Jump to content

0.22 Yards before contact in the running game.


damj

Recommended Posts

Just now, billsfan1959 said:

You needed to hear that to know how bad the oline was yesterday?


Many people in this forum feel a different running back would solve all the problem in the run game.  I’m of the belief that the problem lies within the OL.  Very few running backs are going to be as successful getting hit behind the LOS 

  • Like (+1) 6
  • Agree 8
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, damj said:

Per WGR ... our RBs had an average of 0.22 yards before contact.

 

That's less than 8 inches.

 

Very telling stat just how bad the o-line was.

 

Again, this was the same problem last year and Beane decided to keep the same starting oline intact.

 

And for a team that apparently values analytics and advanced metrics you really have to wonder what they are looking at to assume to hold the line and not make big time changes to the oline.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume that stat is from only yesterday?  In which case, it's a garbage stat (not that our blocking & running game isn't garbage).  RBs had like what, 8 carries?

I assume a decent number is between 2-3 yds.  W/ only 8 carries, you get caught behind the LOS even only 2 times & voila, that's how it averages 8".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That stat flies in the face of my naked eye that thinks they are barely getting the handoff before first contact

1 minute ago, Ethan in Portland said:

And the so called wizard did nothing to address it.

That 2022 second round pick isn't blocking anyone this year

I really dont have a problem with Boogie....I have a problem that they are not playing him

 

Spencer looks like he is a find.  They should have done MORE.  Also there is obviously something wrong with Dawkins?  Covid related?

2 minutes ago, TheProcess said:

Then why keep calling runs? 

So the opposing defense has to at least account for it a little bit in their scheme?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Gugny said:

Doesn't matter.  It's Singletary's fault and if we had a better running back, we'd be undefeated and they'd cancel the Super Bowl right now because it would be moot to even bother playing it.

While I don't agree with this sarcasm the OL isn't the only blame here. The RBs are slow and have no vision. Everytime I bring up signing a back in the forum everyone says they don't want to pay one. Nobody that plays this team is afraid of one of these backs breaking one asks talking it to the house.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, FilthyBeast said:

 

Again, this was the same problem last year and Beane decided to keep the same starting oline intact.

 

And for a team that apparently values analytics and advanced metrics you really have to wonder what they are looking at to assume to hold the line and not make big time changes to the oline.

There plenty of games where it was not a problem last year. The line plays decently sometimes, terribly other times.

 

This is not an oline that will prevent you from ever winning. Yes, in some games they are really bad. But in others they do give Allen time to throw. I remember some games last year where Allen had an eternity to throw. For whatever reason, they struggled. Having two starters out was part of the problem.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MJS said:

There plenty of games where it was not a problem last year. The line plays decently sometimes, terribly other times.

 

This is not an oline that will prevent you from ever winning. Yes, in some games they are really bad. But in others they do give Allen time to throw. I remember some games last year where Allen had an eternity to throw. For whatever reason, they struggled. Having two starters out was part of the problem.

Seriously Dude, no one has said that, but we had Super Bowl aspirations until this line took a ***** this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, FilthyBeast said:

 

Again, this was the same problem last year and Beane decided to keep the same starting oline intact.

 

And for a team that apparently values analytics and advanced metrics you really have to wonder what they are looking at to assume to hold the line and not make big time changes to the oline.

 

They drafted our starting RT in the 3rd round as well as some more developmental projects. I think this offseason will see the OL as a priority (as WR and DL were previously), as well as getting younger at WR. You can’t do it all at once, unfortunately. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...