Jump to content

Operation Boomerang AG Barr's Investigation of Acts of Treason by Federal Employees

Nanker

By Nanker
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

 Share

Recommended Posts

keepthefaith All Pro

keepthefaith

Posted
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Didn't the Horowitz report say they found no evidence of political bias?  What the ***** is this?

 

Just 2 people expressing their personal dissatisfaction with election results.  Nothing else to see here. 

Edited by keepthefaith
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

B-Man
B-Man

SEEN ON FACEBOOK:          

Deranged Rhino
Deranged Rhino

All of this is an attempt to have a real conversation, and put the partisanship stuff aside. I'm not a partisan, I don't think you are either. None of this is meant to be combative or attacking of you

Prickly Pete
Prickly Pete

How much of what Deranged Rhino posted here YEARS ago has turned out to be accurate (so far)?   What's the score between Deranged Rhino and Tibs (or any of those other ****heads)?  

Posted Images

3rdnlng Hall of Famer

3rdnlng

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

Didn't the Horowitz report say they found no evidence of political bias?  What the ***** is this?

Clinesmith, by the very act of altering the CIA email, not only triggered a large and expensive investigation but caused tens of millions of dollars to be spent on it. The worst of it though is the pitting against each other of the different factions making up our country. It appears that this man deserves hard time for a long time. 

Edited by 3rdnlng
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nanker Hall of Famer

Nanker

Posted
  • Author
Posted
18 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

If those are texts, then just like Strzok and Page it's not evidence of bias. It has to be done within the official course of their FBI duties to count as documentary evidence of bias. 

 

Uh huh. 

Exactly. As stupid as those azzholes are, they didn't write in their official government documents "I'm doing this because I hate Trump!" 

So - no official records exhibiting political bias, even though it just oozes from their wide pores and pimples. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
snafu Veteran

snafu

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Foxx said:

thread: origins.

 

https://twitter.com/The_War_Economy/status/1208469501307760640

 

 

I’m not complaining about the fact that you posted a tweet. It looks like there’s a lot of good info there. 

I just want to say that I can’t stand the fact that this guy has to break up what would probably be a good blog post into a series of tweets. I get it that twitter is formatted that way on purpose, and that’s the reason for its success. But it doesn’t work for long form thoughts.  Not at all. There ought to be a better way.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DC Tom Hall of Famer

DC Tom

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

I just want to say that I can’t stand the fact that this guy has to break up what would probably be a good blog post into a series of tweets. I get it that twitter is formatted that way on purpose, and that’s the reason for its success. But it doesn’t work for long form thoughts.  Not at all. There ought to be a better way.

 

 

 

There is.  It's called "write a blog post, and link to it in your tweet."

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Deranged Rhino Hall of Famer

Deranged Rhino

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Foxx said:

https://twitter.com/RealSLokhova/status/1210202840238563330

 

#moderndaywatergate 


That’s a fact that they just can’t escape. None of the NPCs down here ever had any answer for it other than ...”Shut up, Putin lover”. 
 

Civil liberties don’t matter to programmed (and broken) minds of the NPC crowd. 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
leh-nerd skin-erd All Pro

leh-nerd skin-erd

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Foxx said:

#moderndaywatergate

 

thread

https://twitter.com/nykr59/status/1210552718831443973

 

I was texting a couple friends on the possibility that prosecutors may file felony charges against Bob Kraft for his visit to the Greased Dog massage parlor last year (the text includes a Bills fan, Pats fan, Steelers fan and a Jets fan).  The long and short was we collectively discussed civil liberties and Kraft being a target of malicious prosecution.  Anyway, I replied that I had greater concerns as it related to FBI and DOJ w/ respect to FISA. 

 

The jets fan hates Trump, describes himself as a libertarian.  His response: “Sure, mistakes were made but don’t be THAT guy”. 
 

I replied I was most definitely THAT guy.   The only two reasonable conclusions to FISA/Russia/Mueller are top-to-bottom institutional  Incompetence by the greatest law enforcement agency in the world or Corruption at the highest level.

 

thanks for linking this. I’ll send it on.
 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hedge Veteran

Hedge

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Foxx said:

#moderndaywatergate

 

thread

https://twitter.com/nykr59/status/1210552718831443973

 


Thanks for posting that.

 

The individual, personal liberty side for Carter Page is horrifying in and of itself. I am continually amazed, however, at how often (nearly 100% of the time) that the 2 Hop rule, and who else got swept up via that rule, is omitted from these various analyses. Maybe it’s too much egg nog recently, but I can’t recall an instance of it even being mentioned during the Horowitz testimony, when conditions were ripe for a question related to what FISA allows.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
B-Man Hall of Famer

B-Man

Posted
Posted


 

REVISITING ROSENSTEIN’S COVER-UP OF CROSSFIRE HURRICANE:

 

To date, no person has been held accountable for the many false statements made to the FISA court under Rosenstein’s signature. In the absence of consequences, there’s nothing to deter continued lying to courts to spy on Americans and interfere in elections. Rosenstein’s unmolested freedom proves his promises of accountability were as false as the FISA application he signed.

 

If Democrats think they can control an FBI that has slipped free of its constitutional safeguards, they’re fooling themselves. If nobody makes good on Rosenstein’s promises of accountability, elections will become a quaint ceremonial exercise as the real power of government remains in the hands of the FBI.

 

Read the whole thing.

 
 
.


 

INSTITUTIONAL CORRUPTION:  Two Possibilities in Trump Wiretapping, and Neither Is Good.

 

Based on what we are told by the I.G., there are only two possible conclusions that can be reached regarding the official conduct of those responsible for infringing on Carter Pages Constitutional freedoms: 

 

The first is that the hand selected team of investigators, attorneys, and Senior Executive Service officials with decades of law enforcement, administrative, and judicial experience were abject failures at a task that they were hired to perform. Speaking from personal experience, in FBI, DEA, and state and local wire tap investigations, the slightest omissions, misstatements, and clerical errors are routinely identified and corrected by the street agents and line prosecutors who do these investigations for a living. To believe that a “varsity level” team, with unlimited time, support, and resources, somehow inadvertently overlooked seventeen major omissions, misstatements, and/or outright falsehoods, is simply not believable. 

 

The second possibility is that nearly everyone who significantly participated in obtaining FISA coverage on Page knowingly and deliberately operated outside the law to one degree or another. The reasons behind the decision to do so are irrelevant. The particulars regarding the seventeen I.G. findings are startling, taken individually. It’s difficult to see how any of the individual omissions or misstatements could have happened accidentally. Viewed collectively, the apparent intentionality is nearly impossible to reconcile as anything but corruption. 

 

In light of the I.G findings, the presiding FISA court judge seems to have come down on the side of intentional abuse.

 

But not hard enough. People need to do jail time for this.

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...