Buffaloflash Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 40 minutes ago, Fadingpain said: Lots of men will side with Shady in this particular instance, or anyone in Shady's role in a situation like this, simply b/c they are misogynists but don't know it. So What,Who cares!
DC Tom Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 Just now, 26CornerBlitz said: You actually believe the general population makes less stupid decisions in everyday life? Famous people regradless of the field just happen to live life under the microscope, thus when one of them does something dumb, illegal, etc. more attention is drawn to the incident. The average person does three stupid things a day. Only done two so far today? You've got one more ahead of you. Done five stupid things today? You overachiever, you... 40 minutes ago, Fadingpain said: Lots of men will side with Shady in this particular instance, or anyone in Shady's role in a situation like this, simply b/c they are misogynists but don't know it. You don't even realize that "I don't know" is a side that can be chosen.
The Real Buffalo Joe Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: The average person does three stupid things a day. Only done two so far today? You've got one more ahead of you. Done five stupid things today? You overachiever, you... Does pressing F5 on this thread count as a stupid thing? Because if so, I'm good for the year.
transplantbillsfan Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: Woman was assaulted at home, we don't know who did it. Shady's associated with home and woman. That's still pretty much the sum total of what's known. And the woman is Shady's ex-girlfriend???? And his ex-girlfriend's best friend is the one making these accusations? And Shady is claiming he hasn't had direct contact with "anyone involved" for months??? Is that about it so far???
Lurker Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 4 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: You actually believe the general population makes less stupid decisions in everyday life? Famous people regradless of the field just happen to live life under the microscope, thus when one of them does something dumb, illegal, etc. more attention is drawn to the incident. This thread is ample proof of that premise... 1
HansLanda Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 Just now, transplantbillsfan said: And the woman is Shady's ex-girlfriend???? And his ex-girlfriend's best friend is the one making these accusations? And Shady is claiming he hasn't had direct contact with "anyone involved" for months??? Is that about it so far??? The only thing we know as true to this point is that Shady's dog is named Henny. Otherwise, it's all pretty murky. 1 3
The Real Buffalo Joe Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 Just now, HansLanda said: The only thing we know as true to this point is that Shady's dog is named Henny. Otherwise, it's all pretty murky. Heinz*
corta765 Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 20 minutes ago, Commonsense said: Suspended? I don’t see him playing in Buffalo if he is at all connected to this. McD is strict and Kim is the First Lady of the NFL. The league has been aggressive on DV they won’t want that image. If he told his buddies to go over and grab his stuff and they proceeded to beat her up then that is on them. If he told them to go there and hurt her then he is 100% at fault. 1st scenario would clear McCoy to the extent he didn't order a hit or anything and things got out of hand. NFL will suspend and its up to Bills if they keep him. The second he goes to prison. That's all I was saying and I agree any connection in anyway he is toast both NFL and potentially life wise.
T&C Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 13 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...something(s) have to lead the charge....door is only so wide, right??........... You just Had to say wide right... thanks man 2
DrDawkinstein Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 3 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: You actually believe the general population makes less stupid decisions in everyday life? Famous people regradless of the field just happen to live life under the microscope, thus when one of them does something dumb, illegal, etc. more attention is drawn to the incident. Not really, but given their greater resources, celebrity, free time, and egos, I feel like anything is possible and they have a greater chance of being involved in crazy ****.
BillsBytheBay Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 3 minutes ago, Fadingpain said: If he voluntarily lives in Jacksonville, FL, I would suggest "no". Militay bud. Besides, I love living here. It's clean, safe inexpensive, low cost of living, no income tax, beautiful... Thriving middle class, St parks, hell, tourists pay our taxes. I've lived all over, including New York, CT. And Mass... North Florida is awesome.... There is no influx of people moving up north. Not the same here.... It's funny. My northen family never want to vacation in New England. And they all plan to move here.
BillsFan130 Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 25 minutes ago, TheTruthHurts said: They won't be able to prove anything even if he was involved. Possibly. We’ll find out shortly I guess
DC Tom Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 4 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said: And the woman is Shady's ex-girlfriend???? And his ex-girlfriend's best friend is the one making these accusations? And Shady is claiming he hasn't had direct contact with "anyone involved" for months??? Is that about it so far??? And the ex-gf removed the security cameras from his house, and he's trying to evict her, and he was nowhere near her when she was assaulted. And he likes his women like he likes his coffee... 1
I Am The Liquor Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 NSFW language wise idk if that's against board rules sorry if it is. Watch From 2:18-3:24 and you'll see what I think happened. Was probably her friend that did it to her in a last ditch effort to F Shady out of all he's worth. Probably how the other female ended up with minor injuries too, the retaliation shot.
Buffalo_Stampede Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 19 minutes ago, DC Tom said: They can do a pretty good job proving he was involved even if he wasn't. Zero chance.
Saxum Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 40 minutes ago, Kevbeau said: Not the way it works...at least in Georgia. First hand experience. Due notice is still required and the squatee/rentee still has a few tricks they can try....and Georgia law is very friendly to owners/landlords. Same issue in Virginia. Renter who missed several rent payments promised to make up but then missed another payment. When we gave eviction notice we were told we had to give more notice and when she finally left she wrecked the house interior.
Guest Mike147 Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 14 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said: Completely different situations, imo. With both Brady and Winston the league knew they were SOMEHOW involved in SOMETHING. They just couldnt prove to what extent. In Shady's case, it will be about whether he was involved AT ALL. To use your own words, if the NFL thinks McCoy is somehow involved they will punish him. The only way he comes out of this without punishment is if the accusation is proven to be false. Any doubt whatsoever will leave it open for the league to punish him because they can't be seen to be giving players free passes on accusations such as this. It is arguably why they punished Winston because they couldn't ignore it. They thought he was involved, probably couldn't prove it in a court of law, but that was enough to punish him. Same goes for McCoy. If there's any doubt, there will be a punishment ban and/or a fine. I hope it's proven he was not involved but it's too early to say either way because we don't know whether these accusations are true or not.
dezertbill Posted July 10, 2018 Posted July 10, 2018 20 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said: Shady is evicting her legally. But he may also have items in the house that she's threatened to take or destroy. And so maybe he sent a guy to retrieve the items, not rough her up. But a confrontation ensued. I hope Shady's not involved in any way. But I'm not convinced. So here is my question for any legal aficionados out there. It's public knowledge that, when out of town, Shady has sent his people over to grab items from the home. Seeing this through cameras, she called police and this was stopped. No charges were filed against anyone, so I would have to assume that no laws were broken through their actions. Now, if the home is in Shady's name, and she is a "tenant", then they both share access. Also, if the home is in Shady's name, then he has authorization to allow someone access to the house with or without her knowledge (interpretation of Georgia law). Police reports say that the home was specifically targeted, and that the victim was asked for certain items. Based on this, there has to be some sense that this is an inside job. Yet, Shady hasn't been charged (or even hinted of being up for) any crimes. It's apparent from what is being filed in the courts, this woman feels entitled to this space and will not leave. She also feels entitled to personal possessions that Shady says are his, but she claims are hers and will not relinquish. So, here are my thoughts. Shady sends someone over to the home thinking she is in London (or perhaps she isn't home) looking to retrieve items in a home that is in his name. (Mind you, he may or may not have documentation via texts, VM, etc from her claiming she will destroy the items if he doesn't cooperate with her. It's a possibility.) She is there and confronts this individual. It's obvious through her fighting Shady in court, she isn't willing to relinquish these items easily. This individual then tells her he is going to take these items. She refuses to allow him to, and she initiates a physical confrontation with this person. This person is unwilling to sit idly by and allow her to physically attack him, so he responds with his own physical reaction. Obviously, with this person being stronger and larger than his girl, he causes more damage to her than she does to him. He then leaves, with or without the items. Now, due to the fact that this occurred in a home that Shady owns and there are legal proceedings currently in play, this isn't a slam dunk case for the police. There are a lot of pieces to try and fit together, specifically who has access to what, and who can allow people access to property that they own. My thoughts are, if there is an open court case regarding whether she has to relinquish belongings that Shady feels are his, then to send someone into the home and just "take" those items to me goes against court orders, and could possibly be deemed as theft...even though those items are in a home that Shady owns??? I sense that the police know a ton more than we do, and the semantics of this case make it difficult to just throw cuffs on someone. If this was her home, and someone broke in, then I truly believe that the police would be moving much faster. But because this home is owned by Shady, his rights are being weighed in on this. Also, could the police know who the assailant is, but are in a situation where A) He was authorized to enter the home by the home owner, so no law was broken there B). Is the possibility of her escalating the situation and causing first physical contact being taken into account???? Of course, the police are going to go off facts and not some social media post. If suspect was sent to the home to merely pick up belongings that Shady said were his, and he authorized him to be there, then I don't see that as a home invasion. I think as the days pass and more information comes out, we'll know just what the cops are thinking and whether or not this is an easier case to figure out than someone like myself who isn't a legal beagle.
Recommended Posts