Jump to content

8th late-game defensive meltdown this season


dave mcbride

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Einstein said:

 

Wow. I agree that it’s probably time to move on, but do you have zero respect for what we has done here? I don’t think he is championship caliber, but he has coaching chops. And he made this city respectable again (football wise). I will always have a fondness for McD, even though I will also admit he didn’t bring the hardware home.

 

To be honest what bugs me most about him at the moment is that he took so long to let Dorsey go. How many more games would we have won with the offense we have seen the last 2 games?


He’s had Allen to bail him out for a long time. This year he’s finally just been fully exposed. 
 

He’s no different than Jauron. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, finn said:

I'm speaking out of turn because I didn't do the research, but my impression is that Bass is reliable when the Bills are in charge of the game but chokes in a close game when the team really needs the points. I wonder if reality bears out my impression. 

He's been terrible this year

 

like bottom of the league bad

 

RtI4Sn.jpg

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep.  It's happened way too many times to be a trend.

 

Every offense in the league has their normal offense, their red zone offense and their 2-minute offense.

Sean McDermott's defense consistently does great against the first two.  It collapses over and over against the third.

 

At this point, it can't be a coincidence.  It happens pretty much every time.  So the question must be asked.  How is McDermott adjusting to opponent's 2-minute offense?  Are his coverage schemes too soft?  Is he blitzing too much?  Not blitzing enough?  Too predictable?  Whatever he is doing isn't working.  

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/27/2023 at 9:29 AM, Generic_Bills_Fan said:

The chargers have done it too with multiple coaches lol. We are having a very chargers season this year 

Except for the fact that Herbert has done nothing to be anointed “elite.” He’s a media darling because he’s tall and throws the ball far. He has won nothing and doesn’t have the wins/ stats of an elite QB. Traits? Sure. So do a lot of QBs. Josh has been in the MVP running, he’s been to the AFCCG. He’s won 3 division titles in a row. Herbert can’t sniff that and I can’t believe people still think this guy is elite. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, warrior9 said:

Except for the fact that Herbert has done nothing to be anointed “elite.” He’s a media darling because he’s tall and throws the ball far. He has won nothing and doesn’t have the wins/ stats of an elite QB. Traits? Sure. So do a lot of QBs. Josh has been in the MVP running, he’s been to the AFCCG. He’s won 3 division titles in a row. Herbert can’t sniff that and I can’t believe people still think this guy is elite. 

That’s kind of a self fulfilling prophecy though lol. Nobody would say Josh is elite either if he had the exact stats he’s had the last few years and the team hovered around .500.  It’d be the same ‘he’s got good stats but he’s not a winner/they lose because he turns the ball over’ argument..  

 

Herbert’s got 114tds, 41 ints, about 17k yards passing in his 4 year career.
That’s an average season of 29 passing tds, 10ints, 4250 yards.  
 

Josh is 162tds(passing)/73 ints/21611 in 6 years.

 Averages of 27 passing tds/12 ints/3601 passing yards 


the bills defense has just been way better than the chargers in the regular season the last few years but this year we are full chargering it up by folding on defense with a chance to win every single time 

 

Edited by Generic_Bills_Fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, peterpan said:

Driving down the field in a minute for a score isn’t hard anymore.  In fact, it’s a given.

 

I believe there was a team a couple years ago that quickly drove down for a FG in a tightly contested AFC divisional game. I believe they had somewhere between 12 and 14 seconds left. If only McDermott had seen this game maybe he would have known better!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

I believe there was a team a couple years ago that quickly drove down for a FG in a tightly contested AFC divisional game. I believe they had somewhere between 12 and 14 seconds left. If only McDermott had seen this game maybe he would have known better!

I’m not a fan of the icing the kicker timeout but the defensive timeouts were followed up by a false start and a huge no gain play keeping them in miracle fg range. If they pick up 4-5 yards there they make the field goal considerably easier.  We are all over the defensive timeouts when the result that follows is bad but nobody talks about them when there’s a good result.
 

Of course the miracle worked out though because why wouldn’t it 😂. The odds of us winning on a missed fg if we held them to no gain on that third down were much much higher than us going down the field in 20 seconds with 3 timeouts imo.  That fg was like a 1/100 type play 

 

still absolutely hate the icing the kicker timeout though so I think some of the criticism is completely justified 

Edited by Generic_Bills_Fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

I believe there was a team a couple years ago that quickly drove down for a FG in a tightly contested AFC divisional game. I believe they had somewhere between 12 and 14 seconds left. If only McDermott had seen this game maybe he would have known better!

You don't have to look that far! Scroll down and note the final possession: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/202211240det.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Generic_Bills_Fan said:

I’m not a fan of the icing the kicker timeout but the defensive timeout was followed up by a huge no gain play keeping them in miracle fg range. If they pick up 4-5 yards there they make the field goal considerably easier.  We are all over the defensive timeouts when the result that follows is bad but nobody talks about them when there’s a good result.
 

Of course the miracle worked out though because why wouldn’t it 😂. The odds of us winning on a missed fg if we held them to no gain on that third down were much much higher than us going down the field in 20 seconds with 3 timeouts imo.  

Imo if you're going to burn a timeout on defense it better be to dial up something that produces a chance for a turnover or negative yardage. Otherwise save them for offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, LABILLBACKER said:

He's easy to plan for.  

I think this is correct.  Easy to plan for. 

 

He gets his success out of disguise - he makes it hard for the QB to recognize what's coming until after the snap.  The thing about that strategy is that everyone can plan for it, and the teams with mediocre QBs, or worse, have trouble because their QB can't make the reads in time.  However, the teams with good QBs can make the reads, and then the defense is easy to attack.  So, Mahomes, Hurts, Burrow, that girl who plays for the Jags, they're all saying, "Keep bringing those disguises."

 

What's working on defense these days is a lot of disciplined, half-crazed defenders chasing the ball and hitting ferociously.  That's not McD's style.  

Edited by Shaw66
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

Imo if you're going to burn a timeout on defense it better be to dial up something that produces a chance for a turnover or negative yardage. Otherwise save them for offense

I could def see it going either way on the defensive timeouts…holding your opponent to -5 yards there was huge is all I was trying to say.  I can’t recall ever seeing an incomplete pass in that situation that was honestly kind of shocking 

 

the icing the kicker timeout was 100%

unnecessary and gave us 0 value 

 

im curious if bass’ struggles factored in…like do you risk a turnover to kick a long fg in bad weather that he’s likely gonna miss anyway? Idk 

Edited by Generic_Bills_Fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

You don't have to look that far! Scroll down and note the final possession: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/202211240det.htm

 

McDermott's excuse for kneeling it down after this one was the rain... I mean how clueless can you be? At what point in this game did the rain slow our offense down?

 

Also not enough discussion has been devoted to him kicking the XP after our go ahead TD (instead of going for 2 to make it a 4 point game) and not going for it on 4th and 6 in OT. Our defense hadn't been stopping the Eagles offense at all. I usually lean conservative, but this is the exact type of game scenario where you have to let your offense win the game for you. Three separate occasions in the final minutes where he inexplicably trusted our defense over our offense - kick the XP instead of going for 2, kneel down with 20 seconds left, kick a FG instead of going for it on 4th and 6.

 

And we will have to win multiple consecutive games like this to ever win in the playoffs and win a Super Bowl! What has McDermott ever shown to make us think he can ever lead the team to do that?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

McDermott's excuse for kneeling it down after this one was the rain... I mean how clueless can you be? At what point in this game did the rain slow our offense down?

 

Also not enough discussion has been devoted to him kicking the XP after our go ahead TD (instead of going for 2 to make it a 4 point game) and not going for it on 4th and 6 in OT. Our defense hadn't been stopping the Eagles offense at all. I usually lean conservative, but this is the exact type of game scenario where you have to let your offense win the game for you. Three separate occasions in the final minutes where he inexplicably trusted our defense over our offense - kick the XP instead of going for 2, kneel down with 20 seconds left, kick a FG instead of going for it on 4th and 6.

 

And we will have to win multiple consecutive games like this to ever win in the playoffs and win a Super Bowl! What has McDermott ever shown to make us think he can ever lead the team to do that?

Go for two and risk making it a 2 point game?

 

There are valid criticisms and then there are things like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FireChans said:

Go for two and risk making it a 2 point game?

 

Yes that's the risk. You accept a very likely win or a very likely loss. Instead of what we did which was almost guarantee OT considering how poor the defense had been up to that point. A FG drive by the Eagles was the most likely outcome by far. We could have had one play from the 2 yard line to almost certainly win the game... Yes it's absolutely a conversation at least worth having.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HappyDays said:

 

McDermott's excuse for kneeling it down after this one was the rain... I mean how clueless can you be? At what point in this game did the rain slow our offense down?

 

Also not enough discussion has been devoted to him kicking the XP after our go ahead TD (instead of going for 2 to make it a 4 point game) and not going for it on 4th and 6 in OT. Our defense hadn't been stopping the Eagles offense at all. I usually lean conservative, but this is the exact type of game scenario where you have to let your offense win the game for you. Three separate occasions in the final minutes where he inexplicably trusted our defense over our offense - kick the XP instead of going for 2, kneel down with 20 seconds left, kick a FG instead of going for it on 4th and 6.

 

And we will have to win multiple consecutive games like this to ever win in the playoffs and win a Super Bowl! What has McDermott ever shown to make us think he can ever lead the team to do that?

I don’t think a single coach in the league is going for it on 4th and 6 in ot there.  Maybe some go for 2 on the td though idk.

 

i try to look at it as ‘how bad do you flame them if the decision doesn’t work out’ and going for that 4th and 6 would’ve been horrendous if it didn’t work.  Nobody would be patting the coaches on the back saying ‘at least your offense lost the game’ lol it would be an all time coaching gaffe 

 

4th and short id totally agree with you but 4th and 6 in any weather is pretty tough and factoring in the bills dropped like 8 passes in the game makes it even more unlikely 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

Yes that's the risk. You accept a very likely win or a very likely loss. Instead of what we did which was almost guarantee OT considering how poor the defense had been up to that point. A FG drive by the Eagles was the most likely outcome by far. We could have had one play from the 2 yard line to almost certainly win the game... Yes it's absolutely a conversation at least worth having.

Who has ever done that in the NFL?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, FireChans said:

Who has ever done that in the NFL?

 

There have been several times that coaches have gone for 2 to win a game instead of 1 for a tie. Not sure about this exact scenario though. I would bet analytics encourages going for 2 there. But personally I just go off the flow of the game, and in this scenario it was obvious to me that the Eagles were going to drive for a FG and they have an almost automatic kicker, so by kicking the XP we basically forced the game into OT. So the question is do you go for OT or do you go for the win from the 2 yard line?

 

This was not the worst decision McDermott made in the game by any means, but it was part of a pattern in those final minutes of him inexplicably trusting his defense to get a stop instead of trusting his offense which was on fire to make one play and win the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great coaches inspire their team to have confidence and a “can do” attitude. That’s how you get teams to over achieve. McDermott does none of that. Josh does it for our offense. It’s almost like our guys on defense are afraid to make mistakes. Then post game Josh has to say he needed to play better and do a better job. That’s not fair to Josh, who plays his heart out every game. When is the last time our defense created a much needed turnover at the end of a close game? Good teams do that. Interceptions, fumble recoveries, blocked kicks, etc. You need someone to be the hero on defense. It can be a different guy each time, but someone has to make a play. I think McDermott has lost the locker room and guys no longer believe in his “process”.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Generic_Bills_Fan said:

That’s kind of a self fulfilling prophecy though lol. Nobody would say Josh is elite either if he had the exact stats he’s had the last few years and the team hovered around .500.  It’d be the same ‘he’s got good stats but he’s not a winner/they lose because he turns the ball over’ argument..  

 

Herbert’s got 114tds, 41 ints, about 17k yards passing in his 4 year career.
That’s an average season of 29 passing tds, 10ints, 4250 yards.  
 

Josh is 162tds(passing)/73 ints/21611 in 6 years.

 Averages of 27 passing tds/12 ints/3601 passing yards 


the bills defense has just been way better than the chargers in the regular season the last few years but this year we are full chargering it up by folding on defense with a chance to win every single time 

 

His team is losing more often, hence he throws more.. 

 

Herbert isn't elite until he wins. Josh has won every year minus his first and this (and this year is still TBD). They've tried multiple HC's, multiple OC's etc because Herbert is "elite" and no one can win with him? Ok.... tell me more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s definitely a problem and I truly believe McDermott when he says he doesn’t know why.  Much like the Bills season there doesn’t seem to be a reason why.

 

NYJ - Josh lost this game on turnovers

NE - This was a result of the defense not being able to tackle, committing a costly DPI and flatout sucking

DEN - McDermott was more aggressive here and went with the C0 blitz which resulted in a DPI

PHIL - I’d attribute this more to the scheme and defense than any other the other 3 losses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/27/2023 at 10:28 AM, Dablitzkrieg said:

Only McD can manage to "lead" a team to a .500 record with an elite QB 

The Jacksinville game was just such a brutal loss.  Then he gloated to the media in patties he had hosted.  If e concentrated more on the jobs he's hired for and spent less time getting wasted, trahed, and hung over then he might actually be an elite Coach.  All the trembles, shakes, and givers he's had in pressers I'm not unfamiliar with those been sober for sixteen years.  Think it's time to push Joe Brady into becoming head coach.  Otherwise might be looking at a future DUI manslaughter case.  Wash hands of a public relations problem before it blows up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, JohnNord said:

It’s definitely a problem and I truly believe McDermott when he says he doesn’t know why.  Much like the Bills season there doesn’t seem to be a reason why.

 

NYJ - Josh lost this game on turnovers

NE - This was a result of the defense not being able to tackle, committing a costly DPI and flatout sucking

DEN - McDermott was more aggressive here and went with the C0 blitz which resulted in a DPI

PHIL - I’d attribute this more to the scheme and defense than any other the other 3 losses

Denver 12 men on the field after 2 timeouts.  100% on McD (+PI on a lousy call).

 

Mac Jones beat the Bills 100% on McD.

 

Phil - 2X's D failed. 100% McD.

 

Jax 500 yards offense.  McD's defense didn't get a stop.

 

Cincy - Again 1 stop was needed

 

Edited by Billsfan1972
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sestak4ever said:

Great coaches inspire their team to have confidence and a “can do” attitude. That’s how you get teams to over achieve. McDermott does none of that. Josh does it for our offense. It’s almost like our guys on defense are afraid to make mistakes. Then post game Josh has to say he needed to play better and do a better job. That’s not fair to Josh, who plays his heart out every game. When is the last time our defense created a much needed turnover at the end of a close game? Good teams do that. Interceptions, fumble recoveries, blocked kicks, etc. You need someone to be the hero on defense. It can be a different guy each time, but someone has to make a play. I think McDermott has lost the locker room and guys no longer believe in his “process”.

Lost it you are right, media has tuned him out, management, and ownership were talking to him after the loss.  My guess d theye already moved onto Joe Brady bd might be telling McKoormatt his time is tiking down.  

2 hours ago, Dan Darragh said:

Pat McAfee had this on his show. This is how close we were to 10-2.

 

 

WhatsAppImage2023-11-28at20_12.37_04952ae1.thumb.jpg.e86a121a962d868d526aa74113e668a3.jpg

Clue less McFloormatt will be pounding many a sideline complaining about how people don't get his elimination process. I do that Japanese system means even those who implement it  get fired too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Billsfan1972 said:

Denver 12 men on the field after 2 timeouts.  100% on McD (+PI on a lousy call).

 

Mac Jones beat the Bills 100% on McD.

 

Phil - 2X's D failed. 100% McD.


Explain how the NE loss was a result of scheme or coaching?  Because I watched Rhamondre Stevenson break about every tackle to get NE in striking distance on 1 play.  After that we have a very bad PI and then Dane Jackson was beat badly in coverage.  These are player breakdowns not a coaching one.  
 

As far as Denver, you can certainly blame him for the 12 men.  But the PI wasn’t really his fault.  If Johnson plays that differently it’s not PI.  
 

Not absolving McDermott by any means, but the degree of blame you are putting on him just isn’t correct

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JohnNord said:


Explain how the NE loss was a result of scheme or coaching?  Because I watched Rhamondre Stevenson break about every tackle to get NE in striking distance on 1 play.  After that we have a very bad PI and then Dane Jackson was beat badly in coverage.  These are player breakdowns not a coaching one.  
 

As far as Denver, you can certainly blame him for the 12 men.  But the PI wasn’t really his fault.  If Johnson plays that differently it’s not PI.  
 

Not absolving McDermott by any means, but the degree of blame you are putting on him just isn’t correct

How do you allow a 30 yard screen on first down.  Bad scheme and play call, that's how.

 

Don't leave TJ on an island.  Better coaching and he isn't flat footed like that.

 

Every game the Defence has blown it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, JohnNord said:


Explain how the NE loss was a result of scheme or coaching?  Because I watched Rhamondre Stevenson break about every tackle to get NE in striking distance on 1 play.  After that we have a very bad PI and then Dane Jackson was beat badly in coverage.  These are player breakdowns not a coaching one.  
 

As far as Denver, you can certainly blame him for the 12 men.  But the PI wasn’t really his fault.  If Johnson plays that differently it’s not PI.  
 

Not absolving McDermott by any means, but the degree of blame you are putting on him just isn’t correct

Um ... Mac Jones prefers to throw very short passes behind the LOS because his arm sucks and NE is good at running screens. That's literally all they are good at. Expect those plays and scheme against them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

Um ... Mac Jones prefers to throw very short passes behind the LOS because his arm sucks and NE is good at running screens. That's literally all they are good at. Expect those plays and scheme against them. 

Mac Jones, who is so bad he's been benched multiple times this season, put up a 9.1ypa on 83% passing vs us

 

it's completely indefensible

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

Um ... Mac Jones prefers to throw very short passes behind the LOS because his arm sucks and NE is good at running screens. That's literally all they are good at. Expect those plays and scheme against them. 

 

Shouldn’t the players on the field know this too the ?  
 

Go back and watch the screen pass.  The defense was in the right position.  The coaching staff can’t make the tackles on the field.  This failure was more on players than coaches.   

2 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

Mac Jones, who is so bad he's been benched multiple times this season, put up a 9.1ypa on 83% passing vs us

 

it's completely indefensible

There are 10 other players in the field.  And about 5 of those Patriots also beat the ***** out of the Bills DL.  Watch the tandem of Jordan Phillips and Tim Settle try to anchor.  It was not pretty.  
 

When your players are missing tackles and getting their ass blown up 1-on-1 there’s little you can do to compensate as a coach.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Billsfan1972 said:

Denver 12 men on the field after 2 timeouts.  100% on McD (+PI on a lousy call).

 

Mac Jones beat the Bills 100% on McD.

 

Phil - 2X's D failed. 100% McD.

 

Jax 500 yards offense.  McD's defense didn't get a stop.

 

Cincy - Again 1 stop was needed

 

The only stop they made in a close game was Giants, and they kind of got rescued by refs there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JohnNord said:

 

Shouldn’t the players on the field know this too the ?  
 

Go back and watch the screen pass.  The defense was in the right position.  The coaching staff can’t make the tackles on the field.  This failure was more on players than coaches.   

There are 10 other players in the field.  And about 5 of those Patriots also beat the ***** out of the Bills DL.  Watch the tandem of Jordan Phillips and Tim Settle try to anchor.  It was not pretty.  
 

When your players are missing tackles and getting their ass blown up 1-on-1 there’s little you can do to compensate as a coach.  

Oh man. The Bills have a top ten defense in every category overall but when they get to the final 10 minutes of games, they hover between 30th and 32nd (this is documented). That is all coaching. Stop drinking the kool-aid.

2 hours ago, BananaB said:

The only stop they made in a close game was Giants, and they kind of got rescued by refs there. 

Kind of?? That was blatant PI. It was a freaking joke that it wasn’t called. We can complain about Hochuli, and we should, but the NFL gifted us a game vs the Giants.

  • Vomit 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dave mcbride said:

Oh man. The Bills have a top ten defense in every category overall but when they get to the final 10 minutes of games, they hover between 30th and 32nd (this is documented). That is all coaching. Stop drinking the kool-aid.


I’m not talking stats or rankings.  Go back and watch the final drive against New England.  You’ll see players missing tackles and committing dumb penalties.  It’s not the scheme of the play calls that failed as much as it, the defense just playing poorly.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teams know to keep it to one score and get the ball last.  McD’s end of game philosophy is old.  Can not give him up yards and put your team into a position to lose.  He has to stop being cautious overall. His zero blitz is done in desperation.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...