford.

Edited by Beast
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

Yea the counter balance for the $41m over the cap is 44 players under contract which is among the highest in the NFL. The maths has been done before but there are ways to get under the cap without taking any of the really hard decisions. The question is how much are they willing to take those decisions to give them the flexibility to re-make parts of the roster (secondary particularly).

 

No. The biggest flaw in his game is his transitions (i.e go from moving backwards to moving forwards or from moving laterally to moving vertically). If you can't transition smoothly as a safety you are toast. 

 

32 minutes ago, juno999 said:

Joe Marino had Greg Thompsett on his podcast a couple of weeks ago.  Thompsett stated the Bills were $29M over the cap for 2024.  He did not cite where he the number came from.  Thompsett said the Bills could make a few salary moves with Allen, Diggs and McGovern to get under the cap.

 

Bills have 9 draft picks but will get awarded another one for Edmunds.  44 players under contract is a great start.

Not a big deal but we don't have 44 players under contract.

 

5 of them (Floyd, Hyde, Jones, Settle, Matakevich) are void years only. 39 players have real contracts.

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, juno999 said:

Joe Marino had Greg Thompsett on his podcast a couple of weeks ago.  Thompsett stated the Bills were $29M over the cap for 2024.  He did not cite where he the number came from.  Thompsett said the Bills could make a few salary moves with Allen, Diggs and McGovern to get under the cap.

 

Bills have 9 draft picks but will get awarded another one for Edmunds.  44 players under contract is a great start.

 

I had a thread about that. Full breakdown of how we can get $30M, $40M, even $50M under cap for next year...

 

Thompsett's full plan has us getting to $72M under cap, but I don't think we need to do all that.

 

 

 

Edited by DrDawkinstein
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chewmylegoff said:

Overthecap suggests there is an out in Hines’ contract - indeed he looks like the most obvious cut with a $5m cap saving. 

Cutting Hines is one of those "race to the office" moves I forsee to make cap space. Nice guy, had some splash plays, but that's a lot of money for a 3rd string running back/special teamer.

Other examples:

  • Extending Taron Johnson and Rasul Douglas. I think there's ~$9 million in savings while solidifying our CBs for the next few years.
  • Restructure or cut Mitch Morse
  • Convert Allen's salary and roster bonus to signing bonus
  • Extend Dawkins (man has been very good at LT, entering final year of contract, we are seeing LTs playing into mid 30s)
  • Cut Harty (addition by subtraction and $4 M in cap space)

 

11 minutes ago, Beast said:


Where would Tre play next season?

 

Not in front of either Douglas or Benford.

Safety? Look, it's not an ideal situation and I know people will flame me here but with an injury settlement the Bills will be getting very little while losing a former All-Pro. We have a big hole at safety and Tre's strengths have never been speed but instinct and technique, which would serve him well as a FS. He's actually really close to Hyde and Poyer's measurables.

 

Again NOT A PERFECT FIT, but with an injury settlement we are getting very little cap space back while losing a player who has shown a lot of talent.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said:

Safety? Look, it's not an ideal situation and I know people will flame me here but with an injury settlement the Bills will be getting very little while losing a former All-Pro. We have a big hole at safety and Tre's strengths have never been speed but instinct and technique, which would serve him well as a FS. He's actually really close to Hyde and Poyer's measurables.

 

Again NOT A PERFECT FIT, but with an injury settlement we are getting very little cap space back while losing a player who has shown a lot of talent.

 

He's not a good fit at Safety at all.

 

Cut him outright and save the money, OR offer him something like 3 years/$18M with like $15M guaranteed. He gets some more guaranteed money and we significantly lower his cap hit. Other than that, he is welcome to test the market.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Beast said:


Where would Tre play next season?

 

Not in front of either Douglas or Benford.

Well, I think that may depend on his health and how he bounces back (or doesn't).

 

Douglas should be the CB1 next year. Benford is likely the CB2. But if White looks good, could they try and move Benford to safety to cover losing either Hyde or Poyer or both? Does a healthy Elam finally factor in?  Before we simply say "No, Benford won't be moved" or "No, Elam is a total bust" we have to acknowledge that we truly don't know. I have my own hunches, but whatever they decide I believe McDermott has earned the benefit of the doubt when it will come to reshuffling the DB room. 

 

In any event I think having too many CBs who can play in the system is a good problem to have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

I had a thread about that. Full breakdown of how we can get $30M, $40M, even $50M under cap for next year...

 

 

Exactly this.

 

I don't love our cap conditions, but I do think that we can bring back DaQuan, Floyd, Phillips, Lawson/Epenesa, maybe a few bridge vets you think you can get a bit more out of and still have a comfortable buffer for our draft picks and in season needs.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

He's not a good fit at Safety at all.

 

Cut him outright and save the money, OR offer him something like 3 years/$18M with like $15M guaranteed. He gets some more guaranteed money and we significantly lower his cap hit. Other than that, he is welcome to test the market.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but I would like to hear your reasons why. If anything, it might save me from my fallacy of thinking of other ways to use him.

Just now, SoCal Deek said:

Only one comment:

 

Thank God Harty is in italics. 

I said it before: addition by subtraction. At this point it's a waste of a roster spot never mind the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrags said:

 

Aren’t you a bigger liability if you have these issues at CB? So wouldn’t S be the lesser of 2 evils? 

 

No. Safety is more of a reaction position. You can be more of a protaganist at corner and particularly in a man scheme get away with not being as smooth in those transitions because the job is run with your guy and once he gets in stride Elam is capable of playing sticky coverage. It is true though that zone coverage rather highlights his weakness even at corner. I never felt like he was a natural scheme fit for the Bills. Still an odd pick to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said:

I'm not saying you're wrong, but I would like to hear your reasons why. If anything, it might save me from my fallacy of thinking of other ways to use him.=

 

He isnt the rangy ball-hawk who can lay a hit to dislodge a catch. Between the knee and achilles injuries, I'm not sure he can change direction back there as would be needed. I'm also not sure he is as instinctual or able to recognize what's in front of him as well as some others either (not saying he is BAD at it, just not as good as you'd want in a safety).

 

If we are talking about converting anyone to Safety (specifically Hyde's spot), I'd put the order as:

 

1. Douglas

2. Benford

 

That's really it.

 

I was wondering about Douglas's willingness to go into contact when he got to the Bills, but he's proven he's willing to go in and hit. And I dont think his ballhawking or awareness can be questioned at this point either.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

He isnt the rangy ball-hawk who can lay a hit to dislodge a catch. Between the knee and achilles injuries, I'm not sure he can change direction back there as would be needed. I'm also not sure he is as instinctual or able to recognize what's in front of him as well as some others either (not saying he is BAD at it, just not as good as you'd want in a safety).

 

If we are talking about converting anyone to Safety (specifically Hyde's spot), I'd put the order as:

 

1. Douglas

2. Benford

 

That's really it.

 

I was wondering about Douglas's willingness to go into contact when he got to the Bills, but he's proven he's willing to go in and hit. And I dont think his ballhawking or awareness can be questioned at this point either.

 

Tre also isn't a good tackler, something you want from your safeties

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PaattMaann said:

 

Tre also isn't a good tackler, something you want from your safeties

 

Thanks, meant to mention that when I was talking about Douglas going into contact.

 

He doesnt need to be able to play in the box like Poyer, but he does need to be able to take good angles and make the TD-saving open field tackle. And as you point out, I dont think he can do that consistently.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, boyst said:

no. at least imo.

 

in our defense the safety can play as deep as 20 yards or as little as only 8-9. We disguise our safety coverage and positions often to make it hard to distinguish the deep safety vs the many other opportunities we give the remainder (generally Poyer). If you remember earlier we have run Poyer as a linebacker at some times - especially when we used Rapp, Hyde and Poyer together.

 

The safety position would require Elam to read the play very quickly and determine the quickest route to cut off a play or put himself in position to be a factor. He seems decent at processing the play and he is very fast but his turning ability and cutting ability is not up to snuff to free roam the backfield.

 

A good case in point that is known to see great turn and pursuit is watching Hyde on the Perfect Game against the Patriots when he made that pick. Once he recognized the play he turned quickly to make an angle to get to the play.

Ok. Except Elam is definitely faster than both Poyer and Hyde. Their processing ability is definitely better as you said. But that also comes with experience with the position. And the disguises and coverage games we play are also because of that. Because we have 2 safeties that are almost interchangeable with each other. Add in a 3rd safety that has more of an idea what he’s doing at the position. 
 

I get the argument. All I’m saying is Elam is definitely more athletic than the safeties we correctly have now. Younger. Faster. And while I’m not saying he is going to be moved to safety. Or should. My argument was the transitioning portion of it. Because of his athleticism, I wonder if it’s as big of an issue as some believe.

1 hour ago, GunnerBill said:

 

No. Safety is more of a reaction position. You can be more of a protaganist at corner and particularly in a man scheme get away with not being as smooth in those transitions because the job is run with your guy and once he gets in stride Elam is capable of playing sticky coverage. It is true though that zone coverage rather highlights his weakness even at corner. I never felt like he was a natural scheme fit for the Bills. Still an odd pick to me. 

Thought would add your reply to the response also. Getting it all in one place. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

He isnt the rangy ball-hawk who can lay a hit to dislodge a catch. Between the knee and achilles injuries, I'm not sure he can change direction back there as would be needed. I'm also not sure he is as instinctual or able to recognize what's in front of him as well as some others either (not saying he is BAD at it, just not as good as you'd want in a safety).

 

If we are talking about converting anyone to Safety (specifically Hyde's spot), I'd put the order as:

 

1. Douglas

2. Benford

 

That's really it.

 

I was wondering about Douglas's willingness to go into contact when he got to the Bills, but he's proven he's willing to go in and hit. And I dont think his ballhawking or awareness can be questioned at this point either.

Fair enough. To be honest, I like Douglas and Benford where they are and I am loath to move them.

 

In my ideal world, the Bills spend a late 1st or 2nd on a safety. I'm of the opinion that it's an underrated position, and that no one seems to prioritize one until you get difference maker and realize how much it helps your CBs.

 

However, the Bills WR2 is such a travesty I fully expect that to be top billing. You can get decent safeties on a budget in free agency. The same can't be said for a solid WR2

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said:

Fair enough. To be honest, I like Douglas and Benford where they are and I am loath to move them.

 

In my ideal world, the Bills spend a late 1st or 2nd on a safety. I'm of the opinion that it's an underrated position, and that no one seems to prioritize one until you get difference maker and realize how much it helps your CBs.

 

However, the Bills WR2 is such a travesty I fully expect that to be top billing. You can get decent safeties on a budget in free agency. The same can't be said for a solid WR2

 

I was banging the table for Dax Hill in 2022 since he played both CB and Safety. Could have already been converted into Poyer or Hyde's spot by now and still be on a rookie contract.

 

Cooper Dejean has McBeane written all over him, if he lasts until our 1st pick. But I doubt he does. Would still need to bring in a FA.

 

With this WR class I could see going DB in the 1st and still getting a playmaking WR in the 2nd. If a Legette or Polk falls. (A reminder to some folks that AJ Brown, DK Metcalf, Davante Adams were all 2nd round WR picks).

 

 

Edited by DrDawkinstein
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bills really aren't in terrible shape.  The depth may take a hit in free agency.  But if they draft well, the Bills should still have a pretty good roster next season.

 

They do have some big re-signing decisions on the D-Line.  Leonard Floyd, AJ Epenesa, Shaq Lawson, Daquan Jones, Jordan Phillips, Poona Ford, Tim Settle and Linval Joseph are all free agents.  And Greg Rousseau will likely get his 5th Year Option extended.  But we don't need to bring back every single player on this list.  Figure out a way to keep 3-4 of these guys, and we should be good.

 

After that, it's pretty clear that we need to part ways with Tre White, Jordan Poyer and Deonte Harty.  That will clear some space.  We probably won't be re-signing Gabe Davis or Micah Hyde.  I'm sure there will be some options for restructures, just like every other offseason.  That will give us some space to dabble in the later stages of free agency.  

 

The big holes that will need addressing next year are Wide Receiver and Safety.  This is supposed to be another historically great WR class, where we can still get a fantastic prospect late in the 1st Round and double-up on Day 2/3.  That works out great for us.  Our coaching staff is very good at developing defensive backs, so they can nab a couple options to replace Poyer/Hyde.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

I was banging the table for Dax Hill in 2022 since he played both CB and Safety. Could have already been converted into Poyer or Hyde's spot by now and still be on a rookie contract.

 

Cooper Dejean has McBeane written all over him, if he lasts until our 1st pick. But I doubt he does. Would still need to bring in a FA.

 

With this WR class I could see going DB in the 1st and still getting a playmaking WR in the 2nd. If a Legette or Polk falls. (A reminder to some folks that AJ Brown, DK Metcalf, Zay Flowers were all 2nd round WR picks).

I mean, I don't know if it's possible to have too many #1 WRs in the pipeline considering what they get in free agency but yeah.

 

We have a #1 WR in Diggs. In spite of conjecture from talking heads, the money makes it nearly impossible to move on from him in 2024. He's still putting up a 1000 yard season on a down year. 

 

The best years he had with us were when he had Smoke Brown or Emmanuel Sanders as the #2 option, an in prime Cole Beasley in the slot and Gabe Davis as a #4.

 

I think we can be productive with Shakir as #3 and Kincaid as a wild card, but just to have someone reliable on the outside so that teams don't just keep shifting to take away Diggs.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...