Jump to content

Bills met this week about Taylor; it may be up to McDermott


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Vic loses credibility here:

 

"In fact, there was a push for rookie quarterback Cardale Jones to supplant Taylor as the starter for the final three or four games of the season, even though the Bills had yet to be mathematically eliminated from the playoffs. Coach Rex Ryan and offensive coordinator Anthony Lynn were said to have pushed back hard enough for Taylor to remain in the No. 1 role."

 

He is saying that Whaley pushed to have Cardale start the last 3 or 4 games.

 

Yet, when Whaley was asked about it after the Jet's game in his press conference, Whaley said that if the Bills were still in the playoff hunt, then Tyrod would have started against the Jets.

 

That pretty much contradicts what Vic is suggesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vic loses credibility here:

 

"In fact, there was a push for rookie quarterback Cardale Jones to supplant Taylor as the starter for the final three or four games of the season, even though the Bills had yet to be mathematically eliminated from the playoffs. Coach Rex Ryan and offensive coordinator Anthony Lynn were said to have pushed back hard enough for Taylor to remain in the No. 1 role."

 

He is saying that Whaley pushed to have Cardale start the last 3 or 4 games.

 

Yet, when Whaley was asked about it after the Jet's game in his press conference, Whaley said that if the Bills were still in the playoff hunt, then Tyrod would have started against the Jets.

 

That pretty much contradicts what Vic is suggesting.

Whaley said that they had no plans to trade SJ13. Days before he traded SJ13.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whaley said that they had no plans to trade SJ13. Days before he traded SJ13.

 

What reason would he have to lie about Tyrod starting in that game though? It's not like it would be hiding something. And if I recall correctly it wasn't a direct question either. It was volunteered information from Whaley to explain what his position was about Tyrod. He would have no reason to lie there regardless of his position on Tyrod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vic loses credibility here:

 

"In fact, there was a push for rookie quarterback Cardale Jones to supplant Taylor as the starter for the final three or four games of the season, even though the Bills had yet to be mathematically eliminated from the playoffs. Coach Rex Ryan and offensive coordinator Anthony Lynn were said to have pushed back hard enough for Taylor to remain in the No. 1 role."

 

He is saying that Whaley pushed to have Cardale start the last 3 or 4 games.

 

Yet, when Whaley was asked about it after the Jet's game in his press conference, Whaley said that if the Bills were still in the playoff hunt, then Tyrod would have started against the Jets.

 

That pretty much contradicts what Vic is suggesting.

Also, EJ starting the last game. If they were pushing for Cardale to start before then, he would've started the last game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vic loses credibility here:

 

"In fact, there was a push for rookie quarterback Cardale Jones to supplant Taylor as the starter for the final three or four games of the season, even though the Bills had yet to be mathematically eliminated from the playoffs. Coach Rex Ryan and offensive coordinator Anthony Lynn were said to have pushed back hard enough for Taylor to remain in the No. 1 role."

 

He is saying that Whaley pushed to have Cardale start the last 3 or 4 games.

 

Yet, when Whaley was asked about it after the Jet's game in his press conference, Whaley said that if the Bills were still in the playoff hunt, then Tyrod would have started against the Jets.

 

That pretty much contradicts what Vic is suggesting.

No it doesn't. It suggests that he may have lost the argument. He can push and not win, you know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

What reason would he have to lie about Tyrod starting in that game though? It's not like it would be hiding something. And if I recall correctly it wasn't a direct question either. It was volunteered information from Whaley to explain what his position was about Tyrod. He would have no reason to lie there regardless of his position on Tyrod.

It could be as simple as the owners telling him what to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No it doesn't. It suggests that he may have lost the argument. He can push and not win, you know.

 

Obviously.

 

The point was that in his press conference after the season ending Jets game, Whaley explained to the press that Tyrod would have been the starter against the Jets if winning the game mattered. If he didn't want Tyrod in there the last 3-4 games of the season when the Bills were technically still in the hunt, why in the world would he explain how he would have started Tyrod in the last game if they were still in the hunt. It is a direct contradiction of what Vic is saying.

 

Also, EJ starting the last game. If they were pushing for Cardale to start before then, he would've started the last game.

 

More evidence. :thumbsup:

 

Just doesn't make sense the way Vic is spinning it.

 

Or perhaps that was Whaley's opinion (but only temporarily) at one point during the season. And Whaley ultimately changed his mind more in favor of Tyrod before playing the final Jets game.

Edited by PolishDave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excuse my ignorance if this has already been covered, but if they have decided to move on from Tyrod, what would need to happen for them to trade him. It seems as though there at least a few interested "suitors." Is this even a possibility?

 

Not really. It's been covered several times.

To trade him, the Bills would have to pick up his option, which involves a $15.5M option bonus currently spread over 5 years but which would accelerate into the 2017 cap if he's traded.

That's a lot of dead cap hit.

 

What reason would he have to lie about Tyrod starting in that game though? It's not like it would be hiding something. And if I recall correctly it wasn't a direct question either. It was volunteered information from Whaley to explain what his position was about Tyrod. He would have no reason to lie there regardless of his position on Tyrod.

 

It's all a giant conspiracy!

 

If we take a lot of the media leaks at face value, Whaley and Pegula are serial liars again and again - about the timing of the decision to fire Rex, about whether or not Tyrod's fate is still undecided, whether there was an ultimatum "playoffs or fired", whether there was a "fix" to hire Lynn and the coach search was a sham, on and on. And then they've reversed course again and again, since different stuff happened.

 

Or, if we take what they say at more or less face value, what they say and what actually happens correspond pretty well (but it's all much more boring and banal!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Not really. It's been covered several times.

To trade him, the Bills would have to pick up his option, which involves a $15.5M option bonus currently spread over 5 years but which would accelerate into the 2017 cap if he's traded.

That's a lot of dead cap hit.

 

I know it was covered in a bunch of threads, but there was also a lot of misinformation being posted.

 

Tyrod is already under contract through 2017. His contract isn't up until 2018. Some people think his contract expires this year and he becomes a free agent. It doesn't. And he doesn't.

 

The option is to extend him 2018 through 2021. And by doing so, it lowers his 2017 base salary and spreads out his bonus money over those years instead of giving him the $30 million all in 2017 which is what will happen if they don't trade him, release him or renegotiate by March 11th.

 

The Bills can trade him any time after March 9th at 4PM.

 

So they can trade him without picking up the contract if they trade him between March 9th and March 11th. Or if they were going to eat that whole $30 million or whatever it was, (which they won't do because of this year's cap) then they could trade him at any point in 2017 up to the trade deadline of November 1st 2017.

 

Here are their options:

 

The structure of Taylor's contract leaves the Bills with four choices:

  1. Exercise his option by March 11 for the 2018-21 seasons, reducing his 2017 cap number from about $29 million to $15.913 million.

  2. Decline to exercise his option but keep Taylor on the roster past March 12 at a fully-guaranteed salary and cap number of about $29 million.

  3. Release Taylor prior to March 11, carrying about a $3 million dead-money hit against the 2017 cap but opening significant cap space.

  4. Renegotiate Taylor's contract prior to March 11.

Information found here.

Edited by PolishDave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excuse my ignorance if this has already been covered, but if they have decided to move on from Tyrod, what would need to happen for them to trade him. It seems as though there at least a few interested "suitors." Is this even a possibility?

Nobody will trade for him. The minute it becomes known the Bills are making him available for trade, I am guessing any interested teams would hedge their bets, and wait for the Bills to release him...then they could work out their own deal with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope he is false.

Because you'd really have to be an egotistical moron to want to start Cardale over Tyrod while still in the playoff race...and next season....

They were supposed to can Tyrod and Rex "if they sucked" vs Steelers.

 

They sucked, yet the hammer didn't come down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Locker Gabbert and Ponder were drafted years ago. They aren't in this draft.

 

Anyone that didn't see the stink coming off Ponder and Locker should be fired.

Was Rick Spielman in Minn when they drafted Ponder? Because if so he drafted Teddy B a few years later. Regardless of his freak injury, that was a bad QB pick followed by a good one. It can be done!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bills aren't going anywhere next year. Let TT go. Give the ball to Clipboard Jones. and move up the draft board. Rebuild.

why? cardales not going anywhere, why miss a chance at the playoffs w new coaching and maybe more talent this year w a good draft and injured guys coming back? Its not your money and tt doesnt want out. let him win 11 games here take us to the playoffs for once. F rebuilding. we are too good still. F rex for fooling you here to thinking we need to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was Rick Spielman in Minn when they drafted Ponder? Because if so he drafted Teddy B a few years later. Regardless of his freak injury, that was a bad QB pick followed by a good one. It can be done!

 

 

If Teddy Bridgewater was a GOOD first round pick at QB then what does that make a BETTER player like Tyrod?

 

Teddy B was a small arm dink and dunker.........and yet put together just a 28-21 TD/INT line over his two years as a starter.

 

Tyrod isn't an elite QB by any stretch but sometimes the grass looking greener on the other side gets a bit out of hand on TSW. :flirt:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Locker Gabbert and Ponder were drafted years ago. They aren't in this draft.

 

Anyone that didn't see the stink coming off Ponder and Locker should be fired.

I'm not impressed by any of the QB's in this class.

 

I'll give Tyrod one more chance, and see how it goes next season.

 

We can draft a QB in 2018, the prospects of that class are far greater than this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Watching Jake Locker, Blaine Gabbert and Christian Ponder makes me want to stick with Tyrod or Josh McCown.

 

Yeah, that 2011 draft was amazing how those teams panicked and drafted those guys so high, especially Ponder at 12. The Bengals and Niners waited and picked Dalton & Kap in the 2nd round, both of which have had better careers than those three.

 

And the Bills have a guy taken in the 6th round of that draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...