Jump to content

[Misleading Title] Barkley to KC Rumor


Recommended Posts

I could see the Giants wanting to move on from Barkley. He will have a cap hit of over 7 million this year. Gettleman ****ed them so bad that they are in cap hell. Plus they are starting a rebuild with Schoen/Daboll so trying to get out of cap hell makes sense. Why would the Chiefs do this trade. Barkley is damaged goods at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would it take to get Matt Barkley from us?

 

A 5th? I'd pull that trigger. Not to KC though, we would need Matt to sign a NDA first. He's got state secrets. I'd deal with KC for a 2nd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, ChronicAndKnuckles said:


What’s a mook?

mook

n. Italian-American short form of malook, motherfxxxxx 1. a person of little social standing, one not worthy of respect. 2. an affectionate term for a regular guy, one who is unpretentious. 3. an incompetent person.

We don't pay mooks.

 

I think that anyone who thinks the Giants are trading Barkley, so they can put more pressure on Daniel Jones is a mook, and I don't mean a regular guy.  At least we didn't get another S. Barkley to Buffalo thread.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, sirebors said:

Useless and pointless thread. Let's post every single conjecture thread possible. 

Okay I'll start.  Isaiah Hodgins for Vanessa Hudgens.  Barely need to change the name on the back of the jersey. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillsFan4 said:

I thought you were talking about Matt Barkley. I was going to say why in the world do they want him? 😂

In a rush to be the first to post a thread with news, some can’t be bothered to create a title that makes sense. 🤔

Edited by BTB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Sorry for pushing this out, & miss-titling, itwas intended for comment / conversation  should this occur.

 

To the geniuses above, didn’t know I was dealing with bunch of condescending a-holes.

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by PayDaBill$
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 3
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PayDaBill$ said:


Not my rumor, I’ve been seeing / reading various mentions on the inter-web today.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A reference would be nice.  Maybe a link?  

15 minutes ago, PayDaBill$ said:

Sorry for pushing this out, & miss-titling, itwas intended for comment / conversation  should this occur.

 

To the geniuses above, didn’t know I was dealing with bunch of condescending a-holes.

 

 

 

 

 

You are the only a hole here buddy.  

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, PayDaBill$ said:

Sorry for pushing this out, & miss-titling, itwas intended for comment / conversation  should this occur.

 

To the geniuses above, didn’t know I was dealing with bunch of condescending a-holes.

 

 

 

 

 

Please feel free to exit anytime at your leisure.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, PayDaBill$ said:

Sorry for pushing this out, & miss-titling, itwas intended for comment / conversation  should this occur.

 

To the geniuses above, didn’t know I was dealing with bunch of condescending a-holes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

You mad, bro?

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...