Jump to content

POLICE STATE BIDEN TRIALS: Corrupt DOJ/FBI/GA DA/CO SC/ME SoS: Trump Indicted 4x.


Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I may be a fascist, but I am strictly PG, maybe PG-13.  

Yeah kind of like the girl in my avatar. are your type ...classy AND Buxom tck!~!~!!

 

Fachist schmasist.  SMH  **hushing my beak*** He doesnt need me to defend him. But I would any day every day.  For a price

 

🙂

 

hasta lasagna PPP carry on.

 

m

 

EDIT. this thread Needs some comic relief . Your puke emoji notwithstanding. 

 

 

 

Edited by muppy
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
  • Mueller was not the AG. Pay attention!
  • Collusion is not a criminal term, it's a political talking point. We agree here.
  • Mueller found insufficient evidence, which is another way of saying the evidence did not support charges.  So?
  • Russians are Russians.  Perhaps the 'diplomats' that Obama expelled a couple weeks before he left office, long after he started complaining about interference, should have been on the receiving end of a tactical FBI raid? 
  • Stone and Manafort are citizens of the country, they get the same rights as everyone else, and it made no sense to testify;
  • Trump loved Wikileaks. Hillary loved a foreign national and his tale of fancy. Biden strong-armed Ukraine.  Obama officials loved surveilling the opposition.  The FBI loved the Patriot Act.   Politics is dirty business.

 

While I think 940 is blissfully complicit, I can actually see you planning the post Salem Witch trial BBQ party. 

 

 

 

940 

And none of that exonerates Trump, he like many serial criminals, especially wealthy ones, get away with stuff all the time. Trump was obviously colluding with Russia, his many actions prove that. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump has been filling the empty space with bull####, while not releasing the information in his possession that could show it is actually bull#### (if it was, which it's not).

 

This was Garland/DOJ calling his bluff, for lack of a better term, 100%. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

That's interesting.  And I can also see that perspective.  My theory is that if people that dream up a lot of bad policies and ideas had to bear the consequences of the idea things would be a lot different.  Like a liberal that supports homeless encampments in city neighborhoods except when the encampment is on their street.  Or a conservative that opposes all abortions that finds out his daughter just got knocked up by some undesirable and isn't too excited about her having that child.   

 

Liberal NIMBYism is so freaking annoying, totally agree with you there. Especially on the homelessness problem since we know how to solve it and homelessness encampments are just reminders that we simply do not care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the DoJ has filed a motion to unseal both the search warrant and the receipt for items seized during the search.

 

Since these were filed with a court, Trump actually can oppose the motion to unseal. I'm not sure if he will or what would happen if he did, but that's why we don't have the documents right now, they need to wait to see if Trump is going to oppose.

 

Of course, Trump's counsel already has copies of these documents, so he could release them if he wanted to without going through the court.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was told all week a Trump appointed Judge (since shown to be a huge Antifa loon) was the one who approved the raid.  

 

 

Yep.  

 

DC is weaponized against Americans.  

 

But we've been telling you this since March of 2020.

 

I am legitimately terrified when it becomes obvious DeSantis is going to win in 2024 what they're going to do to this country.  

 

What's left of it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

Get a grip. It's a part of the conversation that's out there. Out there includes here on this forum. I happen to agree with the statement made.

 

You can embed tweets here. It's allowed. I will continue to. If you don't like it please ignore. 

Still makes you look less credible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2e2u1b.gif

 

 

 

if you were paying attention the last few days, you would know that he dispelled some of the information that was "leaked".  Some of which came from Trump's own statements and his lawyer Christina Bobb  "appearance" on a "tv" network. 

 

but yeah, keep recycling the same ole bull####. 

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That guy (probably a big Trump supporter) exchanged fire with police in Ohio. Guess he was cornered and they are waiting the freak out. Local residents have to go to lock down because of this terrorist 

 

Is this what the Civil War is going to look like? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

That guy (probably a big Trump supporter) exchanged fire with police in Ohio. Guess he was cornered and they are waiting the freak out. Local residents have to go to lock down because of this terrorist 

 

Is this what the Civil War is going to look like? 

 

I sincerely doubt there will be a civil war, but I do believe we are going to see a marked increase in political violence.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since some are concerned with random takes from Twitter. I'll include the background on this one.. Here's a former Gorsuch clerk and former counsel to Senate judiciary committee. So sure he's on the right, but also more qualified to opine than anyone here.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

Since some are concerned with random takes from Twitter. I'll include the background on this one.. Here's a former Gorsuch clerk and former counsel to Senate judiciary committee. So sure he's on the right, but also more qualified to opine than anyone here.

 

 

 

That's certainly a defense he could raise should he be charged since there doesn't appear to be a formal presidential declassification procedure, but I do not think it's a slam dunk.

 

We also know there was ongoing back and forth between the FBI and Trump's team about recovering the documents. I think it's a good question to raise why they went this route, but too early to jump to conclusion either way.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Did CNN report yet that they found a MAGA hat along with a copy of Mein Kampf at the scene?

And a pair of khakis, a light blue shirt, a U-Haul, and mirrored sunglasses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

So...this is interesting. 

 

94zed comes out and declares that based numbers from the last election, 75 million +/- people in the country are fascists.  Your response is you're "not sure" 75 million citizens are fascists, which is a very brave position to take, Bill.  Godspeed for taking this stand, God Bless the Queen, and Go Trudeau or Go Home!  I guess maybe you see it as 40 million, or 20 million, 60 million or maybe the full 75 million.  Hard to say, not being sure and all.

 

I would suggest, humbly, that the siren call of the every day simpleton is declaring tens of millions of non-believers fascists. 

 

 

 

 

So Lenny, trying not to go over the top. But NOT ALL repubs are fascists, but maybe 10m are. You know all the Poor Boys, Parkland, Sandy Hook denying lovely folks. The rest are being fooled or just hate the left so much. I get that. 

But Trump talks like a wannabee dictator. It is what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

Stating that the government is persecuting you makes you a wannabe dictator? Really? How so? Come on Man! 

Just looking at other countries around the world, trying to end an election, defying laws of document removal, kinship with Kim, Putin, Poor Boys, enjoying the attempted obstruction of congress on Jan 6, just to mention a couple little things.

Look, the left have gone way too far, and I hate that people call me a racist because I say D Watson is headed in the Jeffrey Epstein direction.

You taught me to love surfers, and I never liked lefty, being fiscal conservative,  never believed governments should build houses, hate illegall immigration, hate when police issue a description of a dangerous suspect and omit skin color, but Trump would love to be leader for life...and would destroy institutions to do it. IMHO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChiGoose said:

 

That's certainly a defense he could raise should he be charged since there doesn't appear to be a formal presidential declassification procedure, but I do not think it's a slam dunk.

 

We also know there was ongoing back and forth between the FBI and Trump's team about recovering the documents. I think it's a good question to raise why they went this route, but too early to jump to conclusion either way.

 

 

This is EXACTLY what the illuminati deepstate want you to think.   It's step 1 in the deep state's takeover. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ChiGoose said:

 

What part of searching the home of a private citizen who had classified documents is an abuse of power? Was the FBI abusing their power when they investigated Hillary's email server?

I'm not clear the classification of these documents has been publicly divulged.  I don't think the raid had anything to do with those documents.  By accounts the President's legal team was cooperating with the government and had been following all instructions they received.  Garland said they'd be submitting motions to release the warrant and the list of items seized by the FBI.  But I'd like to know exactly what information and testimony was presented to the judge to establish probable cause and sign off on a warrant?  My gut says the DOJ/FBI was running the broken taillight routine.  A traffic cop sees a car with a broken taillight and uses it as probable cause to stop the vehicle and conduct a search.  On a fishing trip in an attempt to find "something".  The DOJ/FBI used the document search as a pretext to obtain a warrant to search the premises in order to find "something else".  That something else I believe is 1/6 "evidence".  So is the AG and the DOJ, and the FBI director and the FBI doing work for the 1/6 House Committee?  That would be troublesome.  I expect the government isn't too eager to reveal anything about what they told the judge.  If that turns out to be true, the AG needs to recuse himself and provide a public explanation.

 

Hillary's server situation was completely different.  She had an illegal server set up that held confidential and secret electronic records and e-mails that were hacked by Russian and Chinese operatives.  Mostly in order to avoid freedom of information act requests keeping her correspondence on a Dept of State server would expose her to.  The FBI basically did nothing.  They should have seized the servers and performed a complete forensic examination.  But they let her slide, as usual.

 

 

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...