Estro Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 http://www.profootballtalk.com/category/rumor-mill/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Beat me to it. You are fast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DwightSchrute Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Git er done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Perhaps closer to bein "dun" then we think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 I think we need to bring him in for a looksee. He's definitely on the Bills radar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fingon Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 If we bring him in, either Langston Walker, Butler, or Levitre goes to the bench. All three of those guys are quality lineman (Levitre should be, at least). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeastMode54 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Wouldn't hurt to bring him in for depth at least. If he doesn't get hurt, which is a big if, then he can help a lot. Even if not we should definitely take a look Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteamRoller67 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Quick find estro.... I'm all for bringing the guy in on the Bills terms, not his. He was once a good up and coming left tackle.... now he's a vet with a history of back problems. I still say go get him, but don't write his name in stone for the LT position for the entire season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandler#81 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 It's possible the guy can still 'git -er done', but I think OBD is satisfied with what we've got going into '09. I'm still holding out hope for a DT/DE/OLB via trade or June 1st cuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Estro Posted May 6, 2009 Author Share Posted May 6, 2009 I think we need to bring him in for a looksee. He's definitely on the Bills radar. According to what Tim Graham has been saying you're absolutely right. If the Bills ae indeed serious there is no reason he shouldn't be signed by Thursday night. Worst case scenario we have another so so LT in the mix for depth. Best case we get an above average LT for 2 years. I would be happy with his signing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 If he got cut someone should give him a band aid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tipster19 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Oh my, this is big news. I wonder why the Bills didn't give up a 7th rder if they are really interested in Jones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordio Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Oh my, this is big news. I wonder why the Bills didn't give up a 7th rder if they are really interested in Jones. Probably because the bills did not want to pick up his contract. Didnt he sign an extension back a few years ago something like 6yrs, $40 mill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Tomcat Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Oh my, this is big news. I wonder why the Bills didn't give up a 7th rder if they are really interested in Jones. Because they knew he was going to get cut. John Clayton reported a couple weeks ago that he was going to be cut and would contacted by the Bills. Stay tuned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanInSouthBuffalo Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Can't have enough good O-linemen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColdBlueNorth Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 The Bills should do this plain and simple A tackle that still has a lot left in the tank, who isn't asking for Jason Peters type money. I like our interior line prospects, and I think we have some decent development players, but having a veteran you can plug in at left tackle would be a huge asset. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColdBlueNorth Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 A bit more from Rotoworld... It looks like he would not be able to start right away, but I think that he would be fine if they gave him the time to heal that he needs. Looks like he tried to tough it out with some injuries. "Jones is only 29, but probably has the body of a guy in his mid-30s. Back, hamstring, and knee issues cost him 17 of the Bengals' last 48 games. His latest injury is to his leg, where heavy scar tissue buildup caused the appendage to go numb. Jones had surgery this winter and is out until June. He's mentioned Arizona as a possible fit, but needs to get healthy first" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Probably because the bills did not want to pick up his contract. Didnt he sign an extension back a few years ago something like 6yrs, $40 mill. Bingo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 It's possible the guy can still 'git -er done', but I think OBD is satisfied with what we've got going into '09. I'm still holding out hope for a DT/DE/OLB via trade or June 1st cuts. June 1st cuts were rendered meaningless years ago. No one of any consequence is going to be released then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Band of Merriman Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 I do hope they bring him in, but only on the Bills terms and for at least a 2 year deal. I think having additional veteran on the line would be benifical. Let's face it. We jetisoned a lot of experience from our line. Here's hoping we're replacing it with greater talent and ability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davefan66 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 If the Bills want him, it should have been a done deal weeks ago. It isn't tampering, unless you get caught. Personally, I'd bring him in. Like our prospects on the o-line, but wouldn't mind adding some veteran talent so we wouldn't need to depend on the rookies so quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock'em Sock'em Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 We should bring him in for a look, but I can understand if we don't. Signing Jones means we don't dress Wood, Levitre, Chambers, Bell, or Butler. Probably Levitre or Bell. Levitre or Bell then becomes a backup if a lineman is out for a game. Will this hinder their development? The upshot is that it basically takes the risk out of shuffling the right side of the line as well as depending on Levitre or Bell being a player this year. We could have a pair of Levi's (Jones and Levitre) on our O-line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Can't have enough good O-linemen. Circumspection is in order...money counts, but in the scheme of things, cutting an LT still effective to save 3M...ummm. Maybe he still can bring the goods..dunno. A few years ago, he was chirping about not getting enough "love" from the B'gals - the newspaper showed him leaning on his $1M+ Bugatti Veyron. Love hurts. http://www.bengals.com/news/article-1/beng...6d-010172613abc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tortured Soul Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 If we bring him in, either Langston Walker, Butler, or Levitre goes to the bench. All three of those guys are quality lineman (Levitre should be, at least). You wouldn't even consider Hangartner on the bench? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 You wouldn't even consider Hangartner on the bench? He is our starting C right now, so no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HurlyBurly51 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Please bring him in. A verteran LT (not a RT moving over to the left side) is all this offense really needs. He could be the missing piece to a top 10 O. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEeEassyy Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Cant see a reason not to bring him in. Couldn't hurt us at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_fan Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 I'd be pretty happy with LT Jones RG Wood C Hamgartner RG Butler RT Walker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 You wouldn't even consider Hangartner on the bench? Not a chance, if you believe what Brandon said about how strongly they pursued him in FA (and I do). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteamRoller67 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 I'd be pretty happy with LT Jones RG Wood C Hamgartner RG Butler RT Walker That is the ideal setup... Stability on the right side, a smart center, a bulldozer for a left guard and a veteran LT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohiobuffalo Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 I'd be pretty happy with LT Jones RG Wood C Hamgartner RG Butler RT Walker perfect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 To me this is a no brainer.....you bring him in on a incentive laden contract and let everyone battle it out in camp for their spots..... I am quite sure that Wood and Levitre are going to do fine as rookies....but what happens if one of them should progress slower then we anticipate? What injuries? You bring in a veteran for insurance purposes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2020 Our Year For Sure Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 As long as we don't give him a contract that makes us hesitant to cut him, I can't complain with giving him a chance. But honestly I wouldn't expect him to be one of our five best linemen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HurlyBurly51 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 I'd be pretty happy with LT Jones RG Wood C Hamgartner RG Butler RT Walker +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsFORlife50 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 If we bring him in, either Langston Walker, Butler, or Levitre goes to the bench. All three of those guys are quality lineman (Levitre should be, at least). I bet it would be Hangartner to get the bench and move Wood to center because that is what he is best at Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans4e64 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 This guy hasn't been able to play at a high level in almost 3 years. If you bring him in, and go through the camps with him at LT, Wood, Hangartner, Butler, Walker... and then get into the season and find out he can't play anymore (which he's already proved) then you've got to re-shuffle the entire line (to the way we have it now) except they haven't had the offseason to practice and get comfortable in their new spots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan74 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 that would be a nice addition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 You wouldn't even consider Hangartner on the bench? Absolutely not... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan89 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Looks like a move the bills might actually make. He won't get much interest from other teams so he could come cheap. Like 2.5 million guaranteed with another two million in incentives for two years. It is a move that is worth the risk because there is so little risk involved Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 I'd be pretty happy with LT Jones RG Wood C Hamgartner RG Butler RT Walker +2 What's the downside to giving Jones a look, if his contract demands are modest and he has something to prove? Levitre, McKinney, Chambers and the Bell Boys can be depth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts