Jump to content

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Biden's Corruption: $20M+ bribes. All the evidence that isn't evidence.


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

Β 

Β 

So Burisma hired idiot boy to get daddy to fire an honest prosecutor who was investigating their corruption.Β  And Joke extorted Ukraine into firing him by withholding $1B.Β  But yes, they impeached Trump who was trying to look into it and making sure the new regime wasn't as corrupt as the old one. :rolleyes:

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/13/2023 at 6:54 PM, SoCal Deek said:

Huh? Cruz? Not sure what you’re talking about here Ron but feel free to keep your head buried in sand.Β 

Cruz lit up the fbi for not sharing info.Β Β 

Β 

There is nothing concrete against Biden right now.Β  If any of the accusations are true he should suffer major consequences.

  • Eyeroll 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Doc said:

Β 

So Burisma hired idiot boy to get daddy to fire an honest prosecutor who was investigating their corruption.Β  And Joke extorted Ukraine into firing him by withholding $1B.Β  But yes, they impeached Trump who was trying to look into it and making sure the new regime wasn't as corrupt as the old one. :rolleyes:


Yeah - why don’t you hire Durham to get at the bottom of this - lmao

Β 

You can’t make this up…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But they're just allegations!

Β 

With all due disrespect leftists STFU until you go back in your time machine and apply the same standard to pee tapes and every other ridiculous 'we got him this time' etc. and Trump.

Β 

Β 

Zlochevsky allegedly told the CHS he was dismayed by Trump’s victory, fearing an investigation would reveal his payments to the Biden family, which included a $5 million payment to Hunter Biden and a $5 million payment to Joe Biden. According to the CHS, the Burisma executive bemoaned the situation, claiming the Bidens had β€œcoerced” him into paying the bribes.Β 

Β 

The CHS responded that he hoped Zlochevsky had taken precautions to protect himself. Zlochevsky then allegedly detailed the steps he had taken to avoid detection, stressing he had never paid the β€œBig Guy” directly and that it would take some 10 years to unravel the various money trails. It was only then that Zlochevsky mentioned the audio recordings he had made of the conversations he had with Hunter and Joe Biden, according to the CHS.

Β 

The broader context of this conversation adds to the plausibility of Zlochevsky’s claims that he possessed recordings implicating the Bidens. And we already know from Grassley and House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer that the FBI considered the CHS, who relayed Zlochevsky’s claims to the FBI, a β€œhighly credible” source.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

Cruz lit up the fbi for not sharing info.Β Β 

Β 

There is nothing concrete against Biden right now.Β  If any of the accusations are true he should suffer major consequences.

Β 

Keep telling yourself that.Β  When does Joe Bribe 'em get arrested?Β Β 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol:Β Nothing concrete...

Β 

Tell us more about the clown world you live in @L Ron Burgundy

Β 

A dossier is leaked to buzzfeed that contains off the wall, insane allegations about Trump that we later find out were completely made up by a foreign national paid by the Clinton campaign.

Β 

That "evidence" the FBI can take to the bank as rock solid and to use as a launching pad for spying on a presidential campaign and ultimately a special counsel/ impeachment...

Β 

But the following is "nothing concrete"...

Β 

Just a 1023 from a credible source that had been paid $200k by the FBI stating that Joe received a $5M bribe.

Β 

Just Joe Biden on tape with Poroshenko where Poroshenko tells Joe he fired Burisma prosecutor despite there being zero evidence the prosecutor was corrupt.Β 

Β 

Just Joe on video saying he was going to withhold US loan guarantees unless "corrupt" prosecutor who Poroshenko told him wasn't corrupt at all, was fired.

Β 

Just Hunter sitting on Burisma board in the midst of all of the above collecting a cool $80k per month.

Β 

It's all nebulous and hard to put together. You need Sherlock Holmes to even have a prayer of connecting those dots!

Β 

Β 

Β 

Β 

Edited by BillsFanNC
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

:lol:Β Nothing concrete...

Β 

Tell us more about the clown world you live in @L Ron Burgundy

Β 

A dossier is leaked to buzzfeed that contains off the wall, insane allegations about Trump that we later find out were completely made up by a foreign national paid by the Clinton campaign.

Β 

That "evidence" the FBI can take to the bank as rock solid and to use as a launching pad for spying on a presidential campaign and ultimately a special counsel/ impeachment...

Β 

But the following is "nothing concrete"...

Β 

Just a 1023 from a credible source that had been paid $200k by the FBI stating that Joe received a $5M bribe.

Β 

Just Joe Biden on tape with Poroshenko where Poroshenko tells Joe he fired Burisma prosecutor despite there being zero evidence the prosecutor was corrupt.Β 

Β 

Just Joe on video saying he was going to withhold US loan guarantees unless "corrupt" prosecutor who Poroshenko told him wasn't corrupt at all, was fired.

Β 

Just Hunter sitting on Burisma board in the midst of all of the above collecting a cool $80k per month.

Β 

It's all nebulous and hard to put together. You need Sherlock Holmes to even have a prayer of connecting those dots!

Β 

Even Dems (are forced to) admit that idiot boy was only on Burisma's board because of access to daddy.Β  It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to piece-together why they wanted that access.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, BillStime said:


Yeah - why don’t you hire Durham to get at the bottom of this - lmao

Β 

You can’t make this up…

I have to agree with my friend BillSy here. I’m not buying any of this until we hear from Adam Schiff that he’s seen the evidence with his own eyes. πŸ˜‚

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

I have to agree with my friend BillSy here. I’m not buying any of this until we hear from Adam Schiff that he’s seen the evidence with his own eyes. πŸ˜‚

Β 

Well, the evidence was provided, Deek. The Trump campaign meeting and collaborating with the Russians is well documented.

Β 

Keep up!

Β 

Β 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What? Russians paying Hunter?Β 

Β 

The committee wants Archer to provide information about his transactions with Russian billionaire Elena Baturina, who sent a $3.5 million payment to a company linked to Archer and Hunter Biden.

Β 

Joe Biden knows NOTHING about his son's business dealings.Β :lol:

Β 

Archer met with Mr. Biden in the White House in April 2014, just a few days before the vice president was dispatched to Ukraine to offer U.S. assistance with energy production and other economic aid.

Β 

Shortly after Mr. Biden’s Ukraine trip, Archer was hired to the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company. Hunter Biden was named to the Burisma board just a few weeks later.

Β 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

What? Russians paying Hunter?Β 

Β 

The committee wants Archer to provide information about his transactions with Russian billionaire Elena Baturina, who sent a $3.5 million payment to a company linked to Archer and Hunter Biden.

Β 

Joe Biden knows NOTHING about his son's business dealings.Β :lol:

Β 

Archer met with Mr. Biden in the White House in April 2014, just a few days before the vice president was dispatched to Ukraine to offer U.S. assistance with energy production and other economic aid.

Β 

Shortly after Mr. Biden’s Ukraine trip, Archer was hired to the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company. Hunter Biden was named to the Burisma board just a few weeks later.

Β 

Dare I ask.Β  Why isn't the DOJ/FBI asking the same questions?Β  Instead Garland is doing his best Sgt. Schultz imitation.Β 

Β 

image.png.8487e1d35d6c121ca5a1c6cee4a8e600.png

Β 

Β 

I love this guy's work.Β  Today he names the names and connects the dots.Β  Doing what an extinct creature that once roamed the news rooms of the national media used to do when professionalism and getting the story ruled the business.Β  Something called investigative journalism.

Β 

https://kunstler.com/cluster*****-nation/call-the-exorcists/

Β 

Β 

Β 

Β 

Β 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, John from Riverside said:

All these accusations absolutely no proof

That depends on your definition of proof.Β  Should statements by House Oversight committee chairman James Comer that he concludes evidence exists that some $20 to $30 million in illegal payments have been made to Biden & family be dismissed?Β  Or should we be curious and pay closer attention?Β  Witnesses with firsthand involvement, recordings of conversations, records of bank transactions and fund transfers.Β  That's what they're gathering.

What we should be asking is we're is the DOJ and the standard crying about national security concerns?Β  Sadly and more specific, those thing remain conditional based on who is being scrutinized.

Β 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

That depends on your definition of proof.Β  Should statements by House Oversight committee chairman James Comer that he concludes evidence exists that some $20 to $30 million in illegal payments have been made to Biden & family be dismissed?Β  Or should we be curious and pay closer attention?Β  Witnesses with firsthand involvement, recordings of conversations, records of bank transactions and fund transfers.Β  That's what they're gathering.

What we should be asking is we're is the DOJ and the standard crying about national security concerns?Β  Sadly and more specific, those thing remain conditional based on who is being scrutinized.

Β 

There's a reason the DOJ and FBI have stonewalled on releasing documents. There's a reason they redacted info from documents they did release. The only ones that know what those reasons are are the DOJ and FBI. No one should be surprised that folks on both sides of the aisle are concluding in ways that best serve their agendas. This coming at a time where many Americans are losing trust in these two institutions. It's most unfortunate.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Should statements by House Oversight committee chairman James Comer that he concludes evidence exists that some $20 to $30 million in illegal payments have been made to Biden & family be dismissed?

He chairs the committee. The Republicans control the House. They promised hearings. Let's have a hearing! Put up or shut up.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No proof of bribes. Saw on twitter today that ther are emails on Hunter's laptop Β from the CEO of Burisma setting up a Maltese account Β that had $10 mil deposited in it.

Edited by Wacka
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

Something tells me @John from RiversideΒ hung on every word of what the sham partisan j6 committee told him was true....and that was surely more than enough evidence for him.

Only what the video actually showed and what people actually testified to
Β 

I would’ve liked to of seen a couple of Republicans on the committee. The problem is the republican party only wanted to put people under investigation on the committee. They could’ve easily put a couple of Republicans that would not have been objected to.

2 minutes ago, B-Man said:


Β 


IMG_2785.thumb.jpeg.41e9cffee31274613912aff279882f26.jpeg

Β 

Β 

Republicans love their memes

Β 

Actual evidence be damned

3 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

That depends on your definition of proof.Β  Should statements by House Oversight committee chairman James Comer that he concludes evidence exists that some $20 to $30 million in illegal payments have been made to Biden & family be dismissed?Β  Or should we be curious and pay closer attention?Β  Witnesses with firsthand involvement, recordings of conversations, records of bank transactions and fund transfers.Β  That's what they're gathering.

What we should be asking is we're is the DOJ and the standard crying about national security concerns?Β  Sadly and more specific, those thing remain conditional based on who is being scrutinized.

Β 

My definition of proof is proof

Β 

Nothing has been presented just a lot of accusations wouldn’t go to court with this unless you wanted to get laughed at

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here’s the problem. Triune was not part of the political lifer club that all the other pols want to be part of. They won’t go after joe cause they want their 20 million. If you think joe didn’t take bribes you’re an idiot. If you think the republicans don’t take bribes you’re an idiot. But the left claiming they’re not taking money is hilarious to hearΒ 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question that both the Bidens and their pathetic leftist sycophants STILL ignore and can't answer...

Β 

What products or services does the Biden family business provide?

Β 

We know through bank records that several Biden family members have received foreign funds through a labyrinth of LLCs and foreign shell companies. To be paid in that fashion all by itself is suspect, but it's extremely suspect when you have no business service that you can point to that you provided in exchange for those millions.

Β 

Β 

Edited by BillsFanNC
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

All these accusations absolutely no proof

Their own members are quietly telling people here that there’s nothing there, but they’re 3 years down the rabbit hole and refuse to believe it. They want an β€œalternative” investigation running alongside Trump’s trials so incredibly badly even if none of it is true. It no longer matters what the story is as long as there’s an investigation.

Β 

They’re about to lose the House back, a few senate seats, and the presidential, so it really is their last desperate attempt for power. The party is already a rotting corpse and they refuse to change the platform to make themselves electable in the future. β€œIt is what it is” as they say.

Β 

https://www.thedailybeast.com/republicans-admit-they-dont-know-if-biden-bribery-tapes-really-exist

Edited by Governor
  • Disagree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Biden case seems simple to me. The US Constitution does NOT say that impeachment is based on the PresidentΒ acceptingΒ a bribe. It only lists bribery as an impeachable offense. So in what universe is Biden purposefully and specifically withholding $1 billion of US taxpayer money for the benefit of his own family not a bribe?Β 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

The Biden case seems simple to me. The US Constitution does NOT say that impeachment is based on the PresidentΒ acceptingΒ a bribe. It only lists bribery as an impeachable offense. So in what universe is Biden purposefully and specifically withholding $1 billion of US taxpayer money for the benefit of his own family not a bribe?Β 

Β 

The universe of the left where allegations are perpetually allegations and can never be bolstered by mounting evidence, let alone proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Also in this world, words mean different things on any given day.

Β 

Therefore Biden didn't do anything wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...