Jump to content

Domestic terrorist attack in Wisconsin


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Gary M said:

And these people have

Trump Conservative YEARS IN OFFICE BIDEN SCHUMER PELOSI Political Shirt |  eBay

This is where you are wrong about me. I am not a lib or lefty, or socialist.

It is my belief that trump is not the man for the job, he is not capable of leading the country. A President should govern for the country not just those who voted for his party. 

Pelosi is far worse than trump. She even blocked her own guy...Obama. 

Obama was very weak leader and his own party stopped him. Obama and trump  are incapable of development of lasting alliances or building trust.

 

trump is not the man for the job...He is openly untrustworthy.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Q-baby! said:

 

 

Just now, Tiberius said:

 

 

?

 

Wow, you guys are really out of ANY type of argument................you're just running on remote control now.

 

You should have paced yourselves, there is still 2 months to go .........

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

?

 

Wow, you guys are really out of ANY type of argument................you're just running on remote control now.

 

You should have paced yourselves, there is still 2 months to go .........

 

 

 

Looking forward to it!!! 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said:

This is where you are wrong about me. I am not a lib or lefty, or socialist.

It is my belief that trump is not the man for the job, he is not capable of leading the country. A President should govern for the country not just those who voted for his party. 

Pelosi is far worse than trump. She even blocked her own guy...Obama. 

Obama was very weak leader and his own party stopped him. Obama and trump  are incapable of development of lasting alliances or building trust.

 

trump is not the man for the job...He is openly untrustworthy.


the government role in the US has been so bastardized over the last 100 years that it does not remotely resemble the intention and design laid out in the constitution. The process of governing has been screwed up, the role of states vs fed, everything. Until that’s fixed, you’re going to see this hysteria play out over and over again because of the power and control that the presidency has but was never intended to have. 
 

To make matters even worse, the media is just thinly veiled propaganda (mostly for the left) and the citizenry has no concept of civics. 
 

in other words, it’s a !@#$ mess. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dubs said:


I just don’t understand that mindset. 
 

maybe there is more information out there that would make this more clearly a police brutality issue, which is why I’d want to wait before really making up my mind, but there’s been such a rush to condemn the cops. 

 

The reality is that the video is somewhat hard to watch. As much as I understand WHY the officer fired on him, I'm not fully convinced why he fired seven times at pretty close range. 

 

That said, you would think seven times would be excessive, if the guy died. But the guy survived. So what I don't know is did all seven shots land, or did he miss while the guy was struggling with him to turn and stab him?

 

In the end, though, if you're wanted by the police and three of them have you, it's pretty simple: don't resist and nothing happens. 

 

My son was recently out night fishing with some friends, one of which was carrying (Idaho is an open carry state). Local cops showed up because unbeknownst to them, they were on park property they weren't supposed to be on. The moment the cops showed up, his friend quickly announced he was carrying. The cop thanked him and reminded him that as long as he didn't reach for his, the cop wouldn't go for his gun. Common sense.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Q-baby! said:

Trump is a fat mobster, nothing more! 

Really? It seems like the Left are the ones interested in mob rule. See Minneapolis, Portland, Seattle, DC, NYC, Chicago, Cali, and the countless other places this bs has been allowed to continue for an extended period of time. The Left is saying they're coming for LEGAL gun owners, gonna hike taxes, they'll lock the entire country down, they're already funding the rioters, kicking in for their bail, support BLM, haven't condemned Antifa, continually project the "do as I say, not as I do" mantra, and the list could go on. They want government to have control over every aspect of your lives so you'll be good little sheeple and bah-ah-ah-ah when they tell you to. Who are really the "mobsters" here. It's clearly evident.

 

9 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

And Putin’s bi OTch too! 

Says who? Mueller? The MSM? A funny little thing happened the other day. A lawyer involved in the investigation plead guilty. Durham's investigation is still under way. There are many people about to be implicated in the Russian Hoax, and yes it was a hoax. Why do you think they are fighting tooth and nail against Flynn even to this day, setting unheard of precedents trying to keep the case ongoing? It will lead back to the top of the food chain in the Democratic Party. They've lost all control. People are starting to see right through them like a single pane window. Like I said, cut the strings and start to think for yourself. ;) 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, bilzfancy said:

If Trump is fat, what do you call Stacy Abrams? Morbidly obese? She should wear a shirt that says Goodyear on the side

I don’t care about her. She is not the president and she is not a mobster. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JUSTICE WILL BE SERVED: 

 

‘Enough Is Enough’: CovCath Attorney Lin Wood Offers to Help Kyle Rittenhouse For Free After GoFundMe Shuts Down Legal Defense Fund.

Lin Wood, the famed attorney who successfully represented Covington Catholic’s Nick Sandmann in multiple lawsuits against the media, graciously and heroically offered to help Kyle Rittenhouse for free on Thursday morning after GoFundMe suspended his legal defense fund.

 

Rittenhouse is disturbingly being charged with first-degree murder for defending himself against a registered sex offender involved in sex crimes with a minor and two other violent assailants with criminal records that attacked him during the riots on Tuesday night in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

 

After witnessing Democrat congresswoman Ayanna Pressley smear Rittenhouse as a “white supremacist domestic terrorist,” Lin Wood tweeted: “Ayanna Pressley just got condemned to the World of the Blocked. She is no Elvis. And I am not a criminal defense lawyer but I am going to see what I can do tomorrow to help Kyle Rittenhouse. If a private defense lawyer steps up to defend him, please notify me of his or her name.”

 

 

But just try getting a rioting, thieving arsonist to face even a single charge.

 

 

 

 

Related item from Leon Wolf: Charging Kyle Rittenhouse with first-degree murder is facially absurd.

 
 
 
 
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Niagara Bill said:

A step to stop the professionals....good

Now address the underlying issues....

trump still has not done anything to fix the racial under tones

Worry about your own country and the leader that likes tp cosplay.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Niagara Bill said:

This is where you are wrong about me. I am not a lib or lefty, or socialist.

It is my belief that trump is not the man for the job, he is not capable of leading the country. A President should govern for the country not just those who voted for his party. 

Pelosi is far worse than trump. She even blocked her own guy...Obama. 

Obama was very weak leader and his own party stopped him. Obama and trump  are incapable of development of lasting alliances or building trust.

 

trump is not the man for the job...He is openly untrustworthy.

Thanks for sharing this Niagara! I wish there were more posts like this on here. It offers an opportunity for dialogue. You and I differ for sure.  I see the President's core roles are maintaining peace and fostering prosperity. I believe Trump has done both. He hasn't started any wars and is in fact real personally opposed to them. And he definitely fostered (not guarantee) prosperity for the American people, until the pandemic attacked. But even the pandemic hasn't stopped him from wanting to get back to a point of prosperity. He is laser focused on it! 

Unfortunately many think the President is supposed to be their friend, father, or priest.  He/She isn't required to be any of those things.  If he gets peace and prosperity accomplished and still has time in his day for some empathy....so be it.  But empathy is not the core job characteristic of the President.  Sadly, it's just about all the Democratic Party talk about anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Immaterial.  How do you know that this person was a communist?

 

Immaterial.  I'm applying the same standards your side does.     If all Trump supporters are Nazis, despite not a single swastika being seen from his core supporters, what does that make the left when there are ever-present Communist symbols at the protests that you support?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, The Trump Virus said:

How many deaths?  Pfft! Hold my beer! 

 

Another new ID.  The little TDS crowd is trying sooooo hard, but can't figure out that when you are so angry at everything it makes you really bad at humor!

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, KD in CA said:

Another new ID.  The little TDS crowd is trying sooooo hard, but can't figure out that when you are so angry at everything it makes you really bad at humor!

lol... another lefty put on double secret probation i guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Immaterial.  I'm applying the same standards your side does.     If all Trump supporters are Nazis, despite not a single swastika being seen from his core supporters, what does that make the left when there are ever-present Communist symbols at the protests that you support?

Those aren’t my standards. The question stands.  How do you know that this person is a communist? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, KD in CA said:

 

Another new ID.  The little TDS crowd is trying sooooo hard, but can't figure out that when you are so angry at everything it makes you really bad at humor!

 

This is what happens when leftists realize they're incapable of logical discussions. Create another user ID and pollute the board under the guise of "I'm doing this to laugh at people."

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Those aren’t my standards. The question stands.  How do you know that this person is a communist? 

 

I'm applying the standards of the people you unequivocally support. 

 

Take it up with them, then come back here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

This is what happens when leftists realize they're incapable of logical discussions. Create another user ID and pollute the board under the guise of "I'm doing this to laugh at people."

 

 

 

Have to do something when 90% of the people here put them on ignore.

 

I have about 10 accounts on ignore... it's maybe 2 people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Tiberius said:

When Trump or some other racist does something evil, all we hear is "Oh everyone is bad!" 

 

That's such a dodge. Comparing Obama to this corrupt, anti-democratic regime is sickening,. I suppose Hitler's supporters blamed the Weimar Republic for all the violence he fostered 

You are the guy who always, without a doubt, and with no uncertainty made excuses for Obama's lies saying on numerous occasions that all politicians lie. Hypocrisy lives within you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Niagara Bill said:

You have a different view on this. If I was to resist arrest on a charge of running a red light, there is no justification that would make it ok to shoot me in the back 7 times. 

Cops have enough training and tools at their disposal to not kill a person over a traffic stop. 

While this young criminal did not die, he appears to be paralyzed, but is either outcome even remotely acceptable. 

The answer is no.

Find another way....has nothing changed since Tombstone.

This guy is not John Dillinger or Bonnie and Clyde. 

Unless significant change occurs, and the time is right for it, it appears, can you see where the future is going...

Yes you have looters and pros in riots, but change needs to happen

Well, maybe if they had read your posts here they could justify it. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Well, maybe if they had read your posts here they could justify it. 

 

Yikes, talk about cruel and unusual punishment. Wouldn't bleach to their eyes give the same effect as reading his posts, whilst still being less painful?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, now that the picture is clear, let’s make it abundantly clear how unfathomably ***** and racist the OP was acting when he made this thread, when he accused Kyle Riitenhouse of being a “white supremacist domestic terrorist”.

 

- Rittenhouse worked for the business he was defending.

 

- Rittenhouse lived 30 minutes away.

 

- Rittenhouse observed absurd levels of trigger discipline.


- Rittenhouse was rushed by Gaige Grosskruetz, 26.  A member of The People’s Revolution Movement, a Communist organization, and a convicted felon for whom it is a felony to possess a gun.  Grosskruetz was chasing Rittenhouse, with the stated intention of “unloading the entire magazine into (Rittenhouse)”.

 

- Rittenhouse fired a single shot into the arm of Grosskruetz.

 

- Rittenhouse was attacked by Joseph Rosenbaum, 36.  Rosenbaum, a convicted pedophile, registered as a sex offender in two states, attacked Rittenhouse, knocking him to the ground and tried to disarm him before he was fatally shot for his efforts.  Rittenhouse fired two shots at Rosenbaum.

 

- Rittenhouse was attacked by Anthony Huber, 26.  Huber, a convicted wife beater, attacked Rittenhouse with a skateboard while he was already on the ground.  He is on video hitting him in the head and face with a weapon.  Rittenhouse fired a single shot into Huber, killing him, ending the assault.
 

- Rittenhouse showed incredible restraint from a defensive firearms training perspective.  He was justified in shooting each aggressor far earlier than he did.

 

- Rittenhouse, in a crowded area, under riot conditions, fired only four shots, eliminating all three threats with no collateral damage.

 

As far as the OP goes, Rittenhouse was in the wrong.  The pedophile, the wife beater, and the convicted felon, all Communist revolutionaries, all assaulting him, atleast one with the expressed intent to murder him, are downtrodden heroes.

 

Oh, that and Rittenhouse, according to him, is a white supremacist.  Without evidence.

 

Carry on.

Edited by TakeYouToTasker
  • Like (+1) 8
  • Awesome! (+1) 6
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 


- Rittenhouse was rushed by Gaige Grosskruetz, 26.  A member of The People’s Revolution Movement, a Communist organization, ....

 

No, not that kind of Communist.  You know the gentle, nice kind they portray in textbooks.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

So, now that the picture is clear, let’s make it abundantly clear how unfathomably ***** and racist the OP was acting when he made this thread, when he accused Kyle Riitenhouse of being a “white supremacist domestic terrorist”.

 

- Rittenhouse worked for the business he was defending.

 

- Rittenhouse lived 30 minutes away.

 

- Rittenhouse observed absurd levels of trigger discipline.


- Rittenhouse was rushed by Gaige Grosskruetz, 26.  A member of The People’s Revolution Movement, a Communist organization, and a convicted felon for whom it is a felony to possess a gun.  Grosskruetz was chasing Rittenhouse, with the stated intention of “unloading the entire magazine into (Rittenhouse)”.

 

- Rittenhouse fired a single shot into the arm of Grosskruetz.

 

- Rittenhouse was attacked by Joseph Rosenbaum, 36.  Rosenbaum, a convicted pedophile, registered as a sex offender in two states, attacked Rittenhouse, knocking him to the ground and tried to disarm him before he was fatally shot for his efforts.  Rittenhouse fired two shots at Rosenbaum.

 

- Rittenhouse was attacked by Anthony Huber, 26.  Huber, a convicted wife beater, attacked Rittenhouse with a skateboard while he was already on the ground.  He is on video hitting him in the head and face with a weapon.  Rittenhouse fired a single shot into Huber, killing him, ending the assault.
 

- Rittenhouse showed incredible restraint from a defensive firearms training perspective.  He was justified in shooting each aggressor far earlier than he did.

 

- Rittenhouse, in a crowded area, under riot conditions, fired only four shots, eliminating all three threats with no collateral damage.

 

As far as the OP goes, Rittenhouse was in the wrong.  The pedophile, the wife beater, and the convicted felon, all Communist revolutionaries, all assaulting him, atleast one with the expressed intent to murder him, are downtrodden heroes.

 

Oh, that and Rittenhouse, according to him, is a white supremacist.  Without evidence.

 

Carry on.

I was just chatting with a bunch of friends about how incredible he actually was. Whether or not his intent was to destroy that guys right arm and immediately end that threat, or whether it was just luck...the fact that he immediately recognized that that threat was now neutralized and fired no additional shots - all under extreme pressure- was truly extraordinary.

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

So, now that the picture is clear, let’s make it abundantly clear how unfathomably ***** and racist the OP was acting when he made this thread, when he accused Kyle Riitenhouse of being a “white supremacist domestic terrorist”.

 

- Rittenhouse worked for the business he was defending.

 

- Rittenhouse lived 30 minutes away.

 

- Rittenhouse observed absurd levels of trigger discipline.


- Rittenhouse was rushed by Gaige Grosskruetz, 26.  A member of The People’s Revolution Movement, a Communist organization, and a convicted felon for whom it is a felony to possess a gun.  Grosskruetz was chasing Rittenhouse, with the stated intention of “unloading the entire magazine into (Rittenhouse)”.

 

- Rittenhouse fired a single shot into the arm of Grosskruetz.

 

- Rittenhouse was attacked by Joseph Rosenbaum, 36.  Rosenbaum, a convicted pedophile, registered as a sex offender in two states, attacked Rittenhouse, knocking him to the ground and tried to disarm him before he was fatally shot for his efforts.  Rosenbaum fired two shots at Rosenbaum.

 

- Rittenhouse was attacked by Anthony Huber, 26.  Huber, a convicted wife beater, attacked Rittenhouse with a skateboard while he was already on the ground.  He is on video hitting him in the head and face with a weapon.  Rittenhouse fired a single shot into Huber, killing him, ending the assault.
 

- Rittenhouse showed incredible restraint from a defensive firearms training perspective.  He was justified in shooting each aggressor far earlier than he did.

 

- Rittenhouse, in a crowded area, under riot conditions, fired only four shots, eliminating all three threats with no collateral damage.

 

As far as the OP goes, Rittenhouse was in the wrong.  The pedophile, the wife beater, and the convicted felon, all Communist revolutionaries, all assaulting him, atleast one with the expressed intent to murder him, are downtrodden heroes.

 

Oh, that and Rittenhouse, according to him, is a white supremacist.  Without evidence.

 

Carry on.

 

If I had a 17 year old son who told me he was going to go to work after hours with a rifle to defend his employer's property in that environment I would have advised him not to go and would have prevented it however necessary.  Too risky for not much reward.  I'd call Rittenhouse very foolish.

 

That said looking at the videos he performed (there's probably a better word for it) with amazing poise and discipline especially for his age.  He was very prepared, much more so than his attackers.  He has obviously studied and is trained in the use of firearms and in law enforcement and in the rules of engagement.  This could have ended up very badly for him, he easily could have been killed.  His antagonists were also very foolish and some paid the price. 

 

What's happened in Kenosha is no different than a sibling battle.  One throws a punch never thinking about what comes after that and so on.  The lack of law enforcement we've seen in several cities in recent months essentially guarantees escalation making these outcomes predictable.

 

Detroit is one city that has nipped this in the bud essentially by making arrests upon the first brick being thrown and not allowing mobs to block streets and loot.

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/detroit-city/2020/08/24/chief-detroit-police-prevented-seattle-zone-lawlessness/5624097002/

 

 

Edited by keepthefaith
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Trump Virus said:

I’m not angry. I am having fun laughing at you. Huge difference. 

 

.....from behind yet another lame, new name.  You're not clever enough to laugh at anybody.  And you know it.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sig1Hunter said:

I was just chatting with a bunch of friends about how incredible he actually was. Whether or not his intent was to destroy that guys right arm and immediately end that threat, or whether it was just luck...the fact that he immediately recognized that that threat was now neutralized and fired no additional shots - all under extreme pressure- was truly extraordinary.


It’s the very best trigger discipline I’ve ever seen, bar none.

 

He was being assaulted by multiple people, in the middle of a riot, fired exactly four shots to stop three targets, with zero collateral damage, from his ass/back after enduring multiple assaults.
 

The should use him to teach classes.

  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

If I had a 17 year old son who told me he was going to go to work after hours with a rifle to defend his employer's property in that environment I would have advised him not to go and would have prevented it however necessary.  Too risky for not much reward.  I'd call Rittenhouse very foolish.

 

That said looking at the videos he performed (there's probably a better word for it) with amazing poise and discipline especially for his age.  He was very prepared, much more so than his attackers.  He has obviously studied and is trained in the use of firearms and in law enforcement and in the rules of engagement.  This could have ended up very badly for him, he easily could have been killed.  His antagonists were also very foolish and some paid the price. 

 

What's happened in Kenosha is no different than a sibling battle.  One throws a punch never thinking about what comes after that and so on.  The lack of law enforcement we've seen in several cities in recent months essentially guarantees escalation making these outcomes predictable.

 

Detroit is one city that has nipped this in the bud essentially by making arrests upon the first brick being thrown and not allowing mobs to block streets and loot.

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/detroit-city/2020/08/24/chief-detroit-police-prevented-seattle-zone-lawlessness/5624097002/

 

 


I say this in the abstract, without judgment.

 

We used to raise our children to believe in higher ideals.

 

That principles are more important than individuals, and that there are things worth dying for. Like standing up for traditional values against Communists. 
 

Join the Army you’ll say. Why? To kill brown kids in Third World Countries?


No. The principled man stands against the Communists in his own streets, and he raises his children to do the same.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Niagara Bill said:

And so a few marxists/communists show up to overthrow your country trump turns to a 17 yr old.

The fbi dies know who they are?

The moment is too big again, just like covid19 was to too big.

FIFY, again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GG said:

 

I'm applying the standards of the people you unequivocally support. 

 

Take it up with them, then come back here.

So ... you don’t know this guys was or is a communist, and you just made it up.  Got it, hoaxer. 

27 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:


I say this in the abstract, without judgment.

 

We used to raise our children to believe in higher ideals.

 

That principles are more important than individuals, and that there are things worth dying for. Like standing up for traditional values against Communists. 
 

Join the Army you’ll say. Why? To kill brown kids in Third World Countries?


No. The principled man stands against the Communists in his own streets, and he raises his children to do the same.

Your ability to spot communists is incredible. Could you please teach us all how to spot the communist? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...