Jump to content

2020 NFL Combine


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Why? 

 

The Kelvin Benjamin trade and seeing how comfortable Allen was with Duke.  I mean, I see how a guy with a larger catch radius helps Josh, I have to believe they see it too.

15 minutes ago, thebandit27 said:


Just a friendly reminder that literally every team in the NFL—including the one that eventually picked him—passed on that same player. There were legitimate questions as to whether or not he could run pass routes.

 

That's the part of football where the "experts" overthink things and rely too much on analytics instead of trusting their own eyes.

 

Lesson learned, hopefully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said:

 

The Kelvin Benjamin trade and seeing how comfortable Allen was with Duke.  I mean, I see how a guy with a larger catch radius helps Josh, I have to believe they see it too.

 

That's the part of football where the "experts" overthink things and rely too much on analytics instead of trusting their own eyes.

 

Lesson learned, hopefully.

I actually think they decided he’s more comfortable with guys like Brown and Beasley than “Big possession guys” (if they actually catch it) like KB and Andre Holmes. Catch radius doesn’t always equate to larger frame. I don’t expect them to use size as a factor that would prop someone over another. That KB trade was a long time ago. 

Edited by YoloinOhio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

I actually think they decided he’s more comfortable with guys like Brown and Beasley than “Big possession guys” (if they actually catch it) like KB and Andre Holmes. Catch radius doesn’t always equate to larger frame. I don’t expect them to use size as a factor that would prop someone over another. That KB trade was a long time ago. 

I think folks are devaluing verticals and high pointing abilities. AB and OBJ are 5’10” and 5’11”. Separation is the name of the game... “open when covered” only matters if the WR can’t get open. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo Junction said:

I think folks are devaluing verticals and high pointing abilities. AB and OBJ are 5’10” and 5’11”. Separation is the name of the game... “open when covered” only matters if the WR can’t get open. 

Give me a Keenan Allen all day every day. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

I actually think they decided he’s more comfortable with guys like Brown and Beasley than “Big possession guys” (if they actually catch it) like KB and Andre Holmes. Catch radius doesn’t always equate to larger frame. I don’t expect them to use size as a factor that would prop someone over another. That KB trade was a long time ago. 

 

It was a while ago, but it wouldn't be a stretch for them to draft someone like Higgins who has talent and size.

 

Maybe catch radius wasn't the right phrase.  A bigger target is more what I meant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said:

Just a friendly reminder that the Bills were WR needy last season and passed on a guy that is 6'4" 230lbs, ran a 4.33 and had a 40.5" vertical, yet he traded for Kelvin Benjamin.

 

 
To be fair, the Bills offensive line was HISTORICALLY awful in 2018, and it's hard to get the ball to your wide receivers if you can't stay upright.

I liked Metcalf, too, but to mention passing on Metcalf without also acknowledging that the player they picked instead ALSO filled a gigantic -- and arguably more important -- need for the Bills is only telling half the story.

  • Like (+1) 6
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chicken Boo said:

 

It was a while ago, but it wouldn't be a stretch for them to draft someone like Higgins who has talent and size.

 

Maybe catch radius wasn't the right phrase.  A bigger target is more what I meant. 

I agree it’s something that the current WR group doesn’t have (unless you count Duke) but I haven’t seen or heard anything from Beane to suggest he’s prioritizing it. I actually think he looks at the KB trade as more of a mistake that he’s learned from than something that would predict he prioritizes size. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said:

 

That's the part of football where the "experts" overthink things and rely too much on analytics instead of trusting their own eyes.

 

Isn't it the other way around?  Analytics would rank DK at the top of the draft, but he failed the eye test for all the GMs to take him at the top of the draft.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Isn't it the other way around?  Analytics would rank DK at the top of the draft, but he failed the eye test for all the GMs to take him at the top of the draft.

 

His metrics were generally a mixed bag. Pretty much average across the board with the exception of having a good breakout age. The guys watching film generally liked him a lot due to how easily he beat press coverage, stacked his man, and accelerated down the field for explosive plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DCOrange said:

 

His metrics were generally a mixed bag. Pretty much average across the board with the exception of having a good breakout age. The guys watching film generally liked him a lot due to how easily he beat press coverage, stacked his man, and accelerated down the field for explosive plays.

 

Countered by concerns about route running, technique, catching the ball and picking up an NFL offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GG said:

 

Isn't it the other way around?  Analytics would rank DK at the top of the draft, but he failed the eye test for all the GMs to take him at the top of the draft.

 

I'm referencing the 3-cone time.

2 hours ago, Logic said:

 
To be fair, the Bills offensive line was HISTORICALLY awful in 2018, and it's hard to get the ball to your wide receivers if you can't stay upright.

I liked Metcalf, too, but to mention passing on Metcalf without also acknowledging that the player they picked instead ALSO filled a gigantic -- and arguably more important -- need for the Bills is only telling half the story.

 

 

Talking about Cody Ford?  Yeah that hasn't panned out well so far, but we're about 2-3 years away from knowing for sure.

Edited by Chicken Boo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, thebandit27 said:


Electronic timing only gives them total time; think the teams like to have their own 10-yard splits

Shouldn’t they be at the 10 yard marker then? It would be funny to see McBeane sitting there all alone while everyone else is stacked up at the finish line. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said:

 

Talking about Cody Ford?  Yeah that hasn't panned out well so far, but we're about 2-3 years away from knowing for sure.


The bolded part is true.

That being said, I have absolutely no idea how you could conclude that Ford "hasn't panned out well so far".

He struggled at times in his rookie season, sure, but MOST rookie tackles struggle. He also had stretches where he played quite well. The offensive line as a whole was also MUCH improved from 2018. The running game, in particular, went from bottom 5 to top 5 in the league. Combine that with the fact that we have yet to really even see him at what is likely his best position (guard), and it's just bizarre to me that anyone would conclude that he "hasn't panned out well so far".

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, thebandit27 said:

Has anyone noticed how good a blocker Jerry Jeudy became? I mean, he’s out there Robert Woods-ing guys on screen plays.

 

Yup!

 

I love how he never takes a play off regardless if the ball is going to him, or it's a run or a pass elsewhere.  Dude always battles

3 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

Give me a Keenan Allen all day every day. 

 

Then Justin Jefferson is your man! Love that kid. Catches everything 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Logic said:


The bolded part is true.

That being said, I have absolutely no idea how you could conclude that Ford "hasn't panned out well so far".

He struggled at times in his rookie season, sure, but MOST rookie tackles struggle. He also had stretches where he played quite well. The offensive line as a whole was also MUCH improved from 2018. The running game, in particular, went from bottom 5 to top 5 in the league. Combine that with the fact that we have yet to really even see him at what is likely his best position (guard), and it's just bizarre to me that anyone would conclude that he "hasn't panned out well so far".

 

 

His bad was really bad, imo.  I wasn't overly impressed and also feel like the o-line's pass protection wasn't the greatest, but that could be because Allen holds onto the ball longer than he should.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Logic said:


The bolded part is true.

That being said, I have absolutely no idea how you could conclude that Ford "hasn't panned out well so far".

He struggled at times in his rookie season, sure, but MOST rookie tackles struggle. He also had stretches where he played quite well. The offensive line as a whole was also MUCH improved from 2018. The running game, in particular, went from bottom 5 to top 5 in the league. Combine that with the fact that we have yet to really even see him at what is likely his best position (guard), and it's just bizarre to me that anyone would conclude that he "hasn't panned out well so far".

 


I don’t see why you wouldn’t agree with that statement.  “So far” says it all.  We drafted him to play RT.  He sucked at RT.  “So far”, he has shown that his feet are really slow and he gets smoked often and in critical times.  
 

He was a rookie, he plays a tough position and will improve.  No doubt, but his play last was poor and he hasn’t panned out well SO FAR.  That may change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...