Billsfed1 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago (edited) Been listening to a few pods on the schedule and one of the recurring points I’ve heard is “wish the bye week was a little bit later”. The Eagles had their bye week last year in week 5 and won the Super Bowl. They also (like the Bills) had to play 3 games prior to the Super Bowl and they even won under those conditions. I’m not entirely convinced it matters. The Lions had a bye by winning the NFC last year and they were out in the Divisional round so I think while it may be nice to have it mid-season or perhaps a touch later…not completely necessary in my book. What do you think? Edited 3 hours ago by Billsfed1 Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago You won't know how much it matters until it happens. If you have a lot of injuries, a bye let will help a bunch. 1 Quote
Success Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago I always like to see it later - just because more injuries happen as the season moves along, and having that week later in the season gives injured players time to heal. 1 Quote
mannc Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 54 minutes ago, Billsfed1 said: Been listening to a few pods on the schedule and one of the recurring points I’ve heard is “wish the bye week was a little bit later”. The Eagles had their bye week last year in week 5 and won the Super Bowl. They also (like the Bills) had to play 3 games prior to the Super Bowl and they even won under those conditions. I’m not entirely convinced it matters. The Lions had a bye by winning the NFC last year and they were out in the Divisional round so I think while it may be nice to have it mid-season or perhaps a touch later…not completely necessary in my book. What do you think? Makes very little difference. Some teams that get late byes are already all but eliminated, so the bye does them no good at all. 1 Quote
BillsFan130 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Ya IMO there's not enough evidence to correlate a late bye being an advantage. Have the majority of teams the last 10 Years or so won the Super Bowl with a late bye? Seems so, but not in convincing fashion. Also could be because of so many factors, which is why it's hard to correlate a late bye with being a big advantage Quote
Orlando Buffalo Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I prefer the bye being around week 10-12 but for the team I doubt it matters much. Obviously if we get the playoff bye that one really matters Quote
NoSaint Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, Billsfed1 said: Been listening to a few pods on the schedule and one of the recurring points I’ve heard is “wish the bye week was a little bit later”. The Eagles had their bye week last year in week 5 and won the Super Bowl. They also (like the Bills) had to play 3 games prior to the Super Bowl and they even won under those conditions. I’m not entirely convinced it matters. The Lions had a bye by winning the NFC last year and they were out in the Divisional round so I think while it may be nice to have it mid-season or perhaps a touch later…not completely necessary in my book. What do you think? There’s a big gap between it being insurmountable and simply less than ideal Quote
BillsFanForever19 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Mentioned this in another post, but one plus in the Bye Week coming after Week 6 is that it gives Hoecht and Ogunjobi two full weeks in the building before they hit the field. It may allow both to hit the ground running in Week 8 with extra preparation. 1 Quote
ganesh Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, Billsfed1 said: Been listening to a few pods on the schedule and one of the recurring points I’ve heard is “wish the bye week was a little bit later”. The Eagles had their bye week last year in week 5 and won the Super Bowl. They also (like the Bills) had to play 3 games prior to the Super Bowl and they even won under those conditions. I’m not entirely convinced it matters. The Lions had a bye by winning the NFC last year and they were out in the Divisional round so I think while it may be nice to have it mid-season or perhaps a touch later…not completely necessary in my book. What do you think? You can’t look by one season. If you take historic results then the #1 seed matters. There will always be exceptions like last year but predominantly the top seed gets to the SB. Quote
WotAGuy Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago If it breaks up two road games, it’s in the right week. 1 Quote
Offside Number 76 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago As fans, if we want to fixate on this, well, ok. I hope management/coaching isn't, because this is exactly the type of thing that leads to paralysis by analysis. The bye week really doesn't matter that much. Quote
MJS Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago It's the same principle as getting a 1st round bye in the playoffs. The later in the season, the more extra rest is valuable. But rest isn't suddenly going to make your team more talented or anything. Quote
NewEra Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I heard someone say something like the the last 10 or so champions had a bye week 8 or 9 or later Quote
klos63 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Byes always help, but to what extent depends on that particular week. What's the injury situation, travel, have a Thursday night game next... Quote
loedward22 Posted 37 minutes ago Posted 37 minutes ago 28 minutes ago, NewEra said: I heard someone say something like the the last 10 or so champions had a bye week 8 or 9 or later not the Eagles last year Quote
Kaenon Posted 6 minutes ago Posted 6 minutes ago I don't think so. Nothing statistically significant depending on all factors. P-value would show it's not statistically significant when ran in minitab. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.