LeSean McCoy Sued by Ex-Girlfriend Delicia Cordon - Now Making Accusations of Being Physically Abused

[JoPar_v2]

14 minutes ago, CuddyDark said:

No implication. Clearly stated.

 

? yes it was clearly stated but the term has a few different meanings, I am asking you what you meant.

[CuddyDark]

2 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Yes. I remember that, but that's neither a proposal nor an engagement.   You best believe if she had been engaged it would have been all over her Instagram page.   

Again with facts as if you were there. You have no clue what they agreed to yet you speak with facts. She didn't do this so I know what I'm talking about is bull. You don't know ****. You believe McCoy. Say that and walk away.

 

She was living with McCoy in a house they shared. She had jewelry giving to her in contemplation of something, friendship? She says marriage, IDK. They're going to court, we'll see where it goes. Hopefully he's not implicated and he continues to be a play football.

[26CornerBlitz]

Just now, CuddyDark said:

Again with facts as if you were there. You have no clue what they agreed to yet you speak with facts. She didn't do this so I know what I'm talking about is bull. You don't know ****. You believe McCoy. Say that and walk away.

 

She was living with McCoy in a house they shared. She had jewelry giving to her in contemplation of something, friendship? She says marriage, IDK. They're going to court, we'll see where it goes. Hopefully he's not implicated and he continues to be a play football.

 

You are hilarious!  If a high profile NFL player such as LeSean McCoy were engaged to be married to this woman we would have heard about it from multiple sources.  More nonsense from you. 

[The Red King]

I think we can all agree it comes down to what we think.  But aa such, people are allowed to have their opinions and until actual facts surface no one opinion is any less valid then the other.  Personally, her antics, and specifically her changing her story one time too many destroyed any credibility in my eyes.  If there are people that want to believe McCoy had a hand in it, I'll not begrudge them that.  They're entitled to their opinion just as I am mine.  At the same time their opinion is just that, their opinion, and no more valid then mine.

[CuddyDark]

3 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

You are hilarious!  If a high profile NFL player such as LeSean McCoy were engaged to be married to this woman we would have heard about it from multiple sources.  More nonsense from you. 

Again, you use your opinion as fact.

[Buffalo86]

8 hours ago, Ned Flanders said:

"Cases won in 30 minutes or less or your pizza is free.  Here's your pizza Mrs. Simpson."

 

"But Mr. Hutz, you won the case."

 

"That's ok, the box is empty..."

 

Works on contingency? 

No, money down!

[26CornerBlitz]

1 hour ago, CuddyDark said:

Again, you use your opinion as fact.

 

He either was engaged or he was not as a matter of fact.  He wasn't.  You persist with nonsense. 

[Boca BIlls]

1 minute ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

He either was engaged or he was not as a matter of fact.  He wasn't.  You persist with nonsense. 

Exactly I doubt a woman like her would ever keep it a secret 

[26CornerBlitz]

1 minute ago, Boca BIlls said:

Exactly I doubt a woman like her would ever keep it a secret 

 

Not only that, we would have heard about it in both the entertainment and sports media.  We didn't because it didn't happen. 

[DC Tom]

8 hours ago, JoPar_v2 said:

What? Where did you hear they were engaged? I have only seen her described as an ex-girlfriend, but obviously I haven’t read everything connected to the case. And “trap”? What are you implying?

 

Apparently they supposedly had a conversation that included the word "marriage" in some form or another in the three days prior to her getting assaulted.

 

CuddyDark believes that constitutes "engagement."   Now I'm not suggesting that it might be because he's a thorough moron with hamburger for brains...but if someone else were to suggest it, after giving it all due consideration I might find that I agree with them.

7 hours ago, cba fan said:

This is likely what he was referencing.  https://heavy.com/sports/2018/07/lesean-mccoy-girlfriend-delicia-cordon/

 

Not clear if this marriage discussion led to a proposal and engagement but possibility exists it could have if it is true a substantial gift was given to her be McCoy at the time of the marriage discussion.

 

https://heavy.com/sports/2018/07/lesean-mccoy-girlfriend-delicia-cordon/

"Court docs show that McCoy is in the process of suing Cordon to try and gain back control of the home. Cordon lives in the home with her 16-year-old son. The docs say that on May 28, Cordon and McCoy had discussed marriage and that he gave her a “substantial gift.” Things went sour according to the documents on June 1 "

 

"The docs" in question are a single affidavit filed with the court in which Cordon and Cordon alone makes the claim with absolutely no corroborating evidence whatsoever.  That doesn't make them engaged.  

 

Even if true, "discussing marriage" does not make them engaged.  The discussion could have been "Leshawn, I'd like to marry you."  "Hell naw, B word, you's !@#$ing crazy."  And even that wasn't the discussion, and it was more "Leshawn, I'd like to marry you."  "That sounds like a good idea, maybe someday." they still wouldn't be engaged.  Because "discussion" does not make a couple engaged, ENGAGEMENT makes them engaged.

[Rocky Landing]

1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

 

Apparently they supposedly had a conversation that included the word "marriage" in some form or another in the three days prior to her getting assaulted.

 

CuddyDark believes that constitutes "engagement."   Now I'm not suggesting that it might be because he's a thorough moron with hamburger for brains...but if someone else were to suggest it, after giving it all due consideration I might find that I agree with them.

 

"The docs" in question are a single affidavit filed with the court in which Cordon and Cordon alone makes the claim with absolutely no corroborating evidence whatsoever.  That doesn't make them engaged.  

 

Even if true, "discussing marriage" does not make them engaged.  The discussion could have been "Leshawn, I'd like to marry you."  "Hell naw, B word, you's !@#$ing crazy."  And even that wasn't the discussion, and it was more "Leshawn, I'd like to marry you."  "That sounds like a good idea, maybe someday." they still wouldn't be engaged.  Because "discussion" does not make a couple engaged, ENGAGEMENT makes them engaged.

DC Tom, will you marry me???

[DC Tom]

26 minutes ago, Rocky Landing said:

DC Tom, will you marry me???

 

I would rather juggle live squid.

[BillsFan4]

1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

 

I would rather juggle live squid.

So, does that mean you two are engaged now? 

 

I say yes, it does.  

 

lol 

[Rocky Landing]

1 hour ago, BillsFan4 said:

So, does that mean you two are engaged now? 

 

I say yes, it does.  

 

lol 

 He played right into my hands!

Edited August 17, 2018 by Rocky Landing

[Hapless Bills Fan]

5 hours ago, Rocky Landing said:

 He played right into my hands!

 

Don’t you mean “my tentacles”?

[CuddyDark]

McCoy met this woman. He purchased a house with or for or because of this woman. He moved in said House with woman, as a couple. He purchased jewelry for said woman at the same time woman says they discussed marriage. He paid or sent goons to remove jewelry from said woman while also beating said woman. All facts. What was said between McCoy and said woman is unknown and what comes from tiny brains here about what is stated between the two is not fact. McCoy purchased her the house and the jewelry meaning despite the words spouted here it was McCoy who saw a future with this woman. Again editorializing fact as opinion does not make opinion fact.

[Foxx]

2 minutes ago, CuddyDark said:

McCoy met this woman. He purchased a house with or for or because of this woman. He moved in said House with woman, as a couple. He purchased jewelry for said woman at the same time woman says they discussed marriage. He paid or sent goons to remove jewelry from said woman while also beating said woman. All facts. What was said between McCoy and said woman is unknown and what comes from tiny brains here about what is stated between the two is not fact. McCoy purchased her the house and the jewelry meaning despite the words spouted here it was McCoy who saw a future with this woman. Again editorializing fact as opinion does not make opinion fact.

it's a fact that he paid goons to remove jewlery and beat the woman?

 

 

[Bills4Ever4Life]

5 minutes ago, Foxx said:

it's a fact that he paid goons to remove jewlery and beat the woman?

 

 

Exactly what I was thinking. Poster claims that we state opinions as fact and in the same post states AS A FACT that "He paid or sent goons to remove jewelry from said woman while also beating said woman.". lol this person sounds like they could be McCoy's ex or lawyer lol

Edit: Totally off topic but why am i on "Probation"? Is it just because I have so few posts and everyone starts out there?

Edited August 17, 2018 by Bills4Ever4Life

[Big Gun]

17 minutes ago, Foxx said:

it's a fact that he paid goons to remove jewlery and beat the woman?

 

 

Or the jewelry was on loan from a jewelry store.

[BillsFan17]

22 minutes ago, CuddyDark said:

McCoy met this woman. He purchased a house with or for or because of this woman. He moved in said House with woman, as a couple. He purchased jewelry for said woman at the same time woman says they discussed marriage. He paid or sent goons to remove jewelry from said woman while also beating said woman. All facts. What was said between McCoy and said woman is unknown and what comes from tiny brains here about what is stated between the two is not fact. McCoy purchased her the house and the jewelry meaning despite the words spouted here it was McCoy who saw a future with this woman. Again editorializing fact as opinion does not make opinion fact.

None of that is fact. Parading conjecture around as "fact" is a bad look.

[Rocky Landing]

25 minutes ago, CuddyDark said:

McCoy met this woman. He purchased a house with or for or because of this woman. He moved in said House with woman, as a couple. He purchased jewelry for said woman at the same time woman says they discussed marriage. He paid or sent goons to remove jewelry from said woman while also beating said woman. All facts. What was said between McCoy and said woman is unknown and what comes from tiny brains here about what is stated between the two is not fact. McCoy purchased her the house and the jewelry meaning despite the words spouted here it was McCoy who saw a future with this woman. Again editorializing fact as opinion does not make opinion fact.

I believe the above bolded is the only established fact.

 

P.S.- Would you officiate DC Tom's and my wedding? We're engaged, ya know! (by your standards, anyway)

[eball]

31 minutes ago, CuddyDark said:

McCoy met this woman. He purchased a house with or for or because of this woman. He moved in said House with woman, as a couple. He purchased jewelry for said woman at the same time woman says they discussed marriage. He paid or sent goons to remove jewelry from said woman while also beating said woman. All facts. What was said between McCoy and said woman is unknown and what comes from tiny brains here about what is stated between the two is not fact. McCoy purchased her the house and the jewelry meaning despite the words spouted here it was McCoy who saw a future with this woman. Again editorializing fact as opinion does not make opinion fact.

 

You taking "fact" lessons from Trump?

[Bills4Ever4Life]

2 minutes ago, Rocky Landing said:

I believe the above bolded is the only established fact.

 

P.S.- Would you officiate DC Tom's and my wedding? We're engaged, ya know! (by your standards, anyway)

You're cheating on me Rocky Landing?!?! I thought we were in love. Remember that one time when I posted and you responded and then you said "cool" ......now your marrying DC TOM?!?!  What is this world coming too?!?!

[26CornerBlitz]

46 minutes ago, CuddyDark said:

McCoy met this woman. He purchased a house with or for or because of this woman. He moved in said House with woman, as a couple. He purchased jewelry for said woman at the same time woman says they discussed marriage. He paid or sent goons to remove jewelry from said woman while also beating said woman. All facts. What was said between McCoy and said woman is unknown and what comes from tiny brains here about what is stated between the two is not fact. McCoy purchased her the house and the jewelry meaning despite the words spouted here it was McCoy who saw a future with this woman. Again editorializing fact as opinion does not make opinion fact.

 

What a bunch of conjectural nonsense.  The bolded from your post has to be a note to self. 

[Royale with Cheese]

52 minutes ago, CuddyDark said:

McCoy met this woman. He purchased a house with or for or because of this woman. He moved in said House with woman, as a couple. He purchased jewelry for said woman at the same time woman says they discussed marriage. He paid or sent goons to remove jewelry from said woman while also beating said woman. All facts. What was said between McCoy and said woman is unknown and what comes from tiny brains here about what is stated between the two is not fact. McCoy purchased her the house and the jewelry meaning despite the words spouted here it was McCoy who saw a future with this woman. Again editorializing fact as opinion does not make opinion fact.

 

Earlier on this page you criticized 26 for not knowing what a fact is yet you just demonstrated you don't know what one is.

You're a strong believer in only listening to one side of the story it looks like....

[DC Tom]

53 minutes ago, CuddyDark said:

McCoy met this woman. He purchased a house with or for or because of this woman. He moved in said House with woman, as a couple. He purchased jewelry for said woman at the same time woman says they discussed marriage. He paid or sent goons to remove jewelry from said woman while also beating said woman. All facts. What was said between McCoy and said woman is unknown and what comes from tiny brains here about what is stated between the two is not fact. McCoy purchased her the house and the jewelry meaning despite the words spouted here it was McCoy who saw a future with this woman. Again editorializing fact as opinion does not make opinion fact.

 

1) The bolded is not a fact.  It is your half-assed supposition.

2) None of that represents a binding proposal of marriage.

32 minutes ago, BillsFan17 said:

None of that is fact. Parading conjecture around as "fact" is a bad look.

 

There's at least two concrete facts in his post: McCoy met the woman, and the woman says they discussed marriage.

57 minutes ago, CuddyDark said:

McCoy met this woman. He purchased a house with or for or because of this woman. He moved in said House with woman, as a couple. He purchased jewelry for said woman at the same time woman says they discussed marriage. He paid or sent goons to remove jewelry from said woman while also beating said woman. All facts. What was said between McCoy and said woman is unknown and what comes from tiny brains here about what is stated between the two is not fact. McCoy purchased her the house and the jewelry meaning despite the words spouted here it was McCoy who saw a future with this woman. Again editorializing fact as opinion does not make opinion fact.

 

3) Even your tiny brain should be able to see how utterly ridiculous the bolded above is.  

[Doc]

The sad thing is that more than a few people believe the same “facts” as CD. 

[The Red King]

White knight syndrome.  Something horrible happens to a woman, and the women IDs the cause, some people will immediately believe them without a shred of evidence and lead the crusade to bring down the horrible ogre that did horrible things to the poor damsel.  They never stop to question, even slightly, if the victim is wrong about their attacker (be it honest mistake, assumption or outright lie), or if all the facts might not be accurate.  They see the victim, feel horrible for them, believe every word said without question, and berate anyone else who doesn't do the same as being insensitive to the victim.  Seen it many times in my life.  Hell, twice I was the white knight...and in the end it was revealed I was duped, both times.  Lesson (eventually) learned.

Edited August 17, 2018 by The Red King

[muppy]

2 hours ago, Bills4Ever4Life said:

Exactly what I was thinking. Poster claims that we state opinions as fact and in the same post states AS A FACT that "He paid or sent goons to remove jewelry from said woman while also beating said woman.". lol this person sounds like they could be McCoy's ex or lawyer lol

 

Quote

Edit: Totally off topic but why am i on "Probation"? Is it just because I have so few posts and everyone starts out there?

 

Yes it is because you have so few posts and all new posters start there. No worries.

[CuddyDark]

3 hours ago, Foxx said:

it's a fact that he paid goons to remove jewlery and beat the woman?

 

 

I said paid or sent. I don't know if he actually paid them. I go by the evidence. The evidence is he wanted the jewelry back, the same jewelry that was stolen at gun point.

2 hours ago, BillsFan17 said:

None of that is fact. Parading conjecture around as "fact" is a bad look.

What part is conjecture?

 

Did McCoy share a house with this woman? Yes.

 

Did McCoy buy her jewelry that was stolen at gun point? Yes.

 

 

15 minutes ago, The Red King said:

White knight syndrome.  Something horrible happens to a woman, and the women IDs the cause, some people will immediately believe them without a shred of evidence and lead the crusade to bring down the horrible ogre that did horrible things to the poor damsel.  They never stop to question, even slightly, if the victim is wrong about their attacker (be it honest mistake, assumption or outright lie), or if all the facts might not be accurate.  They see the victim, feel horrible for them, believe every word said without question, and berate anyone else who doesn't do the same as being insensitive to the victim.  Seen it many times in my life.  Hell, twice I was the white knight...and in the end it was revealed I was duped, both times.  Lesson (eventually) learned.

I don't care about the woman. I care about the facts. I think they deserve each other if you want to know what I believe.

2 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

Earlier on this page you criticized 26 for not knowing what a fact is yet you just demonstrated you don't know what one is.

You're a strong believer in only listening to one side of the story it looks like....

No you all are siding with McCoy's side because he plays for the Bills. I said many time WE don't know ****. I see facts. She met him. They lived together. Goons took jewelry at gunpoint that McCoy had previously asked the woman to return.

 

All you see it the Bills and McCoy. I don't care if he gets away with it, if he did it, or if he does 20 years.

[Royale with Cheese]

8 minutes ago, CuddyDark said:

No you all are siding with McCoy's side because he plays for the Bills. I said many time WE don't know ****. I see facts. She met him. They lived together. Goons took jewelry at gunpoint that McCoy had previously asked the woman to return.

 

All you see it the Bills and McCoy. I don't care if he gets away with it, if he did it, or if he does 20 years.

 

LOL....

 

Now you're changing your facts huh?  In the earlier reply, you specifically stated it was a "FACT" that McCoy sent the goons.

 

"He paid or sent goons to remove jewelry from said woman while also beating said woman. All facts."

 

 

 

[Rocky Landing]

2 hours ago, Bills4Ever4Life said:

You're cheating on me Rocky Landing?!?! I thought we were in love. Remember that one time when I posted and you responded and then you said "cool" ......now your marrying DC TOM?!?!  What is this world coming too?!?!

We never discussed the M word. 

 

Also, someone keyed my car this morning. I'm assuming that it was DC Tom, which makes it a proven fact. So, I guess the wedding is off. I'll start the litigation process this afternoon.

[Mr. WEO]

2 hours ago, Doc said:

The sad thing is that more than a few people believe the same “facts” as CD. 

 

They don't understand who the "most likely" culprit is.  Help them, doc...!

[CuddyDark]

20 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

LOL....

 

Now you're changing your facts huh?  In the earlier reply, you specifically stated it was a "FACT" that McCoy sent the goons.

 

"He paid or sent goons to remove jewelry from said woman while also beating said woman. All facts."

 

 

 

I did. Where's the change? We know the jewelry he asked for was taken at gunpoint. I stand by what I said there.

[Royale with Cheese]

7 minutes ago, CuddyDark said:

I did. Where's the change? We know the jewelry he asked for was taken at gunpoint. I stand by what I said there.

 

Where's the change?  In the first response you specifically stated McCoy sent them.  Then in this latest reply you stated you didn't mention McCoy sent the goons.

 

So lets throw the semantics aside and just answer this simple question.

 

Is it a FACT that McCoy sent those goons?  

[Tenhigh]

15 hours ago, Buffalo86 said:

 

Works on contingency? 

No, money down!

Lionel Hutz was the best. 

 

Hutz: Mrs. Simpson, in your own words, please tell us what happened after you and your husband were ejected from the restaurant.
Marge: We pretty much went straight home.
Hutz: Remember, Mrs. Simpson, you're still under oath.
Marge: We drove around until 3:00 in the morning looking for another open all-you-can-eat seafood restaurant.
Hutz: And when you couldn't find any?
Marge: (crying) We went fishing!
Hutz: Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, do these sound like the actions of a man who's had ALL he could eat?
Fat Juror: That could have been me!

[The Red King]

"I care about the facts."

 

What facts?!?  The woman was attacked...fact.  Every single other thing about this matter...heresay and conjecture.  There aren't even facts...there is a single fact.  One.

 

See, I have not, and will not say McCoy didn't do it, any more then I'll say he did.  Without facts, it's all speculation.  Due to her recent antics, especially changing her story I find her far less credable, but I can't say for certain she's lying.  And I've maintained that from the start.  But stating McCoy either attacked her or hired someone to as outright fact?  I love people who rant about people here already declaring him innocent, when they are already declaring him guilty.  Hypocracy at it's finest.

[Foxx]

2 hours ago, CuddyDark said:

...  I don't care if he gets away with it, if he did it, or if he does 20 years.

so, you don't care if he gets 20 years even if he had nothing to do with it? 

 

i think you should just quit while your behind. all your doing is digging the hole deeper.

Edited August 17, 2018 by Foxx

[The Red King]

Oh, should we toss some more facts out?  Fact, McCoy wanted her out of the house, and jewelry returned.  Fact, he was trying to evict her.  Fact, there was an eviction court hearing slated for the day after the attack.  Fact, the victim's story keeps changing, most recently with a newly added claim that the attacker outright said he knew McCoy, information that somehow did not come out right away.

 

Fact...the facts do not make things as clear-cut as some believe.

[CuddyDark]

36 minutes ago, Foxx said:

so, you don't care if he gets 20 years even if he had nothing to do with it? 

 

i think you should just quit while your behind. all your doing is digging the hole deeper.

I said "OR." Did you miss I said or? I'm not too bright but or is a conjunction joining two things, anyway I think it is. Like I said I'm not too bright on those kind of things. A conjunction joins two independent thoughts.

2 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

Where's the change?  In the first response you specifically stated McCoy sent them.  Then in this latest reply you stated you didn't mention McCoy sent the goons.

 

So lets throw the semantics aside and just answer this simple question.

 

Is it a FACT that McCoy sent those goons?  

I never said I don't believe he did not send them. So that I'm really clear I believe McCoy sent them. I don't know if they went for free or if he paid them is what I said in the earlier post.