Jump to content

Global warming err Climate change HOAX


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 hour ago, Gary Busey said:

You're a moran.

 

1) You need to think of your own line. 

2) If you're going to use it, it's, "Your a moran," moran. 

 

And whoever made that error is probably long gone. But I think he was really really short. 

Edited by John Adams
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

5 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

Then you missed the entire point of the "100% accurate" post.  

Or is that what I want you to think? 

 

(I probably missed it but numbers like yours make me nervous because of the potential for an infinite number of decimal places. It's unsettling, like Tom Hanks in Bosom Buddies)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

 

 

Or is that what I want you to think? 

 

(I probably missed it but numbers like yours make me nervous because of the potential for an infinite number of decimal places. It's unsettling, like Tom Hanks in Bosom Buddies)

 

You know, the mass of the electron has been calculated to some eleven decimal places...but only measured accurately to nine.

 

That's how good the theory of the electron is: it's more accurate than we can accurately perceive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

You know, the mass of the electron has been calculated to some eleven decimal places...but only measured accurately to nine.

 

That's how good the theory of the electron is: it's more accurate than we can accurately perceive.

I’m torn between two answers:

 

1. Obviously.
2. Nice try. 
 

This isn’t over. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/10/2020 at 10:34 AM, DC Tom said:

 

Important point here...

 

 

One of the easiest ways to tell you're being conned is artificial precision.  People are more likely to believe precise statements than vague ones, so when lying, be precise.  Conversely,  if someone's being precise to you, question it, particularly if it's a future prediction or a statistical statement.  

 

That was really the point of this joke.  When you see artificial precision, suspect nonsense.

Like this one, oddly specific number there:

 

"17 security agencies agree that Donald Trump is colluding the RUSSIA!!!!!!" - Hilldawg, Nov 2016

 

I believe one of them was the US Post Office or something.

Edited by ScotSHO
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greta strikes again!

 

How dare Roger Federer take millions of dollars from a sponsor that provides loans to the fossil fuel industry! He should be more responsible.

 

Though I can just picture the productive dialogue with his sponsor:


 

Quote

 

Roger Federer: Credit Suisse, we must talk about our environmental responsiblities!

 

Credit Suisse: Absolutely, how can we help Mr. Federer?

 

RF: Well, the next time you give me a multi-million dollar sponsorship check, how about we forego the paper check and just do direct deposit?

 

CS: Not a problem, sir! We will save nearly 1/1024th of a tree that way!

 

RF: Saving the environment just feels good.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

Facebook Bug Reveals Greta Thunberg's Posts Are Written by Her Father

 

Left using children...........no surprise.

 

Someone tell the Nobel Prize Committee

 

.

 

Quote

The edit history for Greta Thunberg’s page shows that the content has actually been written by her father, Svante Thunberg, and Adarsh Prathap, a climate activist in India who serves as a delegate at the UN’s Climate Change organization.

 

So Activist-A serves as a delegate to a UN organization, and Activist-A is writing content for Activist-B to lobby the organization which Activist-A sits?

 

Collusion anyone?

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, B-Man said:

Are we sure Greta isn’t about  50? I remember her being in Willy Wonka and the Chocoate  Factory   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Wacka said:

Are we sure Greta isn’t about  50? I remember her being in Willy Wonka and the Chocoate  Factory   

My bad . I meant about 60. Messed up my math.  I think she played Veruca Salt  in the original with Gene Wilder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

5f853e3906ae71b47d33ab4de8ca42390ce153d8

 

 

 

.

 

That's an excellent point. If the science is settled, then not another dime of anyone's tax dollars needs to be spent on climate research.

 

That needs to become the new mantra: "The science is settled, no taxes for research!"

 

If that actually became a thing, watch how quickly the "settled science" BS is dropped and the science becomes "ongoing" again.

Edited by Azalin
  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Azalin said:

 

That's an excellent point. If the science is settled, then not another dime of anyone's tax dollars needs to be spent on climate research.

 

That needs to become the new mantra: "The science is settled, no taxes for research!"

 

If that actually became a thing, watch how quickly the "settled science" BS is dropped and the science becomes "ongoing" again.

 

Oh come on, you know they need to continue to monitor the situation.!!!!! :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/12/world/aboriginal-australia-fire-trnd/index.html

 

The fires in Australia have been burning for months, consuming nearly 18 million acres of land, causing thousands to evacuate and killing potentially millions of animals.

They're showing minimal signs of slowing down. The Australian state of New South Wales, where both Sydney and Canberra are located, declared a state of emergency this week, as worsening weather conditions could lead to even greater fire danger.
But a 50,000-year-old solution could exist: Aboriginal burning practices.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/12/world/aboriginal-australia-fire-trnd/index.html

 

The fires in Australia have been burning for months, consuming nearly 18 million acres of land, causing thousands to evacuate and killing potentially millions of animals.

They're showing minimal signs of slowing down. The Australian state of New South Wales, where both Sydney and Canberra are located, declared a state of emergency this week, as worsening weather conditions could lead to even greater fire danger.
But a 50,000-year-old solution could exist: Aboriginal burning practices.

 

 

 

Pfft. What do those ***** know? They're neither woke, nor environmentally friendly. Think of the poor creature who might need to use that dry plant for shade (you know, to escape the effects of catastrophic global warming) someday! Well, if they burn the dry brush to prevent massive wildfires, that poor creature isn't going to have shade, now is it?!?

 

What the Australian Aboriginals need is a woke white person of privilege to swoop in and rescue them from their own ignorance.

53 minutes ago, Hedge said:

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Koko78 said:

 

Pfft. What do those ***** know? They're neither woke, nor environmentally friendly. Think of the poor creature who might need to use that dry plant for shade (you know, to escape the effects of catastrophic global warming) someday! Well, if they burn the dry brush to prevent massive wildfires, that poor creature isn't going to have shade, now is it?!?

 

What the Australian Aboriginals need is a woke white person of privilege to swoop in and rescue them from their own ignorance.

 

 

 

Impossible. The science is already settled, and they never said anything about this while they were settling it.

 

In fact, what do we even need climate scientists for any more?

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Azalin said:

 

Impossible. The science is already settled, and they never said anything about this while they were settling it.

 

In fact, what do we even need climate scientists for any more?

 

 

 

I'm not sure. I will have to wait for Greta's father to write her next social media post telling me what to think.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/14/2020 at 8:34 PM, Hedge said:

 

 

 

It's been asked before but ignored.   Wouldn't the oceans' temperature rise faster due to warming that's occurring under water - ie undersea volcanic activity - rather than from atmospheric warming? 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, GG said:

 

It's been asked before but ignored.   Wouldn't the oceans' temperature rise faster due to warming that's occurring under water - ie undersea volcanic activity - rather than from atmospheric warming? 

 

additionally, underwater volcanic activity lends to land mass building. which if significant enough, has the capability to alter deep sea currents which would then also lend to warming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Foxx said:

additionally, underwater volcanic activity lends to land mass building. which if significant enough, has the capability to alter deep sea currents which would then also lend to warming.

 

These stories caught my eye when there were so many alarms about the conditions of The Great Barrier Reef around 2015, obviously attributed to the global warming calamity.

 

Turns out, they didn't even know at the time there were massive eruptions near New Zealand a few years prior, with ongoing activity.  The entire Ring of Fire has been hyperactive over the past decade, and I'm guessing they really have no clue of the true underwater activity.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, GG said:

 

These stories caught my eye when there were so many alarms about the conditions of The Great Barrier Reef around 2015, obviously attributed to the global warming calamity.

 

Turns out, they didn't even know at the time there were massive eruptions near New Zealand a few years prior, with ongoing activity.  The entire Ring of Fire has been hyperactive over the past decade, and I'm guessing they really have no clue of the true underwater activity.

muh... it's settled science don't you know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...