Jump to content

Democratic 2020 Presidential Primary Thread


snafu

Recommended Posts

Suprised I missed Gabbard on the Joe Rogan show but she had some interesting things to say....  She has little chance so she knows she can speak freely.

 

First about Trump and this is how you attack him......

 

 

Throws some shade at Obama and Clapper.....

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 10.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

12 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

Suprised I missed Gabbard on the Joe Rogan show but she had some interesting things to say....  She has little chance so she knows she can speak freely.

 

First about Trump and this is how you attack him......

 

 

Throws some shade at Obama and Clapper.....

 

 

 

Snowden was not a whistleblower, he was a government contractor who leaked massive amounts of classified information.  

 

If you grant him "whistleblower" status, you are green-lighting the leaking of classified info.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

 

Snowden was not a whistleblower, he was a government contractor who leaked massive amounts of classified information.  

 

If you grant him "whistleblower" status, you are green-lighting the leaking of classified info.

True and that's why he hasn't returned to the US as he likely won't be granted whistelblower protections.  You don't have to be a whistleblower to make the public aware of the governments broad surveillance powers under the Patriot Act including their ability to access your personal information through cloud computing.  The changes made to the Patriot Act (now USA Freedom Act) pry wouldn't of happened without Snowden's revelations because of the public backlash that ensued.  

 

What's funny to me for people like Nunes that are crying over the ease of renewing Page' FISA warrant as a way to spy on Trump had no problem defending the Patriot Act's broad surveillance power over the years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

Snowden was not a whistleblower, he was a government contractor who leaked massive amounts of classified information.  

 

If you grant him "whistleblower" status, you are green-lighting the leaking of classified info.

 

The liberal media worshipped Daniel Ellsberg for doing this.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why Joe Biden Gets Away With It

Slate, by Lili Loofbourow

 

Original Article

 

 

 

 

 

'We can't take four more years!' Nineteen Democrats descend on the same Iowa stage
in 2020's first cattle-call audition to take down Trump

by David Martosko & Katelyn Caralle

 

Original Article

 

 

 

 

 

19 presidential hopefuls audition in front of Iowa Democrats

Sioux City Journal (IA), by James Q. Lynch & Rod Boshart

 

Original Article

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eric Swalwell Says He And Fellow Democrats Are Heroes Like The Avengers

by Virginia Kruta

 

Original Article

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Probably not. Biden is not Putin's bi tch. 

 

 

But we know who is. 

You can keep right on saying this nonsense but it doesn’t make it true. You’re little fantasy world has less inhabitants every day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

You can keep right on saying this nonsense but it doesn’t make it true. You’re little fantasy world has less inhabitants every day.

It's all right in the Mueller report 

 

Heck, if anyone has been paying attention its pretty obvious Trump is his bi tch. Secret meetings, delays in sanctions, secret meetings, hotels, and lies, lies and more lies. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

It's all right in the Mueller report 

 

Heck, if anyone has been paying attention its pretty obvious Trump is his bi tch. Secret meetings, delays in sanctions, secret meetings, hotels, and lies, lies and more lies. 

 

 

yes.  i see it now.  what does trump have on mueller to force him to be complicit in the scheme?  and barr, why is barr complicit in the destruction of the republic?  maybe they all get the commie hookers?

 

and why are you so committed to being a biden sock puppet?  he's a washington insider, makes inappropriate comments relative to race, has a history of plagiarism, flips and flops like fosbury, and can unhook a bra with just using his hair plugs.  and that's before the whole ukrainian fiasco, and his assault on anita hill.  why are you itching for him to be your daddy?  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

yes.  i see it now.  what does trump have on mueller to force him to be complicit in the scheme?  and barr, why is barr complicit in the destruction of the republic?  maybe they all get the commie hookers?

 

and why are you so committed to being a biden sock puppet?  he's a washington insider, makes inappropriate comments relative to race, has a history of plagiarism, flips and flops like fosbury, and can unhook a bra with just using his hair plugs.  and that's before the whole ukrainian fiasco, and his assault on anita hill.  why are you itching for him to be your daddy?  

 

 

I just don't want a President who is Vladimir Putin's bi tch. Is that too much to ask? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

yes.  i see it now.  what does trump have on mueller to force him to be complicit in the scheme?  and barr, why is barr complicit in the destruction of the republic?  maybe they all get the commie hookers?

 

and why are you so committed to being a biden sock puppet?  he's a washington insider, makes inappropriate comments relative to race, has a history of plagiarism, flips and flops like fosbury, and can unhook a bra with just using his hair plugs.  and that's before the whole ukrainian fiasco, and his assault on anita hill.  why are you itching for him to be your daddy?  

 

 

  Tibs likes strange hands placed in moist dark places.  He's a natural for being someone's sock puppet.

10 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

I just don't want a President who is Vladimir Putin's bi tch. Is that too much to ask? 

  Then you must be happy that we all dodged a bullet when Hillary did not become your lord and master.........err... President.

Edited by RochesterRob
  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

I just don't want a President who is Vladimir Putin's bi tch. Is that too much to ask? 

While I would not want to be a victim of Ted Kazcinski,  being bludgeoned by Ted Bundy would not be a better outcome. 

 

If I believed the things you did (and I do not) the question would not be "Is that too much to ask", it would be "why am I selling out for a candidate that has all the same problems as the guy I profess to hate?".  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

While I would not want to be a victim of Ted Kazcinski,  being bludgeoned by Ted Bundy would not be a better outcome. 

 

If I believed the things you did (and I do not) the question would not be "Is that too much to ask", it would be "why am I selling out for a candidate that has all the same problems as the guy I profess to hate?".  

 

why do you bother?

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, reddogblitz said:

 

I remember when Barack and Hillary wanted to buddy up with Pooty Poot.  Who can forget the reset button?

Totally different. Had Putin hacked Romney's computers and used the info to interfere in our elections, there might be some similarity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Totally different. Had Putin hacked Romney's computers and used the info to interfere in our elections, there might be some similarity. 

Romney didn't have a computer!  He had a notebook full of women!  We all remember that made up left wing nonsense.  Doesn't this ever get old?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Romney didn't have a computer!  He had a notebook full of women!  We all remember that made up left wing nonsense.  Doesn't this ever get old?

 

So... Romney didn't really give that broad cancer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Democrats won’t name names on list of judges they’ll nominate if Trump loses

Name the names, so we can have the debate on the future of the federal judiciary.

 

During the 2016 campaign, Donald Trump famously put out a list of judges he would consider for the Supreme Court if he were elected.

 

The list served both to assure conservatives and also to motivate Republican voters. It’s widely agreed that the Supreme Court specifically, and the federal judiciary more generally, were key factors in Trump’s victory.

 

(more…)

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ELIZABETH NOLAN BROWN: Kamala Harris Tries (Again) to Rewrite Her History as a Prosecutor of Petty Crimes.

I don’t presume to know what Harris truly believes or who she really is behind the mask, which is why I think that her actions as a prosecutor and legislator are probably a better guide to how she would govern than anyone’s commentary. And that record bears little resemblance to the prosecutor that Harris has been conjuring on the campaign trail.

 

The Harris campaign slogan is “Kamala Harris For the People” (a callback to her days representing Alameda and San Francisco counties in court), and her campaign is pushing hard on the idea that America needs a prosecutor-in-chief to counter President Donald Trump’s corruption and lawlessness.

 

This seems to be missing the point of running for president.

 

 

 

 

Gillibrand locks up June debate spot. “The New York senator announced that she got 65,000 unique donors.”

Gillibrand had long ago crossed the polling threshold to qualify for the first debate. But hitting the donor threshold shores up her spot on the debate stage, because candidates who have crossed both thresholds take priority over candidates who only crossed one. The Gillibrand campaign confirmed to POLITICO that she has also received 200 donors in 20 states.

 

A maximum of 20 candidates can qualify for the first round of Democratic debates, which will be hosted by NBC News, MSNBC and Telemundo in Miami on June 26 and June 27. Candidates have until Wednesday to qualify for the first round.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...