Jump to content

It's WAAAYYY Overdue - Holding Calls Should be 5 Yards


BuffaloBaumer

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, BuffaloBaumer said:

The fact that this penalty basically happens on EVERY SINGLE DOWN, isn't it ridiculous that it is still 10 yards? These penalties are drive killers and they ruin the offensive vibe immediately. I don't think I have ever heard this being brought up at owner's meetings and there is no reason that it should not be 5 yards. What am I missing here?

 

I totally agree that 10 yards is too much, and even hit agree to your OP...however...given how often holding does happen in the league, a more severe penalty is unfortunately necessary to avoid it being tried even more than it already is.  

 

It is an unfortunately a necessary evil that can't go away.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Logic said:

I think 10 yard penalty is perfect.

As others have said, a sack usually results in the loss of 5-7 yards anyway. If it was only a five yard penalty, people would hold all of the time to save themselves the down.

The penalty has to be bad enough that teams don't do it on purpose.

If we want to talk about the enforcement or language of holding penalties, that's fine, but the penalty yardage for it is right on point, IMO.

Now....defensive pass interference? THAT should change. 45-yard penalties that decide game outcomes are ridiculous and should not happen.

 

Why can't the refs determine if the hold was leading to a sack then? I mean when it is a running play and a ticky tack holding call is made, away from the play, there should be a difference. It's very comparable to running into the kicker and roughing the kicker, just separate the two calls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BuffaloBaumer said:

 

Why can't the refs determine if the hold was leading to a sack then? I mean when it is a running play and a ticky tack holding call is made, away from the play, there should be a difference. It's very comparable to running into the kicker and roughing the kicker, just separate the two calls.

You want more judgement calls from these refs? And then you got qbs like Lamar allen mahomes that can avoid sacks.

 

adding to much confusion no point to adjust the rule 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as we're airing our penalty grievances, the following scenario bothers me way more than it should:

  • Offense has a third and four at the opponent's six yard line.
  • Defense called for Offside.
  • They mark the ball half the distance to the goal line, which I get, but it's now third and one at the three. It should be first and goal at the three with the penalty making up the yards toward the first down, like anywhere else on the field.

I'll put this on the agenda for the next owner's meeting. You're welcome.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never liked offensive holding as a 10 yard penalty.  It is highly dependent on the officiating crew in terms of whether it is called, and it often has zero impact on the play unlike something like defensive pass interference where the ball is required to be catchable.

 

I have been watching football for 35 years and I still don't fully understand what rises to the level of a hold, versus what's considered legitimate.

 

The argument that it saves a sack... well, since 1993, the average loss of yardage on a sack is 6.5 yards.  That's a lot closer to 5 yards than it is 10 yards.  It also doesn't take into account holds on running plays, which might result in a 1-2 yard loss if the hold didn't take place and the runner is somehow caught behind the line of scrimmage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in the "keep it at 10 yards" group.  I'm old enough to remember this:

 

https://www.footballzebras.com/2019/10/nfl100-90-year-old-rules-made-for-a-different-game/#:~:text=Big fouls %3D big yardage penalties&text=Up through 1977%2C a holding,was a 20-yard penalty!

Big fouls = big yardage penalties

Today, a holding penalty puts the offense in a difficult position to keep the drive alive. Up through 1977, a holding penalty almost assuredly killed a drive. A holding penalty used to be 15-yards, from the spot of the foul. So, if the offense held five yards behind the line of scrimmage, the hold actually was a 20-yard penalty! Starting in 1978, all illegal blocking fouls (except personal fouls) were reduced from 15 to 10 yard penalties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, sullim4 said:

The argument that it saves a sack... well, since 1993, the average loss of yardage on a sack is 6.5 yards.  That's a lot closer to 5 yards than it is 10 yards. 

 

Yeah, but the penalty also negates the play, so the O gets an extra down, which provides added incentive to commit the hold.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BuffaloBaumer said:

The fact that this penalty basically happens on EVERY SINGLE DOWN, isn't it ridiculous that it is still 10 yards? These penalties are drive killers and they ruin the offensive vibe immediately. I don't think I have ever heard this being brought up at owner's meetings and there is no reason that it should not be 5 yards. What am I missing here?

Just make every penalty except personal fouls, DPI and OPI a spot penalty plus or minus 5 yards.  So for holding it’s the place of the hold -5 yards.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Success said:

People would hold a lot more.  10 yards is just.

Especially when you consider that they seldom call it anymore when the hold wasn’t instrumental in the success of the play on which it was called. That wasn’t always the case and it was infuriating when it was called against a player that was never really involved in the play to begin with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Logic said:

I think 10 yard penalty is perfect.

As others have said, a sack usually results in the loss of 5-7 yards anyway. If it was only a five yard penalty, people would hold all of the time to save themselves the down.

The penalty has to be bad enough that teams don't do it on purpose.

If we want to talk about the enforcement or language of holding penalties, that's fine, but the penalty yardage for it is right on point, IMO.

Now....defensive pass interference? THAT should change. 45-yard penalties that decide game outcomes are ridiculous and should not happen.

We all have seen wide open receivers drop passes. Agree, why 45 yard DPI, assuming the WR would catch it, they do drop them some times, especially as it would be contested. That's why the flag is thrown because of close coverage, not uncontested. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Success said:

People would hold a lot more.  10 yards is just.

That’s what I initially thought. But it doesn’t deter holding with it being 10 yards already. I see it on 90% of pass plays. I think the point here would be if 5 yards, then a ref will likely call it more being that it’s not  as game changing, but still negates the play and affects the offense’s drive. The main reason it’s not called now is that the nfl wants this dynamic passing league with highlights galore. So with 5 yard penalty, the offense still has a chance to make the next play a pass play. If on third down, 10 yards might cause some teams to punt. Whereas 5 yards might net another pass attempt, keeping the pass happiness league MO going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...