H2o Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 33 minutes ago, DCofNC said: Yeah, thats exactly what Im saying. Hill is a helluva playmaker, but a conventional WR he is not. A lot of yards came on gadget bull#### and crazy scrambles that broke defenses down by Maholmes. I'd take a bet he wont break 1000 yards this year, teams can plan for him AND he's buily like a school girl, he wont last. I'll take that bet as long as there are outs for injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFunPolice Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 Whatever it takes to stop NE from ruining the Super Bowl every year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 (edited) 30 minutes ago, whatdrought said: I didn’t see that- the part where he said “you should be scared of me too, B word” was fake? It's called context. She basically tells him that she can end his NFL career with false accusations, eventually the argument gets heated enough where he tells her what would happen if everything she's accusing him of were true. Interesting that everyone here remembers the initial accusation, but almost no one knows about the follow-up investigations. Maybe the NFL should ban every player accused of a crime, because if it's about image, whatever happens after the initial report is irrelevant. Edited September 6, 2019 by unbillievable 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malazan Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 59 minutes ago, DCofNC said: Yeah, thats exactly what Im saying. Hill is a helluva playmaker, but a conventional WR he is not. A lot of yards came on gadget bull#### and crazy scrambles that broke defenses down by Maholmes. I'd take a bet he wont break 1000 yards this year, teams can plan for him AND he's buily like a school girl, he wont last. So there's like 2 #1 receivers in the league? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klos63 Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 1 hour ago, DCofNC said: Yeah, thats exactly what Im saying. Hill is a helluva playmaker, but a conventional WR he is not. A lot of yards came on gadget bull#### and crazy scrambles that broke defenses down by Maholmes. I'd take a bet he wont break 1000 yards this year, teams can plan for him AND he's buily like a school girl, he wont last. what type of gadget plays? just because he runs circles around defenders doesn't mean it's a gadget play. This is really a ridiculous comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoHuddleKelly12 Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 The double standards in this league that exist for domestic violence, let alone on just the Chiefs roster, are frankly mind-boggling. But hey, there are the all-important yards to be had per play, right Andy? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 7 minutes ago, klos63 said: what type of gadget plays? just because he runs circles around defenders doesn't mean it's a gadget play. This is really a ridiculous comment. I agree with you... Sure he catches a lot of passes near the LOS... but he also is insanely fast and elusive. He's executing the gadget play better than anyone else could - so that would lead me to believe that he's an amazing player. He has top level deep ball tracking. This leads me to believe he'll have a long and successful career, because speed while important is nothing if you can't get under the pass and catch it in stride. Look at Desean Jackson - not a particularly sharp route runner, and probably not as fast as he used to be, but the guy gets open and catches deep balls. He's not particularly physical, but he is quick out of breaks. Just because he's not huge or a high catch point guy doesn't mean he isn't a top 3 receiver in the league at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 2 hours ago, VaMilBill said: I guess the Chiefs are looking the other way on physical abuse of his son. The son would be much better off if his dad's earning potential was significantly diminished. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 2 minutes ago, Rob's House said: The son would be much better off if his dad's earning potential was significantly diminished. But the chiefs aren't responsible for that... That's CPS' job.They're responsible, as an organization, to not pay scub bags. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 1 minute ago, whatdrought said: But the chiefs aren't responsible for that... That's CPS' job.They're responsible, as an organization, to not pay scub bags. I'm with you. I'm all about doing purely symbolic things that hurt the victims while doing nothing to improve the situation, as long as those things make self-righteous d-bags with no skin in the game feel good about themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 16 minutes ago, klos63 said: what type of gadget plays? just because he runs circles around defenders doesn't mean it's a gadget play. This is really a ridiculous comment. So Hill does catch bubble screens and a the little shovel passes (far from all he catches of course) but newsflash - that is modern NFL offense. The Bills just kept a guy for exactly that purpose over a big guy who high points the ball. So is Hill a bit "unconventional" as a #1 receiver? Yep. But calling it gadget bull**** completely misses the direction NFL offenses are going in. A guy who can do gadget stuff isnt a drawback.... it is an asset! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 Just now, Rob's House said: I'm with you. I'm all about doing purely symbolic things that hurt the victims while doing nothing to improve the situation, as long as those things make self-righteous d-bags with no skin in the game feel good about themselves. Oh look, you're cute. If that's what you understood from my post, i'm not gonna bother with you, but say hi to your colon when your head is up there.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil The Thrill Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 3 hours ago, VaMilBill said: I guess the Chiefs are looking the other way on physical abuse of his son. Just like they did with Kareem. Then the video came out.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StHustle Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 You guys know the NFL is QUICK to suspend a player if they find a shred of credible evidence. Law enforcement and the league determined the allegations were false...what makes you think you know better than them? I'm sure you think Shady got his ex robbed as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLFan Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 4 hours ago, mannc said: Or maybe, like the NFL, they don’t think he did it. Like the NFL, they could not care less whether he did it or not, only that there is ample public cover to ignore the accusations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 58 minutes ago, StHustle said: You guys know the NFL is QUICK to suspend a player if they find a shred of credible evidence. Law enforcement and the league determined the allegations were false...what makes you think you know better than them? I'm sure you think Shady got his ex robbed as well. That's not what they determined. They determined they couldn't prove anything and they don't want to risk being sued. None of this compels the Chiefs to extend this cretin but here we are. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nester Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 I would like to see a bit more proof before condemning a man. But that's just me. Audio tape is proof of nothing. Some of you calling for Hills head did not call for Shady's last year when he was accused. .....how odd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan17 Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 Wonder if anyone in the league will take a knee for domestic/child abuse... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannc Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 25 minutes ago, BillsFan17 said: Wonder if anyone in the league will take a knee for domestic/child abuse... Would you be ok with that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 2 hours ago, StHustle said: You guys know the NFL is QUICK to suspend a player if they find a shred of credible evidence. Law enforcement and the league determined the allegations were false...what makes you think you know better than them? I'm sure you think Shady got his ex robbed as well. So this is the hill you want to die on? That Tyreek Hill isn't a shitlord? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts