Gugny Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 6 minutes ago, Doc said: If he hadn’t missed the end of the past 2 seasons it might be a different story. Being historically bad in the playoffs also isn't helping any. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaos Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 49 minutes ago, Gugny said: Being historically bad in the playoffs also isn't helping any. But he really really really wants to be the highest paid player Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuvian Posted March 10 Share Posted March 10 this could take until July to play out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dollars 2 donuts Posted March 10 Share Posted March 10 (edited) 19 hours ago, DrDawkinstein said: Stafford has 130,000,000 guaranteed reasons to come back tho It's a worse deal than paying Lamar $270M fully guaranteed imo because of how old and beat up Stafford was when they signed it. Lamar has been injured, but at least he should have 5 more years playing ahead of him. Stafford barely had 5 months left. Right! It stinks, Dr., when you sign an older guy for more than 100 million dollars (per year, what? I don't know, let's say $19 million - $21 million, no, how about $19.75 mill to $20.25 mill, somewhere around there jsut for an example) and then he isn't even healthy enough to play. I feel bad for those teams. Edited March 10 by dollars 2 donuts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NyQuil Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 I’m not crazy, his MVP season was three years ago right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Low Positive Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 2 minutes ago, NyQuil said: I’m not crazy, his MVP season was three years ago right? It was 2019, so I guess it depends on which season you consider us to be in right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 1 minute ago, NyQuil said: I’m not crazy, his MVP season was three years ago right? It was actually 4 years ago. And his last full season playing was 3 years ago. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillMafia716ix Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Lamar messed up playing this past season I would have sat out. But it’s wild that so many QB needy teams would rather gamble with a rookie QB than sign a proven winner in the prime of his career. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 3 minutes ago, BillMafia716ix said: Lamar messed up playing this past season I would have sat out. But it’s wild that so many QB needy teams would rather gamble with a rookie QB than sign a proven winner in the prime of his career. You think he would have strengthened his "I want a fully guaranteed contract" position by sitting out last season after missing the last 5 games plus at least 1 playoff game of the previous season? He had no idea he'd get injured again and miss the same number of games again. All of which in addition to having to give up 2-1st round picks are making teams shy away from trying to acquire him. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikemac2001 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 6 minutes ago, BillMafia716ix said: Lamar messed up playing this past season I would have sat out. But it’s wild that so many QB needy teams would rather gamble with a rookie QB than sign a proven winner in the prime of his career. He’s on a well coached team that schemed for him he hasn’t won big playoff games and is injury prone - he botched this deal and should fire his agent because he cost himself a lot of money I think he gets less cash now and if plays on franchise I could see it going worse Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NyQuil Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 2 hours ago, mikemac2001 said: He’s on a well coached team that schemed for him he hasn’t won big playoff games and is injury prone - he botched this deal and should fire his agent because he cost himself a lot of money I think he gets less cash now and if plays on franchise I could see it going worse His agent is his mom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikemac2001 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 1 hour ago, NyQuil said: His agent is his mom. Ya I know this - that’s why I keep saying it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albany,n.y. Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Turned down Ravens offer of 3 years $133 million fully guaranteed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Albany,n.y. said: Turned down Ravens offer of 3 years $133 million fully guaranteed. Does his tweet mean that, or that he might want that or maybe had just agreed to that deal? The way it came off I thought he was saying that to refute the false claims of what he wanted or may have turned down. But I didn’t look at it closely either cuz I don’t really care about his contract situation. Edited March 14 by Alphadawg7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBillsGospel2014 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 4 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said: Does his tweet mean that, or that he might want that or maybe had just agreed to that deal? The way it came off I thought he was saying that to refute the false claims of what he wanted or may have turned down. But I didn’t look at it closely either cuz I don’t really care about his contract situation. Going on Twitter and telling an average american who's probably making less than 60K a year he just turned down 133M guaranteed is always a good thing, what could go wrong? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 On 3/9/2023 at 3:43 PM, DrDawkinstein said: Stafford has 130,000,000 guaranteed reasons to come back tho It's a worse deal than paying Lamar $270M fully guaranteed imo because of how old and beat up Stafford was when they signed it. Lamar has been injured, but at least he should have 5 more years playing ahead of him. Stafford barely had 5 months left. Rams are screwed with Stafford. Won 3 games out of 9 last year (10 TDs, 9 INTs)....then got injured. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Behindenemylines Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Can’t recall where I read it but Lamar may sit out this year and not sign the tag-if that’s possible. what happens to his value then? I would think it tanks. I mean has sitting out ever actually worked? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QLBillsFan Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 On 3/11/2023 at 7:54 AM, BillMafia716ix said: Lamar messed up playing this past season I would have sat out. But it’s wild that so many QB needy teams would rather gamble with a rookie QB than sign a proven winner in the prime of his career. What has he proven for a guarantee $133M 3 year deal? He continues to refuse to get an agent even though he brags about this offer he turned down. He wants more than that! His value isn’t worth his ask. And he’s demonstrating a huge self awareness maturity issue. And he’s getting the same result. No contract. For an oft injured 1-3 playoff qb that has to have an O created around his skill set. He’s a good qb (8-12) but many going back to his draft year aren’t convinced he’s a SB qb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nextmanup Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 17 minutes ago, Behindenemylines said: Can’t recall where I read it but Lamar may sit out this year and not sign the tag-if that’s possible. what happens to his value then? I would think it tanks. I mean has sitting out ever actually worked? I have no idea if sitting out ever worked, but his value isn't going to tank. He'll be snatched up by someone, for big bucks, when he becomes available. He's clearly done in Baltimore. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Duffy Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Just now, Behindenemylines said: Can’t recall where I read it but Lamar may sit out this year and not sign the tag-if that’s possible. what happens to his value then? I would think it tanks. I mean has sitting out ever actually worked? Not sure, but I don't think it would help in terms of value. Not 100% sure, but doesn't agent(s) normally advise against sitting out a year in these type situations? Considering he doesn't have an agent though, curious how it ends up if he hurts himself much more than help himself with this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.