boyst Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, /dev/null said: 50-48 https://goo.gl/images/F6eQ5Q Edited October 6, 2018 by Boyst62 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albwan Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 (edited) PARTY DUDES ! Edited October 6, 2018 by Albwan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 24 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: The gallery is brought in every 5 minutes to observe democracy in action as the guests of the congressional delegates. Watch Mr Smith goes to watching you ignorant swine. I've watched it a number of times, but I don't see the significance.... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaoulDuke79 Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 Good triumphs again.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 3 hours ago, LSHMEAB said: But that's not true. Bill Gates lives in a relatively populous state while the dude living under the overpass in Wyoming does not. So the dude living under the overpass in Cheyenne has MORE of a say than Bill Gates based on the electoral college. Not only that, the dude living under the overpass in Cheyenne is represented by the same number of senators as the overpass dwelling transient in Los Angeles despite the fact that 20 million people live in CA compared to 580k in Wyoming. The whole system has allowed Bridgy Bill in Cheyenne to choose our leaders; thus Trump. The fact that you continue to analyze the electoral college by individual votes shows that you really don't understand the US Constitution at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 Prediction: If Democrats retake all three branches they will increase the number of Supreme Court Justices to give them a majority citing McConnell's refusal to hold a vote on Garland as the betrayal of 150 years of an unspoken agreement between the parties of the Supreme Court appointment process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 1 minute ago, Koko78 said: The fact that you continue to analyze the electoral college by individual votes shows that you really don't understand the US Constitution at all. Easy on him... As you know, kids are taught now that our nation is a democracy so the ignorance is only partially self inflicted.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaoulDuke79 Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 Now we can sit back and watch people destroy.....ooops I mean protest their own communities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bray Wyatt Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 2 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: Prediction: If Democrats retake all three branches they will increase the number of Supreme Court Justices to give them a majority citing McConnell's refusal to hold a vote on Garland as the betrayal of 150 years of an unspoken agreement between the parties of the Supreme Court appointment process. Except they can’t pack the court, FDR tried and it was ruled unconstitutional Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 (edited) C'mon Capitol police , bring out the tear gas, fire hoses and police dogs! Edited October 6, 2018 by Wacka Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaoulDuke79 Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 1 minute ago, Wacka said: C'mon Capitol police , bring out the tear gas, fire hoses and police dogs! And batons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 1 minute ago, Wacka said: C'mon Capitol police , bring out the tear gas, fire hoses and police dogs! Is it that bad? I turned it off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 Who were the 2 that didn't vote? Assuming Manchin & Murkowski were a yea & nay respectively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bray Wyatt Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 1 minute ago, Taro T said: Who were the 2 that didn't vote? Assuming Manchin & Murkowski were a yea & nay respectively. The montana guy didn’t show up and murkowski didn’t vote I believe 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 1 minute ago, Taro T said: Who were the 2 that didn't vote? Assuming Manchin & Murkowski were a yea & nay respectively. Montana Senator at his daughter's funeral was one non-vote Murkowski voted an Obamaesque "present" 10 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: Prediction: If Democrats retake all three branches they will increase the number of Supreme Court Justices to give them a majority citing McConnell's refusal to hold a vote on Garland as the betrayal of 150 years of an unspoken agreement between the parties of the Supreme Court appointment process. And when the pendulum swings back again the Republicans follow suit When does it stop? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 6 minutes ago, Bray Wyatt said: Except they can’t pack the court, FDR tried and it was ruled unconstitutional It wasn't. The Democrats started to revolt against FDR, so he dropped it. The Constitution does not specify the number or makeup of federal courts (including the Supreme Court.) It's up to Congress to legislate how many district courts, circuit courts and supreme court justices there are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaoulDuke79 Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 I'm floored by the number of extremely homely "victims" out there protesting. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 2 minutes ago, /dev/null said: Montana Senator at his daughter's funeral wedding was one non-vote Murkowski voted an Obamaesque "present" FIFY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 3 minutes ago, /dev/null said: Montana Senator at his daughter's funeral was one non-vote Murkowski voted an Obamaesque "present" And when the pendulum swings back again the Republicans follow suit When does it stop? I'd consider a wedding to be the end of one person's life therefore a funeral. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 8 minutes ago, Bray Wyatt said: Except they can’t pack the court, FDR tried and it was ruled unconstitutional No it wasn't. 3 minutes ago, /dev/null said: And when the pendulum swings back again the Republicans follow suit When does it stop? Exactly. It's a slippery slope. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 1 minute ago, Cinga said: FIFY thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdutton Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 #Winning 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 7 minutes ago, bdutton said: #Winning I'm not tired of winning yet. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 (edited) I do like how Trump is always willing to give people cover and take any "blame" onto himself: Edited October 6, 2018 by Buffalo_Gal 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 1 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bray Wyatt Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 37 minutes ago, Koko78 said: It wasn't. The Democrats started to revolt against FDR, so he dropped it. The Constitution does not specify the number or makeup of federal courts (including the Supreme Court.) It's up to Congress to legislate how many district courts, circuit courts and supreme court justices there are. Oh thanks didn’t know that is what happened, was going off memory (obviously incorrect ones lol) What would be needed to pass that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MILFHUNTER#518 Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 Looks like Mitch McConnell's balls dropped this week 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSHMEAB Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 (edited) 3 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said: As an aside, you're letting your inner authoritarian show by asserting that people not living in costal urban centers should have no say in how they are governed, and instead those people living in "****ty states" should be dictated to by their betters. No. What YOU are doing is asserting that people who live in Wyoming should have more of a say than someone who lives in New York. The majority of the country votes democratic and yet the right holds all three branches of government. That is fundamentally unfair. I understand that you like it because it benefits your ideology, but our government does not represent the will of the people. That's unfortunate. Edited October 6, 2018 by LSHMEAB 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 1 hour ago, Boyst62 said: Is it that bad? I turned it off No, I just want to see the cops bust some lib heads!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted October 6, 2018 Author Share Posted October 6, 2018 4 hours ago, LSHMEAB said: But that's not true. Bill Gates lives in a relatively populous state while the dude living under the overpass in Wyoming does not. So the dude living under the overpass in Cheyenne has MORE of a say than Bill Gates based on the electoral college. Not only that, the dude living under the overpass in Cheyenne is represented by the same number of senators as the overpass dwelling transient in Los Angeles despite the fact that 20 million people live in CA compared to 580k in Wyoming. The whole system has allowed Bridgy Bill in Cheyenne to choose our leaders; thus Trump. So maybe the little states should lose some of their Congressional Representatives that are decided on population too. And of course California, New York and the other more populous states should get more Senators too. You’re an idiot Tom, I owe you a beer or a copywrite payment. 59 minutes ago, RaoulDuke79 said: I'm floored by the number of extremely homely "victims" out there protesting. That’s what makes them “victims.” 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSHMEAB Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 3 hours ago, Foxx said: thats right, damn it! you are all guilty until proven innocent. sheesh where the hell you been living, under a rock these last few weeks (years)? I try to be as consistent as possible and the presumption of innocence is pretty damn important to our republic. It would be nice if everyone was consistent in their beliefs. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 (edited) 15 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said: No. What YOU are doing is asserting that people who live in Wyoming should have more of a say than someone who lives in New York. The majority of the country votes democratic and yet the right has all three branches of government, and the Supreme Court. That is fundamentally unfair. I understand that you like it because it benefits your ideology, but our government does not represent the will of the people. That's unfortunate. You do realize that Democrats got clobbered in the '10 and '14 midterms by a large gap and that's a major reason the GOP controls the House and Senate. My problem with Democrats is they only seem to realize there's an election every four years. The complacency by Democratic voters is the reason we're in the minority in all three branches today. Stop whining and vote. Bring some friends. I'm going to bring my undocumented gardener. Edited October 6, 2018 by Doc Brown 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 10 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said: No. What YOU are doing is asserting that people who live in Wyoming should have more of a say than someone who lives in New York. The majority of the country votes democratic and yet the right has all three branches of government, and the Supreme Court. That is fundamentally unfair. I understand that you like it because it benefits your ideology, but our government does not represent the will of the people. That's unfortunate. So the Republicans having a majority directly elected in the House of Representatives - the only portion of the government that was ever meant to be directly elected by the people - is "fundamentally unfair"? That the Republicans have a majority in the Senate, now directly elected by the people, is "fundamentally unfair"? All because Hillary got more meaningless "popular" votes in an election that has never, ever, been decided by a popular vote? Your lack of understanding of the US government is going far beyond sheer stupidity. You're rapidly approaching Gator territory with this idiocy. However, with that said, please continue. Liberal tears taste so good, especially on a glorious day like today. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 13 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said: No. What YOU are doing is asserting that people who live in Wyoming should have more of a say than someone who lives in New York. The majority of the country votes democratic and yet the right holds all three branches of government. That is fundamentally unfair. I understand that you like it because it benefits your ideology, but our government does not represent the will of the people. That's unfortunate. !@#$ the will of the people. The so-called "people" want to force authoritarian rule upon their neighbors and feel they are oppressed because they are unable to do so. Their goal is to have a Federal government without constitutional restraints so that they may impose their will upon others. Their will is illegitimate. The imposition of one's will on another is the essence of evil. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prickly Pete Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 24 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said: No. What YOU are doing is asserting that people who live in Wyoming should have more of a say than someone who lives in New York. The majority of the country votes democratic and yet the right holds all three branches of government. That is fundamentally unfair. I understand that you like it because it benefits your ideology, but our government does not represent the will of the people. That's unfortunate. "Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 Comfortably Smug @ComfortablySmug Cocaine Mitch is completely unstoppable. You can now say without a doubt he's the most effective and powerful senate majority leader we've ever had. Quote Tweet Nicholas Fandos @npfandos While White House staff and his own are celebrating in private rooms around the Senate, Mitch McConnell is still on the Senate floor advancing more Trump nominees. 5:22 PM · Oct 6, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 44 minutes ago, LSHMEAB said: No. What YOU are doing is asserting that people who live in Wyoming should have more of a say than someone who lives in New York. The majority of the country votes democratic and yet the right holds all three branches of government. That is fundamentally unfair. I understand that you like it because it benefits your ideology, but our government does not represent the will of the people. That's unfortunate. That's what REPRESENTATIVES are for. Wyoming has two senators. NY has two senators. Wyoming has one representative. NY has 27 representatives. That is where the "will of the people" is expressed. You're complaining about a problem that doesn't exist. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 Ok, someone has a little too much time on his hands, but these are funny - especially the Bee Gees and Janis Joplin ones (long thread): 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 17 minutes ago, DC Tom said: That's what REPRESENTATIVES are for. Wyoming has two senators. NY has two senators. Wyoming has one representative. NY has 27 representatives. That is where the "will of the people" is expressed. You're complaining about a problem that doesn't exist. Remember when they used to teach basic civics in grade school? The era of hyper self esteem means these people are too full of themselves to realize how !@#$ing stupid they are. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts