Jump to content

I hope Star and Ford have both been powerlifting


Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, gobills404 said:

Morse is better than Feliciano and it isn't close. He's one of the best pass blocking centers in football and was great in 2019 as a puller but for some reason they stopped using him like that in the run game.

Most of the passing plays this year found Morse getting pushed back into the pocket, with the KC game his worst effort. On running plays, he could never make the block at the point of attack, allowing penetration which broke up most running plays. 

When he was hurt, Mongo showed much more promise at center. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Coach Tuesday said:

Cody Ford is a horrible football player. Injuries aside, I see very little instinct, technique or commitment to getting better.  Would love him to prove me wrong but I’m very skeptical he will.

 

Amazes me they had a 1st round grade on him and were giddy trading up to 38th in 2019 to select a tweener OL.  They significantly overvalued him. 

 

Cue the hindsight is 20/20 types, but when he couldn't win the RT job in camp and then rotated with a journeyman I knew it wasn't good. He's finished both his seasons on IR, which is also cause for concern.  But I agree, he seems weak at the point of attack.  Maybe that changes and he recovers, but right now he's a spare OL part.  

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

The 1T position between the guard and center forces a double team.

 

Whomever the Bills used at 1T got the double team this season.......Phillips, Butler, Oliver, Zimmer....

 

The 3T lines up on the outside shoulder of the opposite side guard.

 

The positioning of the 3T makes it very difficult to double team that player...........counterproductive in most cases.

 

Ed Oliver simply needs to work on his game more this offseason........and the Bills need to get some better pass rushers on the rest of the DL.

 

1T plugger was not the problem with this defense.

 

 

This is a fair argument, and I'm on record as saying we underestimated Star's loss.

 

Would love to see comparative tape. Do you know of any out there?

 

I "think" the difference I saw this year: yes, the 1T eating the DTeams, but getting turned, at least enough times for me notice ...and (whichever) gap that created wasn't getting filled quickly enough.

 

W Star, no push (obviously) but he'd rarely get tuned. That's my perception, at least.

22 hours ago, thurst44 said:

Star always gets this tude from a large part of the fanbase and I'm downright sick of it. When he was brought in as a FA in 2018, one of the big reasons given was b/c QBs were stepping up into the lack of pressure up the middle for short passes and tight ends were feasting. That was one of the biggest rationales I heard for his contract: he would stop tight ends. In 2017, we gave up the 6th most yards to tight ends. In 2020, the most. In Star's two years, we gave up the fewest yards to tight ends. Yet so few people seem to be putting two-and-two together that maybe, just maybe, Star's not the garbage player we've judged him as. 

 

Entire comment is a good think through. This is pretty much where I am currently. But, again, I'd have to see 19 v 20 comps tape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, BigPappy said:

All I know is that the run game on both sides of the ball regressed without both of these men. Is that a coincidence? Time will tell if they are both back next year. That said, as someone else pointed out, Carolina's run defense regressed when they lost Star when they thought he was replaceable. 

2019s run blocking was better by far, the difference on the O line was and is no Spain, and an injured and then IRd Ford, with them gone/out the run game on offense has been woeful, and has been equally less good on the D side with Star’s absence, as well as Shaq and Jordan being gone, your point is spot on, some fans here don’t see the obvious that is starring at them. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Dukestreetking said:

This is a fair argument, and I'm on record as saying we underestimated Star's loss.

 

Would love to see comparative tape. Do you know of any out there?

 

I "think" the difference I saw this year: yes, the 1T eating the DTeams, but getting turned, at least enough times for me notice ...and (whichever) gap that created wasn't getting filled quickly enough.

 

W Star, no push (obviously) but he'd rarely get tuned. That's my perception, at least.

 

Entire comment is a good think through. This is pretty much where I am currently. But, again, I'd have to see 19 v 20 comps tape.

 

 

There really isn't any footage out there to support the notion that Lotulelei did a better job helping the defense defend the run.

 

He was ineffective...........he didn't even always draw the double because a key to causing the double from the 1T(as opposed to the nose) is threatening the gap between the center and guard........which he wasn't athletic enough to do.

 

The defense was going to see a statistical regression this season...........for the first time they had a legitimately difficult schedule........the linebacking corps was banged up.........there were a ton of new faces in that front 7 and they lost a bunch of sacks in Phillips, Alexander and Shaq.

 

Ed Oliver had a down year.........one of the reasons wasn't the loss of Lotulelei though.......Phillips and Butler comparably replaced Star's 2019 1T reps.........it was the lack of a 350# gap shooter alternating with him at 3T.    The combination of Oliver and a motivated Phillips was a long days work for a guard.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/27/2021 at 12:06 PM, Ethan in Portland said:

You sure about that? Bloated contract for below average player and a healthy scratch after clearing the concussion protocol.

They can bring back Feliciano on the cheap, draft the center of the future, and clear cap space for 2022 and 2023.


Morse is a key reason the pass pro is good. 
 

albeit also a reason the inside run is not good. 

4 hours ago, frostbitmic said:

Star and Ford need to be spending the Winter sumo wrestling each other.

That’s a whole lotta beard flying around 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, BillsVet said:

 

Amazes me they had a 1st round grade on him and were giddy trading up to 38th in 2019 to select a tweener OL.  They significantly overvalued him. 

 

Cue the hindsight is 20/20 types, but when he couldn't win the RT job in camp and then rotated with a journeyman I knew it wasn't good. He's finished both his seasons on IR, which is also cause for concern.  But I agree, he seems weak at the point of attack.  Maybe that changes and he recovers, but right now he's a spare OL part.  

 

 

As fans, we never know what issues a player may be going through off the field, but as a fan I must admit, Ford's play does not inspire me.

 

At RT, he's too slow footed to move laterally with a DE and gets beat regularly.

At Guard, he doesn't possess the necessary strength to anchor or push his man back.

 

IIRC Ford was described as a mauler with a nasty streak who plays to the echo of the whistle.  I haven't seen any of that plus he can't stay healthy.  2021 is a big year for Ford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/27/2021 at 9:20 AM, Doc said:

Yes Star was a loss.  As for Ford, I'm not ready to write-him-off just yet.  I just hope they put him at one guard spot and that's it.

 

I agree, he needs to focus in on the details of the blocking and blocking technique at one spot.

 

My concern for Ford is that he spent his rookie year injured, and then in addition to the groin, knee etc injuries he showed up with on injury report, he was observed wearing a brace on one arm or shoulder and to be struggling blocking to that side.  I'm not "up" on the niceties of what injuries get reported or not.  Beane said of Ford "he's played more games injured than he has healthy". 

 

Maybe it's just bad luck, and he'll address it and heal up and come back healthy and stay healthy.  Or maybe his body just got too beat up in college and he can't handle it any more.

 

I don't think he needs to powerlift per se though, I think he needs to train differently to get strong but avoid injury.

 

5 hours ago, Don Otreply said:

2019s run blocking was better by far, the difference on the O line was and is no Spain, and an injured and then IRd Ford, with them gone/out the run game on offense has been woeful, and has been equally less good on the D side with Star’s absence, as well as Shaq and Jordan being gone, your point is spot on, some fans here don’t see the obvious that is starring at them. 

 

 I agree our run blocking was better in 2019 but I'm not sure losing Spain was the root cause. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, fasteddie said:

Most of the passing plays this year found Morse getting pushed back into the pocket, with the KC game his worst effort. On running plays, he could never make the block at the point of attack, allowing penetration which broke up most running plays. 

When he was hurt, Mongo showed much more promise at center. 

 

Mongo is a better run blocker, but he's not as good a technician on pass plays.

 

I don't think it's true "most of the passing plays found Morse getting pushed back"....there were a number, but of course we can find passing plays with Feliciano or Williams getting beaten like drums.  Morse did struggle at times... I think working between Brian Winters and either an injured Cody Ford or sometimes Boettger (initially) had a lot to do with it. 

 

But no, there were plenty of pass plays where Josh Allen had time to smoke a cigarette and survey his domain.

 

On running plays as Beane alluded, we are not a power run team and Morse will never be that guy who can help you run up the gut with power.  But Morse is actually a skilled run blocker, and on our zone run plays he was usually not the problem.

 

On 1/27/2021 at 9:38 AM, JohnNord said:

As far as Star, I think they see a role for him on the roster as a rotational player.  I think they will want to find another option specifically at 1 Tech DT to keep Oliver at 3 Tech.

 

Before injury, it was Harrison Phillips who was rotating with Star at 1TDT.  He was supposed to be the 1TDT of the future, or at least one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I agree, he needs to focus in on the details of the blocking and blocking technique at one spot.

 

My concern for Ford is that he spent his rookie year injured, and then in addition to the groin, knee etc injuries he showed up with on injury report, he was observed wearing a brace on one arm or shoulder and to be struggling blocking to that side.  I'm not "up" on the niceties of what injuries get reported or not.  Beane said of Ford "he's played more games injured than he has healthy". 

 

Maybe it's just bad luck, and he'll address it and heal up and come back healthy and stay healthy.  Or maybe his body just got too beat up in college and he can't handle it any more.

 

I don't think he needs to powerlift per se though, I think he needs to train differently to get strong but avoid injury.

 

 

 I agree our run blocking was better in 2019 but I'm not sure losing Spain was the root cause. 

Not so much the root cause but certainly part of the difference, both he and Ford have a bit of a mean streak and as a combination it is missed in our current run game, jmo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/27/2021 at 10:54 AM, Ethan in Portland said:

Cut Morse. Bring back Feliciano to play center in 2021. Draft a true center to develop. Play Ford at RG.

 

If you listen to Beane, he won't tell you everything but he does mean what he says, and it provides clues to his thinking and priorities.

 

Beane said so much positive stuff about Morse: that he was an athletic center, that he played very well and had great communication, especially the 2nd half of the season  People are keying on that one comment about "never gonna be the guy to move the NT 3 ft back" but I don't think that's the kind of OL we want to be - at least, nothing I heard in Beane's presser sounded like "we plan to totally retool our OL and RBs to become a power rather than a zone run team".   It was more about execution and how 1 player missing their block can totally stuff the play and we need to practice and emphasize and work on the run plays.

 

Cutting Morse would create more dead cap than we'd save in salary as well as leaving a hole, so I don't see it.

 

About Feliciano, Beane emphasized how valuable his positional flexibility is to them.  But he didn't mention his play at center.  Feliciano is probably our best run blocker, but he is not a pass blocking star.  And when he was playing center, there was at least 1 snap a game where I said "Sunnuvabeeotch, it's a good thing our QB is 6'5" tall".  I think Beane would like him back, but at a "positionally flexible depth" price.  So if someone sees him as a star and pays him, he's gone.

 

I hope we draft either a G or a G/C to develop, but given how complicated our offense is said to be, I'd rather not be in the position where we have to count on them.

 

I wish someone had asked Beane about the other OL guys, especially Bates.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, fasteddie said:

Most of the passing plays this year found Morse getting pushed back into the pocket, with the KC game his worst effort. On running plays, he could never make the block at the point of attack, allowing penetration which broke up most running plays. 

When he was hurt, Mongo showed much more promise at center. 

I feel that if Bills want to run the ball. Morse is not the guy..

Will not argue the pickup at the time. Even with the injury risk.
 Bills should move on and or offer restructure to Back up Center pay. No hate. but Bills might need to bite the bullet here and consider Morse Not the starter next season. as of right now

1 hour ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Mongo is a better run blocker, but he's not as good a technician on pass plays.

 

I don't think it's true "most of the passing plays found Morse getting pushed back"....there were a number, but of course we can find passing plays with Feliciano or Williams getting beaten like drums.  Morse did struggle at times... I think working between Brian Winters and either an injured Cody Ford or sometimes Boettger (initially) had a lot to do with it. 

 

But no, there were plenty of pass plays where Josh Allen had time to smoke a cigarette and survey his domain.

 

On running plays as Beane alluded, we are not a power run team and Morse will never be that guy who can help you run up the gut with power.  But Morse is actually a skilled run blocker, and on our zone run plays he was usually not the problem.

 

 

Before injury, it was Harrison Phillips who was rotating with Star at 1TDT.  He was supposed to be the 1TDT of the future, or at least one of them.

Issue became Morse and friends were having trouble getting up field. When they did they all looked good.

 But at some point Bills could not move a DT off the lane more than a yard or so. Mitch struggled to get push and it was becoming too obvious

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/27/2021 at 11:50 AM, BADOLBILZ said:

The 1T position between the guard and center forces a double team.

 

Whomever the Bills used at 1T got the double team this season.......Phillips, Butler, Oliver, Zimmer....

 

The 3T lines up on the outside shoulder of the opposite side guard.

 

The positioning of the 3T makes it very difficult to double team that player...........counterproductive in most cases.

 

Ed Oliver simply needs to work on his game more this offseason........and the Bills need to get some better pass rushers on the rest of the DL.

 

1T plugger was not the problem with this defense.

 

Good explanation of why 1T gets double teams and 3T does not...as we see a number of folks like to talk of DL without understanding the difference.

 

That said, I'm not sure I can entirely agree that 1T plugger was not the problem with this defense....perhaps you mean not the only problem? or not the major problem?

 

Early on it seemed to me they were trying to use Harrison Phillips in his expected role as the emerging 1TDT; I don't remember who they were rotating him with.  But they weren't getting it done.  The Rams ran over us, and we were struggling to get any QB pressure.

 

That led to the Great Kansas City Experiment of "healthy" scratch for Harry and Trent Murphy in favor of Zimmer and Bryan Cox Jr...but as I recall the experiment ran deeper, they were really swapping rotations around trying to find a couple that worked.  And of course, KC just humiliated us in the run game for 245 yds, leading to the Conf Championship epitaph "at least they only ran over us for 114"

 

It seems to me that we were kind of in the mode "can anyone play 1TDT?" much of the year.  It seems like they finally got it done by platooning extensively - everybody played a little 1TDT, everybody played a little 3TDT.  At least I recall being surprised to see Harry lined up at 3T a few times, and of course Oliver played 1T

 

I don't know if you caught in his presser, Beane basically acknowledged Phillips was not really recovered enough from his ACL to play well at the beginning of the season, and "didn't want to" be shut down but they thought it was best to try to have him effective by the season's end (then they barely played him against IND)

 

At times in the season's last games there were plays where he blew up 2 guys and made a tackle.  Perhaps a full offseason of training will bring us the guy they thought they drafted.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

If you listen to Beane, he won't tell you everything but he does mean what he says, and it provides clues to his thinking and priorities.

 

Beane said so much positive stuff about Morse: that he was an athletic center, that he played very well and had great communication, especially the 2nd half of the season  People are keying on that one comment about "never gonna be the guy to move the NT 3 ft back" but I don't think that's the kind of OL we want to be - at least, nothing I heard in Beane's presser sounded like "we plan to totally retool our OL and RBs to become a power rather than a zone run team".   It was more about execution and how 1 player missing their block can totally stuff the play and we need to practice and emphasize and work on the run plays.

 

Cutting Morse would create more dead cap than we'd save in salary as well as leaving a hole, so I don't see it.

 

About Feliciano, Beane emphasized how valuable his positional flexibility is to them.  But he didn't mention his play at center.  Feliciano is probably our best run blocker, but he is not a pass blocking star.  And when he was playing center, there was at least 1 snap a game where I said "Sunnuvabeeotch, it's a good thing our QB is 6'5" tall".  I think Beane would like him back, but at a "positionally flexible depth" price.  So if someone sees him as a star and pays him, he's gone.

 

I hope we draft either a G or a G/C to develop, but given how complicated our offense is said to be, I'd rather not be in the position where we have to count on them.

 

I wish someone had asked Beane about the other OL guys, especially Bates.
 


I don’t think the Bills cut Morse either and I think if you improved guard play would help elevate his performance 

 

But given the comment about physicality it does make you wonder.  Here is what Sal had to say about it:

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Don Otreply said:

Not so much the root cause but certainly part of the difference, both he and Ford have a bit of a mean streak and as a combination it is missed in our current run game, jmo. 

 

I have a theory, with only fragments of supporting evidence, that the root cause of the run game problems this year was a "low interest rate" early in the season.

Hang with me a second, and I'll explain what I mean.

 

What was the single most important question for the team to answer this season?  IMO: "Will Josh Allen be that Franchise Guy for us, or No?"  McDermott and Beane had made it clear before the draft, they wanted a guy who could "operate from the pocket" as a passer.  They acquired Diggs to go with Brown and Bease.  They'd upgraded the line.  Josh Allen had spent the off-season reworking his mechanics in pursuit of accuracy.  It was time to "Rut Hog or Die"

 

So, with no OTA or minicamp and abbreviated training camp/no preseason games, and then with turmoil on the OL after Feliciano was injured - I think they gave the Run Game the "Bum's Rush".  I believe every scrap of time Daboll could wrangle got spent working on the passing game, trying to nail down routes and timing concepts that Josh hadn't tried before.

 

My evidence for this is:

1) Beane explicitly pointed to run blocking as a problem and said to achieve balance, we need to practice, emphasize, and work on it.  To me, that implies lack of practice, emphasis, and work on it last training  camp and early in the season

2) Daboll mentioned practicing 50 plays, 48 run 2 pass before the NE game.  Result: 190 rush yards.  McDermott mentioned the run game as a focus for the bye.  Next game LAC: 172 yards.  So somehow when we practiced, emphasized, and worked on the run game - it worked.

 

I don't think they expected the run game to be as poor as it was, for whatever reason.  I think they felt the practice they gave it was "enough".

 

But if it was the thought, I can't argue with the prioritization to do everything possible to make the pass game work correctly and answer that critical Year 3 Question "Will Josh Allen be that Franchise Guy for us, or No?"

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, JohnNord said:


I don’t think the Bills cut Morse either and I think if you improved guard play would help elevate his performance 

 

But given the comment about physicality it does make you wonder.  Here is what Sal had to say about it:

 

 

 

I re-listened to that section of the press conference.  The press really zeroed in on, and amplified the signal, from the comment that Morse is never gonna be a guy to move the nose tackle back 3 feet.  But that was one line several phrases in.  The whole section was very very positive, almost glowing.  Beane's whole demeanor during it was very pleased.

 

 The press likes to make different stuff out of players being a healthy scratch than the team may intend.  They did this when Horrible Harry was scratched.  To the press, it's all "ooooooh, they're moving on!  He's in the doghouse!  He'll be traded...or cut!"   And as the weeks wore on, it became clear that no, he wouldn't be, and he was working his way back into the lineup.

 

The Bills, with the limited off-season and with some players returning from injury and other changes, were focused on "play our best football in January" and were looking, midseason, at combinations of guys they would ordinarily work through in pre-season. 

 

I think Morse was a healthy scratch because the OL Williams-Winters-Feliciano-Boettger-Dawkins played well in a run-centric offense vs. NWE.  So they wanted to see it in a pass-centric offense vs. SEA.  Was it still good?  No.  No it was not.  We won handily, but Allen was sacked 7 times,  had to do a lot of escaping from pressure, and there were a couple shotgun passes where I was "Damn, good thing he's 6'5". 

Experiment over.  Could have been bad news for Morse if it worked, but it didn't.  Here's the ball, Mitch.  Finish the season strong.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I re-listened to that section of the press conference.  The press really zeroed in on, and amplified the signal, from the comment that Morse is never gonna be a guy to move the nose tackle back 3 feet.  But that was one line several phrases in.  The whole section was very very positive, almost glowing.  Beane's whole demeanor during it was very pleased.

 

 The press likes to make different stuff out of players being a healthy scratch than the team may intend.  They did this when Horrible Harry was scratched.  To the press, it's all "ooooooh, they're moving on!  He's in the doghouse!  He'll be traded...or cut!"   And as the weeks wore on, it became clear that no, he wouldn't be, and he was working his way back into the lineup.

 

The Bills, with the limited off-season and with some players returning from injury and other changes, were focused on "play our best football in January" and were looking, midseason, at combinations of guys they would ordinarily work through in pre-season. 

 

I think Morse was a healthy scratch because the OL Williams-Winters-Feliciano-Boettger-Dawkins played well in a run-centric offense vs. NWE.  So they wanted to see it in a pass-centric offense vs. SEA.  Was it still good?  No.  No it was not.  We won handily, but Allen was sacked 7 times,  had to do a lot of escaping from pressure, and there were a couple shotgun passes where I was "Damn, good thing he's 6'5". 

Experiment over.  Could have been bad news for Morse if it worked, but it didn't.  Here's the ball, Mitch.  Finish the season strong.

 

 


You aren’t wrong about the press amplifying comments from those end of the year pressers.  
 

So many interpreted McDermott saying “we need to run the ball” to mean that they would be reverting back to a ball control, ground and pound offense.

 

It was pretty clear to me that he was referring to running at times when it would be advantageous because the defense is protecting versus the pass.  Especially considering this happened the past two weeks.
 

I guess it’s a long offseason so they need something to write about!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I have a theory, with only fragments of supporting evidence, that the root cause of the run game problems this year was a "low interest rate" early in the season.

Hang with me a second, and I'll explain what I mean.

 

What was the single most important question for the team to answer this season?  IMO: "Will Josh Allen be that Franchise Guy for us, or No?"  McDermott and Beane had made it clear before the draft, they wanted a guy who could "operate from the pocket" as a passer.  They acquired Diggs to go with Brown and Bease.  They'd upgraded the line.  Josh Allen had spent the off-season reworking his mechanics in pursuit of accuracy.  It was time to "Rut Hog or Die"

 

So, with no OTA or minicamp and abbreviated training camp/no preseason games, and then with turmoil on the OL after Feliciano was injured - I think they gave the Run Game the "Bum's Rush".  I believe every scrap of time Daboll could wrangle got spent working on the passing game, trying to nail down routes and timing concepts that Josh hadn't tried before.

 

My evidence for this is:

1) Beane explicitly pointed to run blocking as a problem and said to achieve balance, we need to practice, emphasize, and work on it.  To me, that implies lack of practice, emphasis, and work on it last training  camp and early in the season

2) Daboll mentioned practicing 50 plays, 48 run 2 pass before the NE game.  Result: 190 rush yards.  McDermott mentioned the run game as a focus for the bye.  Next game LAC: 172 yards.  So somehow when we practiced, emphasized, and worked on the run game - it worked.

 

I don't think they expected the run game to be as poor as it was, for whatever reason.  I think they felt the practice they gave it was "enough".

 

But if it was the thought, I can't argue with the prioritization to do everything possible to make the pass game work correctly and answer that critical Year 3 Question "Will Josh Allen be that Franchise Guy for us, or No?"

 

I hear ya on those thoughts and do not disagree. I mused in another thread that the running game got short shrift, in that Daboll gave it little attention. I do suspect that the refrigerator sized guard (Spain) was missed to some degree, that, on top of Fords injury didn’t help the run game issues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Beane and McDermott are going to view both of these guys as sort of "FA Additions" this offseason.  Beane drafted Ford and I'm sure that Ford will have a job to lose in the starting OL lineup.  And we all saw what we were missing without Star, who I think we underrated with the team when we had him.

 

I hope both guys come back hungry and motivated.  Obviously the fact that Star sat the season out makes you wonder that a little more with him.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/27/2021 at 10:38 AM, JohnNord said:

Remember what McDermott about needing to be physical and the desire to run the ball better.  I think could have implications toward Ford being part of the plan. 

 

It’s possible that he could make John Feliciano expendable - as much as they love him, I don’t know if they’ll break the bank to keep him.   While he has been decent, it’s clear the middle of the line has been an issue this season.

 

As far as Star, I think they see a role for him on the roster as a rotational player.  I think they will want to find another option specifically at 1 Tech DT to keep Oliver at 3 Tech.  
 

 

I think they have to wait 1 more year before the cap hit becomes reasonable 


John, I like you’re points.  Regarding Star, I saw a precipitous loss of performance from Oliver and Edmunds when he was out as well as a loss of run defense.  He’s one of those unsung heroes kind of guys.  With Ford, if he is a solid Guard, that makes it that much easier to shed Morse’s contract and keep Mongo at a lesser price moving him to Center.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, frostbitmic said:

Star and Ford need to be spending the Winter sumo wrestling each other.

 

Well at least there is a precident:

 

9.jpg?1

1 hour ago, Don Otreply said:

I hear ya on those thoughts and do not disagree. I mused in another thread that the running game got short shrift, in that Daboll gave it little attention. I do suspect that the refrigerator sized guard (Spain) was missed to some degree, that, on top of Fords injury didn’t help the run game issues. 

 

The refrigerator sized guard was malfunctioning since he got new contract and when he got to Tennessee he was mysteriously injured when he was not when he got on plane.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/27/2021 at 8:25 AM, 947 said:

I think it's more likely that Feliciano comes back is the starting Center. Morse could be a cap casualty, he has been no better than league average overall & is paid like a Pro Bowler. Feliciano is a better OC than OG in my mind.

I think Ford and Star will help......but much like Beane overkilled it on WR this past year I dont want to count on it and not try other ways to improve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/28/2021 at 12:12 AM, Bangarang said:

I doubt either of those guys moves the needle much of at all. 

 

 

I doubt you're correct there. IMO losing Lotulelei moved the needle a lot, downwards. And Ford is young, and he's played 22 and maybe 1/3 games, without much of an offseason before that second year.

 

But we'll see.

Edited by Thurman#1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Limeaid said:

 

Well at least there is a precident:

 

9.jpg?1

 

The refrigerator sized guard was malfunctioning since he got new contract and when he got to Tennessee he was mysteriously injured when he was not when he got on plane.

That is true, it is also true he was a force during the 19/20 seasons run game, as well didn’t allow a sack that season. We miss that performance level on the O line, he and Ford when healthy made a difference, as compared to the 20/21 season. Beane needs to find a guy to replicate that for next year, just my thoughts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Good explanation of why 1T gets double teams and 3T does not...as we see a number of folks like to talk of DL without understanding the difference.

 

That said, I'm not sure I can entirely agree that 1T plugger was not the problem with this defense....perhaps you mean not the only problem? or not the major problem?

 

Early on it seemed to me they were trying to use Harrison Phillips in his expected role as the emerging 1TDT; I don't remember who they were rotating him with.  But they weren't getting it done.  The Rams ran over us, and we were struggling to get any QB pressure.

 

That led to the Great Kansas City Experiment of "healthy" scratch for Harry and Trent Murphy in favor of Zimmer and Bryan Cox Jr...but as I recall the experiment ran deeper, they were really swapping rotations around trying to find a couple that worked.  And of course, KC just humiliated us in the run game for 245 yds, leading to the Conf Championship epitaph "at least they only ran over us for 114"

 

It seems to me that we were kind of in the mode "can anyone play 1TDT?" much of the year.  It seems like they finally got it done by platooning extensively - everybody played a little 1TDT, everybody played a little 3TDT.  At least I recall being surprised to see Harry lined up at 3T a few times, and of course Oliver played 1T

 

I don't know if you caught in his presser, Beane basically acknowledged Phillips was not really recovered enough from his ACL to play well at the beginning of the season, and "didn't want to" be shut down but they thought it was best to try to have him effective by the season's end (then they barely played him against IND)

 

At times in the season's last games there were plays where he blew up 2 guys and made a tackle.  Perhaps a full offseason of training will bring us the guy they thought they drafted.

 

 

 

The point of the 1 tech in this defense is supposed to be to set up the instinctive MLB to be able to make plays in run defense.

 

Doesn't even make sense with a guy like Edmunds behind it.

 

I think they roll with this setup for another year and eventually have to change out the MLB or change the positioning up front.

 

Wouldn't hurt this defense OR offense to be able to be multiple like recent champs NE and KC have been able to be.

 

The 1 tech's mostly did their job this season once the rotation was set in the second half..........Vernon Butler basically cloned the performance of Star Lotulelei(which wasn't hard) and Phillips was an improvement over what they had in the WC game in Houston last year(Liuget) so IMO the 1 tech position overall was improved.      

 

As I said the regression statistically with the defense was mainly the MUCH better schedule and the significant loss of pass rush.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/27/2021 at 12:06 PM, Ethan in Portland said:

You sure about that? Bloated contract for below average player and a healthy scratch after clearing the concussion protocol.

They can bring back Feliciano on the cheap, draft the center of the future, and clear cap space for 2022 and 2023.

 

I would encourage you to watch a few Cover 1 videos about Morse. Cheers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

 

The point of the 1 tech in this defense is supposed to be to set up the instinctive MLB to be able to make plays in run defense.

 

Doesn't even make sense with a guy like Edmunds behind it.

 

I think they roll with this setup for another year and eventually have to change out the MLB or change the positioning up front.

 

Wouldn't hurt this defense OR offense to be able to be multiple like recent champs NE and KC have been able to be.

 

The 1 tech's mostly did their job this season once the rotation was set in the second half..........Vernon Butler basically cloned the performance of Star Lotulelei(which wasn't hard) and Phillips was an improvement over what they had in the WC game in Houston last year(Liuget) so IMO the 1 tech position overall was improved.      

 

As I said the regression statistically with the defense was mainly the MUCH better schedule and the significant loss of pass rush.

 

I take your point that to advance to the next level, we need more ability to be multiple on D.

 

It's apparent that you and McDermott and Frazier just disagree fundamentally on Edmunds capabilities.  They think he's their MLB of the future.  You disagree.  He keeps going to the pro-bowl for some reason.   I'm skeptical of the pro-bowl as a "popularity contest" but there's that. 🤷‍♂️

 

Edmunds and especially Milano in pass coverage, seem to me to have made their living on "zone eyes".  That ability has served them well much of the season.   Mahomes used that ability to bite them hard, to manipulate them all over the field and move them wherever he wanted.  Mahomes is a master, but QB and OCs all over the league will surely be looking at that film and trying to take a lesson.  Not sure how we counter.  When you make your living "taking the cheese" how do you abstain?

 

Even when they had set 1st and 2nd rotations the second half of the season, I thought we were still playing 1TDT by committee a significant amount, to the detriment of Ed Oliver's abilities..  I gave up trying to go through the game film play by play to see who was playing where when - even on all-22 I find it challenging - but for sure I saw Oliver playing 1TDT and Harrison Phillips at 3T (!!) late in the season. 

 

Three questions for ya:

1) What did you see from Q Jefferson?  I couldn't see him.  He had falling snap-counts through the season but still played 40-ish% of the snaps the back half of the season.  Whatever he contributed, it doesn't seem to be QB hits or TFL, and I think he was mostly playing 3TDT.  As the guy with the 8th highest cap hit this season but little dead cap, he seems an obvious target for "see ya later"

 

2) Milano.  Beane seemed to use the Jordan Phillips "good luck in your future endeavors" code in his presser.  Yet the D just seems to work much better (outside last Sunday) when he plays.  What are your thoughts on Milano?

 

3) John Brown.  You were pretty staunch mid-season that our offense doesn't work nearly as well when he's not out there.  What are your thoughts now?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/27/2021 at 10:09 AM, TheBeaneBandit said:

Having both these players make a difference would be a great start to making a weakness a strength. With Ford, he has come off an offseason surgery both his years so I really hope he can come in a new man and vindicate his draft status.

Agreed. Defense missed star this year. He’s not a stat guy but he constantly takes up 2 blockers and is decent in run support. Ford on the other hand needs to do better. 

Edited by Rebel101
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

I take your point that to advance to the next level, we need more ability to be multiple on D.

 

It's apparent that you and McDermott and Frazier just disagree fundamentally on Edmunds capabilities.  They think he's their MLB of the future.  You disagree.  He keeps going to the pro-bowl for some reason.   I'm skeptical of the pro-bowl as a "popularity contest" but there's that. 🤷‍♂️

 

Edmunds and especially Milano in pass coverage, seem to me to have made their living on "zone eyes".  That ability has served them well much of the season.   Mahomes used that ability to bite them hard, to manipulate them all over the field and move them wherever he wanted.  Mahomes is a master, but QB and OCs all over the league will surely be looking at that film and trying to take a lesson.  Not sure how we counter.  When you make your living "taking the cheese" how do you abstain?

 

Even when they had set 1st and 2nd rotations the second half of the season, I thought we were still playing 1TDT by committee a significant amount, to the detriment of Ed Oliver's abilities..  I gave up trying to go through the game film play by play to see who was playing where when - even on all-22 I find it challenging - but for sure I saw Oliver playing 1TDT and Harrison Phillips at 3T (!!) late in the season. 

 

Three questions for ya:

1) What did you see from Q Jefferson?  I couldn't see him.  He had falling snap-counts through the season but still played 40-ish% of the snaps the back half of the season.  Whatever he contributed, it doesn't seem to be QB hits or TFL, and I think he was mostly playing 3TDT.  As the guy with the 8th highest cap hit this season but little dead cap, he seems an obvious target for "see ya later"

 

2) Milano.  Beane seemed to use the Jordan Phillips "good luck in your future endeavors" code in his presser.  Yet the D just seems to work much better (outside last Sunday) when he plays.  What are your thoughts on Milano?

 

3) John Brown.  You were pretty staunch mid-season that our offense doesn't work nearly as well when he's not out there.  What are your thoughts now?

 

 

1) Jefferson was a curious signing because he really isn't a good DE or DT.   I assumed they thought he was an ascending player but he was underwhelming.   I would assume that they cut him? 

 

2) I think they can move on from Milano.   He's a very good weak side LB but they have Edmunds or Klein or possibly Dodson all who could move there and be good.  

 

3) I don't think Brown ever got healthy.    I see them moving on from Brown for cap reasons but I don't think they should just hand the job to Davis.   If they get to pick 30 and the best player on the board is a potential stud WR that shouldn't be passed on to address a perceived need in the moment.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

1) Jefferson was a curious signing because he really isn't a good DE or DT.   I assumed they thought he was an ascending player but he was underwhelming.   I would assume that they cut him? 

 

2) I think they can move on from Milano.   He's a very good weak side LB but they have Edmunds or Klein or possibly Dodson all who could move there and be good.  

 

3) I don't think Brown ever got healthy.    I see them moving on from Brown for cap reasons but I don't think they should just hand the job to Davis.   If they get to pick 30 and the best player on the board is a potential stud WR that shouldn't be passed on to address a perceived need in the moment.

 

The great thing about the DL signings is that they could all be interpreted as one-year “prove it” deals that are relatively painless to move on from.

 

I have come around to your thinking on Edmunds.  I think he has incredible potential as an edge guy, either rushing the passer or dropping into coverage, but he doesn’t have the “wow” factor as a MLB.  I think they’re wasting his ability.

 

Davis is not Brown’s replacement, I agree.  Different skill sets.  This is another deep WR draft; go get another one.

 

 

Edited by eball
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

1) Jefferson was a curious signing because he really isn't a good DE or DT.   I assumed they thought he was an ascending player but he was underwhelming.   I would assume that they cut him? 

 

2) I think they can move on from Milano.   He's a very good weak side LB but they have Edmunds or Klein or possibly Dodson all who could move there and be good.  

 

3) I don't think Brown ever got healthy.    I see them moving on from Brown for cap reasons but I don't think they should just hand the job to Davis.   If they get to pick 30 and the best player on the board is a potential stud WR that shouldn't be passed on to address a perceived need in the moment.

The one caveat about Brown is that he basically had a leg injury for most of the season, and it clearly hampered him. Will he fully recover? If so, I'd keep him.  I still remember people here griping about Robert Woods in 2016, and then after the season we find out that he played at least half of it with a torn groin. We said "Sayonara," and whaddaya know -- it healed just fine, and he's a borderline elite player. People overreact to injuries; they're part of the deal in the NFL. To be sure, some players are actually injury prone for various reasons. But in his seven seasons, Brown has played at least 15 games in 5 of them (and 9 and 10 in the other 2). In the  NFL, that qualifies as "generally healthy and not injury prone." I'd definitely keep him for camp and see how he's doing, but if they're dead set on dumping him, Beane isn't a wait-for-June-1 kind of GM.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

1) Jefferson was a curious signing because he really isn't a good DE or DT.   I assumed they thought he was an ascending player but he was underwhelming.   I would assume that they cut him? 

 

That's basically where I was going.  I know you see different things than I do, so if I saw nothing and you saw underwhelming, maybe there's nothing to see.

He is a younger guy, and if they felt he developed during the season maybe they hang onto him, but he seems like a candidate for "cap casualty" with $6.5M savings and $1.5M dead

 

33 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

2) I think they can move on from Milano.   He's a very good weak side LB but they have Edmunds or Klein or possibly Dodson all who could move there and be good.  

 

As we've discussed before - you and the Bills Brain Trust see Edmunds very differently and unless they have a "scheme change revelation" in those meetings that Beane alluded to, I don't see him moving.

 

Klein worked - Kind of - but they had to rework the coverage responsibilities and we'd need a better Dime guy 'cuz we'd be playing it more.  And if we want to get faster, losing Milano for Klein is heading the wrong way.

 

Not sure what you saw in Dodson that inclines you towards this Milano substitute notion.

 

We may have no choice, but I see it as leaving more holes.

 

33 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

3) I don't think Brown ever got healthy.    I see them moving on from Brown for cap reasons but I don't think they should just hand the job to Davis.   If they get to pick 30 and the best player on the board is a potential stud WR that shouldn't be passed on to address a perceived need in the moment.

 

It may well be that Brown never got healthy.  My problem with Brown is that even healthy, I think press man can take him away.  Not sure press man can't take Davis away, and he's slower.  Agree that if Brown is a cap casualty that leaves a gap.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...