Jump to content

Panthers' Owner Jerry Richarson Under Investigation for Workplace Misconduct


26CornerBlitz

Recommended Posts

 

The Carolina Panthers today announced it has commenced an internal investigation into allegations of workplace misconduct against the team’s owner and founder, Jerry Richardson. The investigation is being led by the outside international law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan, LLP, and will be overseen by limited owner and former White House Chief of Staff Erskine Bowles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Panthers are launching an internal investigation, targeting owner Jerry Richardson, who is being charged with "workplace misconduct"

 

 

http://www.panthers.com/news/article-2/Panthers-statement-on-internal-investigation/7f04eedd-f208-49a0-9b4c-5585bae98863

 

No ends to this sexual misconduct stuff. yeesh. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Erskine Bowles has extraordinary credibility in NC and particularly in Charlotte.  Smart move having him lead the investigation.  He's pretty damn thorough...kind of like a Southern Robert Mueller...

 

Edited by JoeF
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Which was posted 1st Siemian lover?

You can take your foot out of your "mouth" when ready. :lol:

Your insecurity is so cute.

38 minutes ago, JoeF said:

Erskine Bowles has extraordinary credibility in NC and particularly in Charlotte.  Smart move having him lead the investigation.  He's pretty damn thorough...kind of like a Southern Robert Mueller...

 

Credibility. Mueller. Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah. Riiiight.

 

It'd be awesome if Richardson was found to have done some things inappropriately and just does a big !@#$ you to them all and closes shop.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

Fwiw bowles couldn't even be elected to serve NC because he is a schmuck.

Love you my fellow Tarheel Bills fan.    I really think you'd like him if you haven't met him yet.  He's pretty damn red for a supposed blue guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, JoeF said:

Love you my fellow Tarheel Bills fan.    I really think you'd like him if you haven't met him yet.  He's pretty damn red for a supposed blue guy. 

That's a reason I did not support him. He was on the fence too much. Seems like a good guy and all but he lost the election because he could not define his campaign with beliefs and ideals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Boyst62 said:

That's a reason I did not support him. He was on the fence too much. Seems like a good guy and all but he lost the election because he could not define his campaign with beliefs and ideals.

Good analysis.  I called him a 45% candidate...he got the party loyalists but no one else.  When he ran against then-Congressman Burr, I knew that Burr would eventually win because once folks statewide got to know Burr-- there was no question they would gravitate toward voting for him.  We live in a state where there are a significant number of DINOs and RINOs who sway with each election.  Burr won the DINOs against Erskine.

 

Anyway, I got to work with Erskine a lot when he was President of the UNC System.  The fact that he and Jerry Richardson are very close friends may actually work against Jerry here...Erskine knows him very well, knows if whatever accusations are out there are possibly true and Erskine will work doggedly to find the truth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JoeF said:

Good analysis.  I called him a 45% candidate...he got the party loyalists but no one else.  When he ran against then-Congressman Burr, I knew that Burr would eventually win because once folks statewide got to know Burr-- there was no question they would gravitate toward voting for him.  We live in a state where there are a significant number of DINOs and RINOs who sway with each election.  Burr won the DINOs against Erskine.

 

Anyway, I got to work with Erskine a lot when he was President of the UNC System.  The fact that he and Jerry Richardson are very close friends may actually work against Jerry here...Erskine knows him very well, knows if whatever accusations are out there are possibly true and Erskine will work doggedly to find the truth. 

I am growing less in favor of Burr in the last two years because with his inability to actually get ahead of anything political. As a long timer it is difficult for me to find comfort in press releases after the fact of statements being made providing his take. He is very conservative with communication but he has this state locked down. The woman who ran against him last election had no chance. She was a loon!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Boyst62 said:

Your insecurity is so cute.

Credibility. Mueller. Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah. Riiiight.

 

It'd be awesome if Richardson was found to have done some things inappropriately and just does a big !@#$ you to them all and closes shop.

 

Arguing cred with Trump is the height of comedy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BillsEnthusiast said:

Panthers are launching an internal investigation, targeting owner Jerry Richardson, who is being charged with "workplace misconduct"

 

 

http://www.panthers.com/news/article-2/Panthers-statement-on-internal-investigation/7f04eedd-f208-49a0-9b4c-5585bae98863

 

No ends to this sexual misconduct stuff. yeesh. 

Holy crap how do you investigate the owner/boss??? Talk about a tuff mandate.

Edited by cba fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Boyst62 said:

Your insecurity is so cute.

Credibility. Mueller. Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah. Riiiight.

 

It'd be awesome if Richardson was found to have done some things inappropriately and just does a big !@#$ you to them all and closes shop.

BLINDED BY POLITICS IS A SAD WAY TO GO THROUGH LIFE. THIS WAS POSTED ON TWITTER TODAY. YEP, NOT CREDIBLE. IF HE WAS ATTACKING HILLARY YOU"D LINE UP TO FELLATE HIM.

 

Guided America through 9/11

Awarded the Bronze Star with Combat "V" for valor in battle

The Purple Heart

Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal w/ Combat "V" for valor

The Vietnam Gallantry Cross

He is an American hero. His attackers are a disgrace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, zonabb said:

BLINDED BY POLITICS IS A SAD WAY TO GO THROUGH LIFE. THIS WAS POSTED ON TWITTER TODAY. YEP, NOT CREDIBLE. IF HE WAS ATTACKING HILLARY YOU"D LINE UP TO FELLATE HIM.

 

Guided America through 9/11

Awarded the Bronze Star with Combat "V" for valor in battle

The Purple Heart

Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal w/ Combat "V" for valor

The Vietnam Gallantry Cross

He is an American hero. His attackers are a disgrace.

 

Joe Scarborough posted that and he's right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, zonabb said:

BLINDED BY POLITICS IS A SAD WAY TO GO THROUGH LIFE. THIS WAS POSTED ON TWITTER TODAY. YEP, NOT CREDIBLE. IF HE WAS ATTACKING HILLARY YOU"D LINE UP TO FELLATE HIM.

 

Guided America through 9/11

Awarded the Bronze Star with Combat "V" for valor in battle

The Purple Heart

Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal w/ Combat "V" for valor

The Vietnam Gallantry Cross

He is an American hero. His attackers are a disgrace.

Youre awful cute when you're angry.

 

Like, really, really cute.

16 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

Joe Scarborough posted that and he's right. 

But, Joe Scarborough is an American disgrace.

 

Crocked and disgusting individual. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GunnerBill said:

 

In the workplace? Yes it is. Tell her in the pub or a bar. This should not be difficult to understand. 

Telling a woman she is attractive is not harassment, regardless of location. Same as saying you like her shoes....dont mean you wanna hump her shoes! 

That said, I dont know the details, but merely saying someone is attractive is not misconduct

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BuffAlone said:

Telling a woman she is attractive is not harassment, regardless of location. Same as saying you like her shoes....dont mean you wanna hump her shoes! 

That said, I dont know the details, but merely saying someone is attractive is not misconduct

I think it's all in how you do it. I mean if the guys a fat ugly toad I am sure the girl doesn't care if he thinks she's attractive.

 

Think about a fat ugly girl telling you that your attractive. If you even a decent looking guy it's not something that interests you. Attraction is sexual in nature when it comes to a man and a woman. Your not telling a woman she's attractive like your attracted to owning a car or owning a pet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lfod said:

I think it's all in how you do it. I mean if the guys a fat ugly toad I am sure the girl doesn't care if he thinks she's attractive.

 

Think about a fat ugly girl telling you that your attractive. If you even a decent looking guy it's not something that interests you. Attraction is sexual in nature when it comes to a man and a woman. Your not telling a woman she's attractive like your attracted to owning a car or owning a pet.

True.and I agree to an extent. But here's an example...

I seen my cousins 17 year old daughter for the first time in 15 years recently. I said Oh my God, she's beautiful.

Does that make me a sexual deviant?  Fine line, but just how far should this go? Merely saying someone is attractive, with no inappropriate advances, should not be a problem. Just my opinion 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the socialist utopia that the left envisions for the future United States nobody will be commenting on the appearance of another "comrade" unless of course that appearance gives them some advantage in the eyes of The State in hiring practices associated with them being a member of a self declared 'protected class'.  (Do not be fooled by this nonsense.)

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

In the socialist utopia that the left envisions for the future United States nobody will be commenting on the appearance of another "comrade" unless of course that appearance gives them some advantage in the eyes of The State in hiring practices associated with them being a member of a self declared 'protected class'.  (Do not be fooled by this nonsense.)

 

e9d.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...