Jump to content

“Cancel” / Knee-Jerk Culture of 2020 and beyond


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Irv said:

 

This has gotten ridiculous.  What's next?  Dynamite Washington, Jefferson, and Roosevelt off the face of Mount Rushmore?  I'm sure somebody is butt hurt about Lincoln.  Blast him off too. 

replace with AOC, Al Sharpton, Obama, and this lady:

 

Screaming-at-Trump-833x517.jpg

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

KAROL MARKOWICZ: The ‘cancel’ crew will come for you someday soon.

A moral panic is sweeping the nation. How we react to the pitchfork hordes will determine the fate of our country for a generation or longer.

 

We call what the hordes do to our fellow citizens “cancel culture,” but the term is far too cute to capture the cruel, mindless and life-destroying process taking place all around us in the name of “fighting racism.”

 

The tendency has been with us for some time, but the current, ­extra-crazed moment has accelerated its malignant energies: Locked in for months due to COVID-19, we re-emerged into a society more enraged and at war with itself than ever before.

 

Then the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis took the ideological madness to the next level. The great majority of Americans agreed that Floyd’s death was horrific and that the police officers responsible for it must be held to account. But that sane consensus wasn’t enough, as far as the cancel left was concerned: Enemies had to be found and eradicated.

 

 

 

It’s almost as if the enemies part is more important than the fighting-racism part.

 
 
 
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Because this is really about white supremacy. 

 

Sorry, Shaun. You're a bigger fraud than most. 

So if I understand this numb nuts, the dark skinned Egyptians enslaved the lighter skinned Jews for years and years?  Let my people go! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

Of course they will.   

 

Everyone associates Niemoller's poem to Nazis.  Unfortunately, there were more fitting precursors on the left.   

 

How many of the statist lefties know that Orwell was an unrepentant communist, until he witnessed firsthand what the Stalinists were capable of and how they went about achieving their goals?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


 

The woke mob will get to Kimmel, Stern and the like eventually.  There's numerous videos on youtube, for now, of Stern wearing outrageous black face make-up on his TV show in the 90's.  But Howard dedicates 1/3 of his show these days to anti-Trump rants, so he's still useful for the time being. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once again the real intentions are covered up by a false narrative.  This is not about removing statues from an era that does not exist today in the name of correcting the evils of the past.  It is about breaking down the history and culture of the country to be replaced by the far left's new normal.  They are pushing now to see how far they can go before they receive push back.  That will then be the starting point for the next wave as they break down the country.

  • Like (+1) 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/18/2020 at 9:25 PM, B-Man said:

 

 

FIRE THEM, AS AN EXAMPLE TO THE OTHERS: 

 

Publishing Staff Threatens To Strike If Company Keeps J.K. Rowling’s Book.

 

 

 

How DARE she stick to her principles !

 

 

 

UPDATE:

 

J.K. Rowling’s literary agency lets clients leave rather that meet their demand to ‘re-educate’ their staff

 

THAT'S what you need to do !

 

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, B-Man said:

Theodore Roosevelt...

DSC04749.JPG

 


Words from Theodore Roosevelt, firmly attached to a wall near the entrance of the Museum of Natural History,  dug up this morning on the occasion of the news that the TR statue will be removed from its sublime place of prominence in front of the museum.

 

No wonder he's offensive to this generation...

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

BLUE ON BLUE............

 

 

 

NEW YORK (AP) — Ever since the historical musical “Hamilton” began its march to near-universal infatuation, one group has noticeably withheld its applause — historians. Many academics argue the portrait of Alexander Hamilton, the star of our $10 bills, is a counterfeit. Now they’re escalating their fight.

 

Ishmael Reed, who has been nominated twice for a National Book Award, has chosen to fight fire with fire — collecting his critique of Lin-Manuel Miranda’s acclaimed show into a play.

 

Reed’s “The Haunting of Lin-Manuel Miranda” is an uncompromising take-down of “Hamilton,” reminding viewers of the Founding Father’s complicity in slavery and his war on Native Americans.

 

“My goal is that this be a counter-narrative to the text that has been distributed to thousands of students throughout the country,” said Reed, who teaches at the California College of the Arts and the University of California at Berkeley and whose latest novel is “Conjugating Hindi.”

 

Reed, whose play had a recent reading in New York and who is raising money for a four-week production in May, is part of a wave of “Hamilton” skeptics — often solitary voices of dissent amid a wall of fawning attention — who have written journal articles, newspaper op-eds and a 2018 collection of essays, ”Historians on Hamilton .”

 

Miranda’s glowing portrayal of a Hamilton who celebrates open borders — “Immigrants, we get the job done!” — and who denounces slavery has incensed everyone from professors at Harvard to the University of Houston to Rutgers .

 

They argue that Miranda got Hamilton all wrong — the Founding Father wasn’t progressive at all, his actual role as a slave owner has been whitewashed and the pro-immigrant figure onstage hides the fact that he was, in fact, an anti-immigration elitist.

 

“It’s a fictional rewrite of Hamilton. You can’t pick the history facts that you want,” said Nancy Isenberg , a professor of American history at Louisiana State University who has written a biography of Aaron Burr and is the author of “White Trash: The 400-Year Untold History of Class in America.”

 

More at the Link: https://apnews.com/db3c9d7573334b55a651d7ceba4dc66b

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

BLUE ON BLUE............

 

 

 

NEW YORK (AP) — Ever since the historical musical “Hamilton” began its march to near-universal infatuation, one group has noticeably withheld its applause — historians. Many academics argue the portrait of Alexander Hamilton, the star of our $10 bills, is a counterfeit. Now they’re escalating their fight.

 

Ishmael Reed, who has been nominated twice for a National Book Award, has chosen to fight fire with fire — collecting his critique of Lin-Manuel Miranda’s acclaimed show into a play.

 

Reed’s “The Haunting of Lin-Manuel Miranda” is an uncompromising take-down of “Hamilton,” reminding viewers of the Founding Father’s complicity in slavery and his war on Native Americans.

 

“My goal is that this be a counter-narrative to the text that has been distributed to thousands of students throughout the country,” said Reed, who teaches at the California College of the Arts and the University of California at Berkeley and whose latest novel is “Conjugating Hindi.”

 

Reed, whose play had a recent reading in New York and who is raising money for a four-week production in May, is part of a wave of “Hamilton” skeptics — often solitary voices of dissent amid a wall of fawning attention — who have written journal articles, newspaper op-eds and a 2018 collection of essays, ”Historians on Hamilton .”

 

Miranda’s glowing portrayal of a Hamilton who celebrates open borders — “Immigrants, we get the job done!” — and who denounces slavery has incensed everyone from professors at Harvard to the University of Houston to Rutgers .

 

They argue that Miranda got Hamilton all wrong — the Founding Father wasn’t progressive at all, his actual role as a slave owner has been whitewashed and the pro-immigrant figure onstage hides the fact that he was, in fact, an anti-immigration elitist.

 

“It’s a fictional rewrite of Hamilton. You can’t pick the history facts that you want,” said Nancy Isenberg , a professor of American history at Louisiana State University who has written a biography of Aaron Burr and is the author of “White Trash: The 400-Year Untold History of Class in America.”

 

More at the Link: https://apnews.com/db3c9d7573334b55a651d7ceba4dc66b

The LSU “Fighting Tigers” are named for a fierce Confederate infantry unit. Wonder when LSU gets Cancelled. 

Edited by Nanker
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 Rock Is Pulling Blackface Episodes From Streaming Platforms and TV Reruns
 

Four episodes of 30 Rock, including two featuring Jane Krakowski’s Jenna character in blackface, are being removed from subscription streaming services Hulu and Amazon Prime and have also been made unavailable for sale on purchase platforms such as iTunes and Google Play. The episodes, which will no longer air on traditional TV either, were pulled at the request of NBCUniversal executive producers Tina Fey and Robert Carlock. A source tells Vulture the four episodes, some of which have already vanished, should be gone by the end of this week.
 

</snip>

Tina Fey's mea culpa follows in the snip...

 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

30 Rock Is Pulling Blackface Episodes From Streaming Platforms and TV Reruns
 

Four episodes of 30 Rock, including two featuring Jane Krakowski’s Jenna character in blackface, are being removed from subscription streaming services Hulu and Amazon Prime and have also been made unavailable for sale on purchase platforms such as iTunes and Google Play. The episodes, which will no longer air on traditional TV either, were pulled at the request of NBCUniversal executive producers Tina Fey and Robert Carlock. A source tells Vulture the four episodes, some of which have already vanished, should be gone by the end of this week.
 

</snip>

Tina Fey's mea culpa follows in the snip...

 

 

Why is it that none of the producers, directors, writers, and anyone else associated with the creation of this racist propaganda are publicly apologizing and in jeopardy of never working again?

 

Did Tina Fey just show up on set one day and demand to play that role and no one could say no to her?

 

If I've learned anything from the defund police efforts it's that ALL of Hollywood is complicit in the systemic racism of our entertainment industries.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

...so with statues of abolitionists being destroyed, toppled and defaced, sounds like these fraudulent "protesters with a cause (COUGH)" failed History 101.....as if they could care.....

Edited by OldTimeAFLGuy
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In an obscure podcast four years ago he said something to the effect of "when I saw her I was just like, I want to ***** rape you."

 

In poor taste, for sure, but it was clearly just a crude attempt at humor in saying he was really attracted to her. Now they want him cancelled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

BLUE ON BLUE............

 

 

 

NEW YORK (AP) — Ever since the historical musical “Hamilton” began its march to near-universal infatuation, one group has noticeably withheld its applause — historians. Many academics argue the portrait of Alexander Hamilton, the star of our $10 bills, is a counterfeit. Now they’re escalating their fight.

 

Ishmael Reed, who has been nominated twice for a National Book Award, has chosen to fight fire with fire — collecting his critique of Lin-Manuel Miranda’s acclaimed show into a play.

 

Reed’s “The Haunting of Lin-Manuel Miranda” is an uncompromising take-down of “Hamilton,” reminding viewers of the Founding Father’s complicity in slavery and his war on Native Americans.

 

“My goal is that this be a counter-narrative to the text that has been distributed to thousands of students throughout the country,” said Reed, who teaches at the California College of the Arts and the University of California at Berkeley and whose latest novel is “Conjugating Hindi.”

 

Reed, whose play had a recent reading in New York and who is raising money for a four-week production in May, is part of a wave of “Hamilton” skeptics — often solitary voices of dissent amid a wall of fawning attention — who have written journal articles, newspaper op-eds and a 2018 collection of essays, ”Historians on Hamilton .”

 

Miranda’s glowing portrayal of a Hamilton who celebrates open borders — “Immigrants, we get the job done!” — and who denounces slavery has incensed everyone from professors at Harvard to the University of Houston to Rutgers .

 

They argue that Miranda got Hamilton all wrong — the Founding Father wasn’t progressive at all, his actual role as a slave owner has been whitewashed and the pro-immigrant figure onstage hides the fact that he was, in fact, an anti-immigration elitist.

 

“It’s a fictional rewrite of Hamilton. You can’t pick the history facts that you want,” said Nancy Isenberg , a professor of American history at Louisiana State University who has written a biography of Aaron Burr and is the author of “White Trash: The 400-Year Untold History of Class in America.”

 

More at the Link: https://apnews.com/db3c9d7573334b55a651d7ceba4dc66b


Glad I saw it in February!

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NOT THE BABYLON BEE: Rhode Island Becomes First State to Change Its Name.

The tiny state of Rhode Island announced that because some people are too stupid and too dense to understand that some words have several meanings, they will change the official name of their state.

 

The “official” name of the state is “The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations.” But to those choosing to be ignorant — or those who really are — “plantations” means “a usually large farm or estate, especially in a tropical or semitropical country, on which cotton, tobacco, coffee, sugar cane, or the like is cultivated, usually by resident laborers.”

 

But in the context as it was originally intended, “plantations” referred to a new colony. But what does context matter when there are dragons to slay? It has been decided that we should choose to remove context and substitute personal interpretation of meaning.

In accordance with the prophecy:

 

babylon_bee_remove_all_history_06-23-202

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, bilzfancy said:

I can't wait till the Buffalo Sabres play the Flavortown Blue Jackets......smh


“Sabres”???

 

You don’t think that image of a weapon of colonialism and conquest will go unnoticed do you???

 

Just because it’s not as horribly racist as ‘Redskins’ or ‘Buffalo Bills’ doesn’t mean we can let Sabres stand!

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, KD in CA said:


“Sabres”???

 

You don’t think that image of a weapon of colonialism and conquest will go unnoticed do you???

 

Just because it’s not as horribly racist as ‘Redskins’ or ‘Buffalo Bills’ doesn’t mean we can let Sabres stand!

The Buffalo Margarine Spreaders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, KD in CA said:


“Sabres”???

 

You don’t think that image of a weapon of colonialism and conquest will go unnoticed do you???

 

Just because it’s not as horribly racist as ‘Redskins’ or ‘Buffalo Bills’ doesn’t mean we can let Sabres stand!

I’m guessing get rid of a Sabre would be more like islamaphobic, no? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Unforgiven said:

He did nothing wrong, he's a spineless weasel.

I remember Dave Chappelle doing white face. That ***** was funny. And IIRC, he actually used it to poke fun at general white people, not even a specific celebrity.

 

I understand the historical context is much worse for black face, but the context is key. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, RiotAct said:

The Buffalo Margarine Spreaders.

 

What's wrong with you???  'Margarine' is a disgusting creation by multi-national corporations who seek to poison our earth and feed us chemicals that turn us into addicts so they can pay their CEOs 8-figure bonuses!!!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LeGOATski said:

I remember Dave Chappelle doing white face. That ***** was funny. And IIRC, he actually used it to poke fun at general white people, not even a specific celebrity.

 

I understand the historical context is much worse for black face, but the context is key. 

 

One thing that gets overlooked is that dressing up as a specific black guy isn't "blackface."

 

Blackface involved dressing up as a random black guy to poke fun at the black image in general. Dressing up as Karl Malone to poke fun at Karl Malone isn't similar, especially, and most importantly, in the way that makes actual blackface offensive.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...