Hedge Posted January 12, 2020 Share Posted January 12, 2020 This raises questions that I am sure will never be asked to Joe. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 1 minute ago, Hedge said: Nonsense, we all know that only evil, biased, constitution-hating Republicans must recuse themselves. Democrats are pure as the driven snow in this affair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 . 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 13 hours ago, Koko78 said: Nonsense, we all know that only evil, biased, constitution-hating Republicans must recuse themselves. Democrats are pure as the driven snow in this affair. The bigger question is why the democratic senators running for president don’t have to recuse themselves. They’re clearly biased and have a personal interest in the outcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted January 13, 2020 Author Share Posted January 13, 2020 Mitch should sit on the “articles” until after the early primaries to let the sitting senators take part in their primaries. Nancy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 22 minutes ago, Nanker said: Mitch should sit on the “articles” until after the early primaries to let the sitting senators take part in their primaries. Nancy. That's not what the present rules say though and we know Leader Pelosi is a stickler for the rules. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 8 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: The bigger question is why the democratic senators running for president don’t have to recuse themselves. They’re clearly biased and have a personal interest in the outcome. Because Democrat Senators are paragons of virtue and impartiality. Oh, and #orangemanbad #orangemanbad #orangemanbad #orangemanbad #orangemanbad #orangemanbad #orangemanbad #orangemanbad #orangemanbad #orangemanbad #orangemanbad 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 13, 2020 Share Posted January 13, 2020 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 Russians are all in for Trump. Well, we already knew that. So you Trump Cultists must be happy now. Putin's got your back. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/russian-spies-hacked-ukrainian-gas-company-at-heart-of-trump-impeachment-trial/2020/01/13/db50b2b0-366c-11ea-bb7b-265f4554af6d_story.html Quote Russian military spies have hacked a Ukrainian gas company that is at the heart of an impeachment trial of President Trump, who sought last year to pressure Ukraine to investigate the company and its links to Joe Biden’s son, according to a cybersecurity firm. Beginning in early November, the Russian spy agency known as the GRU launched a cyber “phishing” campaign against Burisma Holdings to trick unsuspecting employees into giving up their email credentials so the hackers could gain access to their email accounts — once again entangling Moscow in domestic U.S. politics, according to Area 1 Security, a Redwood City, Calif., company. The operation’s launch coincided with a congressional impeachment inquiry into Trump and whether he abused his office by seeking to press Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky into announcing a probe of Burisma and Hunter Biden — an action that conceivably would aid Trump’s reelection bid. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted January 14, 2020 Author Share Posted January 14, 2020 The Wicked Witch of the West indeed! Except that witch is better looking than Stretch Pelosi. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) announced publicly that he would vote to hear Bolton, and perhaps others, testify. He is not the only Republican, according to a CBS News report: Senior White House officials tell CBS News they increasingly believe that at least four Republicans, and likely more, will vote to call witnesses. In addition to Senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine, Mitt Romney of Utah and possibly Cory Gardner of Colorado, the White House also views Rand Paul of Kentucky as a “wild card” and Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee as an “institutionalist” who might vote to call witnesses, as one official put it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 13 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) announced publicly that he would vote to hear Bolton, and perhaps others, testify. He is not the only Republican, according to a CBS News report: Senior White House officials tell CBS News they increasingly believe that at least four Republicans, and likely more, will vote to call witnesses. In addition to Senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine, Mitt Romney of Utah and possibly Cory Gardner of Colorado, the White House also views Rand Paul of Kentucky as a “wild card” and Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee as an “institutionalist” who might vote to call witnesses, as one official put it. Color me shocked that Schitt Romney's for witnesses. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 bring 'em on. bring 'em all on. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 16 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: Color me shocked that Schitt Romney's for witnesses. Bass turd actually respects the republic and the constitution, imagine that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 (edited) https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1217086934100717568 https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1217090576312676352 https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1217086487092699141 i very sincerely doubt ol' Jerry Lewis Nads will be an impeachment manager. he would need to have all his questions written for him from the chair. Edited January 14, 2020 by Foxx 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 Has anyone contemplated the reasons for the House Dems not having a special prosecutor/counsel to investigate Trump's "impeachable deeds"? Instead they empowered guys named Schiff and Nadler (who basically have immunity for what they may say) to run the impeachment efforts in the House. Pelosi, otherwise known as the Wicked Witch of the West, has morphed into an even slimier partisan hack than ever before. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 1 hour ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1217086934100717568 https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1217090576312676352 https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1217086487092699141 i very sincerely doubt ol' Jerry Lewis Nads will be an impeachment manager. he would need to have all his questions written for him from the chair. No way Nadler will subject himself to that scrutiny. He won't be a manager. Not a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 38 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Has anyone contemplated the reasons for the House Dems not having a special prosecutor/counsel to investigate Trump's "impeachable deeds"? Instead they empowered guys named Schiff and Nadler (who basically have immunity for what they may say) to run the impeachment efforts in the House. Pelosi, otherwise known as the Wicked Witch of the West, has morphed into an even slimier partisan hack than ever before. They're out of bullets is why. That's why they're recycling literally the same playbook from "Trump Russia" and hoping no one notices. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 38 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: No way Nadler will subject himself to that scrutiny. He won't be a manager. Not a chance. I would say he probably will in fact, and Schiff is an absolute must as a floor manager simply because then, they arguably could not be called as witnesses... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 (edited) 55 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Has anyone contemplated the reasons for the House Dems not having a special prosecutor/counsel to investigate Trump's "impeachable deeds"? Instead they empowered guys named Schiff and Nadler (who basically have immunity for what they may say) to run the impeachment efforts in the House. Pelosi, otherwise known as the Wicked Witch of the West, has morphed into an even slimier partisan hack than ever before. of course. they learned from the Mueller Investigation. they knew that a special investigator would bring them nothing so they held onto it to manufacture the outcome. Edited January 14, 2020 by Foxx 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Egg Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 3 hours ago, Joe in Winslow said: Color me shocked that Schitt Romney's for witnesses. Left wanted him dragged through the streets for his 47%'ers remark. Now they want to put him on a pedestal.... err a witness stand. The proverbial and hypocritical: the enemy of my enemy is my friend. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 (edited) 8 hours ago, Joe in Winslow said: Color me shocked that Schitt Romney's for witnesses. .....another PO'ed has been......Mr Irrelevant trying to become relevant....quite the sore loser...go commiserate with Hillary.....BOTH offer squat........ Edited January 14, 2020 by OldTimeAFLGuy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albwan Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Hedge said: Is all this Rudy Guilliani correspondence? Lol is all this saying Laura Ingraham, Rudy Guiliani, Shaun Hannity, Putin were all in on the quid pro quo?? Edited January 14, 2020 by Albwan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 9 minutes ago, Albwan said: Is all this Rudy Guilliani correspondence? Lol is all this saying Laura Ingraham, Rudy Guiliani, Shaun Hannity, Putin were all in on the quid pro quo?? Rudy, obviously. Putin, probably directly. And part of the Ukraine scam was to trying an exonerate Russia for putting stooge Trump in the WH. Shameful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albwan Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted January 14, 2020 Share Posted January 14, 2020 21 hours ago, Cinga said: ... no effin' way....she needs "training wheels"........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q-baby! Posted January 15, 2020 Share Posted January 15, 2020 36 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ... no effin' way....she needs "training wheels"........... Fatty trump should try riding a bike every now and then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 15, 2020 Share Posted January 15, 2020 Not that it will matter to the cultists, but more evidence of the abuse of power and general criminality of this Junta \ https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ukraine-prosecutor-offered-information-related-to-biden-in-exchange-for-ambassadors-ouster-newly-released-materials-show/2020/01/14/cc45d19e-371e-11ea-9541-9107303481a4_story.html Quote New materials released by House Democrats appear to show Ukraine’s top prosecutor offering an associate of President Trump’s personal attorney, Rudolph W. Giuliani, damaging information related to former vice president Joe Biden if the Trump administration recalled the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine. The text messages and documents provided to Congress by former Giuliani associate Lev Parnas also show that before the ambassador, Marie Yovanovitch, was removed from her post, a Parnas associate now running for Congress sent menacing text messages suggesting that he had Yovanovitch under surveillance in Ukraine. A lawyer for Yovanovitch said Tuesday that the episode should be investigated. The cache of materials released by House investigators late Tuesday exposed a number of previously unknown details about efforts by Giuliani and his associates to obtain material in Ukraine that would undermine Trump’s Democratic opponents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted January 15, 2020 Share Posted January 15, 2020 Hey Tibs....what if a certain former Vice President was actually laundering money and peddling influence in a foreign country? We just look the other way? (You May want to look in the mirror. You’ve been pointing the same finger at a certain then presidential candidate for over three years now) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 15, 2020 Share Posted January 15, 2020 Biden’s a criminal. We need to look into his election interference collusion with Ukraine. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts