Jump to content

Interesting Josh Allen Stat


Elite Poster

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, FilthyBeast said:

 

Definitely accurate, when this team loses they are typically bad across the board which was true in 3 of the 4 losses we took last year (Titans and Chiefs x2).

 

That's why looking back to the other day, it really does raise some alarms knowing we were essentially terrible for four quarters in a home game and allowed 23 unanswered points in the 2nd half.

 

 

We weren't "terrible for 4 quarters".  We had some damn fine defensive play in the 1st half and some good defensive play nullified by ?? penalties in the 2nd half.

 

We had 1 turnover the whole game, that's a mistake, but strip sacks are going to occur with a QB who fights as hard as Josh does to extend the play.

We had a bad mistake on ST

 

Essentially when you can point to a handful of plays that swung the game, I don't think you can say "essentially terrible".  We had some good play, we had a handful of bad plays and questionable choices and calls.

 

The Tennessee game last season would be an example of "essentially terrible on all 3 phases" to me.

 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I think Mahomes is still ahead in terms of that ability to just put a bad play out of his mind and play the next play. Josh got in his own head a bit Sunday every time the camera cut to him his body language screamed frustration. You just have to be able to acknowledge that has gone, next play, and he still has some room to grow there. 

 

You're right of course.  The other kind of related factor, that seems common to most of the losses during the McD era is that even (especially?) when behind they are just lethargic.  Slow getting the play in, slow getting to the line, just no urgency whatsoever.  When there is 10 minutes left on the clock, the game is a few first downs from over, they need to start acting like it.  The only possibility i can think of is that the D is in such bad physical condition that McD is more worried about making sure they can catch their breath than he is in displaying any urgency on O

4 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

...

 

Essentially when you can point to a handful of plays that swung the game, I don't think you can say "essentially terrible".  We had some good play, we had a handful of bad plays and questionable choices and calls.

 

The Tennessee game last season would be an example of "essentially terrible on all 3 phases" to me.

 

 

Talk to a football gambler, they will tell you that almost every football game swings on 5 plays.   Given that the team cant afford multiple coaching brainfarts a game.  I dont even know how to classify the blocked punt, that was just a breakdown that is inexcusable for a team with pretensions to getting back to the AFCCG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

8 Fourth Quarter Comebacks, 11 Game-Winning Drives

 

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/comeback.cgi?player=AlleJo02

 

For Reference - Mahomes

 

7 Fourth Quarter Comebacks, 8 Game-Winning Drives

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/comeback.cgi?player=MahoPa00

@ScottLaw et al

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thenorthremembers said:

The same stat was also brought up on WGR this morning.   They essentially showed that Mahomes is the much better QB when down by 10+ points, not surprising because I think Mahomes is a better quarterback in a better offense.    Outside of 2020, Josh has been in a less talented offense, and he is also not able to hit the quick strike long ball consistently. 

 

It's only Tuesday, and we are starting to get into paralysis by analysis.   The reason teams like the Chiefs come back from 10+ points consistently is in part due to Quarterbacking.   It also has to do with the talent around the Quarterback.  

 

agreed.  It also likely has to due to the fact that our defense can't get anyone off the field down the stretch in the 2nd half.  Happened against the Steelers, KC, etc.  Need to have a shot to come back.  I think JA is a clutch QB, but other circumstances have hindered his ability to make a 10+ point comeback.  

21 minutes ago, dorquemada said:

 

You're right of course.  The other kind of related factor, that seems common to most of the losses during the McD era is that even (especially?) when behind they are just lethargic.  Slow getting the play in, slow getting to the line, just no urgency whatsoever.  When there is 10 minutes left on the clock, the game is a few first downs from over, they need to start acting like it.  The only possibility i can think of is that the D is in such bad physical condition that McD is more worried about making sure they can catch their breath than he is in displaying any urgency on O

 

Talk to a football gambler, they will tell you that almost every football game swings on 5 plays.   Given that the team cant afford multiple coaching brainfarts a game.  I dont even know how to classify the blocked punt, that was just a breakdown that is inexcusable for a team with pretensions to getting back to the AFCCG

 

agreed.  Also inexcusable for a team that spends wayy to much $$ and player capital on ST.  (benching Moss for Breida on ST) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thenorthremembers said:

The same stat was also brought up on WGR this morning.   They essentially showed that Mahomes is the much better QB when down by 10+ points, not surprising because I think Mahomes is a better quarterback in a better offense.    Outside of 2020, Josh has been in a less talented offense, and he is also not able to hit the quick strike long ball consistently. 

 

It's only Tuesday, and we are starting to get into paralysis by analysis.   The reason teams like the Chiefs come back from 10+ points consistently is in part due to Quarterbacking.   It also has to do with the talent around the Quarterback.  

It also helps when Mahommes can just toss it in the air and Hill will make an adjustment, catch, then take it in for a TD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, TheyCallMeAndy said:

It also helps when Mahommes can just toss it in the air and Hill will make an adjustment, catch, then take it in for a TD.

I only saw it once on replay so can’t confirm, but on the Hill TD vs Browns it looked like he saw the DB facing him and located the underthrown ball early but continued his route as if it wasn’t until breaking it off at the last second knowing the corner would just fly on by. That is crazy ability…scumbag human being but top, top wideout talent. Guy has insane physical gifts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Conversely, he’s been normally so solid throughout the games that the need for dramatics with large comeback margins at the end not as prevalent? That should count for something too—a team that doesn’t let huge holes be dug in the 1st place? 

1 hour ago, Tenhigh said:

But how much did he spend on the refs to get that record?

 

😮

giphy.gif?cid=82a1493bxyvg7auxtf0n37a5ka

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will include it here because I am unsure if it needs a new thread. 

 

A more interesting stat is that Brian Daboll continuously seems to put together an offense that has the QB hold onto the football for a super long time. Josh is regularly in the top 10 for Time to Throw (TT). Twice in the top 3 for longest time holding the ball. 

Which is fine. Rodgers, Wilson, Mahomes, have had years where they have been near the top. These guys can buy time and make things happen.


BUT!  If we are going to have a difficult time either getting the run game up and going early, or we want to be a pass first kind of offense, we have to be able to mix in some more west coast concepts and get the ball out super quick when we want to. High percentage, short yardage plays. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, thenorthremembers said:

The same stat was also brought up on WGR this morning.   They essentially showed that Mahomes is the much better QB when down by 10+ points, not surprising because I think Mahomes is a better quarterback in a better offense.    Outside of 2020, Josh has been in a less talented offense, and he is also not able to hit the quick strike long ball consistently. 

 

It's only Tuesday, and we are starting to get into paralysis by analysis.   The reason teams like the Chiefs come back from 10+ points consistently is in part due to Quarterbacking.   It also has to do with the talent around the Quarterback.  

Hell  yes! I watched that game and the defense started making plays getting the ball back for Mahomes while simultaneously stopping the Cleveland O.

Just now, billybrew1 said:

Hell  yes! I watched that game and the defense started making plays getting the ball back for Mahomes while simultaneously stopping the Cleveland O.

I mean, Mahomes is clearly a magician but the KC D is notoriously underrated and it did create the most nester turnovers that led to the turnaround.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a very generic statistic (as most are)

 

It does not take into account;

- how much you are down by (losing by 20 is included in losing by 10)

- when in the game you are down (e.g. are you down early in 1st quarter or late in the 4th)

- that the offense might come back, take the lead, and then the defense blows the game on the last play

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, FilthyBeast said:

That's why looking back to the other day, it really does raise some alarms knowing we were essentially terrible for four quarters in a home game and allowed 23 unanswered points in the 2nd half.

 

 

It was only 20 unanswered.  We kicked a FG to make it 20-13 (albeit a very weak "answer").  Or does it make it 13 unanswered, since the answered the Squeelers TD with a field goal?  Such a confusing cliche....

 

Edited by Freddie's Dead
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...