Jump to content

Week 17: Bills at Bengals on MNF


Beck Water

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, BuffaloBaumer said:

No team has won a championship so yeah, this is pretty big.

1964 and 1965 Bills would beg to disagree.  Bills won the 1965 title on the road.

 

This old guy remembers those titles.  Agreed, much harder now with so many teams in the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, newcam2012 said:

Thanks for the numbers. Well thought out but still its all relative and had variables that just can't be factored in. Such as weather, injuries, and match ups. That's really my point.

 

I believe your point is that the #1 seed is a huge advantage. I couldn't agree more. You are 100% correct. Playing one less game and being at home is obviously big! Anyone who thinks otherwise really isn't a knowledgeable football fan. With that said, it doesn't guarantee a Super Bowl appearance or even a playoff win. Look at last year as can example. 

 

In concluding the #1 seed is a very big deal and advantage. Yet, if the Bills lose the #1 seed they still can represent the AFC. Each path is substantially different with different degrees of difficulty. Personally, I like the Bills chances of winning the AFC as the #1 seed. If they lose that seed it's very possible they might have to win in Cinci and in KC. I really don't like that. 


Correct, that was my only point the whole time.  CincyBillsFan had questioned you about how much the one seed really matters.

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

Bingo. They’re not looking at them or at least not much. It’s not an MVP award anymore, it’s a best QB stats award. Easy as looking at stats, no real leg work or in depth analysis required. As pointed out , Mahomes has played almost every game in ideal conditions. That’s more than enough to account for a couple hundred yards over a season. 

 

Mahomes still typically puts up like 300 yards passing and is relatively consistent with completion percentage even when he has bad games with INTs. Allen sometimes has these outlier games where he has under 200 yards passing with INTs and low completion percentages that hurt him more than the actual INTs themselves do, IMO.

Edited by Big Turk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, BRH said:

 

One more thing.  Think about how much harder it is now than it was in the ‘90s.  Back then there were 16 regular season games, two byes and just five playoff teams.  Plus the scheduling was more random - we had eight division games (six of them against patsies), four non-conference games, and just four other games that depended on where we finished the previous year.  Now it’s six division games (and the AFCE is stronger now than it was then), four non-conference games, and seven games that depend on the previous year’s finish.  Those extra games in the last category are likely to make the schedule harder for a good team.  And the last game of the season now is usually a divisional matchup instead of a mail-in non-conference game. Given that and everything else that’s happened this year, 12-3 so far is pretty damned impressive. 

 

 

?? There are only three games based on the previous year's finish aren't there? 14 are predetermined and have nothing to do with your previous record.

 

Each team plays 6 in their division, 4 from the conference division they are matched up with that year (rotating, predictable, same for everyone in your division), 4 from the non-conference division they are matched up with that year (same thing), and then the three finish-dependent games - the team who finished in equivalent position in the two conference divisions you are not playing, and then the equivalent team in one of the (rotating) non-conference divisions - which is the new 17th game.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Last Guy on the Bench said:

?? There are only three games based on the previous year's finish aren't there? 14 are predetermined and have nothing to do with your previous record.

 

Each team plays 6 in their division, 4 from the conference division they are matched up with that year (rotating, predictable, same for everyone in your division), 4 from the non-conference division they are matched up with that year (same thing), and then the three finish-dependent games - the team who finished in equivalent position in the two conference divisions you are not playing, and then the equivalent team in one of the (rotating) non-conference divisions - which is the new 17th game.


I was just testing to see who would read all that. :) 

 

Youre right of course, my bad. I still think it’s harder now than it was for us in the 90s, because the Jets and Pats are better than they were back then and we don’t get two games against the lowly Colts either. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

 

Mahomes still typically puts up like 300 yards passing and is relatively consistent with completion percentage even when he has bad games with INTs. Allen sometimes has these outlier games where he has under 200 yards passing with INTs and low completion percentages that hurt him more than the actual INTs themselves do, IMO.

As @Boatdrinks mentioned above, Patrick Mahomes hasn’t had a wind game this year. He hasn’t even had to play in light rain. Didn’t even have a heat game. Somehow, he has had nearly perfect conditions for 15 straight games despite playing in an outdoor stadium. It was cold in KC on Sunday, but no wind and no snow. This Sunday in KC? Partly sunny and 51 with no wind. Monday night in Cincinnati? Rain with the chance for thunderstorms. Sometimes you just gotta laugh.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, FrenchConnection said:

As @Boatdrinks mentioned above, Patrick Mahomes hasn’t had a wind game this year. He hasn’t even had to play in light rain. Didn’t even have a heat game. Somehow, he has had nearly perfect conditions for 15 straight games despite playing in an outdoor stadium. It was cold in KC on Sunday, but no wind and no snow. This Sunday in KC? Partly sunny and 51 with no wind. Monday night in Cincinnati? Rain with the chance for thunderstorms. Sometimes you just gotta laugh.

 

Yeah, Allen isn't being done any favors, for sure...thought Kelly won one but I see it was Thurman who did in 1991.

Edited by Big Turk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

I don’t believe Jim Kelly ever won an NFL MVP award, but maybe I’m mistaken. 

 

You are right...it was Thurman who won it in 1991. The last non QB who won it was another RB, Ladanian Tomlinson in 2006

Edited by Big Turk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, FrenchConnection said:

As @Boatdrinks mentioned above, Patrick Mahomes hasn’t had a wind game this year. He hasn’t even had to play in light rain. Didn’t even have a heat game. Somehow, he has had nearly perfect conditions for 15 straight games despite playing in an outdoor stadium. It was cold in KC on Sunday, but no wind and no snow. This Sunday in KC? Partly sunny and 51 with no wind. Monday night in Cincinnati? Rain with the chance for thunderstorms. Sometimes you just gotta laugh.

Are the "football gods" trying to tell us something? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, newcam2012 said:

For Cinci, the RBs catch lots of passes. I believe they are in the top 5 in the NFL. Their west coast offensive scheme is based on rhythm and getting the ball off quickly. Burrows is near the top of QBs in releasing the ball quickly. Not sure what scheme the Bills D employs to stop Cinci. It will be a very tough task to stop Chase, Higgins, and Boyd. Could be the best 3 WR combo in the league. WR Irwin whoever he is has been burning it up too. Burrow will make plays because he's elite. This game should tell us off the Bills D is legit. 

 

Conversely, I'm not sold on the Cinci D. The Bills are much more balanced and a very good offense. I believe Allen will be ready to play. I don't want to see an overhyped and poor Allen out of the gate. Seems to be a theme throughout his career. The Bills offense should have success against the Bengals. 


What you say is true, they catch a lot of passes. I don’t necessarily think that means they are better at RB than the Bills. Here are some numbers:

 

Mixon and Perine combined:

 

120 targets…78% catch rate for 92 grabs for 683 yards … 6 TDs…7.4 ypc

 

Singletary and Cook combined:

 

81 targets…. 72% catch rate for 58 grabs for 451 yards and 2 TDs….7.7 ypc

 

The backs will be a factor in the passing game for sure, likely for both teams. I just don’t know that the Bengals backs are elite at catching passes and making things happen, and they definitely are not as successful on the ground. As you mentioned their WR room is much more concerning. 

 

Like @PatsFanNH mentioned, it is just an opinion, and it is okay that they differ.  While some may think their backs will be a problem, I like the match up with our LBs and S…I remain more focused on how the CBs and rest of the secondary will contain the WRs….it’s possible through alignment and scheme, the RBs will have a big day. If I know anything about Fraiser, it’d be that he’s more willing to get beat by dink and dunks than the long ball. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Please can we just put together a complete game and slap all those down who continue to make excuses about KC and Cincy being better...oh, and get one step away from locking up HFA?

 

I would love 40 degrees, Josh going 27-35 for 350, with 5 total TDs (4 air, 1 ground) and all runners totaling 130-140 yards, and at least 6 TDs in a 45 - 21 game.

 

That really isn't asking for much.

 

Go Bills!

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...