Jump to content

CNN losing credibility as each day passes... Its pure propaganda at this point


Recommended Posts

Coming soon to CNN, an exciting new show! Our intrepid reporter goes around the country asking every woman and child he can find one question:

 

Where did the Orange Man Touch you?

 

Hosted by Jim Acoster.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Teddy KGB said:

 

The problem with that story is that is it not true. 

 

Quote

 

The move came just hours after Acosta, CNN's chief White House correspondent, drew the ire of President Donald Trump and his allies by asking multiple questions at a post-midterms news conference.

 

 

Acosta didn't ask him multiple questions. He made multiple statements. Journalists ask questions. Activists makes statements.

 

Figure out the difference, nutbags.

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

That video looks doctored to me as they seemed to slow it down when he approaches the woman and then speed it up to make it look like a karate chop.  Regardless, just on decorum, Acosta needed to go.  

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, snafu said:

I miss the shoutbox at the top of the page. The one thing I don't like about the redesign.  That and the posts aren't numbered anymore. 

 

Two things.

 

 

And the ashtray

Shoutbox not at the top, posts aren't numbered, and the ashtray

 

And this paddle game

Shoutbox not at the top, posts aren't numbered, the ashtray, and this paddle game...

  • Haha (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

 

And the ashtray

Shoutbox not at the top, posts aren't numbered, and the ashtray

 

And this paddle game

Shoutbox not at the top, posts aren't numbered, the ashtray, and this paddle game...

And this. I definitely need this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

That video looks doctored to me as they seemed to slow it down when he approaches the woman and then speed it up to make it look like a karate chop.  Regardless, just on decorum, Acosta needed to go.  


Unlike many, I do not think he assaulted her (yeah, yeah, I know that according to many laws unwanted touching of any kind can be considered assault, this is JMO). However, as you said, on decorum alone (I swore he was gonna fight her for that microphone!), Acosta needed a time-out.

The people defending him on Twitter are probably the same people that swore Corey Lewandowski broke off Michelle Fields' arm and left her bloodied on the floor. SMH

Jim Acosta is a nasty little piece of work that would do better as a talking-head on some round-table program. That way, when he makes the story all about him, it would make more sense.  He clearly does not understand that you can be tenacious and ask pertinent questions without being rude and disrespectful.  Many of these journalists need a refresher course in respect for the White House and Presidency. You do not have to respect the person personally (say that three times fast!), but you do have to respect the office.  Jim Acosta is just the worst of the lot.



Here's the real-time video where you can see him pressing down on her arm and pulling the mic closer to him (like he was gonna cuddle it). Look below the video of his making the SS guy work to get the hard pass back.
 

 

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

That video looks doctored to me as they seemed to slow it down when he approaches the woman and then speed it up to make it look like a karate chop.  Regardless, just on decorum, Acosta needed to go.  

 

They did that to show that Acoster (and CNN) were lying about him not touching the intern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

They did that to show that Acoster (and CNN) were lying about him not touching the intern.

But, but, but... according to the comments SHE invaded HIS space and SHE touched HIM! It was a set-up! Nothing short of a trap for poor Jimmy the Acoster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Quote

 

Now that Jim @Acosta's hard pass has been suspended, who's next? Which reporter might be next? https://mailchi.mp/cnn/rs-nov-7-2018 …

 

 

 

.

Well Brian, that would be the next reporter who acts out at a press conference..............................simple

 

 

.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The conduct of a handful of so-called reporters during President Trump’s news conference was disgraceful beyond measure. This is not journalism, this is narcissism.

 

Naturally, the boorish Jim Acosta of CNN was the instigator. As is his habit, Acosta doesn’t ask questions — he makes accusations and argues. Almost daily, he does it with the press secretary; Wednesday, he did it with the president.

 

“I want to challenge you,” Acosta began after Trump called on him. Trump realized he’d made a mistake, murmuring, “Here we go,” and Acosta didn’t disappoint.

 

He insisted that despite the president’s use of the word “invasion,” the caravan of Central American migrants “is not an invasion.”

 

He adopted a lecturing, I-know-best tone to declare that “they’re hundreds and hundreds of miles away; that’s not an invasion.”

 

Trump’s response should not have been necessary: “Honestly, I think you should let me run the country, you run CNN.”

 

https://nypost.com/2018/11/07/jim-acosta-violated-one-of-the-oldest-rules-of-journalism/

 

 

 

 

 

Quote

 

 

I don’t think they should revoke his WH pass. Revoking press access for being rude is a very slippery slope. But the WH pass is to cover the news,not make yourself the news. His tweet & his behavior is what you expect from an activist,not a journalist.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, njbuff said:

And, of course, the scumbag Acosta goes on his pitiful network and claims victimhood.

 

What a POS he is and the WH should NEVER allow his ass back in.

 

CNN should never allow his ass to go back in.  Put him behind a desk in front of the camera, and make him the pundit he is.  

 

And the White House idiots shouldn't have reduced this to a single issue of "he touched a girl!"  Given his history of disruptive, unprofessional behavior, they should have simply said "We're revoking his access, as he continually exhibits behavior that is disruptive and disrespectful to the rest of the White House press pool.  We encourage CNN to assign as their representative an adult who will respect the rights of others in the press pool."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, snafu said:

 

Okay, but only until someone spots Jim Acosta at an Antifa protest.

 

he really should have been wearing a black hood to the pressers.

 

 

15 hours ago, snafu said:

... That and the posts aren't numbered anymore. ...

 

technically, they have to be. it is just that it is somewhat hidden to you. your post is #5460234

 

Edited by Foxx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Unlike many, I do not think he assaulted her (yeah, yeah, I know that according to many laws unwanted touching of any kind can be considered assault, this is JMO). However, as you said, on decorum alone (I swore he was gonna fight her for that microphone!), Acosta needed a time-out.

The people defending him on Twitter are probably the same people that swore Corey Lewandowski broke off Michelle Fields' arm and left her bloodied on the floor. SMH

Jim Acosta is a nasty little piece of work that would do better as a talking-head on some round-table program. That way, when he makes the story all about him, it would make more sense.  He clearly does not understand that you can be tenacious and ask pertinent questions without being rude and disrespectful.  Many of these journalists need a refresher course in respect for the White House and Presidency. You do not have to respect the person personally (say that three times fast!), but you do have to respect the office.  Jim Acosta is just the worst of the lot.



Here's the real-time video where you can see him pressing down on her arm and pulling the mic closer to him (like he was gonna cuddle it). Look below the video of his making the SS guy work to get the hard pass back.
 

 

 

That actually might be an edited/doctored video.  More on why later. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

 

CNN should never allow his ass to go back in.  Put him behind a desk in front of the camera, and make him the pundit he is.  

 

And the White House idiots shouldn't have reduced this to a single issue of "he touched a girl!"  Given his history of disruptive, unprofessional behavior, they should have simply said "We're revoking his access, as he continually exhibits behavior that is disruptive and disrespectful to the rest of the White House press pool.  We encourage CNN to assign as their representative an adult who will respect the rights of others in the press pool."

I agree and that would've been the better statement instead of claiming assault.  People are now rolling their eyes with the assault claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

I agree and that would've been the better statement instead of claiming assault.  People are now rolling their eyes with the assault claim.

 

In the administration's defense...if you reverse the politics, you know progressives would be screaming "assault."  It's an opportunity to hold the proglodytes accountable for their own stupidity.

 

It's just not an opportunity the administration should have availed themselves of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Unlike many, I do not think he assaulted her (yeah, yeah, I know that according to many laws unwanted touching of any kind can be considered assault, this is JMO). However, as you said, on decorum alone (I swore he was gonna fight her for that microphone!), Acosta needed a time-out.

The people defending him on Twitter are probably the same people that swore Corey Lewandowski broke off Michelle Fields' arm and left her bloodied on the floor. SMH

Jim Acosta is a nasty little piece of work that would do better as a talking-head on some round-table program. That way, when he makes the story all about him, it would make more sense.  He clearly does not understand that you can be tenacious and ask pertinent questions without being rude and disrespectful.  Many of these journalists need a refresher course in respect for the White House and Presidency. You do not have to respect the person personally (say that three times fast!), but you do have to respect the office.  Jim Acosta is just the worst of the lot.



Here's the real-time video where you can see him pressing down on her arm and pulling the mic closer to him (like he was gonna cuddle it). Look below the video of his making the SS guy work to get the hard pass back.
 

 

It's not assault, it was never assault, it should never be considered assault and calling so is an affront to actual assault victims.  You cannot have serious dialogue when the rules change to include boorish behavior as assault.  I'm only me, I only speak for me but if my daughter--roughly try same age as this young lady appears to be---showed me that video and spoke of assault I would tell her to toughen up and recognize the difference. 

 

Agree that the WH was well within their rights to put Acosta on ice for a bit.  These conferences are a dog and pony show anyway, with one jackass shouting louder than another jackass looking for a soundbite to hammer someone with later on. 

 

Trump was civil and decent to Acosta and have him several chances to act professionally. Acosta chose not to. AMD btw these people are so incredibly soft and weak at times it makes me laugh. They are the veal of the professional world. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

It's not assault, it was never assault, it should never be considered assault and calling so is an affront to actual assault victims. 

 

This is absolutely correct. Here's the problem: the left proved with Kavanaugh that they have absolutely no boundaries for histrionics. Countless lies were told by them -- paid for by them -- and everyone ran with it. He was portrayed as a convinced gang rapist alcoholic.

 

The left will never, ever, ever stop being disingenuous and careless with other people's lives until they truly have skin in the game.

 

Today's skin is Acosta. You beat the ever-loving snotschitt out of him with assault accusations and maybe, just maybe, a few people on the left will realize what they are really doing to innocent people.

 

I would't count on it, but it's time to beat them silly with their own bat. I despite that I'm writing this, but I'm tired of the right being the coward of the county.

Edited by LABillzFan
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

It's not assault, it was never assault, it should never be considered assault and calling so is an affront to actual assault victims.  You cannot have serious dialogue when the rules change to include boorish behavior as assault.  I'm only me, I only speak for me but if my daughter--roughly try same age as this young lady appears to be---showed me that video and spoke of assault I would tell her to toughen up and recognize the difference.

 

#IBelieveHer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it wasn't assault.

 

What it was, however, was a very visual escalation in the rise of Jim Acosta's openly hostile incivility, which happened to be physical in nature; it was absolutely outside the realm of acceptable decorum addressing the President of the United States in the White House.

 

He should not be given back his credentials, ever.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

It's not assault, it was never assault, it should never be considered assault and calling so is an affront to actual assault victims.  You cannot have serious dialogue when the rules change to include boorish behavior as assault.  I'm only me, I only speak for me but if my daughter--roughly try same age as this young lady appears to be---showed me that video and spoke of assault I would tell her to toughen up and recognize the difference. 

 

Agree that the WH was well within their rights to put Acosta on ice for a bit.  These conferences are a dog and pony show anyway, with one jackass shouting louder than another jackass looking for a soundbite to hammer someone with later on. 

 

Trump was civil and decent to Acosta and have him several chances to act professionally. Acosta chose not to. AMD btw these people are so incredibly soft and weak at times it makes me laugh. They are the veal of the professional world. 

 

You aint woke.     

 

Looks like rape to me.   

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Teddy KGB said:

 

You aint woke.     

 

Looks like rape to me.   

 

Read a story recently from a woman who claimed she was sexually assaulted by her boyfriend because he refused to have sex with her unless she wore his favorite eye shadow.

 

If "refusing to have sex with someone" is sexual assault, then what Acosta did was definitely rape, and probably attempted murder.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Teddy KGB said:

 

You aint woke.     

 

Looks like rape to me.   

 

Not just a rape, but a gang rape. Look at all the people present for the rape.

 

Almost like Acoster attended a gang rape party!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chandemonium said:

One thing is clear in his defense: at least he went  out of his way to avoid slipping her the mickey.

 

I think we need the FBI Police to investigate whether or not he was passing out drinks to that poor intern. His "hard pass" will just have to remain revoked until the full and thorough investigation is completed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Foxx said:

that's a pretty bold statement to just drop and run on.

 

After further and very close review I don't see the evidence of alteration in the video that I thought I did.  More likely just crappy resolution from 2001 era camera.  It could be an older camera than that but picked that date because Clinton probably didn't have cameras in place. 

Edited by keepthefaith
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

No, it wasn't assault.

 

What it was, however, was a very visual escalation in the rise of Jim Acosta's openly hostile incivility, which happened to be physical in nature; it was absolutely outside the realm of acceptable decorum addressing the President of the United States in the White House.

 

He should not be given back his credentials, ever.

My microphone, MINE!
 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, keepthefaith said:

 

That actually might be an edited/doctored video.  More on why later. 

 

Through who-knows-what sort of camera, digitized and compressed for CSpan, then redistributed by the White House from CSpan to be photo-analyzed on consumer-quality LCD screens everywhere.  

 

But keep it up.  Maybe you'll find that Acosta was actually hit by a supersonic cruise missile...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...