Tiberius Posted December 23, 2015 Share Posted December 23, 2015 Women consumers, that is http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/12066820/New-Gender-Tax-study-shows-women-are-charged-more-for-being-woman.html A gender tax! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted December 23, 2015 Share Posted December 23, 2015 So women pay more for their clothes and beauty supplies than men do and you think this is a war on women? Seriously? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 23, 2015 Author Share Posted December 23, 2015 So women pay more for their clothes and beauty supplies than men do and you think this is a war on women? Seriously? You will take this seriously when Hillary starts leading boycotts of these places! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted December 23, 2015 Share Posted December 23, 2015 You will take this seriously when Hillary starts leading boycotts of these places! You've lost it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 23, 2015 Share Posted December 23, 2015 You will take this seriously when Hillary starts leading boycotts of these places! :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted December 23, 2015 Share Posted December 23, 2015 I doubt this is an issue for Hillary since she clearly spends all her money wearing men's clothing anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted December 23, 2015 Share Posted December 23, 2015 It's ridiculous that they call it a "gender tax". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 Sports equipment for women cost far less than the men's version. It's about the product. Despite what the feminists want us to believe, men and women do THINK (and prioritize) differently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 24, 2015 Author Share Posted December 24, 2015 It's ridiculous that they call it a "gender tax".It's perfect. Pithy and perfect way of describing it without losing the reader in needless detail. LAblilz will tell you, he was a journalist major. You need to keep your writing tight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 I doubt this is an issue for Hillary since she clearly spends all her money wearing men's clothing anyway No man would be caught dead wearing what she wears. I think she is being lobbied by the Broyhill furniture company who makes her pant suits from leftover couch fabric. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 It's perfect. Pithy and perfect way of describing it without losing the reader in needless detail. LAblilz will tell you, he was a journalist major. You need to keep your writing tight. It's not needless detail to characterize something as it really is. How can an issue be properly addressed if you treat it as something it isn't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 24, 2015 Author Share Posted December 24, 2015 It's not needless detail to characterize something as it really is. How can an issue be properly addressed if you treat it as something it isn't?Peopleare smart enough to understand the comparison Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 Peopleare smart enough to understand the comparison Absolutely, and they're also smart enough to see it as a complete mischaracterization. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 It's perfect. Pithy and perfect way of describing it without losing the reader in needless detail. LAblilz will tell you, he was a journalist major. You need to keep your writing tight. Simplistic presentation for simplistic minds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 Peopleare smart enough to understand the comparison So why do you think this is happening? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 I'm having a hard time figuring out their methodology for this survey. What products do they associate exclusively for each gender but have versions for the opposite sex? Fashion? -anything else? I would also like to point out that women often cross over to "men's" products, while men rarely do the same. Also, designers create items that mimic men's clothes created exclusively for women- boyfriend jeans (which is downright idiotic)- then charge more for it. Gullibility tax? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 I'm having a hard time figuring out their methodology for this survey. What products do they associate exclusively for each gender but have versions for the opposite sex? Fashion? -anything else? I would also like to point out that women often cross over to "men's" products, while men rarely do the same. Also, designers create items that mimic men's clothes created exclusively for women- boyfriend jeans (which is downright idiotic)- then charge more for it. Gullibility tax? I wonder if Bruce Caitlyn Jenner wishes he she could get the old prices for his her products. Unintended consequences are a B word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 I wonder if Bruce Caitlyn Jenner wishes he she xecould get the old prices for his her xerproducts. Unintended consequences are a B word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 Hillary supports the war on women, especially the women who slept with Bill - either consensually or by force. She attacked them with more vigor than she did the young girl in Arkansas that was raped by a client of hers whom she got off and laughed about. She pays her female employees 76% of what her male counterparts get paid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 I wonder if Bruce Caitlyn Jenner wishes he she could get thed prices for his her products. Unintended consequences are a B word. Her !@#$ is upset about paying high costs for hygiene products I doubt many here get the reference. also 'f you Gary. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted September 24, 2023 Share Posted September 24, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted September 24, 2023 Share Posted September 24, 2023 Lol. There is no war on women. It's not 1950 anymore What we have is a victimhood mentality. Martyr mentality. It's defective Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 24, 2023 Share Posted September 24, 2023 The "war on women" is actually "we can't abort our babies anytime before a few hours after birth." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted September 24, 2023 Share Posted September 24, 2023 15 minutes ago, Doc said: The "war on women" is actually "we can't abort our babies anytime before a few hours after birth." And once again, you remind us that you are in fact, not a doctor. thanks for playing, doc! 18 minutes ago, Chris farley said: Lol. There is no war on women. It's not 1950 anymore What we have is a victimhood mentality. Martyr mentality. It's defective What are red states doing today? What bubble do you live in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 27, 2023 Share Posted October 27, 2023 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted October 27, 2023 Share Posted October 27, 2023 ^^^^^^^^^^ pure lies and fear being pushed By shady funded PACS and they just eat it up and stay angry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted October 27, 2023 Share Posted October 27, 2023 Advocating and embracing the practice of allowing biological men to masquerade (if you prefer, "identify) as women which results in disadvantaging biological women in many areas including competitive sports is "war on women". That's totally a liberal thing. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 27, 2023 Share Posted October 27, 2023 4 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: ^^^^^^^^^^ pure lies and fear being pushed By shady funded PACS and they just eat it up and stay angry. Oh, LIES? Where is the LIE? You freaks can't handle the truth about your party. It's a fking terrorist organization. Also, I don't give a 💩 about your nonstop biching about PACS when you pick and choose to acknowledge the ones that make you UNCOMFORTABLE. Facts matter B. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast Posted October 27, 2023 Share Posted October 27, 2023 On 12/23/2015 at 11:48 AM, Tiberius said: Women consumers, that is http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/12066820/New-Gender-Tax-study-shows-women-are-charged-more-for-being-woman.html A gender tax! how do you afford it? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 27, 2023 Share Posted October 27, 2023 4 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Advocating and embracing the practice of allowing biological men to masquerade (if you prefer, "identify) as women which results in disadvantaging biological women in many areas including competitive sports is "war on women". That's totally a liberal thing. Seriously, get out of here. DEFLECT because you CAN'T HANDLE the truth. 1 minute ago, Beast said: how do you afford it? Boy, this topic really triggered the cult. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 27, 2023 Author Share Posted October 27, 2023 41 minutes ago, Beast said: how do you afford it? Your avatar is a drink. Ya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 27, 2023 Share Posted October 27, 2023 16 minutes ago, BillStime said: Oh, LIES? Where is the LIE? You freaks can't handle the truth about your party. It's a fking terrorist organization. Also, I don't give a 💩 about your nonstop biching about PACS when you pick and choose to acknowledge the ones that make you UNCOMFORTABLE. Facts matter B. I watched the clip. I read the text above from @voteAnnJohnson. She indicated she wants to "exempt people for sexual assault exams". I googled HB4 and see that it is a contentious issue, dealing with how law enforcement in Texas is expected to handle individuals once it is revealed they are not legal residents of the United States. I can't seem to find anything specific about what she is talking about. Help me out here. What is she talking about? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 27, 2023 Share Posted October 27, 2023 41 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I watched the clip. I read the text above from @voteAnnJohnson. She indicated she wants to "exempt people for sexual assault exams". I googled HB4 and see that it is a contentious issue, dealing with how law enforcement in Texas is expected to handle individuals once it is revealed they are not legal residents of the United States. I can't seem to find anything specific about what she is talking about. Help me out here. What is she talking about? I can't find the actual amendments in question either - but here is more debate about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted October 27, 2023 Share Posted October 27, 2023 2 hours ago, BillStime said: You freaks can't handle the truth about your party. It's a fking terrorist organization. Ok Jack Nicholson. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 27, 2023 Share Posted October 27, 2023 On 12/23/2015 at 12:14 PM, Deranged Rhino said: On 12/23/2015 at 1:51 PM, IDBillzFan said: I doubt this is an issue for Hillary since she clearly spends all her money wearing men's clothing anyway On 12/23/2015 at 2:42 PM, Azalin said: It's ridiculous that they call it a "gender tax". On 12/24/2015 at 9:31 AM, keepthefaith said: No man would be caught dead wearing what she wears. I think she is being lobbied by the Broyhill furniture company who makes her pant suits from leftover couch fabric. On 12/24/2015 at 9:53 AM, DC Tom said: Simplistic presentation for simplistic minds. A toast to all of those who moved on. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yall Posted October 27, 2023 Share Posted October 27, 2023 3 hours ago, Beast said: how do you afford it? Why not just buy the cheapest razor, shampoo etc.? Who is at fault if the consumer is making poor decisions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 27, 2023 Share Posted October 27, 2023 2 hours ago, BillStime said: I can't find the actual amendments in question either - but here is more debate about it. Thanks for the additional clips, but I'm confused as to why you linked it before without understanding the issue it purported addressed? Your commentary before and after the initial link included aggressive commentary (freaks, truth, not giving a sh*T), and the clip you shared (and the text from Twitter) is quite unclear. In the most recent clip shared, Rep Spiller explains his rationale and thinking, and Rep Johnson responds. It's an emotional subject, but as one of the few centrists on the board, I can see elements of both positions that seem logical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 27, 2023 Share Posted October 27, 2023 2 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Thanks for the additional clips, but I'm confused as to why you linked it before without understanding the issue it purported addressed? Your commentary before and after the initial link included aggressive commentary (freaks, truth, not giving a sh*T), and the clip you shared (and the text from Twitter) is quite unclear. In the most recent clip shared, Rep Spiller explains his rationale and thinking, and Rep Johnson responds. It's an emotional subject, but as one of the few centrists on the board, I can see elements of both positions that seem logical. The War on Women is real. I know, not in your fantasy world - but it is real. You can do your research next time champ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 27, 2023 Share Posted October 27, 2023 THE WAR ON WOMEN. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted October 27, 2023 Share Posted October 27, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts