Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I remember the shock I felt when Brandon Beane came in and immediately dealt Darby and Watkins.

It immediately signaled two things to me: One, he and McDermott were trying to build a culture, and only wanted players that fit that culture. And two, they were gonna be drafting a quarterback in 2018 come hell or high water, and this was the first move made with an eye toward positioning them for a potential move up the board.

Always thought the way Beane pulled off those moves nearly simultaneously was cool, as was the fact that he got replacement players at each position that he traded away, simultaneously planning for the future but signaling to the locker room and fans that they weren't throwing in the towel on the present.

Other than that, as far as Darby himself, all I can say is: Good, solid, athletic man corner. Never a world beater, but usually a plus player when he was healthy. Carved out a nice, long, respectable NFL career. Here's wishing him a happy retirement.

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Agree 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, Logic said:

I remember the shock I felt when Brandon Beane came in and immediately dealt Darby and Watkins.

It immediately signaled two things to me: One, he and McDermott were trying to build a culture, and only wanted players that fit that culture. And two, they were gonna be drafting a quarterback in 2018 come hell or high water, and this was the first move made with an eye toward positioning them for a potential move up the board.

Always thought the way Beane pulled off those moves nearly simultaneously was cool, as was the fact that he got replacement players at each position that he traded away, simultaneously planning for the future but signaling to the locker room and fans that they weren't throwing in the towel on the present.

Other than that, as far as Darby himself, all I can say is: Good, solid, athletic man corner. Never a world beater, but usually a plus player when he was healthy. Carved out a nice, long, respectable NFL career. Here's wishing him a happy retirement.

I forgot that he started all 16 games for Washington in 2020, when they won the division with a 7-9 record and finished second overall on defense. They had no QB.

Posted

wow irts been a decade already ? set for life at age 31 - 40M career earning whick includes a great NFL pension - whale(y) of a pick but better trade (Phillips)

 

He got a ring with Philly as well.. made his mind up at Kentucky Darby...

 

 

Posted

I remember being in Chicago for the year we drafted him. Jim Kelly came out on stage to announce the pick, this was after he beat the cancer he had gone through.

 

Roger Goodell didn't even have to introduce him as they both walked out on the stage, the crowd erupted when they saw Kelly. :thumbsup:

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, Logic said:

I remember the shock I felt when Brandon Beane came in and immediately dealt Darby and Watkins.

It immediately signaled two things to me: One, he and McDermott were trying to build a culture, and only wanted players that fit that culture. And two, they were gonna be drafting a quarterback in 2018 come hell or high water, and this was the first move made with an eye toward positioning them for a potential move up the board.

Always thought the way Beane pulled off those moves nearly simultaneously was cool, as was the fact that he got replacement players at each position that he traded away, simultaneously planning for the future but signaling to the locker room and fans that they weren't throwing in the towel on the present.

Other than that, as far as Darby himself, all I can say is: Good, solid, athletic man corner. Never a world beater, but usually a plus player when he was healthy. Carved out a nice, long, respectable NFL career. Here's wishing him a happy retirement.

 

 

Well we already knew they were going to be drafting a QB in 2018 well before the Darby/Watkins trades.   That's why they handed Mahomes to conference rival KC 4 months earlier.  To get another 2018 first rounder.  

 

I don't think you and the other BBMB refugees had washed ashore here yet but the general consensus was that the primary "signal" of the Darby/Watkins trades was that they were tanking.  

 

It didn't go over well when I explained how getting rid of the core young talent(players with leverage) but keeping all of the old vet talent meant they were going to try to "Jauron ball" their way to the playoffs.  

 

You couldn't pay me to re-watch that brutal 2017 offense.   

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Logic said:

I remember the shock I felt when Brandon Beane came in and immediately dealt Darby and Watkins.

It immediately signaled two things to me: One, he and McDermott were trying to build a culture, and only wanted players that fit that culture. And two, they were gonna be drafting a quarterback in 2018 come hell or high water, and this was the first move made with an eye toward positioning them for a potential move up the board.

Always thought the way Beane pulled off those moves nearly simultaneously was cool, as was the fact that he got replacement players at each position that he traded away, simultaneously planning for the future but signaling to the locker room and fans that they weren't throwing in the towel on the present.

Other than that, as far as Darby himself, all I can say is: Good, solid, athletic man corner. Never a world beater, but usually a plus player when he was healthy. Carved out a nice, long, respectable NFL career. Here's wishing him a happy retirement.

Was Darby not a culture fit?  I cant remember anything from then.  Or was that a scheme fit thing? The Sammy trade at the time was bigger news to most.  Was he traded after only his rookie year here?

Posted
10 minutes ago, BillsShredder83 said:

Was Darby not a culture fit?  I cant remember anything from then.  Or was that a scheme fit thing? The Sammy trade at the time was bigger news to most.  Was he traded after only his rookie year here?

 

 

Darby was more of a non-fit of the scheme.    

 

Obviously,  in hindsight guys like Gilmore and Woods went on to be big stars for SB teams and clearly not any kind of culture problem.   Darby was the same but more of a good starter than a star.   Watkins and Dareus were the flakes.    

 

Really what McBeane were doing was getting rid of the young, early round talent because those are the players with contract leverage that can undermine a no-name young regime's agenda.    

 

They only wanted players that would be beholden to them.

 

That approach works but ideally you don't have to tear it down to that extent to build it back up.  

 

KC and Reid have always been able to stay a step or two ahead,  despite never drafting as highly since 2013,  because Reid didn't ever need to compromise on talent.

Posted

Favorite memory:

 

Local night club way after hours, circa 2016. Run into a guy coming up the stairs as my group and I tried to go up the same stair case from a different level. We stopped and he passed by. My then gf (now wife) said “is that Ronald Darby?”

 

I eyed him up and concluded no way. Dude is tiny. We got to the roof top bar and immediately bumped into Sammy Watkins, scores of fan girls, and a guy who I thought was mini-Gronk (then with the Bills) along with a handful of other recognizable players.

 

That’s my favorite memory of Ron Darby. Great 2nd round pick or greatest 2nd round pick?! 

  • Thank you (+1) 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...