Jump to content

Predict Diggs' 2020 stats


GreggTX

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:


So your point is that he simultaneously was not in fact the #1 receiver, but also got more than enough targets. What a stretch. Dude, you’re so contrarian. Do you even know why you do it? 

 

I was correcting the errors in your posts:

 

It is false that he got "hardly any" targets from Cousins (others have corrected you on that as well--yet you keep digging deeper and deeper...).

 

It is false that he was the #1 WR (unless you mean after their #1WR was injured).

 

See?  It's hardly "contrarian" to point out obvious BS.  

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

So now 243 targets in 2 years defines "didn't get any targets"?

 

10 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Yea that was a bizarre take. 

From the list I’m looking at on ESPN he’s the only wr in the top 20 for yds that saw less than 100 targets. He had 94. The next closest is 113. 
 

Last year he wasn’t targeted nearly as much as other high profile wr’s. That’s a fact. It’s not a bizarre take IMO. 

Edited by Stank_Nasty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Stank_Nasty said:

 

From the list I’m looking at on ESPN he’s the only wr in the top 20 for yds that saw less than 100 targets. He had 94. The next closest is 113. 
 

He’s not been targeted nearly as much as other high profile wr’s. It’s not a bizarre take IMO. 

 

 

He's been in the league for more than a season...scroll up to your post above to see the 2 year total.  For the past 3 seasons, he has had 338 targets. In '17 and '18 he was not the primary target (Theilen was by numbers). So that's 244 targets for a #2 WR those 2 seasons.  "Didn't get any"---is ridiculous, and bizarre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well since 2015 his low end was in 2018 at 10 yds./r, and high end was 17.9 yds/r in 2019. Basically the middle ground was around 13 and change.  I am forecasting like I used to do with my sales reps as I was always pushed by my AVP for monthly forecasts and was educated I needed to be within 2%.  The best way for me to do that was looking at run rates, not listening as much to the pie in the sky individual forecasts as some are constantly pessimistic or the opposite are hopelessly optimistic.

 

With that said, I’m guessing 81 receptions for 13.5 yds./r, and 1100 yards.  I know being a true #1 a number of people are guessing a lot more, but I’m considering Brown and Beasley will also have good seasons, and we’ll run the ball even more between Singletary, Moss and Allen.  They won’t walk away from Allen in some impromptu and designed runs as it makes our offense scary.  I do think we will have a very balanced attack which will make us dangerous.

 

The problem already discussed is facing the Chiefs, Broncos, Titans, 49ers, Hawks, and even the probably improved Cardinals.  If we were playing last year’s schedule, I’d say the stats would be even higher.  As long as we have a full season and hopeful of that point, we will have a battle hardened team, and will go into the playoffs with a home game, and ready to play the toughest teams in the AFC.

 

Go Bills!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

I was correcting the errors in your posts:

 

It is false that he got "hardly any" targets from Cousins (others have corrected you on that as well--yet you keep digging deeper and deeper...).

 

It is false that he was the #1 WR (unless you mean after their #1WR was injured).

 

See?  It's hardly "contrarian" to point out obvious BS.  

 

 

 

Its an inherent contradiction. It you agree that he is here to be a #1, but that before he was a #2, then by definition he was not getting a sufficient number of targets. Easy and obvious. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

Its an inherent contradiction. It you agree that he is here to be a #1, but that before he was a #2, then by definition he was not getting a sufficient number of targets. Easy and obvious. 

 

 

He is in Buffalo to be #1.  He will get a lot of targets. 

 

He got a lot of targets as a #2 in Minnesota from Cousins.  Not "hardly any", as you bizarrely claimed.

 

There is no contradiction.  Your claim was flatly wrong--by a mile. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

He is in Buffalo to be #1.  He will get a lot of targets. 

 

He got a lot of targets as a #2 in Minnesota from Cousins.  Not "hardly any", as you bizarrely claimed.

 

There is no contradiction.  Your claim was flatly wrong--by a mile. 

Sure, man. Im glad you are happy with the idea of giving Diggs 100 targets. I, and I would wager most, think that is obviously ridiculous. But you stay edgy, man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:


So your point is that he simultaneously was not in fact the #1 receiver, but also got more than enough targets. What a stretch. Dude, you’re so contrarian. Do you even know why you do it? 

Actually Diggs was their #1 receiver. You would know that if you watch the games 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:

Sure, man. Im glad you are happy with the idea of giving Diggs 100 targets. I, and I would wager most, think that is obviously ridiculous. But you stay edgy, man. 

 

Oh I think he'll get more than 100 easily.

 

"Happy" with 100 targets?  Of all the responders to the OP in this thread ONLY ONE (before me of course) has predicted more than 100.  NOBODY else thinks it will be more.  Even that poster estimated 122---which would slightly above what he averaged over 3 years with Cousins giving him "hardly any" targets.

 

Why would you die on this molehill?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Mr. WEO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, TBBills said:

If he doesn't have over 1k yards it means something bad happened to either think or Allen.

I doubt he ever even thought of that.

Or it means the NFL doesn’t play a full season. I would bet that, even if a season is completed, c. 4 weeks won’t be played. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ny33 said:

Or it means the NFL doesn’t play a full season. I would bet that, even if a season is completed, c. 4 weeks won’t be played. 

 

If they're as stupid as the Marlins...

 

11 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

That entire offense will struggle, teams will bring safeties into box to counter the dumpoffs to Cook which they couldn't do with Diggs and Thielen 

 

Yup.  And no time for the rookie 1st rounder to get acclimated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, GreggTX said:

He is one of the top receivers in the league. Still, he was catching passes from Kirk Cousins last year and I don't see how he'll be able to match those numbers catching passes from Josh Allen. I'll go with:

 

55 receptions

775 Yards

5 TD

 

What's your guess?

 

Wow

 

You really must've hated that trade.

17 hours ago, NewEra said:

Zero stats.  No games.

 

 

 

 

 

You're fun

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, NoSaint said:

11 yards a catch? I think that’s the most outlandish metric in the thread. 

 

More outlandish - imo - is 100 catches.

 

I just don't see any WR getting that in an offense I suspect will be run heavy. Plus the other talent at WR and the improvement I expect from Knox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, inaugural balls said:

Wow

 

You really must've hated that trade.

 

No, he just hates Josh.  He hasn't posted (in his own thread) since people pointed out that John Brown had a career year with Josh, and I'll add that Beasley did as well.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, inaugural balls said:

 

Wow

 

You really must've hated that trade.

 

You're fun

So if I said 72 catches for 1008 yards and 18 tds id be fun?  
 

Dude asked question.  I answered question.  I’m fun. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, JoshAllenHasBigHands said:


Yes, ignoring the impending catastrophe, and imagining what could be, is fun. Choosing not to play that game, but also insisting on adding your negative two cents, is not fun. It’s a real “Karen” move.

Well I stand corrected.  I guess I’m not fun, because I definitely don’t feel like predicting someone’s stats is “fun”.  Different strokes for different folks I guess.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, NewEra said:

Well I stand corrected.  I guess I’m not fun, because I definitely don’t feel like predicting someone’s stats is “fun”.  Different strokes for different folks I guess.  

 

It seems clear that The Outstanding Leader/Superior Person/Shining Star of Paektu Mountain/Great Sun of Life/Great Man Who Descended from Heaven will be sending you to the re-education camps where you will lose such non fun thoughts and learn never to question the greatness of the Democratic People's Republic of Bills.

 

 

Run...........

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, NewEra said:

Zero stats.  No games.

 

 

 

 

 

I fear you may be correct, and I’d bet money it’s not 16 games. The only thing that would make sense is averages per game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, GreggTX said:

He is one of the top receivers in the league. Still, he was catching passes from Kirk Cousins last year and I don't see how he'll be able to match those numbers catching passes from Josh Allen. I'll go with:

 

55 receptions

775 Yards

5 TD

 

What's your guess?

F@$% please nooooo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/31/2020 at 8:16 PM, GreggTX said:

He is one of the top receivers in the league. Still, he was catching passes from Kirk Cousins last year and I don't see how he'll be able to match those numbers catching passes from Josh Allen. I'll go with:

 

55 receptions

775 Yards

5 TD

 

What's your guess?

So basically what you're saying is  he's our new Cole Beasley?

 

Beasley in  2019

67 rec

778 yds

6 TDs

 

Can't believe we gave up a 1st rounder for another slot receiver.?

Edited by billsbackto81
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, billsbackto81 said:

So basically what you're saying is  he's our new Cole Beasley?

 

Beasley in  2019

67 rec

778 yds

6 TDs

 

Can't believe we gave up a 1st rounder for another slot receiver.?

 

"We" did?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...