Jump to content

2020 Election is officially Trump vs Biden


Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:
 

 

 

I'm kind of surprised that Biden is blaming global warming cooling climate change crisis for the fires, and is stupid enough to think that people will vote for BIden over Trump because if Trump gets re-elected, "...these hellish events will continue to become more common, more devastating and more deadly,"

 

The far left nutjobs are the only ones who believe this, and they're already voting for Biden. He's not going to scare normal people into voting for him over this issue.

 

So weird.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gee, I wonder why they're slipping? Could it be No Chance Joe's love of Castro? His love of Venezuelan socialism? The fact he and his party have spent the past four months ignoring the Latino businesses which were burned and destroyed? Or... could it be that they see through his pandering BS and realize he's fraud? 

 

 

Here's a political tip: if a campaign is bleeding key demographics 50 days out from the election, as Biden is doing in both the Latino and Black demos, chances are you don't really have a double digit lead in said race. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 


Kinda like when Trump canceled over 200,000 American lives?

 

Kinda like when the draft dodger canceled Transgender soldiers in our military?

 

You’re a fraud 

 

 

 

 

Edited by BillStime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

This is crazy *****:
 


Being perfectly honest? I'd have been freaking out and doing the heebie jeebies dance:
 


 

 

Joe you dumbass......

 

U.S. carbon emissions have been dropping since about 2006, and did so under Obama/yourself.  Take some credit for that, but give Trump some too.  Emissions continue to drop domestically and are further trending down.  It's Asia and other developing nations that are not improving. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

This says a lot.

 

 

Trump campaign far outpacing Biden in money given by small donors, Biden leads among big donors

by Carrie Sheffield

 

Original Article

 

An imperfect though telling metric in presidential campaigns is enthusiasm among small donors, those giving $200 or less. It's a rough proxy for enthusiasm among the base, and just as polling shows President Trump receives a more ardent embrace among his base than rival Joe Biden, the individualized money story reflects that as well. Americans who donate to campaigns are more likely to vote, according to the Pew Research Center. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

...so the "unemployed", struggling to make ends meet on UC with no jobs are Whoa Joe's big donors?.......something ain't passing the Smell Test here........YAWN.......

Exclusive: Data shows that half of 2019 donations to ActBlue came from untraceable 'unemployed' donors

A Take Back Action Fund analysis of $400M in donations to liberal causes raises red flags of possible foreign involvement

By Hollie McKay | Fox News

 

EXCLUSIVE: Less than two months ahead of the presidential election – with concerns of foreign interference again at the forefront – a conservative political group is raising "serious concerns" about millions of donations reported by a major Democratic fundraising platform.

A  preliminary computer analysis by the Take Back Action Fund, obtained exclusively by Fox News, has found that nearly half of all 2019 donations to ActBlue were made by people claiming to be unemployed.

Action Fund President John Pudner questioned the veracity of those donations and called it a loophole that must be closed for the sake of election integrity.

 

"After downloading hundreds of millions of [dollars in] donations to the Take Back Action Fund servers, we were shocked to see that almost half of the donations to ActBlue in 2019 claimed to be unemployed individuals," he said. "The name of employers must be disclosed when making political donations, but more than 4.7 million donations came from people who claimed they did not have an employer. Those 4.7 million donations totaled $346 million ActBlue raised and sent to liberal causes."

 

The trend is continuing this year: An Action Fund examination of 2020 data from January through August showed an uptick in "unemployed" donations through ActBlue, to 50.1% this year.

 

ActBlue defends the integrity of its donations and said many come from retirees and people who aren't counted as employed, such as homemakers.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/exclusive-data-shows-that-half-of-2019-donations-to-actblue-came-from-untraceable-unemployed-donors

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

This is crazy *****:
 


Being perfectly honest? I'd have been freaking out and doing the heebie jeebies dance:
 


 

Joe's used to bugs landing on him thinking he just might be vertical road kill. In fact, the vultures have been circling for quite some time now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

I'm kind of surprised that Biden is blaming global warming cooling climate change crisis for the fires, and is stupid enough to think that people will vote for BIden over Trump because if Trump gets re-elected, "...these hellish events will continue to become more common, more devastating and more deadly,"

 

The far left nutjobs are the only ones who believe this, and they're already voting for Biden. He's not going to scare normal people into voting for him over this issue.

 

So weird.

 

 

You could say the same thing about him tweeting about banning so-called assault weapons in a year with record gun sales, a significant portion of which are to first time gun owners. Makes you wonder if his campaign has data suggesting that the middle/swing voters are a lost cause and he has more to gain by ginning up enthusiasm among his base.

Edited by Chandemonium
Typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Chandemonium said:

You could say the same thing about him tweeting about banning so-called assault weapons in a year with record gun sales, as significant portion of which are to first time gun owners. Makes you wonder if his campaign has data suggesting that the middle/swing voters are a lost cause and he has more to gain by ginning up enthusiasm among his base.


Or "donations"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Chandemonium said:

You could say the same thing about him tweeting about banning so-called assault weapons in a year with record gun sales, a significant portion of which are to first time gun owners.

 

The gun control response is simply a reflex of the left.  How else can you explain that response to an unmotivated attack on police officers using a handgun that likely not legally owned?  Trained seals. 

 

 

 

 

Edited by keepthefaith
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kamala Harris accidentally touts plans under a 'Harris administration' during virtual roundtable

 

Kamala Harris, Joe Biden's running mate in the 2020 election, raised eyebrows on Monday evening after she accidentally touted economic plans under a "Harris administration."

 

Speaking during a virtual roundtable with small business owners in Arizona, Harris vowed that they will have an ally in the White House with the campaign's "Build Back Better" initiative.

 

However, the California senator appeared to briefly suggest that she was at the top of the Democratic ticket.

 

"A Harris administration, together with Joe Biden as the president of the United States," she said. She quickly clarified, "The Biden-Harris administration will provide access to $100 billion in low-interest loans and investments from minority business owners."

 

Many on social media questioned whether Harris' misstatement was a "Freudian slip" as critics of the Biden candidacy insist that former VP is a placeholder for the liberal senator.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kamala-harris-accidentally-touts-plans-in-a-harris-administration-during-virtual-roundtable

 

See no worry if Joe is elected 🙂

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

                Advanced age + senility + dementia = DNC's fatally flawed candidate for President.  

 

For an encore, the accompanying candidate isn't sure of her lineage at any one time, and has accused the top of the ticket of racism and sexual abuse.

 

 

Just an all 'round attractive package, eh?

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

"Scientific American has never endorsed a presidential candidate in its 175-year history. This year we are compelled to do so. We do not do this lightly.


The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people."
 

Scientific American Endorses Joe Biden

You are either for the Enlightenment or for the cult 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Chandemonium said:

You could say the same thing about him tweeting about banning so-called assault weapons...

 

Those tweets tell you all you need to know about the Democratic ticket: two police officers are shot by a BLM member, and the second thing Biden wants to do is take your guns away.

 

Because the first thing Biden wants to do is defund the police.

 

No police to protect you. No guns to protect yourself. The Harris-Biden plan is pretty damn clear.

 

And please don't tell me Joe doesn't want to defund police because he admitted so in an interview, just like he spent the last bzillion years telling everyone he wants to ban fracking before he started losing PA.

 

BIden's first words are his true words. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...