Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 33 minutes ago, McGee Return TD said: Tomorrow is a public hearing that allows Democrats to ask questions of Barr, correct? Yes, he will be there without question. It's the Senate Judiciary (Graham's chairman) -- they're the committee with direct oversight of the DOJ. There was never any question that Barr would show tomorrow. It's Thursday's hearing in the House Judiciary, which has no direct oversight powers over the DOJ, which is in question because that committee is chaired by Jerry Nadler who wants a circus. Tomorrow's hearing will likely not be what you expect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 So tomorrow is when Trump is arrested and Hillary can be President? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 10 hours ago, Tiberius said: From the Washington post: The Borg is still computing how to react to this. Apparently not breaking news, as I see no Tweets quoted that tell them what to think yet. Give it some time. "Mueller was an American hero acting as a hidden Trump asset to expose Clinton and Pizzagate used like the lemming he is by Trump as a pawn to expose pizzagate coup plotters. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Funny how that Mueller letter story is published by the Post and NYT simultaneously, the night before Barr's hearing. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Just now, DC Tom said: Funny how that Mueller letter story is published by the Post and NYT simultaneously, the night before Barr's hearing. No funny business there. The coup rolls on -- but they've been defanged. Soon they will be fully exposed and then the fun will begin in earnest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: No funny business there. The coup rolls on -- but they've been defanged. Soon they will be fully exposed and then the fun will begin in earnest. They still have a third of the country in their pocket. They won't go down without a lot of suffering one way or another. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 https://mobile.twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1123576080697384962 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McGee Return TD Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 38 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Funny how that Mueller letter story is published by the Post and NYT simultaneously, the night before Barr's hearing. ...and The Wall Street Journal. 37 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: No funny business there. The coup rolls on -- but they've been defanged. Soon they will be fully exposed and then the fun will begin in earnest. Is WSJ part of the coup attempt? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 3 minutes ago, McGee Return TD said: ...and The Wall Street Journal. Is WSJ part of the coup attempt? Well, duh. You can only trust some guys on Twitter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 2 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: Well, duh. You can only trust some guys on Twitter. geese. i go away for a bit and i see you're still an idiot. no surprise i guess. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 9 minutes ago, McGee Return TD said: Is WSJ part of the coup attempt? https://www.wsj.com/news/author/devlin-barrett He is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 3 minutes ago, Foxx said: geese. i go away for a bit and i see you're still an idiot. no surprise i guess. He's gotten a little better. He just doesn't appear to think there is a deep state nor a soft-coup attempt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said: He's gotten a little better. He just doesn't appear to think there is a deep state nor a soft-coup attempt. He doesn't think anything unless he gets approval to think it from his chosen "experts" and "authorities". It's how he's always been: intellectually dishonest and lazy. And when he says enough false statements, he doesn't take accountability he just changes handles like a hermit crab. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: He doesn't think anything unless he gets approval to think it from his chosen "experts" and "authorities". It's how he's always been: intellectually dishonest and lazy. And when he says enough false statements, he doesn't take accountability he just changes handles like a hermit crab. Yes, I consult the Deep State each day to get my daily talking points. Hillary posts them on her server. Going deeper into the crazy pill stash? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 48 minutes ago, Foxx said: geese. i go away for a bit and i see you're still an idiot. no surprise i guess. Geese? Take a Gander at all of the stupidshit he's posted. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: https://www.wsj.com/news/author/devlin-barrett He is. Al Hunt apparently repped the WSJ on talk formats on CNN and PBS for decades and never once did a sentence come out of his mouth that wasn't typical liberal cowflop Edited May 1, 2019 by row_33 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 7 hours ago, row_33 said: Al Hunt apparently repped the WSJ on talk formats on CNN and PBS for decades and never once did a sentence come out of his mouth that wasn't typical liberal cowflop He also was the WSJ's token lefty on the editorial pages (since followed by Alan Blinder & then William Galston). Anyone that read the Journal knew what they were getting from him. He was consistent. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 AG BARR: ‘We Have Multiple Criminal Leak Investigations Underway’ After Russia Probe. . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 11 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: He doesn't think anything unless he gets approval to think it from his chosen "experts" and "authorities". It's how he's always been: intellectually dishonest and lazy. And when he says enough false statements, he doesn't take accountability he just changes handles like a hermit crab. Trump? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 Bring the smack down on the candy ass of the Dems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prickly Pete Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, row_33 said: Bring the smack down on the candy ass of the Dems Bring a smack down on SOMEBODY..please. Anyone...I'm not expecting them to start with Hillary, but how about one of these CIA, DoJ, FBI people? It's been long enough, can we at least get some of this started (and I mean publicly)? Edited May 2, 2019 by OJ Tom 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 7 minutes ago, OJ Tom said: Bring a smack down on SOMEBODY..please. Anyone...I'm not expecting them to start with Hillary, but how about one of these CIA, DoJ, FBI people? It's been long enough, can we at least get some of this started (and I mean publicly)? #twoweeks i jest, but things are starting to roll now. Everyone can see this snowball starting to pick up speed, and the reports, declassifions, and indictments will be happening soon. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 19 hours ago, BeginnersMind said: Yes, I consult the Deep State each day to get my daily talking points. Hillary posts them on her server. Going deeper into the crazy pill stash? You got an lol emoji from Bob on that. Lucky you said crazy pill instead of wacky weed or else you'd have made an enemy instead of a friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 5 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: #twoweeks i jest, but things are starting to roll now. Everyone can see this snowball starting to pick up speed, and the reports, declassifions, and indictments will be happening soon. The clock will be run out over the next 18-66 months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 1 hour ago, 4merper4mer said: The clock will be run out over the next 18-66 months. That is just not possible at this point. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 4 hours ago, 4merper4mer said: The clock will be run out over the next 18-66 months. every day i wake up excited in anticipation of how Trump will win again today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 This is a long, but extremely interesting article on a (possible) play by Trump's attorneys:Checkmate </snip> Clearly, though, Mueller was undeterred by the Trump team’s legal argument. And why would he be? This was not a lawsuit or a criminal proceeding. It was an investigation. Dowd and Sekulow couldn’t go in front of a judge and demand the investigation be stopped; no judge had jurisdiction. But if Trump’s legal team couldn’t persuade Mueller to let go of his obstruction theory, the investigation could go on indefinitely. Any act that could be characterized as “impeding” the Russia probe – even the exercise of core Article II powers or Trump’s complaints about Mueller – could conceivably be investigated as potential obstruction of justice. Rather than ending by Thanksgiving 2017, the Mueller investigation could continue through Trump’s first term – and perhaps longer. Dowd and Sekulow needed to come up with an answer. And that’s why I think they turned to Bill Barr. ENTER BARR On June 8, 2018, Bill Barr wrote a detailed memorandum to Rod Rosenstein about what he believed was Mueller’s interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2). While Barr professed to be “in the dark about many facts,” in light of the Mueller Report, it’s clear he knew *exactly* what Mueller was up to. There are other interesting things to note about this memorandum. First, it’s addressed to Rod Rosenstein and Steve Engel – not to Mueller, Weissmann, or the Special Counsel’s office, which were running the Trump investigation. In that respect, it’s distinct from the Trump team’s prior letters, which were sent directly to Mueller. </snip> 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 RICH LOWRY ON WILLIAM BARR’S TESTIMONY AND THE RUSSIAN COLLUSION NARRATIVE HOAX: “In sum, this is all a non-scandal that shows how small the Russia controversy has gotten—from alleged treason to a squabble over a summary of a report that was released in full.” 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 Forget the Deep State ... Deep Fried Chicken The Chicken Bar is open Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 26 minutes ago, B-Man said: RICH LOWRY ON WILLIAM BARR’S TESTIMONY AND THE RUSSIAN COLLUSION NARRATIVE HOAX: “In sum, this is all a non-scandal that shows how small the Russia controversy has gotten—from alleged treason to a squabble over a summary of a report that was released in full.” but this is the biggest intellectual accomplishment of the Democratic Party since LBJ's Great Society Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 9 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said: Forget the Deep State ... Deep Fried Chicken The Chicken Bar is open That must be the new KFC Progressive Bucket... all left wings and azzholes. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 30 minutes ago, Nanker said: That must be the new KFC Progressive Bucket... all left wings and azzholes. don't forget the rats who fell off the counter and into the frying batter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 Want to see a candidate/campaign colluding/conspiring with a foreign government to subvert the will of the American voters? Why is Hillary making more media rounds the last week than she's made in a year? She's scared. And she should be. So should 44. It's all going to come out and they'll both be lucky if the worst that happens to them is an indictment. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 11 hours ago, OJ Tom said: Bring a smack down on SOMEBODY..please. Anyone...I'm not expecting them to start with Hillary, but how about one of these CIA, DoJ, FBI people? It's been long enough, can we at least get some of this started (and I mean publicly)? Dems are completely immune apart from egegrious graft everyone else is fine as long as it promotes the narrative and their power hold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaryPinC Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: So should 44. It's all going to come out and they'll both be lucky if the worst that happens to them is an indictment. I think 44 is fine no matter what. He'll get a pardon from Trump to avert any racial unrest. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 Just now, GaryPinC said: I think 44 is fine no matter what. He'll get a pardon from Trump to avert any racial unrest. I think the odds are heavily in your favor on that, without question. I was told very early on in this whole thing that Trump wanted to tie everything off before it reached 44 out of respect for the office (and to keep the Republic from coming undone while they're trying to preserve it/restore it). I think had Obama backed off after the transition period, his cappos might have been spared too (specifically in State and his cabinet) -- but I think that's off the table now. Trump will take it as high as he can without risking what you laid out above. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 10 minutes ago, GaryPinC said: I think 44 is fine no matter what. He'll get a pardon from Trump to avert any racial unrest. I think he'd pardon him to avoid ANY unrest - racial or otherwise IF he's complicit (is turning a blind eye complicit?), which he may not be. My guess (just a guess) is Obama knew what was going on after the ball got rolling, but he was not the person who began the soft-coup. As they say, what did the President know, and when did he know it? I am very hopeful this investigation does not lead directly to him. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 Take off the f ***** g gloves. It’s time to go on Offense. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: I think he'd pardon him to avoid ANY unrest - racial or otherwise IF he's complicit (is turning a blind eye complicit?), which he may not be. My guess (just a guess) is Obama knew what was going on after the ball got rolling, but he was not the person who began the soft-coup. As they say, what did the President know, and when did he know it? I am very hopeful this investigation does not lead directly to him. His involvement is why they've never been able to make a case on Hillary for the emails -- because doing so would expose 44's own secondary (and illegal) email handle and the fact he not only knew she was breaking the law with her server, but he was doing the same. That's a big problem in the origin of the coup as well -- because Obama's fingerprints are all over it. "The president wants to know everything we're doing"... plus he definitely knew of, and used, the illegal spying operation being run out of the DOJ-NSD and FBI-CID. No matter what thread you pull on the coup origin, it leads almost directly to 44 and his handlers. He won't come out of this clean. His legacy is going to be destroyed. Perhaps as many as four of his cabinet members are going to be indicted for serious offenses... But you and Gary are right, there's a risk to that kind of exposure... but the alternative is that it all gets swept under the rug in order to protect him. I don't think that's something Trump or Barr will allow. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts