Jump to content

Draft Prospects


Milanos Milano

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, LyndonvilleBill said:

Thanks. I'll add him to my list to review. 👍

Marquan McCall, NT, Kentucky
Height: 6-3. Weight: 358.
Projected 40 Time: 5.35.
Projected Round (2022): 5-7. .........................  immoveable.  run stopper, not a pass rusher..... late round

 

Edited by maryland-bills-fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, maryland-bills-fan said:

Marquan McCall, NT, Kentucky
Height: 6-3. Weight: 358.
Projected 40 Time: 5.35.
Projected Round (2022): 5-7. .........................  immoveable.  run stopper, not a pass rusher..... late round

 

Thanks. For some reason he was already on my list for DT'S and I have him as a 7 and maybe even an udfa.... Don't remember where I got his name from though.🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/27/2021 at 5:38 AM, IronMaidenBills said:

Penning-Dawkins-Patterson/Morris-Brown-Faalele 

 

On 1/1/2022 at 4:41 PM, SCBills said:

Currently projected late 1st Round in areas we could be looking at:

 

Trevor Penning - OT - Northern Iowa

 

On 1/1/2022 at 4:53 PM, GunnerBill said:

 

If Penning is there I am drafting him and putting Dawkins inside.

 

On 1/1/2022 at 6:24 PM, Solomon Grundy said:

Gunner, I thought the same all season. Penning/Brown bookends would be awesome, but I’ll save that thought until after the combine.

 

On 1/1/2022 at 8:09 PM, JGMcD2 said:

Some of my favorite guys for 2022… 
 

Trevor Penning OT, Northern Iowa

 

On 1/1/2022 at 10:17 PM, LyndonvilleBill said:

I don't have any issue moving Dawkins inside. My only issue is if we get a rookie center (a lot of people want to replace Morse) and a rookie LT, you'd be putting him in the middle of 2 rookies. Don't think that would be a good idea.

 

Seems that many of you guys would draft Trevor Penning and move Dawkins inside. I am just curious - is there any reason to believe that Dawkins would be any good playing guard? Did he play that position in the past?

 

On 1/1/2022 at 10:21 PM, NewEra said:

Yeah, it’s tough to discuss moving a team captain from a premier position to an less valuable position.  How would he deal with it mentally.  Some dudes are fragile and can’t cope.  It’s a demotion in a sense and can possibly have a negative effect in the locker room if he doesn’t cope well. He seems like an emotional gentleman.  Ya never know. 
 

but I’d roll the dice on Pennell.  Would be a nice pairing @ LT and RT protecting 17

 

Also this. We pay Dawkins to play LT and I guess he feels like one. Is it that easy just to draft someone else and "downgrade" Dion? He'd certainly not be happy about it. Which does not mean he is not a team first guy and would be able to handle it, I just think that is something to consider.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, No_Matter_What said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seems that many of you guys would draft Trevor Penning and move Dawkins inside. I am just curious - is there any reason to believe that Dawkins would be any good playing guard? Did he play that position in the past?

 

 

Also this. We pay Dawkins to play LT and I guess he feels like one. Is it that easy just to draft someone else and "downgrade" Dion? He'd certainly not be happy about it. Which does not mean he is not a team first guy and would be able to handle it, I just think that is something to consider.

I don’t want to dock Dawkins pay, just slide him inside. If Dawkins views getting paid the same but being a LG as a demotion, then that’s a Dawkins problem. We need help at LG and I think Dawkins would play well there. Either that or take Green with our first round pick if he is available. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, IronMaidenBills said:

I don’t want to dock Dawkins pay, just slide him inside. If Dawkins views getting paid the same but being a LG as a demotion, then that’s a Dawkins problem. We need help at LG and I think Dawkins would play well there. Either that or take Green with our first round pick if he is available. 

 

I think Dawkins is a pretty good LT.  I'd much rather take someone like Green and keep Dawkins at LT.  

 

If Green is gone, but Penning is there, I guess that's up to the staff to make that work, but LT/RT are the least of our problems moving forward. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, No_Matter_What said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seems that many of you guys would draft Trevor Penning and move Dawkins inside. I am just curious - is there any reason to believe that Dawkins would be any good playing guard? Did he play that position in the past?

 

 

Also this. We pay Dawkins to play LT and I guess he feels like one. Is it that easy just to draft someone else and "downgrade" Dion? He'd certainly not be happy about it. Which does not mean he is not a team first guy and would be able to handle it, I just think that is something to consider.

 

I had Dawkins graded as a guard with tackle flex coming out. He played tackle at Temple but he has always lacked idea length for tackle in the NFL something he has made up for with quickness and sound technique. He did play some snaps for us at guard as a rookie when I think Incognito went down during a game for a series or two and they had Cody left tackle and Dawkins left guard and he was flying off the ball in the run game and was aggressive getting to the second level. I get it, really small sample size, but I have always thought he would be a good NFL tackle and a great NFL guard. The last 18 months before this season he has been excellent at tackle and probably out performed my expectations. But this season has not been a good one. Some of it might be the covid hangover but there were stories out there about his conditioning last spring even before he contracted covid. That is a worry.

 

I am not trying to replace Dion Dawkins as such, but if you are drafting to upgrade the oline in round 1 you go after a guy who can be a franchise left tackle and then you future the rest out from there. You don't draft a 1st round guard unless you are getting Quinton Nelson or Zack Martin.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Offensive weapons I’d like to see added to this roster in the draft are Isaiah Likely and George Pickens. Pickens is the 50/50 ball type receiver we’ve been yearning for. A 2 TE look with Knox and Likely would scare the bejeezus out of defenses. I’d also like to see the Bills draft Brennan Armstrong at QB to develop. He’s athletic and accurate with the ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/1/2022 at 1:09 PM, JGMcD2 said:

Some of my favorite guys for 2022… 
 

Trevor Penning OT, Northern Iowa

 

Ahmad Gardner CB, Cincinnati 

 

Trent McDuffie CB, Washington

 

Daniel Faalele OT, Minnesota 

 

Kyler Gordon CB, Washington

 

Alec Pierce WR, Cincinnati 

Velus Jones Jr. WR, Tennessee 

 

Clint Ratkovich H-Back, NIU

 

 

Trevor Penning is my guy too…

 

As a rookie you slot him in at LG (played many snaps at RG for N Iowa) for a potential swap with Dawkins after a few years if he wins the competition.

 

Bad thing is….He is already considered a round 1 guy.  He will be at the Senior Bowl in 3 weeks and I 100% expect him to boost his draft stock even more.

On 1/3/2022 at 9:36 AM, SCBills said:

 

I think Dawkins is a pretty good LT.  I'd much rather take someone like Green and keep Dawkins at LT.  

 

If Green is gone, but Penning is there, I guess that's up to the staff to make that work, but LT/RT are the least of our problems moving forward. 

Penning had plenty of playing time at RG for N Iowa…. You plug him in right away At LG… Bates a future replacement for Morse.  After a year, maybe 2, Penning and Dawkins can battle for the LT position being Dawkins may only have a year left on his contract.

Edited by CEN-CAL17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CEN-CAL17 said:

Trevor Penning is my guy too…

 

As a rookie you slot him in at LG (played many snaps at RG for N Iowa) for a potential swap with Dawkins after a few years if he wins the competition.

 

Bad thing is….He is already considered a round 1 guy.  He will be at the Senior Bowl in 3 weeks and I 100% expect him to boost his draft stock even more.

Penning had plenty of playing time at RG for N Iowa…. You plug him in right away At LG… Bates a future replacement for Morse.  After a year, maybe 2, Penning and Dawkins can battle for the LT position being Dawkins may only have a year left on his contract.

I want Penning, but I will settle for Faalele. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/1/2022 at 2:23 PM, ExWNYer said:

 

It's amazing how many myopic people think that you have to take a RB in Round 1 to get a 'dynamic' player. It's so blatantly false and a not a great use of a top asset. The OL-needy Steelers foolishly eschewed that need and took Najee Harris instead. 

Notice that they are in the playoffs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the philosphy is to go for the superior player with the highest ceiling, rather than a good JAG with a high floor to fill a hole.  We will this in all the rounds after round 1.  For round 1:

 

Davis will not be there, and we will not trade up for him.

 

IF one of the top 3-4 OT is there, we take him and reshuffle the o-line.  Neal, Ekonwu, Pennning, Kinard

 

If the world's best center is there we take him. Remember that our center has had a lot of concussions and there may be some knowledge that he is going to call it a career.  (Linderbaum if Morse is going)

 

If the first LB is there we take him and upgrade our run defense by getting us a killer 4-3 formation option against the running game.

Damone Clark .................. .Llyod or B.Smith in the 2nd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, maryland-bills-fan said:

 

IF one of the top 3-4 OT is there, we take him and reshuffle the o-line.  Neal, Ekonwu, Pennning, Kinard

 

 

I am looking at tackles at the moment. Neal makes me very wary. He is great going forwards. Once he has to go sideways... ugh that is ugly. I really worry about him in pass sets for a team that wants to throw it down the football field. At this stage I think he is a right tackle only. And if that is my conclusion then he won't get a 1st round grade from me. 

 

The talk of him going top 5 is mad. Charles Cross and Ikem Ekonwu are the top two tackles and Ekonwu reminds me a bit of Dawkins. The arm measurements for him will be vital. I think he is potentially an all pro guard. His length worries me a tad at tackle. I will wait for the measurements before I finalise my view but I am leaning towards grading him as a guard with tackle flex. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I am looking at tackles at the moment. Neal makes me very wary. He is great going forwards. Once he has to go sideways... ugh that is ugly. I really worry about him in pass sets for a team that wants to throw it down the football field. At this stage I think he is a right tackle only. And if that is my conclusion then he won't get a 1st round grade from me. 

 

The talk of him going top 5 is mad. Charles Cross and Ikem Ekonwu are the top two tackles and Ekonwu reminds me a bit of Dawkins. The arm measurements for him will be vital. I think he is potentially an all pro guard. His length worries me a tad at tackle. I will wait for the measurements before I finalise my view but I am leaning towards grading him as a guard with tackle flex. 

Thanks for the analysis.  I would not take a pure guard in the first round, nor a tackle, who would have a chance of downgrading to guard. I want a LOF with such a pick.  We can get a good shot at that player in the second round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/3/2022 at 7:00 AM, No_Matter_What said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seems that many of you guys would draft Trevor Penning and move Dawkins inside. I am just curious - is there any reason to believe that Dawkins would be any good playing guard? Did he play that position in the past?

 

 

Also this. We pay Dawkins to play LT and I guess he feels like one. Is it that easy just to draft someone else and "downgrade" Dion? He'd certainly not be happy about it. Which does not mean he is not a team first guy and would be able to handle it, I just think that is something to consider.

It looks like Dawkins is stalking tbd like

Sneaking Andrew Garfield GIF by A24
 

he saw this thread and said awwwww helll naaaaaw!  Dude has been a beast since the last patriot game.  Just about the time our OL woke up

1 hour ago, maryland-bills-fan said:

Notice that they are in the playoffs

As they were the prior season…..while missing a handful of their best players to injury. It’s not like they went from the a bottom 10 team to top 10.  The Steelers are what they were last year, but with a good RB and no time to throw deep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, maryland-bills-fan said:

Thanks for the analysis.  I would not take a pure guard in the first round, nor a tackle, who would have a chance of downgrading to guard. I want a LOF with such a pick.  We can get a good shot at that player in the second round.

 

Yea me too on a pure guard. Ekonwu is definitely not that, he has played tackle and played it well. I had the same concern with Dion coming out he ended up as my top guard with a 2nd round grade that year. The Bills took him played him at tackle and he has been pretty good. I feel like Ekonwu can be pretty good as well. Can he be better than that at tackle? That is the question and his length may be a physical limitation. If I conclude it is then Ekonwu would probably end up my top guard prospect but still in the first because I am more confident at tackle in him than I was with Dion based on their college film. That would promote Penning to my #2 tackle. I really like him and I think his ceiling is almost limitless. The issue is there is some rawness in his game too. So he is a bit boom or bust compared to Ekonwu who I think is a very safe pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NewEra said:

As they were the prior season…..while missing a handful of their best players to injury. It’s not like they went from the a bottom 10 team to top 10.  The Steelers are what they were last year, but with a good RB and no time to throw deep

Steelers don't make the playoffs with James Conner and Benny Snell running the ball this year. They also lost Smith-Schuster from last year.

 

I'm fine with an rb in the first, especially with where we will be picking. But that player needs to make the others around him better. That's what Harris does.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BrainwashedBillsFan said:

We need some roads graters on the Oline to set the tone. Remember when the Cowboys some years back drafted a bunch of Oline with their first few picks. That line became the best in football for several years. I wouldn’t be opposed to it. 

 

It wasn't all in one draft. They spent 3 out of 4 first rounders on OL.

 

2011 - Left Tackle - Tyron Smith - ELITE

2013 - Center - Travis Fredrick - ELITE

2014 - Guard - Zack Martin - ELITE

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I have started to get a handle on this class and here are some initial thoughts:

 

1. Where are the stars? 

This might be the weakest draft at the top since 2013. Obviously the Quarterback class has been a topic of discussion and there are no elite level prospects here. Could we see a 2013 like first round where only one, very desperate, franchise (for the Bills in 2013 see the Panthers or Washington now) reaches for a guy in the first? Maybe not but I do not think you are going to have 4 or 5 Quarterbacks in the first like the past couple of drafts. And it isn't just Quarterback. While this is a good edge group and a good offensive line group and a decent secondary group... those real stand out premium players are not there. There is normally a tier of 7 or 8 guys at the top of each draft who are the established premium prospects. In this class that might be 3 or 4. 

 

2. Expect the unexpected in the top 10

Because the draft is weaker at the top end and because the top ten has two teams picking twice (Giants and Jets) I think it is less predictable than any top 10 in years. As we stand here right now I am going to guarantee Aidan Hutchinson and Kayvon Thibodeaux are top 10 picks. Who fills the other 8 spots is up for grabs. Remember in 2013 the Dolphins traded right up to #3 to take Dion Jordan who not everyone had as a first round player. That kind of crazy trade up and reach might be in play this year too. Equally the Giants and Jets might feel that with a weaker top 10 they can reach for need a bit more at their picks than in other years with at least one of their selections. You might get a really scheme specific type guy going earlier than most expect. 

 

3. Build through the trenches

The offensive tackle group is not as top heavy as the 2020 class that produced Wirfs, Thomas, Wills and Becton as early day 1 guys but there are some good prospects there and I expect 5 or 6 to go in the first round. Equally there are a glut of pass rushers who would normally be late day 1 / early day 2 guys who will get pushed up due to the lack of elite players in the class. 

 

4. Day 2 is going to be chaotic

I expect less trad activity in round one than we have seen in some recent drafts as teams stand pat and let the rather uninspiring board come to them. But day 2 is a spot with plenty of depth in the "scheme specific" category of guys. I think you can expect a lot of jostling and trading as teams try to get in position to take people who can bring a specific skillset to their football team. 

 

5. The bumper covid depth doesn't really exist

There was lots of speculation last year that 2022 would be a super deep draft because of kids taking advantage of the extra year of eligibility to stay in school last year. From my early work I am not sure that is really borne out in the class. It is a pretty average depth class. There are probably more day 2 or day 3 type guys than some year but they will be pushed up somewhat by the lack of those top end of the first style studs. So I'm not sure this is class like say 2020 where you could (in certain positions) get day 2 talents in the first couple of rounds of day 3. There will always be some that slip through the cracks.... but teams who banked on this draft being transformational - looking at your Philadelphia - might be sorely disappointed. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

So I have started to get a handle on this class and here are some initial thoughts:

 

1. Where are the stars? 

This might be the weakest draft at the top since 2013. Obviously the Quarterback class has been a topic of discussion and there are no elite level prospects here. Could we see a 2013 like first round where only one, very desperate, franchise (for the Bills in 2013 see the Panthers or Washington now) reaches for a guy in the first? Maybe not but I do not think you are going to have 4 or 5 Quarterbacks in the first like the past couple of drafts. And it isn't just Quarterback. While this is a good edge group and a good offensive line group and a decent secondary group... those real stand out premium players are not there. There is normally a tier of 7 or 8 guys at the top of each draft who are the established premium prospects. In this class that might be 3 or 4. 

 

2. Expect the unexpected in the top 10

Because the draft is weaker at the top end and because the top ten has two teams picking twice (Giants and Jets) I think it is less predictable than any top 10 in years. As we stand here right now I am going to guarantee Aidan Hutchinson and Kayvon Thibodeaux are top 10 picks. Who fills the other 8 spots is up for grabs. Remember in 2013 the Dolphins traded right up to #3 to take Dion Jordan who not everyone had as a first round player. That kind of crazy trade up and reach might be in play this year too. Equally the Giants and Jets might feel that with a weaker top 10 they can reach for need a bit more at their picks than in other years with at least one of their selections. You might get a really scheme specific type guy going earlier than most expect. 

 

3. Build through the trenches

The offensive tackle group is not as top heavy as the 2020 class that produced Wirfs, Thomas, Wills and Becton as early day 1 guys but there are some good prospects there and I expect 5 or 6 to go in the first round. Equally there are a glut of pass rushers who would normally be late day 1 / early day 2 guys who will get pushed up due to the lack of elite players in the class. 

 

4. Day 2 is going to be chaotic

I expect less trad activity in round one than we have seen in some recent drafts as teams stand pat and let the rather uninspiring board come to them. But day 2 is a spot with plenty of depth in the "scheme specific" category of guys. I think you can expect a lot of jostling and trading as teams try to get in position to take people who can bring a specific skillset to their football team. 

 

5. The bumper covid depth doesn't really exist

There was lots of speculation last year that 2022 would be a super deep draft because of kids taking advantage of the extra year of eligibility to stay in school last year. From my early work I am not sure that is really borne out in the class. It is a pretty average depth class. There are probably more day 2 or day 3 type guys than some year but they will be pushed up somewhat by the lack of those top end of the first style studs. So I'm not sure this is class like say 2020 where you could (in certain positions) get day 2 talents in the first couple of rounds of day 3. There will always be some that slip through the cracks.... but teams who banked on this draft being transformational - looking at your Philadelphia - might be sorely disappointed. 

Yup. I expect a lot of emphasis on high value positions like Edge, CB and WR early.  If there is not a stud sitting there, then teams will tho for good players at a premium positions.  Some QBs will go due to need too.  If it were a better IDL class then they’d be included above.  Needy teams will have to reach.  It’s going to be a rough FA period if you need one - and most teams do. 

 

For the Bills, day 1 might be a good time to trade back.  There will be a QB or two sitting there at the end of round 1 and some team will want the 5th year option.  

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

 

2. Expect the unexpected in the top 10

Because the draft is weaker at the top end and because the top ten has two teams picking twice (Giants and Jets) I think it is less predictable than any top 10 in years. As we stand here right now I am going to guarantee Aidan Hutchinson and Kayvon Thibodeaux are top 10 picks. Who fills the other 8 spots is up for grabs. 

Did you forget about Evan Neal? He might even go at #1 imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Bill from NYC said:

Did you forget about Evan Neal? He might even go at #1 imo.

 

No I didn't forget him. He might go number 1. He probably will go top 10. But he is far from guaranteed to be the first tackle off the board. There will be teams for whom his lateral movement is a concern. 

29 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

Yup. I expect a lot of emphasis on high value positions like Edge, CB and WR early.  If there is not a stud sitting there, then teams will tho for good players at a premium positions.  Some QBs will go due to need too.  If it were a better IDL class then they’d be included above.  Needy teams will have to reach.  It’s going to be a rough FA period if you need one - and most teams do. 

 

For the Bills, day 1 might be a good time to trade back.  There will be a QB or two sitting there at the end of round 1 and some team will want the 5th year option.  

 

Think this is fair. If I was Washington or Carolina I'd be far more willing to pick one of these QBs trading up from early round 2 to end of round 1 than I would to spend a top 10 pick on them. But like you say, desperate teams reach. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Solomon Grundy said:

@GunnerBill, what do you think about the depth of talent at the guard/center positions?

 

Not got into the depth as in beyond the likely day 1 and 2 guys but from a first look I think not as good as the tackle depth would be my instinct. There are some tackles who you could draft and shift inside to guard potentially. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Not got into the depth as in beyond the likely day 1 and 2 guys but from a first look I think not as good as the tackle depth would be my instinct. There are some tackles who you could draft and shift inside to guard potentially. 

With this being said, this is how I wish the Bills pick in this years draft. In order, Breece Hall (RB), Travis Jones (DT), George Pickens/John Metchie (WR). This is pre-combine. Need to see timed speed for some. I like what Motor is doing, but I still think the Bills need that dynamic RB to compliment Josh. Jones is that run stuffing DT needed to add. Pickens is THAT GUY!! The throw it up and I’ll catch it guy. Opposite Diggs will help create some serious matchup problems. His timed speed will be the deciding factor. If bad, then Metchie. Also, Metchie is from Brampton 😎

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

No I didn't forget him. He might go number 1. He probably will go top 10. But he is far from guaranteed to be the first tackle off the board. There will be teams for whom his lateral movement is a concern. 

 

Steve Serby of the NY Post predicted that he goes to Jax at #1. I agree because his potential is sky high. He coiuld possibly turn out to be a RT of Erik Williams proportions (best that I ever have ever seen) or Orlando Pace at LT (also the best I have ever seen). 

When the draft comes closer, I will rate all of the Alabama draft eligible players. That said, I cannot begin to imagine how Jax could pass up on an opportunity to have this kid protect Trevor Lawrence. 

Edited by Bill from NYC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bill from NYC said:

Steve Serby of the NY Post predicted that he goes to Jax at #1. I agree because huis potential is sky high. He coiuld possibly turn out to be a RT of Erik Williams (best that I ever saw) or Orlando Pace at RT (also the best I ever saw). 

When the draft comes nearer, I will rate all of the Alabama draft eligible players. That said, I cannot begin to imagine how Jax could pass up on an opportunity to have this kid protect Trevor Lawrence. 

I love the guy as a prospect but he doesn't move anywhere near well enough laterally to be in the Orlando conversation. His straight  line explosion though does belong in the Erik Wiliams mold for sure👍

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, TheBeaneBandit said:

I love the guy as a prospect but he doesn't move anywhere near well enough laterally to be in the Orlando conversation. His straight  line explosion though does belong in the Erik Wiliams mold for sure👍

As I said, I will be more descriptive of Neal and other Crimson Tide players as we get closer to the draft.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JaCrispy said:

Speed, speed, and more speed on the offensive side of the ball...can never have enough...

I want more speed on the defensive side of the ball too, particularly in the front 7. Micah Parsons ran an ungodly 4.36 and has the instincts to boot, so he plays that fast. Sadly a player that dynamic won’t be around at #32. But a heat seeking missle at LB, a speed DE, or a big ugly disruptor like Jordan Davis is what I want. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TheBeaneBandit said:

I love the guy as a prospect but he doesn't move anywhere near well enough laterally to be in the Orlando conversation. His straight  line explosion though does belong in the Erik Wiliams mold for sure👍

 

I agree totally with this. But for me it makes him much more of a RT prospect at the NFL level than a LT. I think he needs to play RT and in a power offense. Remains to be seen who the Jags hire to know how much of a fit that is.... but is an NFL team drafting a right tackle 1st overall? I wouldn't. 

 

I don't think he is the best tackle in the draft personally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

No I didn't forget him. He might go number 1. He probably will go top 10. But he is far from guaranteed to be the first tackle off the board. There will be teams for whom his lateral movement is a concern. 

 

Just saw this on NFL.com, and I must admit that it was poorly written and obviously not edited. The writer claims that Neal will go first, but he does not list him as his favorite OT. Btw, do you know much about the OT from Northern Iowa?

https://www.nfl.com/news/daniel-jeremiah-2022-nfl-mock-draft-1-0-kenny-pickett-malik-willis-among-3-qbs

 

 

Edited by Bill from NYC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Bill from NYC said:

Just saw this on NFL.com, and I must admit that it was poorly written and obviously not edited. The writer claims that Neal will go first, but he does not list him as his favorite OT. Btw, do you know much about the OT from Northern Iowa?

https://www.nfl.com/news/daniel-jeremiah-2022-nfl-mock-draft-1-0-kenny-pickett-malik-willis-among-3-qbs

 

 

He’s bad ass!!

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Solomon Grundy said:

He’s bad ass!!

I only saw a little bit of you tube video on him but he looks really strong and pretty quick. It seems as if he played RG before moving to LT, and he looks like he could be a GREAT guard. 

This of course is NOT to say that he woudn't be a good tackle!

Edited by Bill from NYC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...