TakeYouToTasker Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 How much money, paid by whom, have these scientists made? I don't give a flip what the moron in chief things. I'm extremely cynical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 You're right. That never happens. Once again carry on. All of them? That's really stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 Hey once again I appreciate your help here but as I've told you before I only care about the opinions of people I respect. So you can carry on too. All of them? That's really stupid Who said it takes them all? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarpetCrawler Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) link? think about it, if you have a glass of pop or beer and then warm it up, what do you think happens to the CO2 level between the surface of the liquid and the top of the glass? Edited June 5, 2017 by #standingbuffalo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 Hey once again I appreciate your help here but as I've told you before I only care about the opinions of people I respect. So you can carry on too. Who said it takes them all? You and douch bag Tasker got bad blood? Exactly, if they were not in on it a whole bunch of them would say it was a hoax and the others were bought and paid for. The conspiracy theory here is total bunk think about it, if you have a glass of pop or beer and then warm it up, what do you think happens to the CO2 level between the surface of the liquid and the top of the glass? It would get warmer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 You and douch bag Tasker got bad blood? Exactly, if they were not in on it a whole bunch of them would say it was a hoax and the others were bought and paid for. Every think that some are totally wrong with their assessment? Science is often times 100% hypothetical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 Every think that some are totally wrong with their assessment? Science is often times 100% hypothetical. This one they seem pretty sure on. And the basic idea makes sense. All the right wing nonsense just makes all more believable. Trump says the Chinese made it up, Har Har! I remember when the right wing was fighting scientists over smoking and cancer. Same thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 So you have no idea what blip of the planet's history that chart covered? But it said 'centuries' and that sounds like a really long time, so it must be significant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 All 75 of them? That's really stupid fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/05/poll-americans-oppose-paris-exit-239150 I guess people figure if Trump is against it it's probably a good thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 think about it, if you have a glass of pop or beer and then warm it up, what do you think happens to the CO2 level between the surface of the liquid and the top of the glass? What does that have to do with the timing of CO2 buildup & temperatures? Aren't you demonstrating the same effect? Heating first, then observing CO2 effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 NASA ✔@NASA Ice loss from Thwaites Glacier may not be as rapid as we previously thought, says a new study. Learn more: http://go.nasa.gov/2ss6jzZ 7:46 PM - 4 Jun 2017 Move those goalposts Al.............................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 Move those goalposts Al.............................. Yes, this sure proves it's a conspiracy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 Mike Bloomberg, trying to keep momentum for an effort by states and cities to stick with the Paris climate deal despite President Donald Trump's rejection of the pact, says he will submit a report to the United Nations outlining what can be done without the federal government's help. Bloomberg, the U.N. special envoy for cities and climate change, submitted to the United Nations Framework Convention for Climate a joint statement today signed by more than 1,000 business leaders, mayors, governors and others committed to upholding the deal. In the coming months, he says he will work with any interested officials to "formally quantify" what kind of greenhouse gas emissions could be achieved at the state and local level, in the private sector, and at universities or nonprofits. http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/05/we-are-still-in-paris-goals-239151 That's good to see. Glad someone gives a hoot about the planet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 Mike Bloomberg, trying to keep momentum for an effort by states and cities to stick with the Paris climate deal despite President Donald Trump's rejection of the pact, says he will submit a report to the United Nations outlining what can be done without the federal government's help. Bloomberg, the U.N. special envoy for cities and climate change, submitted to the United Nations Framework Convention for Climate a joint statement today signed by more than 1,000 business leaders, mayors, governors and others committed to upholding the deal. In the coming months, he says he will work with any interested officials to "formally quantify" what kind of greenhouse gas emissions could be achieved at the state and local level, in the private sector, and at universities or nonprofits. http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/05/we-are-still-in-paris-goals-239151 That's good to see. Glad someone gives a hoot about the planet So we can solve this "problem" without my tax dollars? !@#$ing awesome!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 So we can solve this "problem" without my tax dollars? !@#$ing awesome!! Good thing you didn't have a vote when they were deciding if sh it was a pollutant, we'd never have built sewars. You'd be saying sh it was natural and didn't harm anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 Good thing you didn't have a vote when they were deciding if sh it was a pollutant, we'd never have built sewars. You'd be saying sh it was natural and didn't harm anything. I did and voted against it. I'm old you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 Good thing you didn't have a vote when they were deciding if sh it was a pollutant, we'd never have built sewars. You'd be saying sh it was natural and didn't harm anything. You're a !@#$ing pollutant, you !@#$ing dolt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 You're a !@#$ing pollutant, you !@#$ing dolt. Why, because I believe the scientist and think you are full of sh it? Sad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 Why, because I believe the scientist and think you are full of sh it? Sad No because you believe hypotheses as fact where thinking people are more skeptical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts