Jump to content

LeSean McCoy allegations


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

I'm not denying that people harm themselves.  I've treated many such patients.

 

I'm saying tossing this out there as an as likely scenario (as has been posted here, is silly.

 

Also, are you saying that the images are faked and that the hospital staff assisted in the propagation of or could not recognize fake injuries?

 

The moon landing is still in question, so.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Kelly the Dog said:

I read and saw "The Lincoln Lawyer" and this idea that the girl beat herself up was the main defense by the client of the star of the movie, Matthew MacConaughey, who won the case, so it's entirely possible.

 

Sure his client was lying and actually did beat the **** out of the girl but that's not the point.

 

Sort of.

Is that the one where Edward Norton killed the priest then turned into Hannibal Lechter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Lurker said:

 

Having read the court document from her attorney, I think it's clear that shady is incredibly petty.  A couple key points...

 

Quote

The last time that the Defendant CORDON spoke to the Plaintiff was on the morning on June 1, 2018, when Plaintiff said that he was going to meet Defendant CORDON in Virginia to attend Defendant CORDON’s sister ’s graduation.

...

The police halted the removal of Defendant CORDON’s furniture and furnishings from the home on June 1, 2018. Plaintiff also has the electricity turned off at the residence.

 

1. According to his ex, McCoy never broke it off, he just stopped communicating (this is provable, and seems like a weird thing to lie about... not a good look for shady)

2. According to his ex, McCoy had not asked her to move out (this... seems wrong, and what you might say if you're squatting...but that's what she's alleging)

3. According to his ex, McCoy hired movers to remove her stuff (again, bizarre that he did so without telling her to move out...allegedly)

4. According to his ex, McCoy turned off the electricity, despite her living there with her kids

 

A few of those details, especially the bit about turning off her electricity, seem incredibly petty but not outside of the realm of an attempt to evict.  The part that is most tricky to me is how it all started so suddenly and how little communication she alleges that she had with McCoy.

 

 McCoy's lack of empathy to the ex is a notable fact of the "case", and I feel like a clear motive is easily provable.  I think it's entirely possible that McCoy could be responsible for sending someone to the house, but it seems unlikely he would've have left an obvious trail of communication.

 

As of tonight there has been no evidence released that suggests McCoy is at all involved, and I think that conjecture from the original instagram post and the lack of empathy in this story overall could lead to a suspension as an investigation digs a little deeper.  It does seem though, that apart from tying him to the beating/robbing, there would be any reason to assume any criminal charges will come about.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, The Red King said:

 

Whelp, then let's just change all instances of "self-inflicted" to "arranged to have do her herself".  Doesn't change the plausibility of it in the least.  Now you discuss the point rather then quibble over wordplay.

 

Entirely plausible, and just like the victim, supported with absolutely no hard facts.  Hell, you just proved my point for me.  Thanks!

 

 

Surrendering your face to the fist of another, whether you are consenting or not, is not the same as you actually damaging yourself to that degree.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MURPHD6 said:

I don't know and I suspect that you don't know either. And I'm not about to take the internets word for it.

It was in the document. It was his buddy from the Philly incident who filed.

 

image.thumb.png.fe8640fa3730c051b264182e0fd05ced.png

Edited by Uncle Joe
add snip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MURPHD6 said:

I don't know and I suspect that you don't know either. And I'm not about to take the internets word for it. Either way these things can be checked out. Having a friend file an eviction notice and not your lawyer when you are a millionaire sounds a bit off and silly, but it could have happened. What's specified could matter in court, but all he needs is charges filed and he's likely gone. And if that is in fact the document the return of items sentence could be enough to charge him. 

 

Not true at all. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MURPHD6 said:

I don't know and I suspect that you don't know either. And I'm not about to take the internets word for it.

 

It says right on the eviction request affidavit (and the GF's lawyer also attests to this in her motion) that it was filed byTamarcus Porter, who happens to be a friend of McCoy's...

 

1-250bdc8f76.png

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ol Dirty B said:

 

Well the only property I've seen rumored in the dispute and the police report was jewelry. And that she has bruising on her wrists from someone trying to take it off her.

 

If it was furniture or something I'd completely agree with your point. But if we're talking rings, necklaces, and bracelets. It's hard to get that without her being in town usually.

 

Granted that's all just hearsay at this point.

 

Not everyone wears all their jewelry all the time.  Particularly expensive gifts.  

 

Most of these observations I make are not to say to people "You're wrong," but to point out "You're making assumptions, and in doing so discarding other plausible theories."  Why would you assume she'd wear jewelry gifted to her, worth five figures, on a jaunt to London?

 

For that matter...why the hell was she wearing it at 3:30 in the morning?  Who wears expensive bracelets while they're sleeping?  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, fridge said:

 

Having read the court document from her attorney, I think it's clear that shady is incredibly petty.  A couple key points...

 

 

1. According to his ex, McCoy never broke it off, he just stopped communicating (this is provable, and seems like a weird thing to lie about... not a good look for shady)

2. According to his ex, McCoy had not asked her to move out (this... seems wrong, and what you might say if you're squatting...but that's what she's alleging)

3. According to his ex, McCoy hired movers to remove her stuff (again, bizarre that he did so without telling her to move out...allegedly)

4. According to his ex, McCoy turned off the electricity, despite her living there with her kids

 

A few of those details, especially the bit about turning off her electricity, seem incredibly petty but not outside of the realm of an attempt to evict.  The part that is most tricky to me is how it all started so suddenly and how little communication she alleges that she had with McCoy.

 

 McCoy's lack of empathy to the ex is a notable fact of the "case", and I feel like a clear motive is easily provable.  I think it's entirely possible that McCoy could be responsible for sending someone to the house, but it seems unlikely he would've have left an obvious trail of communication.

 

As of tonight there has been no evidence released that suggests McCoy is at all involved, and I think that conjecture from the original instagram post and the lack of empathy in this story overall could lead to a suspension as an investigation digs a little deeper.  It does seem though, that apart from tying him to the beating/robbing, there would be any reason to assume any criminal charges will come about.

 

 

 

So...the attorney of a woman being evicted by McCoy painted McCoy as a bad guy?  No big shock there.  That's part of their job.  When you cherry pick things and put a spin on as harsh as a washing machine you can make a saint look like Satan, and lawyers are the best at that.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Boatdrinks said:

Not sure how much empathy someone should have for an ex that they’ve had to take to court to evict. 

 

It goes to show how foolish these guys are to have more than a few key people surrounding them. THIS is how guys make gazillions and still wind up broke. I hope Shady is generally smarter than that. Funding all the “hangers on” is bad business and a bad decision. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

You don't consider a person doing that type of damage to themselves, by far, the LEAST likely of the three?

 

 

Audio?

There was a case a while back where a guy killed his family and had his friend shoot him so he would look like a victim.

 

There was another case where a woman accused her husband of beating her and had the bruises to prove it until video surfaced of her inflicting her own wounds.

 

These cases are rare, but they do happen. With how little we know about this case, and how odd what we do know is, no decent person would be quick to jump to conclusions.

 

FTR, I don't find it much harder to believe that someone would take a beating like that if they thought they'd get millions of dollars than to believe a multi-millionaire celebrity would risk everything for some jewelry and an expedited eviction. Both are pretty bizarre. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

Not sure how much empathy someone should have for an ex that they’ve had to take to court to evict. 

The best choice for her was to move on. Then again I wasn't her having kids and probably living in a nice house surrounded by comfort. 

 

So in a way it's like yea, you were just a girlfriend but he let her move in and gave her the wife treatment no doubt. In a way you kind of have it coming as a person if those are the choices you make. 

 

If he let her live free and didn't help her get on her feet enough to move on her own then he brought it on himself. 

Edited by Lfod
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

I'm not denying that people harm themselves.  I've treated many such patients.

 

I'm saying tossing this out there as an as likely scenario (as has been posted here, is silly.

 

Also, are you saying that the images are faked and that the hospital staff assisted in the propagation of or could not recognize fake injuries?

 

 

Again, I'm not arguing that it is not possible, but really less likely.

 

I could be wrong.

 

I've said repeatedly that it's unlikely.  Generally, with a level of self-injury this extreme, the story would break down pretty rapidly, and the self-inflicted nature of such an injury would be distinguishable.  

 

But I'm not dismissing it on the basis of "no one would EVER do that to themselves."  Because that's stupid reasoning.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Red King said:

 

So...the attorney of a woman being evicted by McCoy painted McCoy as a bad guy?  No big shock there.  That's part of their job.  When you cherry pick things and put a spin on as harsh as a washing machine you can make a saint look like Satan, and lawyers are the best at that.

 

I agree, which is why I didn't include everything in the document.

 

I was just trying to list out some of the details from their side that seemed to get overlooked, like shady shutting off the electricity on them less than a month after he "ghosted" her completely.  Again, and I stated it every time I brought it up in my post - this is all according to her and her attorney.  She could be crazy, I'm not ruling that out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rob's House said:

These cases are rare, but they do happen. With how little we know about this case, and how odd what we do know is, no decent person would be quick to jump to conclusions.

 

This.  All the this.  I'm not saying McCoy is innocent.  I'm saying there are too many plausible scenarios here to be able to declare with certainty whether or not McCoy was responsible.  Most of us are simply waiting until there is hard evidence before deciding.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Red King said:

 

So...the attorney of a woman being evicted by McCoy painted McCoy as a bad guy?  No big shock there.  That's part of their job.  When you cherry pick things and put a spin on as harsh as a washing machine you can make a saint look like Satan, and lawyers are the best at that.

 

That seems pretty self-evident.   But it's amazing how many people just nod their head and say, "yep, that right..."

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

I've said repeatedly that it's unlikely.  Generally, with a level of self-injury this extreme, the story would break down pretty rapidly, and the self-inflicted nature of such an injury would be distinguishable.  

 

But I'm not dismissing it on the basis of "no one would EVER do that to themselves."  Because that's stupid reasoning.  

 

I didn't say that.

 

I was just indicating my surprise that it would be put out there as a plausible possibility in this case.  It's a possibility, but not a plausible one.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...